data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48200/482001dc55ccabd5cbb4027c081892317aea7223" alt="IT IT"
After Forced Return-to-Office, Some Amazon Workers Find Not Enough Desks, No Parking (nypost.com) 151
Amazon has angered its workers again "after forcing them to return to the office five days a week," reports the New York Post. The problem? "Not enough desks for everyone." (As well as "packed parking lots" that are turning some workers away.)
The Post cites interviews conducted with seven Amazon employees by Business Insider (which notes that in mid-December Amazon had already delayed full return-to-office at dozens of locations, sometimes until as late as May, because of office-capacity issues).
Here in mid-January, the Post writes, many returning-to-office workers still aren't happy: Some meeting rooms have not had enough chairs — and there also have not been enough meeting rooms for everyone, one worker told the publication... [S]imply reaching the office is a challenge in itself, according to the report. Some complained they were turned away from company parking lots that were full, while others griped about having to join meetings from the road due to excess traffic on their way to the office, according to the Slack messages. Once staffers conquer the challenges of reaching the office and finding a desk, some lamented the lack of in-person discussions since many of the meetings remain virtual, according to BI.
Amazon acknowledged they had offices that were "not quite ready" to "welcome everyone back a full five days a week," according to Post, though Amazon believed the number of not-quite-ready offices were "relatively small".
But the parking lot situation may continue. Business Insider says one employee from Amazon's Nashville office "said the wait time for a company parking pass was backed up for months." (Although another Nashville staffer said Amazon was handing out passes for them to take mass-transit for free, which they'd described as "incredibly generous.")
There's also Amazon shuttle busses, according to the article. Although other staffers "said they were denied a spot on Amazon shuttle buses because the vehicles were full..." Others said they just drove back home, while some staffers found street parking nearby, according to multiple Slack messages seen by Business Insider...
This month, some employees were still questioning the logic behind the policy. They said being in the office has had little effect on their work routine and has not generated much of a productivity gain. A considerable portion of their in-office work is still being done through video calls with customers who are elsewhere, these employees told BI. Many Amazon colleagues are at other office locations, so face-to-face meetings still don't happen very often, they added.
The Post adds another drawback of returning to the office. "Employees at Amazon's Toronto office said their personal belongings have repeatedly been stolen from their desks."
The Post cites interviews conducted with seven Amazon employees by Business Insider (which notes that in mid-December Amazon had already delayed full return-to-office at dozens of locations, sometimes until as late as May, because of office-capacity issues).
Here in mid-January, the Post writes, many returning-to-office workers still aren't happy: Some meeting rooms have not had enough chairs — and there also have not been enough meeting rooms for everyone, one worker told the publication... [S]imply reaching the office is a challenge in itself, according to the report. Some complained they were turned away from company parking lots that were full, while others griped about having to join meetings from the road due to excess traffic on their way to the office, according to the Slack messages. Once staffers conquer the challenges of reaching the office and finding a desk, some lamented the lack of in-person discussions since many of the meetings remain virtual, according to BI.
Amazon acknowledged they had offices that were "not quite ready" to "welcome everyone back a full five days a week," according to Post, though Amazon believed the number of not-quite-ready offices were "relatively small".
But the parking lot situation may continue. Business Insider says one employee from Amazon's Nashville office "said the wait time for a company parking pass was backed up for months." (Although another Nashville staffer said Amazon was handing out passes for them to take mass-transit for free, which they'd described as "incredibly generous.")
There's also Amazon shuttle busses, according to the article. Although other staffers "said they were denied a spot on Amazon shuttle buses because the vehicles were full..." Others said they just drove back home, while some staffers found street parking nearby, according to multiple Slack messages seen by Business Insider...
This month, some employees were still questioning the logic behind the policy. They said being in the office has had little effect on their work routine and has not generated much of a productivity gain. A considerable portion of their in-office work is still being done through video calls with customers who are elsewhere, these employees told BI. Many Amazon colleagues are at other office locations, so face-to-face meetings still don't happen very often, they added.
The Post adds another drawback of returning to the office. "Employees at Amazon's Toronto office said their personal belongings have repeatedly been stolen from their desks."
Not ideal, but not new (Score:5, Interesting)
Even before the pandemic, the company I worked for (a large, growing company) had problems with finding desks and parking spots for all workers. It was simply accepted as a common characteristic of a growing company. Our company had a flexible work policy even before the pandemic, but most people chose to come to the office for whatever reason.
