Google's FeedBurner Moves To a New Infrastructure But Loses Its Email Subscription Service (techcrunch.com) 6
Google today announced that it is moving FeedBurner to a new infrastructure but also deprecating its email subscription service. From a report: If you're an internet user of a certain age, chances are you used Google's FeedBurner to manage the RSS feeds of your personal blogs and early podcasts at some point. During the Web 2.0 era, it was the de facto standard for feed management and analytics, after all. Founded in 2004, with Dick Costolo as one of its co-founders (before he became Twitter's CEO in 2010), it was acquired by Google in 2007. Ever since, FeedBurner lingered in an odd kind of limbo. While Google had no qualms shutting down popular services like Google Reader in favor of its ill-fated social experiments like Google+, FeedBurner just kept burning feeds day in and day out, even as Google slowly deprecated some parts of the service, most notably its advertising integrations. [...] But in July, it is also shutting down some non-core features that don't directly involve feed management, most importantly the FeedBurner email subscription service that allowed you to get emailed alerts when a feed updates. Feed owners will be able to download their email subscriber lists (and will be able to do so after July, too).
Alternatives. (Score:2)
If you're an internet user of a certain age, chances are you used Google's FeedBurner to manage the RSS feeds of your personal blogs and early podcasts at some point.
I figured by this time there would be alternatives [kevinmuldoon.com]
RSS vs. Email? (Score:2)
There was a time where content providers treated RSS and e-mail as two different ways to get the same content. Do you want it from my e-mail server, or auto-updating by RSS?
Seems like Google has picked the winner.
I'm beginning to wonder ... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, you're late to the party.
I'm just thinking I need to spin up my email again because even gmail ain't safe
RSS is so old fashioned. (Score:2)
RSS allowed people to decide what they wanted to read.
Twitter allows people to decide what they want to read *.
* T&C may apply.