DHS Will Use Facial Recognition To Scan Travelers at the Border (engadget.com) 91
An anonymous reader shares a report: Last year, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) put out a notice, saying it was looking for a facial recognition system that could work with images taken of people inside their cars. The idea was that such a system could be used to scan people entering and leaving the country through the US/Mexico border and match them to government documents like passports and visas. Now, The Verge reports that DHS will be launching a test of a system aiming to do just that. The Vehicle Face System, as it's called, is scheduled for an initial deployment in August and it will be installed at the Anzalduas border crossing. The test will take place over one year and will aim to take images of passengers in every car that enters or leaves the US through the crossing.
I have a question (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
What exactly would this do that a passport wouldn't? If you want to know who someone is, tada, passport.
Presumably, to speed up processing once travelers get to the checkpoint. From TFA: [bold mine]
Those images will be matched to government documents and travelers will be verified before they get to the border checkpoint, in theory.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Given that it is not that hard to enter this country and completely bypass the checkpoints, that is not really much of an argument. Honest people come in via the real crossing points. Criminals enter as far away from them as possible. This is easily proven by the number of people that have been deported three or more times, but still wind up here.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I thought you guys were building a big fucking fence to take care of this.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The false negative/false positive rate has to be multiplied by the (number of people in the database * number of people you're scanning) to get the (number of comparisons). You multiply that by the failure rate and you get...
The german federal security service stopping someone's grandmother to see if she is a (male) terrorist (:-))
Re: (Score:2)
Might be true, but this story says otherwise (Score:3)
> no skin off of their nose if it costs you your last shreds of privacy, your firstborn, your tax dollars, or whatever else.
Your name and passport number isn't private while crossing the border. Cameras and computers and cheaper than border guards. Seems to me this will cost fewer tax dollars and have roughly zero privacy impact.
> doesn't matter that this adds nothing of value whatsoever. Competence, efficacy, cost-effectiveness, efficiency, are all irrelevant. They're made out of pure cover-your-assi
You're right, it just became a bigger issue lately (Score:2)
You're right, since 1953 border patrol has had the authority to act within 100 miles of the border. It seems that in the last ten years or so they have significantly increased their interior operations.
Re: (Score:2)
Cameras and computers and cheaper than border guards.
LOL!
You don't know who's installing/running this, do you?
If any guards are removed you can bet their salary goes into the new boss's pocket.
I have an answer (Score:2)
What exactly would this do that a passport wouldn't?
Possibly verify the person entering is really the person named on the passport, and not someone using a forged or cloned passport?
Re: (Score:2)
What exactly would this do that a passport wouldn't?
Possibly verify the person entering is really the person named on the passport, and not someone using a forged or cloned passport?
Passports are actually checked against the DHS database and both include a photo so I'm not sure how an extra photo would help. The purpose if this new system is to process an image and pull up the record *before* the car gets to the checkpoint and speed up processing. (as stated in TFA)
Re:I have a question (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Mexico doesn't care about Americans coming there to spend tourist dollars. That would be insane. But they have built a border wall on their southern border, while getting upset at the US for wanting to do the same.
As a Libertarian, I'm all for open borders, as long as you check in when you come here. Self Documentation at the border seems like the best solution, and would solve all sorts of problems.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I have a question (Score:5, Funny)
There's 7" or so fence in places you can see from the car when getting out of / returning to Mexico.
Is there also a model of Stonehenge?
Re: (Score:2)
There is no use of force to compel people to document themselves at the border. That is a voluntary transaction in exchange for crossing the border. If the US was forcing people to cross the border, and then documenting them in the process, that would be anti-Libertarianism. All voluntary exchanges are not prohibited.
If you don't see it as a transaction for proper legal entry, that isn't my problem, it is yours.
Re: (Score:2)
People with multiple names and nationalities, multiple passports including fake ones etc. Don't you ever watch TV? :)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Secondarily, it's for security. They already use other automated targeting devices in advance of you arriving at the border as well(such as license plate scanners). It will help tracking smugglers(capturing patterns of behavior that can be profiled), capturing people with falsified documents, identify people with c
Re: (Score:2)
What exactly would this do that a passport wouldn't? If you want to know who someone is, tada, passport.
With facial recognition systems, the more sample photos of a subject you have, the better it works. A lot better than having just one passport picture.
The DHS folks want to build a bigger database that allows law enforcement folks to better identify criminal folks from surveillance cameras.
Re:I have a question (Score:4, Interesting)
With facial recognition systems, the more sample photos of a subject you have, the better it works. A lot better than having just one passport picture.
The DHS folks want to build a bigger database that allows law enforcement folks to better identify criminal folks from surveillance cameras.
This.
It's about building facial databases which can be shared among the various Federal. and State agencies and departments.
If anyone thinks it will only be used to identify and track "criminals" and not journalists, whistle blowers, political enemies and more, they are fools.
Couple this with AI using facial micro-expression analysis and you can quickly learn anything about anyone, how someone will react to a given situation, their strengths & weaknesses, if they're lying or telling the truth, what makes them angry, sad, happy, what scares them, or makes them laugh, cry...or kill.