The main way to avoid being overcrowded at work is to work for a company that is not growing and not doing that well financially. I used to visit Google (for a free lunch) with a friend about 20 years ago. People and desks were stuffed into room, hallways, and everywhere else. Finding parking was impossible. When I go for a free Google lunch now, people and desks are not crowded anymore and parking is not hard to find. And that's not a good sign for Google.
Re: Not ideal, but not new (Score:5, Insightful)
The main way to avoid being overcrowded at work is to work for a company that is not growing and not doing that well financially.
Or work for a company that is doing well financially and allows work from home.
Re: (Score:2)
The fact that other companies haven't planned well for office space, doesn't let Amazon off the hook.
And there are many companies, like mine, that are doing quite well, growing by double digits each year, and allow work-from-home, with no plans to call people back to the office. In fact, we recently shut down our Austin office, despite 5 years remaining on the lease, because not enough people were coming in. Maybe Amazon can sublease some of our space!
Re: (Score:3)
"It was simply accepted as a common characteristic of a growing company."
Except it isn't. It's a common characteristic of a mismanaged company. The company should how what rate it is hiring people and in what locations and therefore should be able to plan physical facilities and equipment for the same timeframe. This is why you employ people with degrees in business administration to administer your business.
"The main way to avoid being overcrowded at work is to work for a company that is not growing and no
Re: (Score:2)
"It was simply accepted as a common characteristic of a growing company."
Except it isn't. It's a common characteristic of a mismanaged company.
Sometimes but not always. Take Nvidia, for example. They allow an extreme about of flexibility. Only people who have lab work are required to come to the office. Despite that, desk and parking space is hard to find, and that's not due to mismanagement but to growth. It's also due to some percentage of workers workers personally determining that it's to their advantage to come to the office.
Re: (Score:2)
Take Nvidia, for example. They allow an extreme about of flexibility. Only people who have lab work are required to come to the office. Despite that, desk and parking space is hard to find, and that's not due to mismanagement but to growth.
Management's primary job is to make sure that workers can work. QED, Nvidia is being mismanaged if the workers can't find parking or desks. You seem to be confused as to what a manager is for, they are not a checkbox and they are not a warm corpus. They have a role.
Government Employees better organised (Score:5, Interesting)
Amazon's management are clearly hopeless and screwed up the Return To Office. Makes government bureaucrats look good!
Re: (Score:2)
This is actually happening to the Canadian government in Ottawa. Very similar scenario. Not enough desks, rat infested buildings, complete chaos.
And the government is doing it because downtown business owners are having a hard time. It's madness.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada... [www.cbc.ca]
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada... [www.cbc.ca]
Literally everything is worse under this system. For a government that pays lip-service to climate action, it's absolutely unwilling to do even small-scale things like let people work from home and no
Almost as if- (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Almost as if- (Score:5, Insightful)
If experiences in other businesses is anything to go by, it's an underhanded way to get people to quit to reduce headcount.
Pressure from panicking bankers (Score:3)
The loss of value of office property is leaving a lot of loans based on office values in trouble.
Poor fit with actual operations (Score:5, Insightful)
I am very, very confident that Amazon has literally hundreds, probably thousands, of employees whose work is exclusively as part of multi-location teams, for whom this RTO mandate is a terrible fit with their actual work. All that happens for these teams is they now have to come to the local office to do their VCs with their colleagues, and when they get there it's distractingly loud and busy, frustratingly non-private, and they've wasted time on the commute.
I've said it here before but it bears repeating: working for a big tech company, I'm in London, and my managees are in Orlando, Seattle, Devon, Munich and Bengalaru, I have no London colleagues I need to meet, and we all spend all our time on calls with colleagues all over the world. Our way of work is totally unremarkable at my company, and I'll bet it is very familiar to lots of Amazon teams too.
Whenever I do training, I'm struck by the following: despite the distributed nature of my team, the training videos all show in-person teams, and yet the training itself is virtual -- and the training is something that really should be done in-person, because it's all interpersonal skills which ought to be done live with colleagues and led by an experienced live-trainer.
