Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Security IT

Microsoft Dumps Partner For Fake Support Call Scam 212

An anonymous reader writes "Microsoft has broken its relationship with one of its Gold Partners, after it discovered that the partner was involved in a scam involving bogus tech support calls. India-based Comantra is said to have cold-called computer users in the UK, Australia, Canada and elsewhere, claiming to offer assistance in cleaning up virus infections. The calls used scare tactics to talk users into opening the Event Viewer on Windows, where a seemingly dangerous list of errors would be seen. This 'evidence' was used to trick innocent users into believing they had a malware infection, and for Comantra to gain the users' confidence. Duped users would then give permission for the support company to have remote access to their PC, and hand over their credit card details for a 'fix.' Security firm Sophos says that internet users have been complaining about Comantra's activities for over 18 months, and it has taken a long time for Microsoft to take action. Comantra's website still retains the Gold Certified Partner logo, although their details have been removed from Microsoft's database of approved partners."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Microsoft Dumps Partner For Fake Support Call Scam

Comments Filter:
  • 90% of all users are idiots.
    • 90% of all people are idiots.


    • by bratwiz ( 635601 ) on Wednesday September 21, 2011 @09:10PM (#37475022)

      90% of all users are idiots.

      And the other half are no brainiacs either!

    • by PerformanceDude ( 1798324 ) on Wednesday September 21, 2011 @09:25PM (#37475134)
      Actually, you need to take your corporate IT hat off for a second. The people who fall for this scam are typically people who didn't grow up with computers. Your mum and dad (now maybe in their sixties), who only use a computer to type the odd letter, Skype the grandkids and maybe look for old friends on Facebook. They do not have access to tech support and mostly their computers have been bought in a standard configuration with just the few things they need installed.

      Those people (I can't get myself to call them users) have been told by their kids, the banks and everyone else they trust to understand computers, that viruses are a real threat and that if you get a computer virus it is really bad and awful things can happen to you (identity theft, damaged computer, having your broadbad costs skyrocket from a spam-virus using up your allowance etc.).

      I know some of these people are scared to even start a web browser for any site that they have not specifically been told they can trust.

      So, when one of these scam (scum) artists calls up and tells them that they have a bad virus - their immediate reaction is fear and confusion. When the scammer then offers to "fix" the problem, they gladly agree to hand over a relatively modest amount (around $150 usually) and let the scammer go ahead. Sadly, once their credit card details have been handed over, it is normally not the end of it.

      How do I know all this? Because it happened to the nice old man down the street. He was almost in tears when he told me how he'd gone ahead and let the scammer take almost half his weekly pension money. It also happened to a nice elderly couple that are friends of my parents and to the man who mowes my lawn to supplement his pension. Nice, normal and not even that gullible people - just people who are not geeks.

      We (the geeks) actually have a responsibility to educate those poor people rather than calling them idiots. Nothing beats a scammer better than being forewarned.

      • All the more reason to move people like this to walled gardens. Let them roam free in the relative safety of iOS or (maybe, if they stick to the Market only) even Android...

        Although some people are too stubborn. Just last month my girlfriend's dad asked me for help picking out a new PC... why not just an iPad? Because he does photo editing - as in rotating, resizing, and captions that look like they were done with the "WordArt" feature from Office 97. And since that's only possible on a high-horsepower, dua

      • Scam artists do the same thing in many specialized fields--stock-based Ponzi schemes, cherry picked or badly reported statistics (typically surveys, often with ignored error margins), crap new age philosophy promising wealth based on quantum physics, Nigerian prince bank transactions, etc. Sometimes they can be recognized from general principles, like when they come to you instead of you coming to them, or when the things they say are too good to be true. Other times it's really hard to sort out the truth f

      • by Eraesr ( 1629799 ) on Thursday September 22, 2011 @07:40AM (#37478036) Homepage
        But the problem here isn't computer savvyness. The problem here is people trusting a stranger on the phone coming up with some vague story about their computer. Anyone with half a brain would (should at least) be suspicious of that, computer knowledge or not.
      • We (the geeks) actually have a responsibility to educate those poor people rather than calling them idiots.