The more data/images/video the AI has to work with, the more specific and precise the predictive ability and also conversely the ability to know what will manipulate individuals and groups to do, say, and believe whatever those in control desire.
Strat
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Some nations don't have a functioning passport service.
Nations will create a passport for cash rather than see if that person is a citizen.
People arrive in the USA with fake created documents. Fictional new documents created to allow them to "move" to the USA and start a new life.
People who have lived in the USA for years illegally under a fake name who want t
In other news ... (Score:3)
sales of Ronald Reagan masks near the border are up 1000%.
Re: (Score:2)
sales of Ronald Reagan masks near the border are up 1000%.
Darn it, Roland Reagan is crossing the border 10,000 times a day now? That's really busy for a guy who doesn't vote democrat from the shady rest cemetery...
Yet another reason... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Yet another reason... (Score:5, Interesting)
Yet another reason not to visit the USA.
Pretty much. I've got nothing to hide, but the ever-increasing security theater intensity makes me fearful. The odds of being incorrectly flagged as a person-of-interest are incredibly low, but the consequence of such an event is massive. The more hoops I have to jump through, the more the odds and the consequence increase.
I live in a (Canadian) border town, but I basically don't cross anymore unless I'm going to the nearby US international airport to go somewhere else.
Shopping in Detroit? Nope. Visiting heritage places in Michigan? Nope. Attending concerts at American venues? Nope. Conferences? Art shows? Air shows? Woodward Dream Cruise? Nope, nope, nope, nope.
To my American friends... I live in a free nation. Coming to visit you is fucking frightening, what with the razor wire and bulletproof-vest-wearing-German-Shepherds, and the angry muscle agents with guns, and the cameras, and the cameras, and the what-the-fuck-is-that-thing scanners pointed at my car, and the simple fact that if I am misheard or misunderstood, my border-crossing "rights", along with my anus and my freedom are moment from being dramatically altered. You're nice people as people. But as a nation, your paranoia makes you scary to visit.
You should probably steer clear (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You mean people who don't reflexively bend over and grab their ankles for mindless authoritarian goons? Boy, I hope so.
Re: (Score:2)
I guess you don't go anywhere then. I just went to Japan on vacation and not only did they take my picture, they fingerprinted me when I arrived in their nation. You go to a foreign country, you play by their rules. If you don't play by their rules, don't get upset when they kick you out.
Re:Yet another reason... (Score:4, Insightful)
"I live in a free nation" as in "free to follow politically correct compelled speech laws." No thank you, I'll stick to the *actually free* country.
Re: (Score:1)
I live in a free nation
Sure, so long as you dont write anything "hateful" online. Then your IP can be tracked and you can be arrested in Canada.
http://toronto.citynews.ca/2017/07/24/mississauga-man-charged-with-hate-crime-over-alleged-online-comments/
My favorite part of the story is at the top:
This story has been edited due to a publication ban.
I'm looking forward to lawsuits (Score:2)
As for why they're doing this, it's called probably cause. They'll use a match to establish prob cause and use that to get a warrant for searches. Same reason we do lie detector tests we've proven don't work.
Re: (Score:2)
Beards and glasses do not create a problem as so many other measurements are taken of a face.
Modern facial recognition has had a lot of nations spend a lot of money on funding to ensure a face can be detected and the measurements will be correct and the results fast.
So DHS is not happy enough already? (Score:1)
Its not enough that they get my photograph in my passport folder. They then take my photograph as I hand them my photograph found in that passport. Now they want to take more photographs to do facial recognition, because they don't have enough photographs to be completely sure that I was the same person that just handed them my passport?
And I thought I was the one that was supposed to be paranoid at the border crossing?
Re: (Score:2)
Skilled people sell fake US passports.
People in the US gov sell real new US passports for money to anyone with money.
People create a series of fake and real documents all over the USA to build up a new identity to then get a real US passport.
So the photo in a US passport cannot be trusted as the entire creation of a US passport cannot be trusted.
People walking around wanting to enter the USA can get passport form any nation selling passports. Nations that give away their
Re: (Score:2)
The US border control was already pretty unfriendly before 9/11, I have no idea what it must be like now (and this as a white male who speaks English as a first language).
9/11 was almost 17 years ago. If you don't know how it is now, are you saying that you haven't crossed the US boarder in at least 17 years? I am not sure how someone that crosses the boarder that infrequently can add much to the conversation. Are you saying that because you had a bad experience 17+ years ago, that you assume it really sucks now? Personally I cross the US border about once a year. My inbound experience (where you deal with the US boarder control folks) has generally been good. I have had a f
Come back, Ljubavi! (Score:2)
The first use of this new facial recognition will be to try to catch Melania as she seeks asylum status with the Cleveland Cavaliers.
Welp. We're in a giant prison now. (Score:5, Insightful)
Title says it all.
It works! (Score:2)
Juan
Juan
Juan
Juan
Enrique
Juan
Juan
Juan
Two kids disguised as an adult in an overcoat
Juan
Juan
Juan
Re: (Score:2)
Quick! (Score:1)
Fix the real problem (Score:3)