FCC Cracks Down On Spam 'Auto Warranty' Robocalls (axios.com) 111
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Axios: The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday told carriers to stop delivering those annoying auto warranty robocalls and said it has launched a formal investigation. The scam has resulted in more than 8 billion unwanted and possibly illegal phone calls. It has been the top consumer robocall complaint for the past two years.
The FCC said it is working with a number of other agencies, including the Ohio attorney general, which is suing Roy Cox, Jr., Aaron Michael Jones, their Sumco Panama companies and other international associates said to be a part of the scam. The agency's enforcement bureau said it sent cease-and-desist letters to Call Pipe, Fugle Telecom, Geist Telecom, Global Lynks, Mobi Telecom, South Dakota Telecom, SipKonnect and Virtual Telecom to warn them to stop carrying this suspicious robocall traffic within 48 hours. The FCC said that its inquiry shows that the operation is still generating millions of apparently unlawful calls to consumers on a daily basis.
The FCC said it is working with a number of other agencies, including the Ohio attorney general, which is suing Roy Cox, Jr., Aaron Michael Jones, their Sumco Panama companies and other international associates said to be a part of the scam. The agency's enforcement bureau said it sent cease-and-desist letters to Call Pipe, Fugle Telecom, Geist Telecom, Global Lynks, Mobi Telecom, South Dakota Telecom, SipKonnect and Virtual Telecom to warn them to stop carrying this suspicious robocall traffic within 48 hours. The FCC said that its inquiry shows that the operation is still generating millions of apparently unlawful calls to consumers on a daily basis.
hopefully up next... (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
How about those "I'm interested in buying your house!" texts and postcards next, please?
I came here to post the same. I get 20-30 of these a day, Its insanity,
Re: (Score:2)
Especially when the "House" they want to buy is actually a former apartment.
Re: (Score:2)
Where I live we had a rash of those tech support spam calls a few years ago, but they stopped fairly quickly.
Re:hopefully up next... (Score:4, Informative)
Hardly a day goes by that I don't get -yet another- of those "we'd like to buy your house" letters in the mail. Prior to early 2020, I hadn't recieved the endless stream of these like I get since. I think the trigger was the fact that my wife passed away in April 2020, and I had to hire a lawyer to go to court to fix a problem with our home titile, and remove her name from it. Now I get those endless letters, which go into the trash before I even go into the house after picking up the mail. These are annoying enough, but what is FAR MORE annoying are the text messages, asking the same thing. They're worded as though they're a long lost friend and want to "follow up" to see if I still want to sell the house. I reply "NO I DON'T-GO AWAY", and I block the number and before you know it, here's another one, from a different number, which gets blocked. Wish there was *something* the carrier (tmobile) could do. smh
Re: (Score:2)
They're worded as though they're a long lost friend and want to "follow up" to see if I still want to sell the house
The realtor that sold me my house send a letter like that so I guess we could reminisce about the time we sat in a conference room and signed some papers together.
Re: (Score:2)
They're worded as though they're a long lost friend and want to "follow up" to see if I still want to sell the house
The realtor that sold me my house send a letter like that so I guess we could reminisce about the time we sat in a conference room and signed some papers together.
Send the realtor a note accusing them of being a stalker and saying you are thinking about having a conversation with your local police constabulary about that realtor's "unacceptable & personally threatening" ("in your opinion", be sure to say that) behavior.
Re: (Score:2)
What you should be doing with them is shredding them and adding them to your compost heap. And if you don't already have a compost heap, you should start one. Junk mail, fruit and vegetable waste, coffee grounds add up faster than you'd think and cost nothing, unlike the chemical fertilizers your gardener is using now.
Re: hopefully up next... (Score:2)
That ink may not be so good for composting though.
Re: (Score:2)
They're worded as though they're a long lost friend and want to "follow up" to see if I still want to sell the house. I reply "NO I DON'T-GO AWAY", and I block the number and before you know it, here's another one, from a different number, which gets blocked. Wish there was *something* the carrier (tmobile) could do. smh
I got one asking if I'd like to "continue discussing the house i wanted to vend." Needless to say I've never discussed "vending" my house with anyone...
Re: (Score:2)
While you're at it... (Score:5, Insightful)
How about all the rest of the auto robocall spamm too? What's special about this one turd, does it smell worse than the others?
Re: (Score:3)
It has been the top consumer robocall complaint for the past two years.
They're doing them in prioritized order.
At this rate they might get around to your complaint by around the year 2060.
Re: (Score:2)
Please hold, your call is important to us...
