German Police Arrest Admin of Tor Anonymity Server 428
An anonymous reader writes "In a recent blog posting, a German operator of a Tor anonymous proxy server revealed that he was arrested by German police officers at the end of July. Showing up at his house at midnight on a Sunday night, police cuffed and arrested him in front of his wife and seized his equipment. In a display of both bitter irony and incompetence, the police did not take or shut-down the Tor server responsible for the traffic they were interested in, which was located in a data center, over 500km away. In the last year, Germany has passed a draconian new anti-security research law and raided seven different data centers to seize Tor servers. While back in 2003, A German court ordered the developers of a different anonymity network to build a back-door into their system."
Typo? (Score:2, Insightful)
Securty vs Freedom (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Securty vs Freedom (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Does anyone recall the French Revolution?
Re:Securty vs Freedom (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Good luck to this guy. Tor is very useful in preserving our privacy. Electronic communication has been a massive free party for government and police surveillance as people have been sending their communications around in ways that are as secure as a postcard. Now people are catching on and taking their privacy back and these agencies are reacting with aggression. If they want to snoop on someone then they can go through the traditional channels and not crack down on the anonymity and privacy of all of us,
Re:Securty vs Freedom (Score:5, Insightful)
Our leaders, both in the EU and the US, paid careful attention to the lessons learned in the French Revolution, namely that as long as you keep your people well fed and entertained, you can do whatever you damn well please. In the French Revolution, the people storming the Bastille had nothing to lose. But our level of comfort is carefully maintained to keep actual violent revolt from ever happening. Even the poor in our countries have too much to lose (thanks to government programs)to risk anything angrier than waving a slogan on a posterboard sign.
Re:Securty vs Freedom (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Securty vs Freedom (Score:5, Insightful)
I gotta warn you, I know of localities where the cops break down doors. If that ever happens in your area, to your door, who are you gonna call? Or do you just plan to break out the ammo?
Re:Securty vs Freedom (Score:5, Interesting)
The most realistic alternative is to call the news media (or anyone you know who has a video camera).
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
People wish there were all these big conspiracies, but any Katrina victim knows that the US government is not evil, just incompetent. I know there are p
Re:Securty vs Freedom (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Securty vs Freedom (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Securty vs Freedom (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Securty vs Freedom (Score:4, Informative)
What is clear is that the revolution was such a bloody event, with deep disorders, that the french people accepted democracy, half heartedly, only in 1870.
And France was the most powerful country (politicaly and economicaly) in Europe in 1789, and never was again after that.
About the bastille, it was a prison for priviledged people, and the prisoners were put again in prison shortly after being freed.
If you want a realistic view of the revolution, just read Chateaubriand (mémoires d'outre-tombe) or Hugo (1793).
Re:Securty vs Freedom (Score:5, Informative)
Huh? The Roman citizenry never revolted (Rome's various "civil wars" were fights between one rich patrician and another, not large-scale popular uprisings); Rome fell because it was invaded by foreign Gallic and Germanic tribes. All the bread and circuses did was weaken the Empire so that the barbarians had an easier time of it (and then again, they might have invaded regardless, since they were fleeing the Huns).
Re:Lazy masses ? Or direct democracy ? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reign_of_Terror [wikipedia.org]
Don't sanctify it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Securty vs Freedom (Score:4, Insightful)
Hmmm
It's also quite clear that the current crop of US soldiers have never been taught anything about the Vietnam War. It's a topic that's rarely if ever mentioned in the history classes in the US school system, for which history seems to have stopped 50 or 60 years ago. What little is known by the current crop of military recruits was mostly learned from Hollywood movies. See "Rambo" for details.
It's true that military historians have studied guerilla warfare in great detail. But there seems to be little evidence that our leaders have ever looked at such studies. To see a detailed example of this, google for "Battle of Algiers". This is a thoroughly documented topic. George Bush and his crowd claim to have read the famous book about it. But looking at their actions, you'd conclude that most have only seen the movie, if that. They certainly didn't learn any of the lessons, because they're making the same mistakes that the historians describe the French government making back in the 1950s, with the same results.
History definitely does seem to be repeating itself. And it doesn't even rhyme
Re: (Score:2)
Frog boiling [snopes.com] according to Victor H. Hutchison [ou.edu] the George Lynn Cross Research Professor Emeritus of Zoology.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Politicians only believe in headline grabbing nonsense like we must crack down on internet porn, without understanding what they are saying and complexities. It helps that the masses are equally as thick so don't see right through the politi
Re: (Score:2)
The masses generally scream that "why doesn't someone do something about it"... whenever something is printed in a newspaper.
Most people with IT degrees aren't very "social" and rarely run for office, if ever.
