All Slack Employees Forced To Spend a Week Getting Salesforce Certifications (fortune.com) 57
Kylie Robison writes via Fortune: Beginning on Monday, Slack employees will be expected to set aside their regular work duties and to instead plug away at various modules on Salesforce's Trailhead online learning platform, Fortune has learned. The goal is for Slack's employees to reach Trailhead's Ranger level, a feat that requires roughly 40 hours on the learning platform, whose modules include topics like "Learn about the Fourth Industrial Revolution" and "Healthy Eating." A large percent of Slack's roughly 3,000 staff have neglected to hit the target, according to sources inside the company. And since Salesforce provides Trailhead to other businesses as a way to "upskill" employees, some speculate that the slackers at Slack make for bad optics.
In a message to employees in mid-September, Slack CEO Lidiane Jones wrote that the one week shutdown, dubbed "Ranger Week," is intended to give everyone "dedicated time to make a lot of progress towards the goal." Jones wrote in her message that the product development engineering (PDE), customer experience (CE), Biz Ops, and communication departments are expected to participate in Ranger Week. "It's important that we all reach Ranger status this year, and I want to ensure that everyone has focus time to upskill on Trailhead," Jones wrote in the message to staff. "I know this will disrupt and slow V2MOM progress for many of us -- we are making this a priority now so we can quickly get back to work on our roadmaps," she said, referring to the company's annual forward-looking strategy planning document which stands for vision, values, methods, obstacles, and measures. [...]
"We really are canceling all meetings next week to facilitate this heads-down time, even 1:1s," Slack's chief of staff to the CTO wrote to employees on Wednesday. "We don't know yet what will happen to people who haven't hit Ranger by Jan. 31. At a minimum, it will make Slack look bad compared to the other clouds. Please do use the time next week to make as much progress as you can!" [...] Still, the work stoppage is somewhat porous. Slack's CTO noted that "deploys, on-call rotations, and interviews" will still happen as normal, and while no executive has used the word "mandatory," it's considered strongly encouraged. According to Insider, some workers at Slack are "gaming" the platform to speed through the sessions.
In a message to employees in mid-September, Slack CEO Lidiane Jones wrote that the one week shutdown, dubbed "Ranger Week," is intended to give everyone "dedicated time to make a lot of progress towards the goal." Jones wrote in her message that the product development engineering (PDE), customer experience (CE), Biz Ops, and communication departments are expected to participate in Ranger Week. "It's important that we all reach Ranger status this year, and I want to ensure that everyone has focus time to upskill on Trailhead," Jones wrote in the message to staff. "I know this will disrupt and slow V2MOM progress for many of us -- we are making this a priority now so we can quickly get back to work on our roadmaps," she said, referring to the company's annual forward-looking strategy planning document which stands for vision, values, methods, obstacles, and measures. [...]
"We really are canceling all meetings next week to facilitate this heads-down time, even 1:1s," Slack's chief of staff to the CTO wrote to employees on Wednesday. "We don't know yet what will happen to people who haven't hit Ranger by Jan. 31. At a minimum, it will make Slack look bad compared to the other clouds. Please do use the time next week to make as much progress as you can!" [...] Still, the work stoppage is somewhat porous. Slack's CTO noted that "deploys, on-call rotations, and interviews" will still happen as normal, and while no executive has used the word "mandatory," it's considered strongly encouraged. According to Insider, some workers at Slack are "gaming" the platform to speed through the sessions.
Oh yeah, those mini onlines classes for employees (Score:5, Funny)
Our company's parent company required all of us to go through one of those painful Powerpoint-looking "classes" that explain completely obvious things as if you were mentally challenged, then take a mini multiple-choice test to regurgitate what you just saw in the Powerpoint 10 minutes ago.
This thing we had to do was a bunch of modules about phishing and social engineering. It was basically 2 hours of boring web-based sildes that can best be summed up as "don't talk to strangers" and "if it looks suspicious, it probably is and you should tell your supervisor".
You had to go through all the slides, and then score a minimum of 50% at the final test for the module to complete and for the damn thing to finally leave you alone and let you resume real work.