Why didn't STIR/SHAKEN work? (Score:5, Interesting)
These calls are the great majority (80%) of the spam calls we get. The Caller ID numbers are forged, both local exchange and elsewhere in the US. ("No, I don't know anyone in Podunk, Iowa, so I'm not answering that.")
What I want to know is why the STIR/SHAKEN requirement has failed to shut this crap down. Is this a technical problem in STIR/SHAKEN, a legal gap in the regulation,the little telcos slipping through the cracks with the longer implementation period, or is it telcos just failing to act?
Re:Why didn't STIR/SHAKEN work? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
OK. I thought the smaller Telcos just had a longer period to implement. If they were exempted from this law, we should forward all those calls to Congress. :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
AFAIK the FCC never created an unqualified safe harbor to block all unauthenticated calls.
So carriers can get fucked when one of the million incompetent government agencies who they aren't supposed to block get blocked and when the FCC suddenly decides just relying on stir/shaken is somehow unreasonable.
Re: (Score:1)
Because the phone carriers supporting the spammers just offloaded the bad customers to smaller providers - the smaller providers don't have to abide by stir/shaken - and to top it off, they can still use the original carrier to carry the calls - so in the end the only thing that happened is another middle man was put in place by telecoms so they didn't actually have to abide by stir/shaken - they only pretend they do.
FCC: we're going to fine you for not implementing/adhering to stir/shaken for some customer
Re: (Score:2)
Because when a business calls out, it often has trunk lines. The number that gets displayed using those trunk lines is usually invalid - you can dial it, but nobody will answer because you're not supposed to call the trunk line.
Instead, what happens is the PBX goes and ssizes a line, then makes a call out on it, telling the telco what number that line is supposed to be calling from. This could be the main line
Question (Score:2)
What the fu** is an "auto warranty robocall"?
Re: (Score:3)
This is far and away the most common spam call I get. "Hi, the warranty on your 2015 Toyota Camry has expired, and we have many attractive options to allow you to extend your automobile warranty..." It's kind of surprising to me that they know exactly what make and model of car I have owned. I saw have owned, because frequently I get a call for a car I no longer own.
Re: Question (Score:2)
So do they sell an actual product or do they just take money?
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously, you are wondering about that? I have a warranty to sell you then!
Re: Question (Score:2)
Yes it's a genuine question. I saw the word "scam" used, and I was wondering if it's a key detail. Would it make a difference for the FCC if it was a real scam or if they were aggressively roboselling a real product?
Re: Question (Score:5, Informative)
Here is an article about a company selling them. Seems like they were "real" but also "real crappy" in terms of what you could feasibly get covered.
https://www.npr.org/2021/04/16... [npr.org]
Re: Question (Score:4, Informative)
Would it make a difference for the FCC if it was a real scam or if they were aggressively roboselling a real product?
Nope, because the FCC only cares about the communication, not the product, and either of your situations would be a scam in the FCC’s eyes.
Robocalls of this sort have been illegal for years, regardless of whether you’re selling a “real” product. You’re only allowed to make calls of this sort if you have a previous business relationship, so the very act of calling is itself a scam in that it tells the recipient that you are someone with whom they have done business with in the past. And then these scammers do nothing to disabuse anyone of that false notion. Instead, they strongly imply through their verbiage that they are—or are working with—the manufacturer to extend your original warranty. They never actually say it, of course, but everything they’re doing is designed to trick people using illegal techniques.
Anyway, the FCC only cares that the calls are happening. The FTC, however, both cares that the calls are happening—they operate the national Do Not Call list that these scammers are illegally ignoring—and they care whether there’s a real product or not. To say the least, they tend to take a dim view of the calls too.
Re: Question (Score:2)
Thanks for the explanation!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
You get calls that actually specify something?
All the ones I get are totally generic "Hi this is Dave at the auto warranty department. Your file just came across my desk and I see your auto warranty is expiring..."
I don't know what comes next as I always get it disconnected by then.
No indication that they know who they are calling, because of course they don't. No doubt it will tell you to enter identifying information and your credit card next.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah. I get generic ones. I talked to an operator for fun. I already get 5 of these calls a day, so finally answering one isn't going to really make it any worse.
I asked what their company's name was. They kept telling me slightly different variations on "Auto Warranty Service (Center/Department/Company)".
They told my warranty has expired. So I asked what car they were inquiring about: "The car you drive the most."
When I asked to be removed from the list before I finished my sentence she hung up on me.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
What the fu** is an "auto warranty robocall"?
Translating to English from American..
