Trackerless BitTorrent Beta Posted 432
jgarzik writes "BitTorrent development is occuring at a furious pace. At the beginning of May, an Azureus update added distributed tracker and database features. Yesterday, Bram updated BitTorrent to include support for trackerless torrents in the new BitTorrent 4.10 beta."
Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? (Score:5, Funny)
Damn it! (Score:5, Funny)
Hmm... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:How (Score:5, Funny)
There's an A-end and a B-end seperated by some amount of time. Say 1 minute. At the A-end, you start your search for the torrent. The search continues for 60 seconds until the torrent is found at the B-end. The torrent data is then loaded at the B-end which is picked back up at the A-end 60 seconds prior. From your perspective, it happens instantly.
The searches are also modular in design. So you can actually include a second search at the B-end. So at the A-end, you might actually get back a second result for something you didn't even know you searched for.
Don't worry about the noise in the attic. It's just birds.
Re:Diluting its strengths? (Score:5, Funny)
Yes, Yes it is. The Independent Thought Police have been dispatched.
Have a nice day.
Mod parent UP! (Score:4, Funny)
See you in Guantanamo, "Bram".
Didn't you get the joke, mods?
Re:Damn it! (Score:5, Funny)
Damn it! K-Why? (Score:5, Funny)
Let's leave your sex life out of this.
Re:How (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Hmm... (Score:5, Funny)
Either that, or I just have a headache.
How the new Trackerless Protocol works (Score:5, Funny)
client1: gimme the warez
client2: who's askin'?
client1: me, mutherfucka
client2: well, your story checks out - here's da shit.
I know what you're thinking - how will they handle flow control? The trackerless developers also thought of that:
client1: the shit's comin' slow - speed it up
client2: get off my back, bitch
client1: don't make me bust a cap in yo' ass!
client2: all aight, all aight... sheee-it.
Re:So...Idle Hands are... (Score:5, Funny)
Hmm. How does one use a deep fryer for evil? Open a KFC?
I, for one... (Score:2, Funny)
I, for one, welcome our new pirate overlords.
Re:So...Idle Hands are... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:How (Score:4, Funny)
You can also go to Wallmart and ask them if they could put the internet on your floppy disk (warning: you need a floppy disk)
Re:Damn it! (Score:4, Funny)
That's no tracker, it's a client!!!
Re:So...Idle Hands are... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Damn it! (Score:5, Funny)
Your sad devotion to that ancient business method has not helped you conjure up the stolen music, or given you clairvoyance enough to tell the difference between a technophobic grandmother and a music pirate.
Re:I fucked your mother (Score:1, Funny)
Re:So...Idle Hands are... (Score:3, Funny)
I would have thought that is what your zombie window intermediary is for.
Michael
Re:How the new Trackerless Protocol works (Score:1, Funny)
Re:So...Idle Hands are... (Score:5, Funny)
Oh what? Like YOU'VE never heard of a deep fried a baby. Sure, sure. All of those KFC and and french-fry lovers like to stand up and say that a ban would be against their best interests, but even they know the primary reason people get deep fryers is for cooking babies.
Re:So...Idle Hands are... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:So...Idle Hands are... (Score:1, Funny)
Insert one human/family pet into deep frier.
Re:Losing Centralized tracker is not good (Score:3, Funny)
Re:So...Idle Hands are... (Score:3, Funny)
Ever seen someone's hand deep fried? Sure, it's not pleasant if it's *your* hand. But it's finger licking good . .
Triple viewership would require more power (Score:1, Funny)
I forget the numbers but yes each receiver draws a certain amount of power from the propagated signal. Crystal radio kits demonstrate this principal. So you would have to up your power if your viewership tripled and you wanted your signal strength to remain the same.
Re:So...Idle Hands are... (Score:3, Funny)
You're new to the internet, aren't you?
Furry, ponygirl/boy, gorean slave, take your pick. There are local and global, commercial and community supported forums dedicated just to finding human pets.
--
Evan
Re:P2P !=guns (Score:3, Funny)
I probably should have use a different noun there, but the point still stands.