        I choose to educate these people by calling them idiots.

        The basic principles behind computing, or your car, or basically anything else in your life are not that complicated, and understanding them bears immediate dividends. Most people, however, willfully avoid learning anything about any of these things, to their detriment. However, what I find more ridiculous is that people are accepting calls out of the blue from J.Random Idiot and believing everything they're saying. It's almost like their parents faile

      • We (the geeks) actually have a responsibility to educate those poor people rather than calling them idiots. Nothing beats a scammer better than being forewarned.

        I would totally agree with your post, but your last sentence there gave me pause. Who says "We the geeks" have that responsibility? Do homeowners, landlords and hotel chain managers have the responsibility to house all the homeless? Does McDonalds have the responsibility to feed the starving kids in [country]? No? Then why do geeks HAVE TO educate the literally millions of clueless computer users who bought their interwebs machine from WalMart along with their milk, bread, sweat shop jeans and cheap 20 piec

    • That's a bit harsh. They don't have our degree of expertise, but everyones knowledge is generally specialised. "The IT Guys" are just jaded, because they've chosen a profession where they have to deal with that lack of knowledge in their specific area, on a daily basis. It's why I got out of tech support after a couple of years - I didn't like dealing with that. Meanwhile, those "IT guys" have a very limited field of expertise, and are usually unskilled at just about everything NOT computer-related. This do

      • Sorry but in my experience this simply is not the case. The same family members and friends who can't take the time to learn to protect themselves when online are also too bloody unhandy to level a picture frame, or screw in a curtain rack. Meanwhile my father who is a carpenter by trade and if anything was a bit of a luddite has a pretty good general idea of what sorts of things to look for these days and now educates our family members as best he can. He taught me that there is no such thing as a free lun
        • Maybe their skills are better suited.. to a more intimate environment? ;)

          J/K. :) Don't get me wrong - I understand there are many.. many idiots around. I just don't find that everyone bamboozled by computers is necessarily an idiot, some being brilliant in their own fields, but still, after all these years, unable to format text.

      • Someone calls you up and says "your car was spotted on the highway driving in a certain fashion and we can tell that you need an alignment job, so report to 1234 your mom's street for service which will cost you a hundred dollars" what do you do? You assume they're a scammer and you hang up the phone. Someone calls you up and says "your computer was spotted on the internet leaking packets in a certain fashion so we can tell you're infected with a virus so give us twenty bucks and we'll give you this softwar

        • Bad analogy, as much as I like car analogies. :) First of all, if someone doesn't know how to drive, we tell them to get off the road because they pose a serious risk to the lives of others and themselves. If the same applied (in the same respect.. I'm sure someone can accidently strangle themselves with a mouse cable if they try really hard) to computers, we wouldn't let folks use those either, but there's no comparison.

          For the first part of the analogy, the individual "spotting cars on the highway", while

          • if someone doesn't know how to drive, we tell them to get off the road because they pose a serious risk to the lives of others and themselves.

            and if someone doesn't know how to compute, we tell them to get off the internet because they pose a serious risk to the data and "identity" of others and themselves.

            For the first part of the analogy, the individual "spotting cars on the highway", while they may have specialist knowledge, they don't have inside knowledge. They haven't been poking around in your car and being able to gain insight that you can't verify. The computer equivalent to this would be "I saw your computer through your Window the other night and reckon you've got malware". Neither will happen.

            Congratulations on knowing little about cars or computers. Advanced car scammers [mis]use semi-public records and contact you with some foreknowledge of what you drive. Advanced computer scammers use popups and tracking combined with the leakiness of your browser [] and contact you with some foreknowledge of who you are and what your computing env

            • Only if there was actually something wrong with your car.