"Automated Car warranty sales call"
Re: (Score:2)
auto = automobile
warranty = a service to provide repairs
robocall = a call performed by a robot (or computer)
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you, I was confused because in my mind "auto" meant "automated" or "automatic" and it made no sense.
8 billion (Score:3)
They have let this go so long that it's happened 8 billion times.
Why would they do that? Who's profiting from this and also in a decision-making position?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The carriers get revenue, so they have an incentive to let this happen.
I had an ever more blatant case with a Greek cellphone. Even though I don't live in Greece, I still have a SIM card I've had since 1999 from back home as a secondary on my phone to get calls from family (well, same number, the SIM card itself is smaller now). At some point (like 3 years ago?), while I was having a tea somewhere in Bath, UK, I received an SMS on it telling me to send a reply to accept registration is some SMS list. I assu
Joke tellers will be unemployed (Score:2)
If the FCC gets the "extended warranty" robo calls stopped, what will stand-up comedians and joke writers do for a living?
Fire alarm (Score:2)
I've started holding the phone up to the fire alarm and setting it off in their ear lately.
Re: (Score:2)
About time! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Same. I got an auto warranty call just yesterday, and the same one a week or 2 before. I want to ignore them, but I'm expecting a call so I need to pick them all up.
The utility is gone for sure since voice calls are practically never from someone other than a solicitor. Pretty much just stick with texts for everything else.
Re: (Score:2)
Here's my manager's great solution to this (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
I doubt your manager's or anyone's time is worth less than the Indian call center employee's calling you. Unless you are doing a video or something, engaging with them is wasting your own time unfortunately...
Re: (Score:2)
Probably, but being known as a time waster gets you pulled off their call lists pretty fucking quickly. A time waster is the worst they can get. Even someone yelling at them that lets them hang up quickly does not warrant an entry in their lists. Only if you manage to routinely keep them from scamming people and be known as a waste of time, you're left alone.
Source: Me not getting any spam calls anymore for over a year now.
Re: Here's my manager's great solution to this (Score:2)
"Hello. This is Lenny."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
At some point they may threaten you with phone harassment, which I point out is not possible since they called me. Next time bring your mom too.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I doubt your manager's or anyone's time is worth less than the Indian call center employee's calling you. Unless you are doing a video or something, engaging with them is wasting your own time unfortunately...
Sure, but sometimes we "waste" a bit of our own resources for the public good. You know, pick up a piece of litter while walking down the street to keep everything a bit tidier, or spend a few minutes of your (admittedly "expensive") time, to waste the "cheap" time of a call centre. Wasting a bit of the scammer's time is VERY expensive to the scammers if anything more than a tiny tiny tiny fraction of their call recipients does it. Scammers like this make money because using computer dialers and voice inter
Re: (Score:2)
Problem: Spam calls waste our time. Our time is valuable, that's why it's a problem.
Solution: Spend more of our time.
You see the problem in this?
I don’t see a problem with that logic, but I do with yours. You’re presuming we only have access to the same resources that they do, but we actually have access to orders of magnitude more. Given that we have many more resources than they do, it can be worth it to us to expend a little for a greater long-term benefit.
There aren’t actually that many of these call centers in India—the handful of call centers doing this stuff collectively employ a few tens of thousands, with most Indian
Re: (Score:2)
Indian call center salaries seem to start.
I have never received one of these that was not just a recorded message. You get a person calling you?
Re: (Score:2)
Scammer time is not that expensive. Indian call center salaries seem to start at 7k RS/month. In USD that's $0.5/h assuming just 8 hour days (I suspect they work more than that). Or less than 1 cent for every minute you engage.
If 99% of their minutes are spent talking to people who are not going to buy their products, then they lose money. If everyone who got a call managed to waste one minute of their time, even once per week, then their economics would not work and the business model would not work. Individually, we do not have to waste hours of our own time, because there are so many of us.
Again? (Score:2)
Jail time, not a simple fine.
A major annoyance (Score:2)
My 1983 240D (Score:3)
with 550K miles.
Is it eligible?
Re: (Score:2)
with 550K miles.
Is it eligible?
I work for an American company so occasionally get these via one of our direct lines for vendors... It's fun as they don't even figure out I'm in the UK... First they struggle with a UK number plate format (location of registry - year of registration - unique ID, I.E. LL 13 ABC) then I have a car that was sold worldwide by have a Europe/UK only manual version. So I can tell them the model and make (Toyota MR2 MK3) but then specify that it's a manual trans which is hilarious.
