Remote Workers Can Get a Cushy Apartment, Free Office Space, and $10K If They Move To Tulsa (nextgov.com) 190
Tulsa, Oklahoma is offering full-time remote workers in the U.S. free office space, a subsidized furnished apartment, and $10,000 cash if you move there and stay for at least one year. The city wants to attract so-called "digital nomads," who would, presumably, start paying taxes, launch businesses, and otherwise contribute to the economy of wherever they're drawn to. Nextgov reports: Tulsa Remote is one of several revitalization projects in the region funded by the George Kaiser Family Foundation. The Tulsa-based philanthropic organization was started by George B. Kaiser, an oil and banking billionaire who has signed on to Warren Buffett and Bill and Melinda Gates' "Giving Pledge," whose wealthy signees promise to give away at least half their fortunes to charity.
The organization has budgeted for 20 new remote workers in the program's first year, says Ken Levit, GKFF's executive director. Applicants must be at least 18, eligible to work in the U.S., already working full-time for an employer based outside the boundaries of Tulsa County, and prepared to move to Tulsa within six months. Applications opened Tuesday at the website TulsaRemote.com; the city hopes to settle the first new residents within the next three months, Levit said.
The organization has budgeted for 20 new remote workers in the program's first year, says Ken Levit, GKFF's executive director. Applicants must be at least 18, eligible to work in the U.S., already working full-time for an employer based outside the boundaries of Tulsa County, and prepared to move to Tulsa within six months. Applications opened Tuesday at the website TulsaRemote.com; the city hopes to settle the first new residents within the next three months, Levit said.
lol (Score:3)
Re:lol (Score:5, Funny)
Monica: What? Who says that?
Chandler: People who've never been to Paris.
The One where Emma cries / 12:50 [dailymotion.com]
Re: (Score:2)
According to the the Post Office Tulsa is OK.
It may not be great, but it isn't that bad either.
Not the stupidest idea (Score:5, Insightful)
Sound like a smart and potentially effective programm to Kickstart local economy to me. If digital natives are what you're looking for this could work way better than throwing obscene amounts of tax cuts in Amazons direction.
Someone has been thinking outside of the box. That alone makes this program and it's proposal intriguing.
If I were an USian, I'd check this out.
Re: Not the stupidest idea (Score:1)
I appreciate your comment. TFS struck me as crazy... until I hark back to the day of my midlife crisis: single, employed and stressed out in Silicon Valley. In the end what I did was give away my kidney and move to Europe... but this move to Oklahoma also would have been a cultural experience and opportunity to reboot myself.
Admittedly, I donâ(TM)t think I could have achieved my goals without renouncing my citizenship... but that is not something on everyone agenda.
Re:Not the stupidest idea (Score:5, Insightful)
It's just a PR stunt. If you read the article, you'll see they only have 20 "slots" available for this program. That's not a serious effort, it's just a PR stunt designed to grab headlines (and it seems to have worked). If this were a serious program, they would be budgeting for hundreds, or even thousands, of workers to participate, not 20.
Re: Not the stupidest idea (Score:2, Insightful)
Maybe there is a plan for more people and they are just starting small. Ya know, testing it out...instesd of investing in hundreds of thousands of dollars without knowing the type of interest it has.
Remind me not to hire you for any sort of planning and rollout strategies. Thanks!
Re: (Score:2)
I'd call it a pilot program. 100 people would have been a better target though.
Re: (Score:2)
If they can achieve critical mass of workers (around 10,000), then it can work. A walkable downtown core with cafes and restaurant bars helps as well. Usually small cities are really like scale models of large cities. They might be 3x smaller (3 mile radius, rather than 10 mile radius), but the main roads are 3x narrower, so you still get a traffic jam.
Re: (Score:2)
$100,000 x 1,000 poorest families = $100,000,000
I wonder which of those would be a better improvement. Sometimes the poor are poor because they make poor decisions. But, generally, the idea of starting 10,000 businesses in one city seems like it'd only make for a good sitcom.
Re: (Score:1)
It's just a PR stunt. If you read the article, you'll see they only have 20 "slots" available for this program. That's not a serious effort, it's just a PR stunt designed to grab headlines (and it seems to have worked). If this were a serious program, they would be budgeting for hundreds, or even thousands, of workers to participate, not 20.