Re: (Score:2)
Absolutely none of this is true. Compliance training is only a small part of training overall. Quizzes are easy to game, in person discussion is not. The cost-benefits of great in-person training can be huge, for the right staff and the right type of training. If you think you can effectively learn (or train staff) on interpersonal skills like giving and receiving feedback or coaching via a remote course, you’re absolutely delusional and don’t have the EQ needed for receiving (or giving) this k
Re: (Score:2)
EQ is just shorthand for the ability to adapt one’s behaviour in light of other people’s thoughts and feelings, to be able to interact with them more effectively. If you think this is unscientific, you’re looking at this through entirely the wrong lens (i.e., science).and displaying low EQ once again. Science is no better a frame for this than it is for saying something meaningful about love or terror or any other human emotion. What matters is our ability to connect with each other. Some
Yay! (Score:5, Insightful)
After Forced Return-to-Office, Some Amazon Workers Find Not Enough Desks, No Parking
Unbounded management genius strikes again.
Re: (Score:2)
Local coffee shops rejoice though.
Honestly I though this was going to go the other way and there'd be investment in small towns rather than mega office structures.
Re: (Score:2)
Local coffee shops rejoice though.
Honestly I though this was going to go the other way and there'd be investment in small towns rather than mega office structures.
Your faith in the anticipatory skills of modern CEO and management geniuses far exceeds mine. Right about Amazon managers they are holding a meeting somewhere with Jeff Bezos at the head of the table and the consensus is: "Nobody could possibly have anticipated this!!".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No desks? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
No desks? (Score:2)
They should just buy some desks at Amazon. If there is no space, Bezos' home office can fit thousands of desks
Re: (Score:2)
Every time you blame Jeff Bezos for a current action by Amazon Andy Jassy earns a million pairs of wings.
No alternative to driving? (Score:2)
In a normal city (from my European perspective), most employees can get to work by transit or cycling. Many, if not all, do. And if parking is hard to find, there tends to be an equilibrium where some changes from driving to other transportation (or working from home), freeing parking space. There price of parking may also affect modal choice - since a few years, free parking at work is considered an employment benefit at least in Sweden, and should be paid tax for. Which kind of makes sense - a free transi
Re: No alternative to driving? (Score:2)
If parking is paid for by your employer, then I can see the logic of it being taxed as a benefit in lieu of income. If itâ(TM)s on the employerâ(TM)s land and thereâ(TM)s no subsidisation, then is it still taxed and how is the amount determined?
Re: (Score:2)
If it's provided directly by the employer, the taxable value is based on the price of commercial indoor or on-street parking in the neighborhood. Which can vary quite a lot between urban and rural, for example.
Re: (Score:2)
Seems pretty weird unless you're specifically trying to discourage driving. Should your employer provided desk also be taxable as a benefit? How about the light they provide while you're at work?
yes, smart employees discourage driving to work (Score:2)
Why would that be weird? Unlike your desk or office light, parking space for a private motor vehicle is certainly not something you need to get your job done. Only - perhaps - for getting to the job, which is usually something you pay yourself.
And yes, of course we try to discourage driving. Better for everyone - less congestion, less costs for widening roads, better air quality ... and employees switching to riding instead of driving usually have less sick days, which is probably of interest to employers.
Re: (Score:2)
I have rain when commuting at most 5 days a month. Why would that affect commuting? Maybe add a few minutes riding time, bring you rain gear and perhaps woolen garments if it's cold also. Of course you have mudguards and good lights anyway. It's not a big hassle - people in the Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden and such are not made of sugar.
We don't have temperatures over 30 degrees often (yet, it depends on how the more ignorant parts of the world population keep doing climate-stupid stuff), but I have been r
Re: (Score:3)
Riding a bicycle on public roads in the USA is a death wish. If you plan on killing someone, do it with your vehicle. You'll face minimal or even no punishment.
Re: (Score:2)
Amazon HQ2 is purposefully being built with less parking than would be normal for a complex its size.
Certainly (Score:2)
As long as shooting SUVs is as well.
Remember LA Story?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
No. Bicycles need to stay off the fucking road or risk being run over....which should be completely legal too.
Found the Red Hat.
Context: I am not American (Score:2)
As a non American I don't typically turn to the legal system every opportunity, but if I were forced to return to the office only to be turned away because there was no where to sit or not where to park my car the next person HR would be hearing from is a lawyer.
Re: Context: I am not American (Score:2)
Thatâ(TM)s a bit of an overreaction, donâ(TM)t you think? Perhaps work reduced hours for that day by finishing at the same time youâ(TM)d have left the office, complain to your manager about it and donâ(TM)t attempt to go in again until they solve the problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks to at will employment they'll just fire you.
Sell Sell Sell, Time to go short on $AMZN (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
RTO was a stealth layoff attempt, but the economic outlook is bad enough too many people caved and came back to the office.