Also they stopped making the M
Re: (Score:2)
For an insurance you pay for through the nose that only pays out if you have an accident on a blue moon when it's at least 110F outside, and it happens between September and March north of the 60th parallel? Sure.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Idea (Score:5, Interesting)
The amount is trivial if there's a charge accidentally made to a legitimate caller, the spammers would be put out of business, and the phone company would be incentivized to make it happen.
Re: (Score:2)
I like the idea another Slashdotter proposed: Make a law setting up the following system. The person who was called can press a number button during any call, charging the caller, say, 25 cents. The phone company gets half of that money, the call recipient gets the other half. The amount is trivial if there's a charge accidentally made to a legitimate caller, the spammers would be put out of business, and the phone company would be incentivized to make it happen.
This is a pretty clever solution and could conceivably work.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The person who was called can press a number button during any call, charging the caller, say, 25 cents. The phone company gets half of that money, the call recipient gets the other half.
I like it.
Re: (Score:3)
That's bad, because the receiver is required to do work.
Caller should be always automatically charged a tenth of a cent upon call completion, credited to the receiver. Net charges of less than $1 each month are waived.
This has no net effect on normal people whose difference between calls placed and calls received is less than one thousand.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Mom is going to pay 25 cents every time she calls. Tech support is no longer free, Mom.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But that requires to be able to identify the caller, and the lack of that ability is why we get so much spam in the first place.
So we must first get STIR/SHAKEN to work 100% of the time.
25 cents a call (Score:2)
This seems reasonable:
1. Setup an VoIP system like Asterisk where you can auto answer a call and do some call control.
2. Give out the number to this system as your main number. Friends and family get your actual number.
3. The system will answer all calls and dial the charge code every time no matter the caller.
4. The system does a supervised transfer to your actual number.
5. If/when you answer, the system auto dials the charge number again for the second line and then completes the transfer.
Easy solution (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Do you really think *any* of these calls are showing up with a +91 country code?
Re: (Score:2)
My solution (Score:2)
Hmmm (Score:1)
Do people really still answer unknown numbers? If you don't answer and the caller really wants to contact you, they'll message you, at which point you can apply extra filtering and call back if required.
Also, is there a way to block all calls originating from India, Including the spoofed numbers?
Re: (Score:2)
Also, is there a way to block all calls originating from India, Including the spoofed numbers?
Think: The Indians are paying your phone company to let the calls through.
Do you imagine your phone company will give you a way to block them?
Re: (Score:3)
Not so. Doctors and banks will not message you. Instead, they will screw you.
Simple solution (Score:2)
The phone system must know the actual number where the calls come from, as well as the "official" one the scammers fake. If the phone could display both of them, it would be trivial to block or ignore calls that look suspicious.
Fcc cracks down (Score:2)
FCC has been cracking down for at least 100 years, and so far no change. FCC cracking down is enough to make anyone crack up.
Confucius say "Naked man who fly plane upside down have crack up."
Dick enlargment (Score:1)
Bogus (Score:1)
Possibly illegal??? (Score:2)
You can sue them yourself (Score:2)
Re: You can sue them yourself (Score:2)
Car Shield (Score:1)
FFS do caller verification already. (Score:2)
Just let me enable through my carrier the option to reject all source unverifiable calls. If that is too expensive for some Telcos maybe they shouldn't be operating anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
This is supposed to be the 21st century, why does my caller id still have security worse than email?
This! Let them have 2FA. They can text you a code on your phone you have to read back... Oh, wait.
WHITELIST (Score:2)
Originally, the only argument was you would cut off 3rd world nations, but since it's MUCH cheaper to add phone service by dropping towers than running lines, most of your remote areas HAVE to use cellular.
Mail (Score:2)
better idea (Score:2)
The first thing the FCC needs to do is crack down on caller ID spoofing.
It's hard to make use of ideas like the do not call list when determined spammers cheat their way out of being held accountable for breaking the rules.
A taste of their own medicine (Score:2)
Put the jerks in jail and give them a phone-call, "Your ass-rape insurance is about to expire. Suck your own dick 50 times to continue your insurance. Bubba and Blade will watch to make sure you comply."
FCC PR at its best (Score:2)
This is pure theatre and PR from the FCC. When it comes to stopping robocalls, the FCC and other state attorney generals have gone after the small bit players. Yes, they often are the address for scam robocallers. But if the FCC was serious about stopping scam robocalls, they would go up against the big telcos like Verizon, Sprint, AT&T, Comcast, and the other major players.
https://brothke.medium.com/the... [medium.com]
Re: (Score:2)
thereby requiring all intermediate providers and terminating voice service providers to cease accepting your traffic
The FCC can actually terminate all connections from the Indian subcontinent?