Hey, 20 is a start.
The real problem is that bringing in the trendoids may eventually wreck what makes the place attractive to begin with.
"Hey, how come there's no rent control around here? How come they don't let the homeless crap on the sidewalk?"
Re: (Score:2)
That's not how it works (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Sometimes it takes a bigger investment to get network effects though. The schools will suck until enough smart people move in and start demanding better schools. Restaurants will be limited to the local flavors until you get a group of people willing to pay more for variety. Internet will be slow until a few thousand techies collectively demand (and pay for) high speed internet.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll be right behind you, spinning up the snake cult of emptiness.... that sort of thing is tax exempt right?
Re:Not the stupidest idea (Score:4, Interesting)
You may want to have a look at the 2016 elect results for Tusla before you pack your bags
Re: (Score:1)
Tulsa is actually the democratic bastion of Oklahoma.
There are definitely worse places to live if you're blue.
Re: (Score:2)
Tulsa is actually the democratic bastion of Oklahoma.
That applies to almost every city (or cities) in otherwise red states. Look at Texas. Hard-red, except for blue enclaves radiating out from Houston, Dallas, Austin, San Antonio, El Paso and Corpus Christi.
Re: (Score:2)
Whether you support or oppose the results, we don't want you if that is your criteria for deciding whether or not to move here
What a ridiculous thing to say, Anonymous Coward.
Of course how a region votes would be one critical determinant as to whether you'd feel comfortable living there. If you're gay, or a non-Christian or non-white and you move to a neighbourhood full of Trump signs, do you think you'd feel comfortable or welcome? It's no different than a homophobic evangelical christian feeling un
Re: (Score:1)
If a gay, non-christian, non white person moved here (believe it or not, we have those already), that person would feel very welcome and comfortable as long as he/she/non-binary-individual could get past his/hers/non-binary-individual's existing bias.
It's got nothing to do with "bias" and everything to do with facts.
I would absolutely NOT feel comfortable living next to someone with a Trump sign in their yard - Trump called Latin Americans rapists, insulted women, wants to trample over trans rights, i
Re: (Score:2)
Trump called Latin Americans rapists
Nope.
insulted women
Sure, he's a sleezeball. I've not met a politician who wasn't. Tell us something we don't already know.
wants to trample over trans rights
Hyperbole.
is a racist "birther"
I personally think the birther thing is kinda dumb, but does believing a conspiracy theory make one a racist?
who called Nazis "very fine people"
I'm not familiar with that one, but I feel like it's safe to assume it's as misquoted as your "he called Latin Americans racist" claim.
and then put children in cages
Thanks Obama!
wants to rip away healthcare
One mans "rip away healthcare" is another mans fixing healthcare. I was one of those people who didn't get to keep my doctor despite liki
Re: Not the stupidest idea (Score:2)
"It's got nothing to do with "bias" and everything to do with facts."
I know as a SCIENTIFIC FACT that the people I dislike are subhuman evil monsters! - "Progressive" Democrat partisans, 2018
Where have we heard this before? Hmmmm.....
I know as a SCIENTIFIC FACT that the people I dislike are subhuman evil monsters! - Adolph Hitler, 1935
Re: (Score:1)
Sound like a smart and potentially effective programm to Kickstart local economy to me. If digital natives are what you're looking for this could work way better than throwing obscene amounts of tax cuts in Amazons direction.
Someone has been thinking outside of the box. That alone makes this program and it's proposal intriguing.
If I were an USian, I'd check this out.
Your optimism is blinded by ignorance as you envision the perfect outcome of this.
The reality is more like "digital nomads" coming there and being about as productive as they currently are in their parents basement.
Re: (Score:2)
My biggest issue is the current political climate.
Tech workers politically lean left. Oklahoma is a conservative state. This type of actions can change the political landscape of the City and State.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Not all tech workers lean left. Where I work here in South Carolina, most (not all) of our programmers and systems staff lean not only right, but far right. But then again so does much of the state.
Re: (Score:2)
I never said ALL I said LEAN.