Old Memes vs. Karma (Score:2)
Misquoting Benjamin Franklin (Score:5, Interesting)
The actual quote, which you failed to attribute, is by Benjamin Franklin and reads:
Note the adjectives "essential" and "temporary". To earn the "Insightful" moderations, which the clueless mods have given you already anyway, you must demonstrate, that the given-up liberty is essential, and that the gained security is only temporary.
Can you? I don't think so...
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Misquoting Benjamin Franklin (Score:5, Insightful)
That said: anonymous speech is pretty darn essential. I hope we can agree that free speech is essential, and in the face of governments that happily restrict it, anonymity is a necessary tool to exercise that right without getting imprisoned or killed. And the security we would gain is temporary - if the ter'ists, pedophiles, Holocaust deniers, or pirates are using Tor, and we shut it down, they'll just switch to something else.
There is no permanent security (Score:4, Insightful)
Security is always, ALWAYS, temporary. You CANNOT gain permanent security. EVER. Even if you locked yourself up in a fortress, protected by 10 battalions of heavily armed private militia, that is NOT permanent security. The circumstances of your security are ALWAYS temporary. The current government is temporary. World order is temporary. Your life is temporary. Franklin underlines temporary security, because it never lasts. EVER.
Similarly, an essential liberty refers to any liberty as essential. Liberties like freedom of speech, freedom of movement, right to your life, etc are all essential. There are no liberties that are non-essential. This is by definitions of what liberty means. You lose any part of that definition, and you lose more than you ever gain through some temporary security.
* autonomy: immunity from arbitrary exercise of authority: political independence
* freedom of choice; "liberty of opinion"; "liberty of worship"; "liberty--perfect liberty--to think or feel or do just as one pleases"; "at liberty to choose whatever occupation one wishes"
* personal freedom from servitude or confinement or oppression
http://www.google.ca/search?q=define%3A+liberty&hl=en [google.ca]
These are very general freedoms and we are losing them one chip of the security hammer at a time. Yet, we will NEVER get security because true security is a state of mind. Think about it - you are never physically secure in this world.
Example. People in UK allowed CCTV cameras to be put everywhere. They lost their liberty of freedom of movement (at least anonymous movement). They "gained" their security because they thought "it will fight crime". Result is that crime rate has not decreased. But the liberty will not be restored. Citizens of UK, and London especially, lost liberty and gained nothing.
silly germany (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:silly germany (Score:4, Insightful)
Except in those countries which offer their people no accountability or transparency from the outset, and consequently have no need to rationalize their self-serving behavior to said people. I don't presently live in one of those places, but as things are going, I will end up in one of those places by simply staying where I am. There's something very wrong going on here.
Whatever this is, it's not just the United States that is affected. A number of nations are going down this road
The excessive desire for power (is there a medical term for it? Megalomania perhaps?) needs to be something for which politicians are regularly checked (much like high-end call-girls are regularly tested for disease), with not having it a prerequisite for holding public office.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
If the users aren't German, then the users can be ignored. The geek seems to favor local authority only when it is convenient.
500km? (Score:5, Funny)
Suggestion (Score:5, Funny)
Let's just get it out of the way... (Score:2)
Ok, now that we can all move on with a more in-depth discussion.
A little perspective for everyone thinking that (Score:5, Insightful)
You know what doesn't happen?
He doesn't get summarily executed.
His wife doesn't get raped at gunpoint.
His child doesn't get burned in an oven.
People throw around the word fascist to describe any policy they don't like (that core observation is the heart of Godwin's law). Excepting the geographical accident that places both of them in Germany, there is NOTHING analagous between Nazism and the actions of the government in this case. If you want to convince people of the rightness of deploying a Tor network, keep a cool head and do not use any goose-stepping analogies, because they will brand you as a perspectiveless fanatic who is not to be taken seriously.
you make it all sound so reasonable (Score:5, Insightful)
People throw around the word fascist to describe any policy they don't like (that core observation is the heart of Godwin's law). Excepting the geographical accident that places both of them in Germany, there is NOTHING analagous between Nazism and the actions of the government in this case.
So what? Was Mussolini German?
German gov hasn't outlawed anonymity (yet) (Score:5, Informative)
the point is, that this is either
a) police stupidity
b) scare tactics
i'd safely bet on the latter.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Malum in se --> Bad in and of itself. These are true crimes. Anyone who has them done against them will object to these... they have victims that can always be identified. These crimes can always be identified as the initiation of force against a victim of some sort. Even the dumping of chemicals into the water supply has human victims.
Examples of things that are bad in and of themselves...
--rape (physical invasion), murder(deprivation of life), kidnapping(deprivation
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Not all crimes that, as crimes, appear to meet the criteria for this category are crimes in themselves. Consider a law against fat guys going shirtless at the beach. If t
Re:German gov hasn't outlawed anonymity (yet) (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe if it happened, more fat guys would get in shape. I did it. Long story, but if a man wants to do something, nothing stops him. Same for the ladies.