Of course, us engineer quickly found out how to script-get all the slides to trigger the test, then automatically try all the test's possible answers until it would say passed. One of us had to spend 30 minutes to defeat the stupid thing with Python and Selenium, but it saved everybody else 2 hours of pointless "online education". Well worth it, and the guy got invited for a drink :)
Of course, we didn't give the script to the suits. Let them enjoy their own dog food.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Of course, us engineer quickly found out how to script-get all the slides to trigger the test, then automatically try all the test's possible answers until it would say passed. One of us had to spend 30 minutes to defeat the stupid thing with Python and Selenium, but it saved everybody else 2 hours of pointless "online education". Well worth it, and the guy got invited for a drink :)
Of course, we didn't give the script to the suits. Let them enjoy their own dog food.
So you cheated a test designed for the lowest common denominator? If my employer wants to waste my time on boring two hour presentations then that's exactly what they're getting.
Re: Oh yeah, those mini onlines classes for employ (Score:3)
In this thread: the optimistic jr newb who thinks doing everything asap and looking for work during lulls, and the old chrotchity old Unix beard who knows the value of a dollar. Both are bad for business but at least they average out to a normal developer.
Re: (Score:2)
Everyone knows the tests are bullshit and half of them are their for insurance reasons or something equally as asinine. Many years ago I worked at a job where someone had the answers to the yearly safety training quiz pinned to the board be
Re: (Score:2)
And yes, *always* save your work for next year. If they don't change the test...not your problem.
The only incorrect thing in your post is the 50%. It's 100% CYA and absolutely nothing more. If companies have even a handful of people who actually *need* to learn the stuff....walking lawsuit factory.
Re: (Score:3)
Why waste so much of your personal time second-guessing someone else's decisions when you can do what you are asked, and what you are paid for, then provide feedback to make the program better?
I've experienced plenty of these types of things, like everyone else, and I have been just as annoyed. I have never even considered doing anything destructive to the company or to the process as a result. It says a lot about those who do.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Just had some for my consulting client. Actually geared toward developers and making resilient software. Buzzwords galore but, the actual things they were saying in the training are top notch best practice stuff.
Now, will said client pay for the tools and time to set all that 'good stuff' up? that's kinda the problem in the real world.
Re: (Score:2)
Why do you think they spent that two hours doing more work? It's called "Slack" for a reason.
Re:Oh yeah, those mini onlines classes for employe (Score:4, Insightful)
If my employer wants to waste my time on boring two hour presentations then that's exactly what they're getting.
I imagine you're being paid, so technically it's their time. Just sayin' ...
Some youngsters don't seem to realize that's how an employer/employee relationship works.
Re: (Score:2)
This youngster doesn't want to waste his time by being someone else's time, so he prefers to always refer to "his time".
And not being paid by the hour changes this relationship a lot.
If you're paid by the hour to watch an empty parking lot, wasted time.
If you're paid to paint lines in said parking lot, who cares if you did it in less time than expected, plus you get to leave early.
Re: (Score:2)
"And not being paid by the hour changes this relationship a lot.
If you're paid by the hour to watch an empty parking lot, wasted time.
If you're paid to paint lines in said parking lot, who cares if you did it in less time than expected, plus you get to leave early."
Hourly and contract are not the only two options and certainly don't apply to the people you are responding to. If you are salaried, you are paid to accomplish company goals, not subvert them, and being salaried means you don't "get to leave earl
Re: (Score:2)
"If my employer wants to waste my time on boring two hour presentations then that's exactly what they're getting."
Yeah, cheating to avoid a learning session the company pays for is the last thing I would ever do, in fact I would put effort into improving it. Sure it's boring and likely worthless, but it's not intended to be and is meant to make the company better.
Bragging about cheating this is peak hubris and selfishness. You are being paid.
Re: (Score:2)
There's a difference between normal corporate training, where you do what you describe with training provided by the cheapest commodity supplier out there, versus 40 hours of that designed solely to make Salesforce training look better. Corporate training is often stuff required by law in some places (harrassment), or stuff the execs demand (ethics), or work place oriented (safety). But "Healthy Eating" and "Fourth Industrial Revolution" is not corporate training.
