Symantec: Religious Sites "Riskier Than Porn For Viruses" 343
Posted
by
samzenpus
from the surfing-dirty dept.
from the surfing-dirty dept.
First time accepted submitter kongshem writes "According to Symantec's annual Internet Security Threat Report, religious and ideological websites have far more security threats per infected site than adult/pornographic sites. Why is that? Symantec's theory: 'We hypothesize that this is because pornographic Web site owners already make money from the Internet and, as a result, have a vested interested in keeping their sites malware-free — it's not good for repeat business,'"
JEBUS will protect me! (Score:5, Funny)
Think of the women and children (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Same for sex (Score:5, Funny)
Children are sexually transmitted so there's a flaw in your logic there.
Re:Think of the women and children (Score:4, Funny)
Re:JEBUS will protect me! (Score:5, Funny)
> But jebus will protect me so I don't need your silly anti-virus Jesus answered him, âoeIt is also written: âDo not put the Lord your God to the test.'"
Why would I want to test Linus?
Re:JEBUS will protect me! (Score:5, Funny)
Our designer, who art in Portland,
Hallowed be thy kernel
Thy system build,
Thy will be built,
On ours, as it is on yours,
Give us this day our daily patch,
And forgive us our errors,
As we forgive them that introduce theirs,
And lead us not into closed software,
But deliver us from non-freedom,
For thine is the kernel, the sources, the glory,
For ever and ever,
Amen.
Re:JEBUS will protect me! (Score:4, Funny)
Well that doesn't sound very nice. Not sure I'd want to see survival rates LOWERED...