Meaning a general trend in that particular direction.
Yes they are a lot of politically right tech workers, that is fine. But more then half of them have a leftward political bias. If a City is willing to use Government money, to attract these workers into their town, and give these people in essence free money to live there, it is a bit more attractive to the leftward individual, who has more trust in government handouts, then someone on the right.
Re: Not the stupidest idea (Score:1)
While I used the word "all" I never said that YOU did, although with no clarifer like "some" or "most" you could be interpreted as such. Having done consulting from Massachusetts to Hawaii over the past 20 years I'm not entirely sure you are correct about more thAn half, although I don't have statistics to support either case.
All that said, I agree with your general premise, if not your opinion on political leanings.
Re:Not the stupidest idea (Score:4, Informative)
Just to help you out since you're foreign to our lands....we refer to ourselves as "Americans".
We don't know WTF a "usian" is or means.
Hope that helps.
Re: (Score:2)
I've yet to meet a fellow American in America, that uses the term "Usian".
It is not what we call ourselves, period.
It's a stupid term......
Re: (Score:2)
Sound like a smart and potentially effective programm to Kickstart local economy to me. If digital natives are what you're looking for this could work way better than throwing obscene amounts of tax cuts in Amazons direction.
Someone has been thinking outside of the box. That alone makes this program and it's proposal intriguing.
If I were an USian, I'd check this out.
Honestly sounds like the worst idea to try to kick start an industry. Bribe people to move there, when the bribes dry up, they'll move somewhere else.
Australia tried to prop up an unprofitable car industry this way. For decades and hundreds of billions of state funding were thrown at them without any regard. However as soon as the gravy taps were tightened even a little bit, Ford and GM Holden picked up sticks and left.
If Tulsa wants people to move there, provide the infrastructure. Better public serv
Re: (Score:2)
If I were an USian, I'd check this out.
Nah. We USians are familiar with Oklahoma.
Re: (Score:2)
Oklahoma is one of the lowest cost of living states in the US if someone that is a full time remote worker came on with a company in a higher cost of living state with a higher wage then it could be a smart move even without the subsidized apartment, shared office space, and $10K. The problem is you need to be content with living in a place with little in the way of entertainment, culture, or opportunities for advancement.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah moving to Tulsa, unless you are a leader in your specific tech niche, is a dead end for your career. There are no meet-ups, no other tech businesses that you will want to network with/do business with, and local talent is going to be at minimum 5 years behind where you are moving from.
If you're a digital nomad building CRUD php websites for legacy businesses etc then Tulsa is probably the place for you. Better for Tulsa to have some tech industry, rather than no tech industry....it's a small be
Re: (Score:2)
Oklahoma would probably be a better place to retire to after you have money although not in Tulsa maybe in the surrounding areas with easy access to services.
Re: (Score:2)
Because the time you had left to live would seem like forever and when death finally came, it would be sweet relief!
Decatur Illinois would be even better in that respect.
Re: (Score:2)
High house prices generate high salaries. High salaries let you afford all those expensive computer kit that lets you keep on the leading edge. Some engineering jobs in the UK only pay 15K up in the Highlands. On the South Coast, the same job pays 45K, just due to the cost of housing.
Re: (Score:1)
High house prices generate high salaries. ...
High house prices don't generate high salaries. They drive out people with low salaries.
Comment removed (Score:3)
Oklahoma? (Score:2)
This comment is redundant but who would want to live in Oklahoma. It certainly wouldn't be me. If I wasn't retired and was working remotely I can think of a thousand other places I'd rather live than Oklahoma. I guess if you're just getting started on your career it could be kind of attractive but you usually don't get the privilege of working remotely until you've proven yourself.
Re: (Score:3)
While it wouldn’t be for me— I need the ocean close— many people can do a lot to change their lives in a year in this kind of scenario. Save money, take risks, etc. Even if the “nomads” don’t stay, there is a chance to impact some locals and potentially set forth positive change.
One thing that did surprise me though, prompted by this story, is just how many >$1MM homes for sale there are in Tulsa.
