Fortune 500 Company Hires Ransomware Gang To Hack the Competition (vice.com) 65
It's no secret that ransomware hackers are in the business to make money. But a new business arrangement hitting the news today may surprise many. Vice's Motherboard, citing research and investigation (PDF) from security firm F-Secure, is reporting that a Fortune 500 company, the name of which hasn't been unveiled, hired a ransomware gang to hack its competitors. From the article: In an exchange with a security researcher pretending to be a victim, one ransomware agent claimed they were working for a Fortune 500 company. "We are hired by [a] corporation to cyber disrupt day-to-day business of their competition," the customer support agent of a ransomware known as Jigsaw said, according to a new report by security firm F-Secure. "The purpose was just to lock files to delay a corporation's production time to allow our clients to introduce a similar product into the market first."In a statement to Motherboard, Mikko Hypponen said, "If this indeed was a case where ransomware was used on purpose to disrupt a competitor's operation, it's the only case we know of." F-Secure adds that the consumer representative noted that "politicians, governments, husbands, wives -- people from all walks of life contract [them] to hack computers, cell phones."
Re: (Score:3)
Hippocracy? Doesn't that mean a government run by horses?
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Wow (Score:4, Interesting)
if they help fortune 500 companies stay rich, their methods will be legalized soon.
During the robber baron days, it was common for the corporations to hire mercenaries and thugs to wage battles with workers and strikers. Murder, mayhem and riots were so routine that the government had to dispatch the military. That activity got outlawed. Internet warfare between corporations will get outlawed in time.
Re: (Score:3)
If so, you are wrong.
Re: (Score:3)
Is it your current thinking that hiring hackers to attack your competition is currently legal?
If so, you are wrong.
Murder, mayhem and riots aren't legal. Not then, not now.
Re: (Score:2)
Murder, mayhem and riots aren't legal. Not then, not now.
That's what makes them so much FUN!!!
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly, they just declined to prosecute.
Oh, and it also is not unlawful if the government does it.
Re: (Score:3)
This is an intrusion into the free market!!
Re: (Score:2)
Mercenaries? Hell didn't the Dutch East India Trading Co have its own army?
Consider the source (Score:5, Insightful)
Someone working with a ransomware scammer might not be the most trustworthy source of information.
Re: (Score:1)
Either way, what about the story seems so implausible? Recent history should indicate that they could do much worse, like hire hitmen, or start wars. The sociopath is today's dominant "species" in this trade.
Re:Consider the source (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Either way, what about the story seems so implausible?
The part where someone working in customer support claimed to have knowledge about confidential deals that their management was making, for one.
And the phrasing, too. "We've been hired for jobs by a very important company. We can't tell you which one, but trust us... you are impressed." Yeah, sure.
And nobody will be punished... (Score:5, Insightful)
Assuming this is true...
What should happen is that the "genius" who thought this up should be convicted and sent to prison for 30 years (or whatever they threatened Aaron Swartz with), for breaking the CFAA.
What actually will happen is that $BIGCORP will get a trivial slap-on-the-wrist fine.
Re:And nobody will be punished... (Score:4, Insightful)
Assuming this is true...
What should happen is that the "genius" who thought this up should be convicted and sent to prison for 30 years (or whatever they threatened Aaron Swartz with), for breaking the CFAA.
What actually will happen is that $BIGCORP will get a trivial slap-on-the-wrist fine.
Punished for what? The article doesn't even describe a single attack, let alone a victim or perpetrator. This is like someone in high school saying "My cousins best friends brothers girlfriend heard that someone down the street smoked a joint 6 months ago"
Re: (Score:2)
What part of "assuming this is true" were you having a problem understanding?
Re: (Score:3)
The Zionist/Rothchild controlled FBI would never allow her to be convicted
So you are saying that the Mormons are controlled by Zionists/Rothschilds?
OMFG
http://www.moneyteachers.org/R... [moneyteachers.org]
Its on the Internet so it must be true!
Serious, if proven true (Score:2)
Re:Serious, if proven true (Score:4, Insightful)
If evidence exists that this event happened, the corporation that directed the attack needs to have all of their top executive imprisoned.
Either that, or they'll be punished with a huge bonus and limos stocked with underage hookers and blow.
Guess which one is more likely to happen.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
At least make sure the hookers are of age! (Don't you just _hate_ the inexperienced ones?)
