Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Security IT

Halliburton Says Hackers Removed Data in August Cyberattack (usnews.com) 17

U.S. oilfield services firm Halliburton said on Tuesday an unauthorized third party had accessed and removed data from its systems, providing details regarding the cyberattack in August. From a report: The company said it is evaluating the nature and scope of information that was removed, but added that the incident is not reasonably likely to have a material impact. Halliburton declined to comment in response to Reuters' requests for additional information on the nature of data removed and expenses incurred due to the cyber incident. It also did not immediately confirm whether it had been contacted by the hackers. U.S energy firms have suffered multiple cyberattacks, including ransomware attacks, in recent years. In 2021, Colonial Pipeline was forced to pay $4.4 million in ransom as its executives were not sure about the severity of the breach.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Halliburton Says Hackers Removed Data in August Cyberattack

Comments Filter:
  • Most possible outcomes are satisfying.
  • OK, that's valid English and all, but the technical term is "data exfiltration" while the common phrasing is copied, encrypted, and/or deleted, depending on if the data is STILL (somewhat) on their systems.

    This sounds slightly like the "Buy It" button for movies. You've bought the movie for life! ....OUR life, that is. Don't die, because you WILL take it with you -- since your heirs won't be able to use it, since, after all, it's only "yours". (Until we say so.)
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      by Baron_Yam ( 643147 )

      I took 'removed' to mean 'copied with originals deleted, including backups'. Though a more technical interpretation would be 'deleted without copying elsewhere first'. There are lots of options and the language chosen was insufficiently precise for effective communication.

      Then again, I understand data storage and the source probably doesn't. In fact, I have revised my understanding to 'they copied stuff', because that's probably the level of technical sophistication we're dealing with here.

  • by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 ) on Tuesday September 03, 2024 @12:55PM (#64759298)

    to a more deserving bunch.

  • It's amazing how nobody takes secrutiy seriously.

    "Sure we'll spend NOTHING and if we get hacked we'll offer a free year of LifeLock."
    Also "Nobody ever verifies we actually got hacked, so we'll blame our own incompetence on a 'Hack" like SEA-TAC airport. No hack. Just incompetence."

    Time for (i hate to ask for government regulation) regulations requiring security, INFOSEC, timely updates, DRPs, and penalties for these incompetent fucks.

  • by machineghost ( 622031 ) on Tuesday September 03, 2024 @02:01PM (#64759444)

    >The company ... added that the incident is not reasonably likely to have a material impact.

    Why do I suspect that they would say this (for the benefit of their shareholders) even if they had lost the "crown jewels"?

  • by jmccue ( 834797 ) on Tuesday September 03, 2024 @03:57PM (#64759716) Homepage

    Poor Halliburton, my heart bleeds for you.

    Since Halliburton is based in Dubai, complain to your home government. When you moved out of the US to avoid taxes, you lost all protection from the US. Enjoy your new reality Halliburton.

  • When Halliburton drills a really deep hole and takes out something, they call it "recovery" Halliburton needs to be consistant in their vocabulary.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Headline corrected for accuracy.

While money can't buy happiness, it certainly lets you choose your own form of misery.

Working...