Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security IT

The Register Email Address Blunder 70

First time accepted submitter Tim99 writes "This morning I got an email from The Register informing me that they have sent 3,521 of their readers the names and e-mail addresses of 46,000 other readers. Considering their frequent rants about security this has got to be a major FAIL." El Reg writes: "Obviously, this was an error. The two-stage send process that is the norm for all of our mailers was over-looked because someone was in a hurry."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Register Email Address Blunder

Comments Filter:
  • by wvmarle ( 1070040 ) on Tuesday October 25, 2011 @04:33AM (#37828898)

    And they deserve credit for that. Within an hour of the the problem they report on it already.

    Mistakes will happen, no matter how hard you try to prevent them. The most important part is: how do you handle those mistakes. Many other companies should take note of what El Reg has done here, and follow their example.

  • by RogueyWon ( 735973 ) * on Tuesday October 25, 2011 @04:40AM (#37828928) Journal

    The impacts of this on the Reg readers affected is probably fairly minimal. At worst, the volumes of spam headed towards certain e-mail addresses will increase. But then - how many people these days really use an e-mail address for their website-registrations that they don't expect to be a complete spam-magnet anyway.

    But there's no credit card info out there, no real-world addresses or telephone numbers. And having an account with The Register isn't the kind of thing that people tend to lose their jobs over, so nobody need be particularly embarrassed about their name being on the list (unlike, say, when the British National Party's membership list was leaked a while back).

    This is far worse for The Register itself. It has - quite rightly - been a prominent critic of companies or organisations who fail to protect personal data. And now - even though the breach is at the lowest end of the severity scale - it's gone and done it itself. Fairly or not (and it's probably not, since I doubt it was one of the actual writers who was responsible for this), their own credibility is tarnished.

    UK readers may remember Angus Deayton of Have I Got News For You fame. I can see the potential for similar consequences here...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 25, 2011 @07:01AM (#37829382)

    must be great to never make mistakes

  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday October 25, 2011 @07:13AM (#37829440)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion

8 Catfish = 1 Octo-puss

Working...