Re: (Score:2)
I looked through a lot of the "modules" just to see what is in there. Most are about Saleforce products itself. Many others about business and technical skills. And who knows what these Slack employees will be forced to endure of the catalog. But here are some "gems" scattered in there:
* Business value of "equality" and "diversity"
* Impact of unconscious bias
* "Equality" ally strategies
* "Inclusive" marketing practices
* "Inclusive" leadership practices
* "Culture" of feedback
* "Green" code: sustainabilit
Re: (Score:2)
I looked through a lot of the "modules" just to see what is in there. Most are about Saleforce products itself. Many others about business and technical skills. And who knows what these Slack employees will be forced to endure of the catalog.
But here are some "gems" scattered in there:
You being sarcastic, right?
Re: (Score:2)
>"You being sarcastic, right?"
That is a distinct possibility
Re: (Score:2)
>"You being sarcastic, right?"
That is a distinct possibility
Fair enough.
Whatever you want (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe so at slack; I imagine it's different if you're in the Army. :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Although the deadlines for the normal work are invariably not going to be pushed back because of Ranger Week. So they spend a week gaming this training so that their employer can game the popularity ratings of their training platform, and the end result is that everyone is now one week behind on their tasks.
Re: Whatever you want (Score:2)
Huh (Score:5, Insightful)
"We don't know yet what will happen to people who haven't hit Ranger by Jan. 31. At a minimum, it will make Slack look bad compared to the other clouds."
Make you look bad? How, exactly? Do you really think when people are evaluating cloud offerings they are saying "I wonder which ones know about the fourth industrial revolution"? or "I want to be sure my cloud provider's staff is comprised of healthy eaters!"
Re: (Score:3)
"I wonder which ones know about the fourth industrial revolution"? or "I want to be sure my cloud provider's staff is comprised of healthy eaters!"
No, it's worse than that: they're probably just wondering "Is this company's staff mostly Rangers?"
I'll be honest, I don't know who Trailhead is or what the Ranger status is, but it sounds like it's important to pretend you're it from what TFA is implying.
I guess it's like ISO9001: a lot of companies don't give a shit about ISO9001, don't know what it's for or what they could gain from it from a quality standpoint. But they want the label: they want to say they're an ISO9001 company. And so they go through
Re:Huh (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Slashvertisement.
If this is Slashvertisement, it must be the worst kind :) I still don't really know who Trailhead is but I know I want nothing to do with them. Also, I know if I hire their services for my company, it'll make it look silly like Slack.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe the point of the Slashvertisment is to remind people that Slack still exists? Most IT departments switched over to Teams for group chat because it's bundled with the Office 365 subscription that they are already paying for.
Re: (Score:2)
Trailhead is Salesforce's educational platform. It is built on Salesforce, so it is garbage. It takes an absolute age to spin up an instance, which you have to do somewhat frequently. The documentation is shit and the search engine for it is also shit. They have clearly employed neither educators nor graphic designers in its creation.
So... you are 100% spot on.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know what any of that shit is either,
Slack was bought by Salesforce a few years ago. Trailhead is a Salesforce product. As such, the “bad look” is that they can’t even sell their own employees on using it.
Frankly, they’ve Streisand Effect’d themselves at this point. The damage is done with this hitting the news. No one will care if they actually “succeed” later.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Huh (Score:5, Informative)
She is a Microsoftie, going with the flow of other Microsoft execs: https://www.linkedin.com/in/li... [linkedin.com]
Re: (Score:2)
It's a strong sign of a CEO who doesn't know what they are doing,
Can you narrow down that category a bit?
Re: (Score:3)
This is kind of the "eat your own dogfood" mentality, it's that instead of just wasting hours on a company's mediocre products they have to spend a week just to push up the numbers so that potential users of the training platform think it's more popular than it really is.
Great (Score:3)
I would love for a paid week to get new training and certifications.
All these people can also update their resumes after that week.
