AT&T Sponsors Zero-Day Hacking Contest For Kids 43
yahoi writes "AT&T has teamed up with an 11-year-old hacker and DefCon Kids to host a hacking contest during the second annual conference that runs in conjunction with the adult Def Con hacker show later this month in Las Vegas. The kid who finds the most zero-day bugs in mobile apps wins $1,000 and an IPad, courtesy of DefCon Kids. The contest was inspired by the mini-hacker's discovery last year of a whole new class of mobile app vulnerabilities."
$1,000 and an iPad? For one kid? Cheap bastards. (Score:4, Interesting)
Child labor in sheep's clothing?
Re: (Score:2)
That was my first thought too. However, you must remember they are looking for flaws in mobile apps... not necessarily mobile apps written by AT&T. In the article, it gave an example of a young girl that is working with AT&T finding a specific flaw that existed in several games.
Re: (Score:3)
A car? A house? A pony?
Kudos and a medal is enough. Being able to brag to classmates is enough. An iThing is more than enough (I'd prefer the kudos myself).
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
What would you give the mini-hacker?
A car? A house? A pony?
Clearly you give them "1337" merit badges. All the other kids get "p0wned" written in Sharpie on their foreheads.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Also, what they may be going for is a situation in which they can truthfully advertise "We sponsored a contest for lots of hackers to find bugs, and they couldn't find anything." (while carefully omitting the fact that the hackers in question were all 11-year-olds)
There's another flaw too, which is this: "Hey kids, want to make way more than that lame iPad? If your hack is really clever, sell it to our totally legitimate Russian company for $15,000." (Actually, that's a problem with all white hat hacking, b
Q/A? (Score:2)
Why is there a slash for "quality assurance"? :P
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, they're taking kids to Vegas. With all the booze and blackjack and strippers they won't even care about the ipads.
Thank goodness! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Thank goodness! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Somebody's completely clueless (Score:2)
Why in the bloody H don't you realize this? Obey the master corporation, huh? Say, dood, any idea who actually owns AT&T???
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
That $1000 will not cover the full 2 year data pla (Score:5, Insightful)
That $1000 will not cover the full 2 year data plan cost that comes with that Ipad.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not to mention it's the least hacker friendly device ever.
Always laugh my ass off when i see macs at hacker conferences and they turn out to not be hype journalists.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe I missed something, but where does it say this is a 3G iPad? Even if it is, getting a wireless plan over 2 years at $30 a month for the 3GB plan only comes out to $720. I hate to see troll comments get modded +5 informative based on hate.
Defcon, I am disappoint (Score:2)
Android seems like a much more logical choice for hacker-friendly computing.
Re: (Score:1)
one week later: (Score:2)
AT&T Hacked By 11-Year-Old. Demands 20 Year Sentence
be careful what you ask for, you just might get it.
How about about not using the term "hacking"? (Score:2)
To me it implies either some sort of intrusion attempt or code-and-go design. Seems like the definition war has been lost on that front. Either way, these kids are testers, not hackers.
Coming to the industry relatively late in life, I've seen a youth fascination with the deconstructor rather than the constructor side of the industry that probably isn't doing any of us any good.
Condescending bullshit for kids. (Score:5, Informative)
They say "She found a whole new kind of exploit", and that she's found many zero-day exploits in mobile apps.
Ok. So I keep reading. Here's all of it: She changes the date on her phone so the trial lasts longer. That's it.
We've been doing that for decades. I did when I was 10 too, in DOS, and so did most of you. An entire generation changed their machine's date so we could use expired trials. We did this back in the 80's, and none of us got press as 1337 hax0rz for it.
This is the equivalent of every kid is a winner, for technology. Everyone is a computer genius at this conference, even if they can't code and all they do is play with their phone all day long and try to beat trials using a technique that's 30 years old,and that's not technical at all.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The truth is, we're all winners. Because out of all those sperm, we're the ones who made it!
Worst Prize Ever
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your post doesn't make any sens. "we did that years ago on the platforms we used as kids" is exactly the point here.
It's like making reports and giving rewards to kids that manage to cross the street in order to get grown ups to hear about road safety. There are better ways, and since any kid can do it, and kids have been doing so for ages, it's not something to be rewarded or praised.
Something seems off here... (Score:3)