Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Spam Government The Courts News

Spammer Alan Ralsky Pleads Guilty 144

Czmyt sends the excellent news that one of the US's most notorious spammers has pleaded guilty and could serve 6 years in jail. "Five individuals pleaded guilty today in federal court in Detroit for their roles in a wide-ranging international stock fraud scheme involving the illegal use of bulk commercial e-mails, or 'spamming'... Alan M. Ralsky, 64, of West Bloomfield, Mich., and Scott K. Bradley, 38, also of West Bloomfield, both pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, mail fraud and to violate the CAN-SPAM Act. ... Ralsky and Bradley also pleaded guilty to wire fraud, money laundering, and violating the CAN-SPAM Act. Under the terms of his plea agreement, Ralsky acknowledges he is facing up to 87 months in prison and a $1 million fine..."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Spammer Alan Ralsky Pleads Guilty

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Math (Score:4, Informative)

    by Andr T. ( 1006215 ) <andretaff@gmail . c om> on Tuesday June 23, 2009 @08:30AM (#28437365)

    Alan M. Ralsky, 64, of West Bloomfield, Mich., and Scott K. Bradley, 38, also of West Bloomfield, both pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud, mail fraud and to violate the CAN-SPAM Act. Ralsky and Bradley also pleaded guilty to wire fraud, money laundering, and violating the CAN-SPAM Act. Under the terms of his plea agreement, Ralsky acknowledges he is facing up to 87 months in prison and a $1 million fine under the federal sentencing guidelines while Bradley acknowledges that he is facing up to 78 months in prison and a $1 million fine under the federal sentencing guidelines.

    John S. Bown, 45, of Fresno, Calif., pleaded guilty ... facing up to 63 months in prison and a $75,000 fine under the federal sentencing guidelines

    William C. Neil, 46, of Fresno, pleaded guilty to conspiring to violate the CAN-SPAM Act and violating the CAN-SPAM Act. Under the terms of his plea agreement, Neil acknowledges he is facing up to 37 months in prison...

    James E. Fite, 36, of Culver City, Calif., ... up to two years in prison and a $30,000 fine under the federal sentencing guidelines.

  • Sorry Dude (Score:5, Informative)

    by sir_eccles ( 1235902 ) on Tuesday June 23, 2009 @08:46AM (#28437483)

    "Greetings friend, this is Homer Simpson, aka, Happy Dude. The courts have ordered me to call everyone, and apologize for my telemarketing scam...I'm sorry. If you can find it in your heart to forgive me, send $1 to Sorry Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. You have the power!"

  • Re:Judgement (Score:2, Informative)

    by emocomputerjock ( 1099941 ) on Tuesday June 23, 2009 @08:53AM (#28437527)
    I say we go green and focus a concave mirror on the guy. We get our pound of (burnt) flesh and the planet doesn't suffer for it!
  • by The Ultimate Fartkno ( 756456 ) on Tuesday June 23, 2009 @08:56AM (#28437559)

    Let's just simplify it all at no expense to the taxpayers.

    Anyone who ever got an unsolicited email from Ralsky gets one shot at him. One for each email. No weapons, no tools, nothing lethal, and no closed fists. Then he goes free.

    And then after a few million slaps to the nuts, we all jump up and go "HAHA! Don't you just HATE being misled!" and throw him in prison, take all his money, and give his cellmate (who has anger issues due to being conned in stock scams) a box containing his body weight in Viagra.

    THEN we hang him from the nearest lamp post and burn him.

  • Well, (Score:4, Informative)

    by TheMightyFuzzball ( 1500683 ) on Tuesday June 23, 2009 @09:41AM (#28438051)
    That is less money that you will have to pay for downloading 25 songs, at least.
  • Re:Judgement (Score:5, Informative)

    by sjames ( 1099 ) on Tuesday June 23, 2009 @11:13AM (#28439287) Homepage Journal

    Let's see, spammers provide financial incentive to operate botnets that do billions in damage. My mail server rejects over 99% of all incoming mail as spam. The remaining fraction of a percent is about 25% spam. Fail2ban triggers on about 1000 hosts attempting to brute force an SMTP password every single day. If I tail the logs, it's a continuous stream of crap 24/7. I could do without that.

    It is a close call. I suppose we just need to make BOTH into permanent porta-potty scrubbers.

"Spock, did you see the looks on their faces?" "Yes, Captain, a sort of vacant contentment."

Working...