Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Spam IT

11 Anti-spam Products Tested 200

An anonymous reader writes "When we achieve world peace, that's when we'll get the perfect anti-spam solution. In the meantime, ZDNet has a comprehensive review of eleven of the latest anti-spam products including solutions from BitDefender, Clearswift, CA eTrust, GFI, IronPort, MailGuard, McAfee, MessageLabs, NetIQ, Network Box and Symantec Brightmail."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

11 Anti-spam Products Tested

Comments Filter:
  • by Vthornheart ( 745224 ) on Monday December 06, 2004 @08:22PM (#11012575)
    you insensitive clod!
  • by Tackhead ( 54550 ) on Monday December 06, 2004 @08:30PM (#11012660)
    > eleven of the latest anti-spam products including solutions from BitDefender, Clearswift, CA eTrust, GFI, IronPort, MailGuard, McAfee, MessageLabs, NetIQ, Network Box and Symantec Brightmail.

    How can this list be considered even remotely complete? What about the personalized Louisville Slugger [sluggergifts.com], the noble etherkiller [fiftythree.org] and (for your Tier 1 types who work in volume) the 1200-bung-per-hour-rated Jarvis Sow Bung Dropper [technex.pl]?

    Oh, wait, this is a review of anti-spam products, not anti-spammer products. Never mind.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 06, 2004 @08:36PM (#11012728)
    Of course you do. It's the only time someone mentions "penis" to you without breaking into fits of laughter :-)
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 06, 2004 @08:44PM (#11012805)
    11 Anti-spammer Products Tested
  • by gl4ss ( 559668 ) on Monday December 06, 2004 @10:30PM (#11013748) Homepage Journal
    well.. it's a SPECIAL REPORT.. you know like special olympics(no offence to the disabled).
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 06, 2004 @10:36PM (#11013804)
    From TFA:

    Since then the market has literally exploded -- from four or five popular applications on the market last year to a submission of no less than 11 for this review.

    It literally exploded? Wow, what a sight that must have been! I can just imagine all the software vendors sitting at booths in a flea-market sort of place, when all of the sudden-- BOOOM! The place goes up like a chinese firecracker, turning half of Symantec's marketing department into a bunch of crispy critters. Kids are orphaned, families are destroyed...

    What's that? You mean it didn't actually blow up? So it didn't literally explode, then? I see.

    Somebody needs to find the editor that let that article slip through and literally beat him until he's comatose.
  • by Jason Mark ( 623951 ) on Tuesday December 07, 2004 @09:20AM (#11016924)
    Well they make up for not testing effectiveness by this fun little line: Please note that these decisions were not based on accuracy testing. Duh! I imagine they test stereo systems without audio output and simply look at the box and the colors of the LCD?

"The one charm of marriage is that it makes a life of deception a neccessity." - Oscar Wilde

Working...