Re: (Score:2)
looks like you can get a 3-4 bedroom house, with land, for a mortgage equal to, or even less, than what you would pay for a shit-hovel apartment in NYC or SF...
just sayin... that might appeal to some
Re: (Score:2)
So I get something I need to spend more money, and more importantly time, to maintain and have to drive to get anywhere? And that anywhere only gets me to Tulsa? You're just making it worse.
Re: (Score:2)
So I get something I need to spend more money, and more importantly time, to maintain and have to drive to get anywhere? And that anywhere only gets me to Tulsa? You're just making it worse.
That's fine; stay where you are ...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Compared to the pains of owning a house and having to live in the middle of nowhere? Yes it is. I've owned houses- worst mistake I ever made financially and from a personal happiness standpoint.
Re: (Score:2)
my home has appreciated in value handsomely, even counting maintenance against equity, and its affordable enough that one spouse can stay home with our two young children
Re: (Score:2)
I rent a fairly large place for $700 a month. I have no interest in spending my weekends, or spare money, on upkeep. The housing market is fairly stagnant here and I know people that had to sell their houses for less than they bought. As well my utility costs are significantly lower than a house.
I have a good gig where I'm working, but if another opportunity came up elsewhere, I could bail pretty quick without the financial burden of a house.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Texans hate Oklahoma because the states are exactly alike. They're just unaware.
Oklahoma, land of failed tax experiments (Score:1)
Oklahoma is hurtling off of a fiscal cliff, and it's entirely self-inflicted. They must be getting desperate.
https://www.csmonitor.com/Busi... [csmonitor.com]
https://www.economist.com/unit... [economist.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Oklahoma is hurtling off of a fiscal cliff, and it's entirely self-inflicted. They must be getting desperate.
Seems like the great Republican experiment is cracking at the base.
The cure of course, is more tax cuts.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Counter-point: do you want anyone good enough to have career options to work for the government? Because if so, you're going to find a very strong downside to moving the agency to Tulsa as soon as most people quit instead of going there.
You've obviously never worked with the Feds (Score:5)
Re: (Score:3)
As an example, the VA's computer systems just crumpled under their load and a lot of VA benefits recipients are now even further behind the eight ball. This is what happens when the pols decide that starving an agency so they can piss off the money on their home districts comes back to bite.
Worse, the last tax giveaway was sold as "paying for itself" because of all that wonderful investment it was going to allow companies to do. The only problem was that companies aren't going to invest if they do not see a
Re: (Score:1)
"Important" as in parasitic. Just FYI.
Re: (Score:2)
Feds could easily snap their fingers and send several thousand new knowledge worker jobs to Tulsa within the next 1-3 years just by giving marching orders to a few agencies to move out of metro DC and set up jobs in that general region. It would also save the taxpayers probably on the order of 25-40% on contract costs.
I have never understood why the other 48 states, particularly California with all of its collective bitching about paying more than it receives, has allowed MD and VA to grow fat on all of these jobs. Metro DC could easily be forcibly disassembled by the other 48 states legislatively if they chose to cooperate.
New jobs, maybe. Moving existing jobs is not easy, for several reasons. First is Congress will protect jobs in their region since they represents voters and money. Moving Fed workers isn't easy either. they have a number of job protections so they can't simply say move. As a result, years of expereince walks out the door, and is not easiliy replaced. Buildings have to meet new security requirements that older ones don't. I've seen some government moves and they often wind up with fewer jibs moving than init
Re: (Score:2)
I lived in a city where people were trying to do this - Federal spending to keep the city afloat.
It doesn't work all that well. Recruitment is still incredibly hard, and the city is still a shithole that can't afford to properly operate basic services like schools, younger people who grow up there desperately fleeing the area, and a general sense of dread permeating everything.
It would be better for the federal government to fund moving everyone who wants to move out, and let the place die.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
So basically you want a federal welfare state for OK.
Got it, very conservative of you. Self sufficient state economy? nah, just pump federal dollars and generate federal jobs that /exist/ due to DC proximity and force a relocation. Most would fly back constantly to DC, you're effectively forcing a commute to prop up an economy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You'd also lose the economy of scale by having Fed jobs concentrated in and around D.C. Government agencies are not stand alone shops, that stopped it the 60's. And the beltway bandits would also then have to split their operations, and charge the government more. Reagan started the move to "privatize" government work and the Shrub continued it. It is Republican orthodoxy that the private sector can do things cheaper. However, when the Fed. Gov. "privatizes" its functions, the beltway bandits become more po
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
With that base, OK would have a shot of improving its tax base and have a core constituency that it can use to drive other programs to make people relocate.