They knew they didn't have the space, they didn't care. I fact, the unpleasant conditions now are probably not unwelcomed, because it will convince a few more to leave without further fuss.
Hmmmph... whatever. (Score:2)
It's a logistical problem. In the short term it will be chaotic, then it'll settle out. Shouldn't be newsworthy. Now if had been seamlessly implemented and everything was buttoned up perfectly, now that would have been worth a read.
Our real rulers have ordered a return to work (Score:3)
It's interesting to speculate precisely who these are, though the banks are on the hook for vast loans based on office blocks are probably part of the fans of this absurd move, along with their regulators who don't want another bank bailout. Sadly if the vast majority of big companies have obeyed the RTO instruction, the best solution - firms that haven't will gain massive competitive advantage - probably won't kick in; such was the failure of the market over racial discrimination for many decades.
Re: (Score:2)
I guess the CEO of my company didn't get the memo - WFH is still very much in effect here.
Re: (Score:2)
My entire company went WFH and everyone loves it. (Around 350K employees).
The only ones still going onsite are the guys who tend the data centers, and that's about it.
Sounds good (Score:2)
I hope you continue to prosper despite going against the memo. If I knew the name of your company I'm not sure if I'd buy shares because it's obviously got the sense to use WFH, or sell because it will be upsetting those who are delegitimating it.
Re: (Score:2)
I hope you continue to prosper despite going against the memo.
I am prospering very well, and no, I didn't miss the memo. The memo was basically:
"Do you want to work from home?"
[_] YES
[_] NO
Everyone and I mean EVERYONE clicked "YES", and that was that. They closed almost all of the external offices and 99% of us work from home now. Again, ~350,000 employees said "yes" and they listened.
I honestly cannot imagine a scenario where we'd go back into an office. It's just not happening. They'd have to acquire a ton of office spaces all over the world (literally hundreds of a
Economics!! (Score:3)
Companies that realise that their competitors are paying more for something that they need to will have a significant advantage. If well managed WFH - by making for happier and more productive workers and reducing office space rental - gives firms an advantage, then it should flourish. If however the consensus of all employers is that it's a bad idea, then few firms will take that advantage.
The same was true for firms that chose to employ ethnic minorities in the 50s and 60s. Potentially they could get skil
Get another job (Score:3)
If I was working at a place as bad as this I'd just get another job. Any job at all just to get out.
If you put up with people treating you like shit, they will. In which case it's entirely your own fault for being a doormat.
Re: (Score:2)
You know, the GP is doing us all a favor by leaving an unreasonable employer. Yes, he may suffer in the short term, but we all benefit from management having that "learning experience" that requires them to treat their employees with dignity and respect. Sometimes, taking one for the team is the most ethical thing to do.
Speaking of teams, if your employer really wanted you in the office, they'd provide a desk and parking for you. The way to approach this scenario professionally is to ask your manager
Hotdesking (Score:5, Interesting)
I bet it's all hotdesking, too. The scourge of modern offices. How is one to feel at ease, psychologically safe and therefore most productive if they sit in a different place every time?
There's also another angle to it. You've got to carry all your laptops and chargers with you. At the same time most corporate equipment policies say that you're not allowed to leave them in public lockers (gyms, for example). This means that the job is restricting your personal freedom to do what you need to do in your life before and/or after work. You've got to go home first to drop off your gear before you go anywhere after work or you've got to accept potential consequences of losing your laptop.
Re: (Score:2)
You lose that bet because you did not read TFS: "Employees at Amazon's Toronto office said their personal belongings have repeatedly been stolen from their desks."
People don't leave personal belongings at hotdesks.
Re: Hotdesking (Score:2)
That's even more f**ked up.
Re: (Score:2)
People don't leave personal belongings at hotdesks.
And if they do, the janitorial service is instructed to remove the items and put them in storage.
Further proof of quiet firing (Score:5, Interesting)
There could be no more conclusive proof that this RTO mandate is a form of quiet firing than there not being enough desks for all of the employees.
Bezos is an even sleazier pile of shit than Musk. One just doesn't notice as often because he knows how to keep his yap shut about how he's treating people.
Re: (Score:2)
People thought Gates wasn't still running Microsoft, too.
Two things (Score:5, Interesting)
1) How did they operate before? They didn't have this mess prior to everyone going home, did they? How could they suddenly not have enough parking spaces and rooms?