              I see you fail at reading comprehension and missed the first half of the sentence. I really don't know why I bother.

              Congratulations on knowing little about cars or computers.

              Incorrect, but nice try. What you quoted was about people, not either of those. Another reading comprehension fail, but that's okay. You're new at this.

              Advanced computer scammers use popups and tracking combined with the leakiness of your browser

              Except we're not talking about advanced computer scammers. We're talking about cold-calling Indians who ALSO use publically available information to garner phone numbers. And yes - I've had this company call a new phone number that even I didn'

    • 90% of all users are idiots.

      The scammers making the calls aren't too bright either. I had one call once saying that they had logs saying I had a virus. I asked who they were. They said "This is Microsoft". They didn't answer my question of "Why does Microsoft have logs from my computer running Ubuntu?" and kept on trying to get me to open a web browser. I got bored after a while and hung up.

  • by F-3582 ( 996772 ) on Wednesday September 21, 2011 @07:19PM (#37474160)
    Seriously, they should start thinking about changing business after this [].
  • Maybe Windows shouldn't have so many errors (even after a clean install).
    • It's not windows' fault this time.

      Check /var/log/syslog - you'll find a similar bunch of arcane "errors" that look disturbing to a typical clueless user.

      • by DarkOx ( 621550 )

        Actually no its not, I am looking at a fresh install of Slackware 13.37 on VM right now. There is certainly some stuff there about my harddisk cache being assumed to be write through and the fact that my file systems were mounted; but nothing says "error", except

        kernel: [51032.320044] usb 5-1: device not accepting address 9, error -71

        Which I seems to have happened shortly after I tried to pass through a USB mouse to the VM, and given udev did not seem to do anything, I think that its probably um an actual

  • taking fake antivirus to the next level next time just say you work for best buy / a 3th party for the geek squad.

    • taking fake antivirus to the next level next time just say you work for best buy / a 3th party for the geek squad.

      I am not familiar with this 3th, is it some kind of drink?

  • This has been happening a lot in Australia. Now I can stop giving tech-support for my freaked out relatives after they were scammed.
    • In Australia this problem has been reported multiple times on News for Mums (A Current Affair and Today Tonight). I'm sure most people who would be scammed by this would have watched these reports.

  • by segedunum ( 883035 ) on Wednesday September 21, 2011 @07:25PM (#37474214)
    I've had countless calls from various companies based in India saying they're calling on behalf of Microsoft who have detected a virus on one of my computers and are offering to 'clean' it up. I don't even say anything now. The phone gets put straight down. It's been getting steadily worse these past few months.
    • Over the months, I have had dozens of these calls. Seriously, I think in June, they would have called my landline more than anyone else.

      First when they called they said they were calling from "Windows operating system" and that I had an error on my computer.

      Letting them know I didn't use windows, they wouldn't take no for an answer.

      Telling them they were not going to catch me with their scam and that there is no company called "Windows Operating system"
      and besides, I do not have a windows device in

      • by deniable ( 76198 )
        What happens if you tell them "I don't have a computer?" That would have been amusing.
      • You dont know how lucky you are! I would relish being phoned up by these people. The trolling potential is enormous. Set up a recording device, string them along, it is ever so funny picking them apart, dissecting their lies.
        • by janimal ( 172428 )

          From the comment, it seems that these ladies really do not know they are part of a scam. They're probably just as knowledgeable about computers as the people they are scamming. Sounds sort of like that fake Apple store in China, whose employees thought they were working for Apple, but in fact were not. The lady above probably really thinks she's working for Windows Operating System too....

          • Kind of sad in a way, but I would not be able to resist messing with them a little bit. Maybe then talk to them about identifying a scam, and educating them a little bit.
  • If you follow a link in the article to the original report, you'll find tons of comments about the domain names and the scam... and a few gems interspersed about the companies being so legit and helpful, in pretty broken english, by incredibly generic usernames. Those are some seriously hardcore scammers.