Goody, I like numbered points too:
1. It doesn't fucking work. I would consider suicide before moving to Oklahoma. A state where the ruling party is so stupid that they are metaphorically sawing off the branch they are sitting on has no attraction.
2. I find your concept of "have a core constituency that it can use to drive other programs to make people relocate." a little odd. The Republicans have moved to the point of making people relocate?
Regardless, Oklahoma is a pretty dreary place. Aside from
Re: (Score:2)
3. If the feds moved a few thousand large scale projects to Tulsa, many contractors would move there if the pay rates were comparable.
I'd expect contract pay change to mirror Fed pay change. Tulsa is considered "Other US" for locality adjustment, which is 15.37% above base GS Schedule pay. The DC area is 28.22% above, so there will be about a 13% decrease in pay on average.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Standard leftist lie.
There is a 'free enough market', get over it.
I'm a freelancer looking for somewhere cheap (Score:1)
I'm a freelancer who would love to get in on this idea. I don't qualify, however, as I am not a fulltimer. Good luck, Tulsa! Looks like North Carolina remains at the top of my list.
Things you should know about Oklahoma: (Score:5, Informative)
There are few places that I warn people about and Oklahoma is one of them.
First off, about half of Oklahoma's power is generated from burning coal which something they take pride in. However you feel about coal energy, there are health consequences for living downwind from a coal plant. If you are still on board then perhaps you will be interested to know that Oklahoma is deeply Republican, very pro-gun, anti-abortion and anti-science.
However you feel about these topics, I just think people should know what they are signing up for before the find themselves in a situation they may be unhappy with.
Re:Things you should know about Oklahoma: (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Already Edison NJ, and Cupertino, CA school districts have been converted to the very same pressure cooker rat race school system of Indian middle class has created in India. Most of
Re: (Score:1)
It brings me great joy to tell you Alabama, Mississippi, and Kentucky all scored higher on the SATs in 2017 than California. How does it feel being dumber than a bunch of inbreed hillbillies?
Re: (Score:2)
you will be interested to know that Oklahoma is deeply Republican, very pro-gun, anti-abortion
Sounds like an ideal home for most slashdotters
and anti-science
Probably not a deal breaker as long as it's just climate science and Evolution they oppose, as again plenty of people here are fine with that. I doubt that even the most rabidly reactionary Christian fundamentalist is opposed to engineering or chemistry.
Re: (Score:2)
Pharmacists can refuse to dispense contraception. Plan B not available. Can be prosecuted if you go out of state for abortion.
Politicians dont care, laws dont apply to them. They get abortions for their family members and other cheating partners all the time out of state. They know they will not be prosecuted. They know people who know people. But working stiffs who might be tempted by 10K and an apartment, th
Re: (Score:2)
Educated, liberal women will scotch any idea of moving to such a backward place like Tulsa, OK.
Pharmacists can refuse to dispense contraception. Plan B not available. Can be prosecuted if you go out of state for abortion.
Educated, liberal people will do the same. Consider their marijuana laws. Life in prison for making hash? Yeah, I'm not going anywhere near those fucks. Oklahoma is not OK. They know nothing about personal freedom.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The Russians pay good money for people to spread divisive propaganda that sets Americans at each others' throats
I knew this could be controversial so I wrote it in a very neutral manner.
sets Americans at each others' throats as you have done.
*sigh* I suppose if you are looking for a fight then even windmills will do.
Actually... (Score:2)
Anybody else think of this? (Score:2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Aparetnemt (Score:2)
Why pick Tulsa? (Score:2)
I don't work remotely, but if I was in an industry where all I did was remote work, I don't think I'd pick Tulsa. Would anyone?
If you need to be in a walkable large city with a diverse culture and lots of things to do, Tulsa doesn't fit the bill.
If you want to occasionally drive to a large city, there are better cities than Tulsa.