2) Where were the project managers? These are the folks who should have been taking into account the needs of all the people coming back. Enough office space, enough chairs, enough this, enough that. Did they not do this? Did they half-ass it by simply looking around? Did they not talk to anyone?
Or is this one of those move fast, break things situation?
Re: (Score:2)
2020 was several years ago, they've grown considerably since then, and didn't have to plan for incremental office space increases since then.
Government of Canada (Score:2)
Parking was always a problem but everyone had a desk.
The pandemic proved people could work at home productively.
The government downsized its office space b/c big cost savings.
Then the political winds changed and the government decided its workers needed to be back in the office.
The existing office space is on average half of what it was.
Coming to work now means the employee may not actually even have a desk, despite schemes like desk reservation, etc.
Ironically, employees come to work to engage in remote me
Amazon screwing Amazon. (Score:2)
Uh, the wait time for the company parking pass is backed up?
If Amazon is the company in question here, this is a bit like them claiming their Prime memberships are suddenly out of stock.
The company either wants their employees back in the office via the damn parking lot, or they don’t. Which is it? Don’t tell me the 1-Click Wonder can’t efficiently process a fucking parking pass purchase.
Re: (Score:2)
Some cities have even removed street parking to make room for dedicated bike lanes. San Diego has some neighborhoods like this. While I enjoy riding my bike, bicycle commuting to work is never going to be anything more then a very tiny portion of the population. Luckily it's only in the city of san diego and not the county.
Even precovid I had this (Score:2)
I contracted for a large company in Australia and there were no seats with my team mates. When I repeatedly brought this up they kept saying, yes we only have seats for 80% of people due to work from home polices. But at least on this floor, there was never anything available.
It sort of blew my mind that they would pay my day rate yet.. how can I work without a desk?
Company polices have a big disconnect from reality.
office musical chairs (Score:2)
Perfect (Score:2)
"Come back to the office so you can stand in the hallway"
Such productivity. Much Synergy. (Score:2)
Oh, as a bonus, it turned Seattle area traffic into a nightmare again overnight.
If Amazon hadn't built such an enormous lead on logistics and e-commerce, it would have collapsed into ashes long ago. But, as it stands, there is no limit to the dumb they can do right now.
Then again, organized labor is bad, right. No need to fight against the whims of executives who know better.
Re:Meeting Rooms? (Score:5, Informative)
Staffers grew used to taking private phone calls throughout the day at their homes, the source said. Now, back in the office, they're ducking into empty meeting rooms to take these calls, which is causing a shortage — and leading some managers to have private chats with employees out in the open, the worker said.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I imagine a manager would just tell somebody on the phone to leave if they needed the room for a full blown meeting.
From the sound of it I'm imagining the managers do not have private offices so would typically use empty meeting rooms for private conversations.
Re: Meeting Rooms? (Score:3)
Re: Meeting Rooms? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Meeting Rooms? (Score:2)
Re: Meeting Rooms? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Meeting Rooms? (Score:2)
There was an item that featured a faux phone cubicle set against a blank wall, so that you can duck in to take a quick phone call. It was just two narrow planks/boards set parallel to each other, about 3 feet or so, long enough and set wide enough apart to accommodate the average joe.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Meeting Rooms? (Score:2)
No, we used to have a payphone in the break room. The boards were already there. They took the pay phone out. It worked well there.They set up pretty much the same thing in the other floors
Re: Huh? Just tell them to leave (Score:2)
My company phone is a mobile!
Re: Huh? Just tell them to leave (Score:5, Insightful)
My company phone is a mobile!
Or in many cases, my company phone is my mobile.
Re: (Score:3)
Or in many cases, my company phone is my mobile.
F*ck that. My manager 'suggested' that I put Teams on my (personal) phone so I could "stay in touch" with what's going on.
The first time she asked, I said I'd rather not. (I don't give a shit about what's happening when I'm not there.)
The second time she asked I said "my version of Android" wouldn't support the "new" Teams app (which was a total lie).
The third time she asked I said the company needs to get me a phone, because I don't want to pollute MY phone with work stuff.
The fourth time she asked I just
Re: (Score:2)
Both my full time job, and my adjunct teaching, require authentication using a smart phone app. They of course to not provide a smartphone.
I don't mind having slack for work on my phone as the small company I work for pretty much only sends interesting astrophysics youtube videos outside of work. The large company I worked for prior to that was a different matter.
Re: Huh? Just tell them to leave (Score:4, Informative)
I'm pretty sure the person you're replying to is saying that he uses his personal phone for company business, not that a company phone is the only mobile he has. "My company phone is my mobile (in other words, the mobile I own)."