Based on prior events my attorney has advised me to remain silent on the subject of underage hookers.
Right. (Score:2)
$SCARYRUMOR
p.s. - Buy our security product.
Reminds me of a guy I talked to... (Score:4, Funny)
The truck was a rusty, 20-year-old Dodge, with a V8 that produces about 240HP from the factory.
Did I smile and nod, occasionally saying 'Wow'? Of course. Did I believe him? Not in the least.
This also reminds me of a story from one of the Gawker blogs, where a writer interviewed taxi drivers. The question she asked was: "Have you ever been propositioned by a passenger?" Most said "No", a couple said "Once", and one guy claimed that it happened every night, and that he had women falling all over him.
The part of this story that makes it a little unbelievable is the range of customers he claimed to have. 'Husbands and wives'; do they have a website where we can go and order some hacking? If not, how are these average citizens finding them? 'Governments'? I should expect that most interested governments would instead invest into their own cyber-military, rather than hiring a 2-bit scammer. This just doesn't smell right.
Re: (Score:2)
The engine produces 240HP. He has 4 wheels (or more specifically, 4 sets of brakes) That's 960 brake horsepower! You just didn't understand how these technical specs are measured.
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously though, thanks for the laugh.
Shadowrun (Score:1)
This is what my tabletop gaming group's current Shadowrun job is. Granted, it's much more involved in the game because the objective is ensure that a live product demo fails spectacularly so that the corporation gets no new clients and goes to a competitor (our employer) instead, but the spirit of the run is essentially the same.
Each day we inch closer to the fictional cyberpunk dystopia of yesterday.
Re:Shadowrun (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
The Donald isn't close enough for you?
Re: (Score:2)
Shadowrun? More like Paranoia.
Please change this headline... (Score:3)
...to "Super-sketchy slimeball makes vague, unsubstantiated claim of having been hired by a Fortune 500 company".
Motherboard's headline at least acknowledges that all it's reporting is "ransomware gang claims that...", and the other report cited by the post says
"""
F-Secure’s security advisor Sean Sullivan doesn’t think the story sounds plausible. “It’s probably a young gun, just trying to make a hundred bucks. 95% chance he’s spinning a yarn,”
"""
I'm not saying it can't be true, but seriously, but why does /.'s headline upgrade crooks to people whose statements should be taken at face value?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
And we all believe this BS ? Yeah, right ... (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
... First off, if this fortune 500 company is not one of the new inductees to the list from mainland China or some equivalent 3rd world country, I do not believe, they would risk anything like that.
To be fair there have been *many* major scandals by major companies that in hindsight seem spectacularly foolish. The most recent example is probably VW but FIFA getting charged under RICO, Olympic commission being so openly bribed that Rio & Sochi were deemed good sites for games, accounting scandals too numerous to name. Remember that Enron was at one time a fortune 500 company. I'd say that large organizations do dumb things all the time.
Re: (Score:2)
Surprise?! No way man! (Score:1)
You taking us for suckers, or what?
VP's CEO's need to due hardtime and not hide under (Score:2)
VP's CEO's need to due hard time and not hide under a system of contractors / sub contractors / independent contractors / staffing firms. Where they can pass the blame but control them them like they are there W2 pay roll.
Re: (Score:2)
On the contrary. Civil asset forfeiture, as evil as it is, would have a much greater effect. In fact, this is exactly the kind of thing it is supposed to be used for. Tattooing "I am a thief" on their foreheads would be a nice supplementary measure to make sure that nobody forgets. Let's save the prison space for the button men and truly violent people who present a real danger to the public.
Re: (Score:1)
Only if we can tattoo "I am a collaborator" on the democrats.
This is offtopic, but I wanted to respond, so I have to post AC for the obvious reason.
Re: (Score:3)
On the contrary. Civil asset forfeiture, as evil as it is, would have a much greater effect. In fact, this is exactly the kind of thing it is supposed to be used for. Tattooing "I am a thief" on their foreheads would be a nice supplementary measure to make sure that nobody forgets. Let's save the prison space for the button men and truly violent people who present a real danger to the public.
Most cops seem to think civil asset forfeiture is for taking small change from out of town folks driving through in their cars!
Re: (Score:2)
And most politicians. And most judges. And most lawyers. And both parties.
The only people who do not support civil assets forfeiture do not matter.
Obvious question (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Silly Locke2005. Penalties are for the little people.
Surprised it took so long (Score:1)