    • Thanks for that, man. It's really impressive and very funny. It makes the copmuter fast and yuo get free things to b e hppy :P:

      "This is Rex and i would like to inform you that i m happy with the tech support service and the most important thing is that i will get unlimited services for the upcoming one year free of charge whenever i want in my computer and i m extremly happy.

  • If it is documented that they routinely defrauded people for money, why are they not in jail?

    • by kiore ( 734594 )
      Because they are in one country and try and defraud people in a second country.

      To put them in jail it would be necessary for the police in the target country to do a lot of paperwork and liaise with the police in the source country.

      As each crime is only for a couple of hundred dollars each time the police probably can't be bothered with making the effort.
  • I'm hoping this bad publicity puts Comantra out of business, but they'll most likely just disappear and pop up under a different name.

    My family members have had calls from a few of these companies and my 84 year old grandpa was recently scammed out of around &pound;85 and had his computer filled with their malware which really pissed me off, he'd just bought a license key for MS Office then a few days later got a call from "Microsoft Windows help desk" or similar saying they've detected a virus on his c
    • This isn't directed at you personally or your grampa... but I'm always wondering... "why Windows?" and then reading your post I realize "oh, Office..." but then I'm left thinking "why Office?"

      It really is 2011, and we really do have 31 flavors of OS to suit every need, and even though I'd estimate at least 75%-85% of all computer users have only the "need" for something along the lines of a simplistic Chrome-like OS, we (as consumers and IT afficionados alike) still shoehorn in that Swiss army knife monstr

      • by black3d ( 1648913 ) on Wednesday September 21, 2011 @10:17PM (#37475506)

        Okay, but extend that "need" into "want", and suddenly you'll find most PC gamers can't manage at all with a simplistic Chrome-like OS. If you exclude "business" users from your percentage, you'll find your target audience for a simple idiot-proof OS on home PCs dwindles significantly. Sure, they're still out there. And I wholly support giving grandma Ubuntu (or even something simplier), Firefox and Thunderbird, and letting her have at it! She doesn't need to do anything else, so anything else is just bloat. But it's not 75-80% of the home user market that applies to. I doubt it's even 50%. This is why Windows is still going strong (well, that, and the fact that it comes pre-installed on most PCs).

        Most folks I know don't buy pre-made PCs, but get friends to price up and build them for them. They're "more power" machines, not "email and messenger" machines. Sure, there's still a market for K.I.S.S, but as each successive generation gets more tech-clued, folks want more options, not less. As the tablet-OS-on-desktops is beginning to take off, we may see this plateau and diverge into two markets - but I don't think you'll find the simple OS market anywhere near as high as 80% for home users - at least not for their primary PC. "Entertainment centers", sure.

        So in the camp of folks who do want a more powerful, diverse OS, why WIndows instead of Linux? Linux isn't ready yet. It's at an ideal point as a Simple OS - see Grandma example above. But it's by no means ready as a replacement for Windows for the folks who want to use the additional functionality, but don't want to have to learn how to tinker with the OS. Thesedays, one should never have to see a command prompt to do ANYTHING, in normal usage. Retaining a command prompt for common usage is holding back the Linux desktop from widespread adoptance. There are too many common, complex functions in Linux, which are simple in Windows.

        Agreed - there's far too much to Windows. But disagree that that fact has virtually any impact on the user. There's no aspect of the interface or interactions I have with the Windows OS that are any faster in Linux. When I finish this text and hit Preview, it won't happen faster in Linux. When I then close the browser and switch across to my Steam window, it wouldn't happen any faster in Linux. There's no distinguishable speed differential on modern-day 64-bit, 8-core PCs.