Re: (Score:2)
I'm pretty sure the person you're replying to is saying that he uses his personal phone for company business, not that a company phone is the only mobile he has. "My company phone is my mobile (in other words, the mobile I own)."
Bingo
Re: (Score:2)
Presumably they're doing it on their mobile phones, not a company phone
Maybe it's just me, but I've never worked anywhere with "company phones".
My boss and my kids call me on the same phone.
Re: (Score:2)
With the spyware companies put onto phones you'd be a fool to have that on your personal phone.
My employer doesn't install anything on my personal phone.
Re: (Score:2)
Becase somebody made it up. Or possibly because "private call" doesn't mean a bit of hanky panky with your mistress but rather a work call that shouldn't be overheard. Meeting rooms in open offices are always in short supply because discussions that could happen in somebody's office with the door closed (or on a teleconference from home) have to happen in a meeting room if nobody has an office.
Re: (Score:2)
Open office plans were always stupid and only intended for creative (eg marketing, animation, and video game development) jobs.
Re: (Score:3)
^^^^ THIS times 1,000,000,000,000
Open offices SUCK, and were one of the reasons I gave up on offices.
Going into an office everyday is bad enough, but then they had to double-shit on you by making you work in a loud, germ-filled room with people whom you normally wouldn't want to be in a room with anyway.
Re: (Score:3)
Then why come in at all? If Amazon are insisting that people DO need to do meetings face to face then having the ability to do so would seem a basic prerequisite. If they do NOT think the face to face needs to happen, then requiring them to work from office is mystifying.
Re: Meeting Rooms? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: Meeting Rooms? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Seems obvious. You have too many workers, some who like to claim they are overworked leaving management to redistribute their unfinished tasks on the coworkers. Force everyone to come in hoping 20% quit. If they quit there is no unemployment insurance claims.
Re: (Score:3)
At this point they can probably resign and claim Constructive discharge; which would get their unemployment paid.
Because that's exactly what it is to order employees that you MUST return to this office, but when you get here there is no space for you to park and no space for you to work, and the things required to perform your job are not available.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Meeting Rooms? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm sure it's not the intent of the RTO policy to change meetings to face to face.
Management would probably prefer all or most meetings remain virtual.
Purpsoe of RTO is just to get employees under closer surveillance by making them be physically present. That's all.
Re: (Score:3)
No. I'm serious. What you have made is an attribution error.
This has nothing to do with me personally. I'm not subject to a RTO policy, and I won't be subject to a RTO policy, period.
I just happen to know about how corporate managers at companies like Amazon think. They firmly believe their companies are slacking off to a degree resulting in less value for the company without a supervisor looking over their shoulder and randomly checking in. That's why the move to RTO any roles whose work output ca
Re: (Score:2)
If there wasn't enough parking and desks and they said I MUST return to office, I would probably just quit. They basically invited me back without saving me a space, which would show how they value me as an employee at that point.
Market power is shifting back to employers (Score:2)
So that's probably not an option.
Re: (Score:2)
If there wasn't enough parking and desks and they said I MUST return to office, I would probably just quit.
Excellent, their tactics worked, now they don't have to pay any severance.
They basically invited me back without saving me a space...
I think you mean "demanded*, not "invited". The latter implies you have a choice in the matter.
...which would show how they value me as an employee at that point
Your mistake was ever thinking they valued *you* as opposed to the profit you make them.
Re: (Score:3)
Excellent, their tactics worked, now they don't have to pay any severance.
Yeah.. don't quit. Just exit the premises when you find there's no space; and discuss the matter with your managers/supervisors in writing making sure they know the RTO is infeasible due to lack of available facilities. Instead of quitting you'll be just be disregarding the requirement of their policy, since it's not feasible to comply with, and continuing to work as best you can.
Re: (Score:2)
That's probably the quiet part they are not mentioning when they force people back into the office. They hope some do quit.
Re: (Score:3)
Just so people know.. call centers, especially outsourced ones, have been doing this for decades. You show up, there's not enough desks, not enough headsets, not enough computers. Sometimes you sit there and do nothing for a few hours until a whole shift goes leaves.
Like here's the thing, for any moron managers considering return to office policies. If your workers do not live within walking distance, you better be giving them their own private office, because good luck convincing staff to share desks. It d
Re: (Score:2)
Says the anonymous coward that's probably just AGI adding a comment.