Re: (Score:2)
Big whoop. The demand for salesforce is tanking because a) their prices are too damn high and b) their service is trash. Everyone hates slack, and with good reason. Salesforce laid off 9,000 employees who have already had to do these trainings months ago, and those people have already applied for all the salesforce administrator jobs out there. These "skills" are completely worthless.
Re: (Score:2)
It's probably a fair bet that training will contribute more to a workers resume than just another standard work week.
Re: (Score:2)
Contribute more that's only relevant to a job that's not available to them thanks to lack of experience in a Salesforce administrator role.
Is that useful?
Re: (Score:2)
Lot's of companies use Salesforce and would find it appealing for someone with up to date training on it for positions other than "Salesforce Admin"
It's all about edges and this gives these people a small over all those people who don't have one. What were they gonna do that week that would have contributed more to their CV that they can't finish the next week?
Re: (Score:2)
Lot's of companies use Salesforce and would find it appealing for someone with up to date training on it for positions other than "Salesforce Admin"
Salesforce is on the way out [cnbc.com], because their product is shit. It is inconsistent, and their training materials are even more shit. There are STILL things you can't do in the "new" "Lightning Experience" so you have to go back to the old system to accomplish them, and those things are very poorly documented. Their "Einstein" search engine is trash, it can't even find things you have already seen in their own documentation properly.
What were they gonna do that week that would have contributed more to their CV that they can't finish the next week?
There's nothing they can do in a week that's going to get them a job as a Sale
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, that's your opinion and it's not as though competition isn't coming to the top company in the field. If Salesforce has 150m users and they bleed 50m that still means there's still a 100m users. Also the first paragraph of that article talks about Salesforce's "robust earnings"
You can keep focusing on "Salesforce Admin" as the one and only job prospect that comes out of this but I think we both know that's not how resume stuffers and certifications work. If you have 2 exactly the same candidates an
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, it's great that they're getting paid time to do the training. And I sincerely hope that the dogfood experience will lead to improvements in Salesforce and their educational materials, for the sake of the people who have to deal with the platform.
But ultimately it's going to benefit them very little, because Salesforce is on the way down. It will be a long, slow spiral down the bowl because it's difficult to escape, but it's going to go in that direction. Salesforce makes it easy to get in and hard to
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe it will improve things but for the employees this is a lot upsides, even if Slack and Salesforce end up in the shitter next year.
These things remind me of an interview (Score:1)
I watched decades ago with a British republican politician. Somehow this fellow had at one point been appointed to the Privy Council, at which point he was sworn to secrecy. The thing that got to him, which he repeated on TV, was that he didn't have to swear or attest to anything; by virtue of being *told* that he was being sworn in, he was now legally bound.
Similarly, by watching the powerpoint, you too now have enough flare on your vest.
I'm Retired (Score:3)
Retirement (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
It's easy, prioritize what is important and stop concerning yourself with stuff that is not. Sad that you couldn't learn that in 35 years.
Yeah, nah... (Score:1)
Based on the summary (Score:2)
It seems like a contender for gold in the olympics of stupidity
Ah, Middle Management Mindlessness... (Score:3)
While I do think that software programmers are not as different as some of them would like to think, there are real advantages to not treat all workers the same.
There are plenty of people that are fine getting paid to watch pretty mindless content and take easy quizzes. However, there are those employees that uniformly hate such things.
Of course, those are often the employees you want to retain, because they often want to just get stuff done.
The flogging⦠(Score:1)
Will continue until morale improves.
My Upskill for Today (Score:2)
Before reading this summary, I certainly would have answered the following quiz question incorrectly:
How many employees does it take to operate the Slack service?
A: 50
B: 250
C: 700
D: 3000
Re: (Score:2)
Well great (Score:2)
Making me qualified (Score:2)
"Learn about the Fourth Industrial Revolution"
Getting paid to learn civics/history and healthcare sounds good to me. It is certainly better than being judged on 35 tasks that the boss never trained me to do and never will because that's spending his money making me qualified to work for the competition.
The usual HR bullshit (Score:1)
Indiana? (Score:3)
Just pronounce that a certain way in your head, and you can imagine this "Trailhead" stuff to be about learning to adventure through ancient tombs and caverns ...