        • I believe you overestimate what most are doing with their desktop, even many of those in the office, but definately not gamers, and not developers. One must look at the application. I think you, sir. would be surprised looking at a list of all the applications you yourself used in, say, the last 2 weeks. and how much time spent with each. No doubt, even some power users might only have a list of a half dozen applications used. If the list is shorter, say 2 or 3 applications, then the user doesn't need a Win
          • Right - you're back to "all". Understand - I have no disagreement with you over office workers. I'm simply trying to point out you *shouldn't* refer to home users and office workers in the same breath as "computer users". The needs of the two are completely, entirely different. Office workers could generally be given a stripped down OS with 1 or 2 applications that they need and their work lives would be complete.

            But that's no argument for home users (which OP was referring to) to be abandoning Windows. The

  • "After spending two hours trying to solve a print problem, I remember co-mantra and with the repeat very patient and competent help, i can now relax. Many thanks co-mantra, I have a felling that it was a good day when i joined your organization."

    Yeah, that's about the gist of all the comments on their website. They are all from English sounding names (James Wood) that use constructs nobody would use.

    "...repeat very patient and competent help..." yeah, rinse and repeat.
    "...felling..." I've got a feeling it's

  • Most computer users aren't geeks, and they don't know how to tell if their computer's infected or not. What they do know, however, is that every single version of Microsoft Windows is full of security holes and that there are millions of viruses, trojans and other malware out there looking for computers to infect. If that weren't true, if Microsoft would clean up its act and put out an operating system that was designed from the bottom up to be secure this type of scam would be impossible.
  • This is similar to the car warranty call scams of a couple of years ago. "Hello, your car warranty is about to expire, blah blah blah."
    The scammers do not care that you are on whatever DNC registry exists in your country. They call anyway, using false phone numbers. And call multiple times a week.

    I used to make a game of it, seeing how long I could keep them on the line.
    My best was 30 minutes, ending with "You do realize that the only reason I am talking to you is to keep you from bothering some other per
    • Nobody does that any more though. If a robot calls you then it just tells you to call an 800 number. A really fancy one might be able to tell the difference between a human and an answering machine, but probably not. Now they call multiple times in a row. I've been getting that "you might have a court issue" spam literally three times in a row in the evening. I actually checked (the old fashioned way) and I don't have a legal issue of any kind (I looked up my name anywhere I've ever had a problem, which has

    • If voice recognition was better you could let A.L.I.C.E. loose on them. Chumping them into believing the "home owner" has to talk through a voice assisted microphone or something might be necessary but it sure would be fun as hell if you were successful.

  • Holy Mackerel. My mother-in-law actually got one of these calls. She said someone with a nearly unintelligable accent had called saying he was from her ISP and he could see that her computer had a dangerous infection.

    Now, mother-in-law is one of the most internet-savvy non-geeks I have ever met. Her first response was "how? the computer is turned off." He babbled something about how they could still tell and insisted she turn it on right now and follow his instructions very carefully. She said he was v

    • by imroy ( 755 )
      My Grandpa got duped by this group a little while ago. He was never very tech savvy and is now going senile. And his vision is going too. The description in the summary is just about spot-on. He found some local PC tech to check out his machine and found it clean. Amazingly it looked like the scammers were simply after the money. He managed to cancel the payment and eventually got new credit cards. IIRC, it took Mum and her siblings a while to convince him to do that though. He thought he was safe because t
  • If you look at the image of the Comantra web site in the PCPro article [] you may notice that they copied the KMail icon for step 1 and step 2 shows a copied Macbook icon (for a Windows "support" site)

  • My elderly neighbour got scammed by this lot. They actually knew some information that could have only have come from a previous support call to her ISP -an ISP that has a call centre in the same Indian city. I've since learnt that a number of Indian call centre firms are selling data to scammers, and that the Indian authorities don't give a damn since it's bringing in foreign revenue.
  • Taking a stand like this should just be the tip of the iceberg, but unfortunately, this is only to bring up stock prices temporarily. MS has a long way to go before they do the right thing all around. Many companies associated to them have practices resembling this....