And if you want to take advantage of working remotely to explore the best of nature (skiing, hiking, mountain climbing, etc), there's still plenty of small rural towns with
Re: (Score:1)
Wasn't Tulsa one of the cities where Google Fiber managed to gain a foothold? Seems like that'd be better for remote work than some rural town where your only options are Comcast and 2x priced DSL.
Reasons not to do this (Score:3)
Before you rush off to Tulsa for $10k and a little housing subsidy:
https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/... [hrw.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Before you rush off to Tulsa for $10k and a little housing subsidy:
https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/... [hrw.org]
Seriously. There is the evil duo of Crypto-conservatism again.
States so incompetent that they legislate themselves into ideological bankruptcy, but they have time to sneak in an important bill to regulate people who don't stick their genitals in the ideologically allowed place.
This pretty much tell us what living there would be like. Most of the country could care less about who puts what thing where, but the states who do are more concerned about it than they are about fiscal responsibility.
Re: (Score:1)
What do North and South Dakota have that Oklahoma doesn't?
My wife is from North Dakota and I've been everywhere from Bismark/Mandan, Devils Lake, Grand Forks and Fargo. Literally none of those places meet any of your criteria -- shit airports with flights to MSP or maybe Denver. No interesting activities beyond mainstream movies and (admittedly good) college hockey. The food is for shit unless you're a bar food fan. They do like to drink A LOT there, if that's your thing. Grand Forks and Fargo are pron
Do you like bugs? (Score:2)
Lots of flies and gnats and creatures like that? Then head to Oklahoma!
How about excessive humidity? They’ve got that in spades!
When I was a kid, we used to drive through Oklahoma every summer as part of our annual trip from our west coast home to visit my dad’s family in Indiana (speaking of bugs and excessive humidity...). Oklahoma was roughly where the environment started getting unpleasant.
Colorado, though? I loved Colorado.
Re: (Score:2)
What about digital bugs? They're everywhere like on your device right now!
Everyone dumping on OK (Score:3)
The general consensus here is that Oklahoma is a shit hole and no way I'd ever live there...etc. I have been to Oklahoma many times and it's not nearly as bad as some here are casting it. Tulsa does have some bad neighborhoods, like nearly every city in the USA, but it isn't terrible. Given the choice I would choose Oklahoma City over Tulsa because there seemed to be more to do. But we did manage to find some very good restaurants there are some nice neighborhoods too.
On the plus side, if you are young and starting out you can buy a really nice house for surprisingly little money. Think about that while you are scratching a rent check for 4K a month for some closet sized apartment in Silicon Valley. Traffic is not bad either, a nice change from a lot of large US cities. Weather? It's not terrible as long as you can avoid the tornado paths, which always seem to strike the same places year after year.
Personally, I am fully settled and not looking to move anywhere but if I were young and mobile I would give this some thought. After all, it is only a 1 year commitment.
Re: (Score:2)
There are options beyond Silicon Valley and Tulsa. And they don't come with all the bible thumping, anti-intellectualism, and shitty government services. Some of them even think your kid's teachers shouldn't live in poverty.
State income tax is the problem (Score:3)
Reverse Magic Dirt Theory (Score:1)
Ahhh Oklahoma. (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Would the time taken for the move on a whim be about a day?
Re: (Score:2)
DEATH TO TULSA (Score:4, Funny)
I mean, Oral Roberts, the Klan and shit.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
A quick Google of "oklahoma religion in schools" brings somewhat horrifying results.
Oklahoma is a genuine and true heartland of America state. Tulsa is the heart of that heartland. Even if they were offering $100,000 plus all the other benefits to anyone who would bring a startup to the state, I could not in good faith consider bringing my children there.
"The racial diversity in the population of Oklahoma is currently at 72.9% Caucasi
Apparently you've never been there (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You need to see the world. Seriously.
Re: I mean... (Score:2)
A careful reading of the requirements states that you need to âalreadyâ be employed remotely.
The demographic they're trying to attract is one with a progressive, entrepreneurial character...not deadbeats trying to bootstrap their underwater basket weaving business.
Re: (Score:2)
That got reported to the IRS...