On the other hand... who's the idiot who came up with the idea to teach our kids that seeing something will traumatize them? It is the fear of excelling that makes most people complacent. Afraid of blood? Take a class on first aid. Afraid of sharks? Go shark fishing. Afraid of guns? Take a rifle or pistol class. Afraid of freedom? Try it
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This is actually more important and basic than that. The question is this: What sort of idiot parent would *ever* let their kid be told that they should be mentally traumatized over anything? I don't care if your kid just stepped on a land mine and lost his leg - you tell him "you'll be fine" and smile at him as you apply the tourniquet. Hysteria or "omg that's so horrible" will just
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Except, of course, for the fact that the Nazis made something illegal that was perfectly legal in the rest of the sane world.
LK
First They Came for the Jews (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Excepting the geographical accident that places both of them in Germany, there is NOTHING analagous between Nazism and the actions of the government in this case.
Perhaps if more people spoke up sooner, the camps might not have happened. The rise of the third reich did not happen overnight.
Re:A little perspective for everyone thinking that (Score:4, Insightful)
One can see in the news and on the internet these changes in Character of the United States:
* Nationalism in the United States has turned to nasty xenophobic bigotry with splash of jingoism with a patriotic veneer.
* Human Rights so important to the founders of this country have been reduced or abandoned.
* Many right of center Americans have identified Muslims as enemies of the state and immigrants as the cause of financial hardships and increased violent crime in their community.
* The US spends more money, today on its military than the rest of the world *combined*.
* The US media has changed in recent years, the is one outlet which is a blatant propaganda arm of the current administration and the others are controlled by select few very, very wealthy men.... today the news reported in the US is markedly different than the news reported in other nations (and the assessment of freedom of the press has plummeted in the last 15 years).
* The national obsession with security is also remarkable... many experts decry the stupidity and ineffectiveness of this yet nearly monthly there are reports of egregious and or silly interference of security officers.
* Religion has become a remarkably scary thing in the US. Politicians are expected to profess belief in Christianity, yet politicians of other faiths are viewed with suspicion and men who profess no beliefs are reviled. A sizable minority of Christians today believe that the United States should not be a secular national but rather a Christian nation and there are Christian Reconstructionist groups in government today furthering this goal.... it's a plank in ideology of the NeoConservative group the Project for a new American century whose members have been in power in the US for the last 7 years.
* Corporations are held above citizens in todays America. The interests of corporations are promoted within the government by a byzantine system of lobbyists and special interest groups who wield far more power than any citizen's group.
* Cronyism within the administration of George W. Bush has been significant and harmful. Do I really need to list all the incompetent people in positions of power, or can I just say "Brownie, you're doing a heckuva job".
* The elections today have significant irregularities and those people in government irresponsible for them have done little to ensure and accurate and fair count.
Now it's true that to date there are a few examples in the above list that equate to violence seen in 1940's Europe. As it is also true that United States of America does not demonstrate all the qualities of Fascist States.
However it's also true than everything on that list is worse than it was 10 to 15 years ago. So I my opinion it's time to stop objecting to the comparison.
Yep (Score:2)
The Nazis were german socialists. The Italians were fascists, Spain at the time was Fascist, and 1900-1930 America was prone to glorifying fascists and pretty much anyone that opposed communism. Hence why whoever studies history will find that many newspapers and radio broadcasts gushed all over Hitler at the time. Course sometime later they did a remarkable "about face" and gushed socialism... prodded the populace to fight on England's side.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, Germany has not slipped back into being a facist state. But it is slipping. There are elements in the government trying to give it a push in that very direction, just as there are similar elements in the USA. The problem is not enough people are pushing back. Until it becomes widely recognized what is happening, not enough people will. This is what happened in the 1920's and 1930's. People who warned others about what was to come were not taken seriously.
I agree: analogies to activities of the Sc
Re:A little perspective for everyone thinking that (Score:4, Insightful)
Fascism is *not* summary executions, torture, rape and pillage. Fascism is an ideology which values not human beings but abstact constructs such as the state, glory, heroism, nation and whatnot.
However, fascism, since it states that the individual is nothing, tends to constantly evaporate any civil liberties still remaining and of course more and more strictly dictate what the citizenry can (or must) do. Keeping people in fear is a very efficient way to achieve the above. Now you can use all sorts of things to plant fear in people, starting from the 24/7 propaganda about the dangers of an imminent nukular ter'ist attack, through the black car with people in dark leather coats at your doorstep at 3 in the morning, to the less subtle police SWAT raids on your home, to publicly executing innocent people on the Underground, up all to the more extrame cases of child rotissery you mentioned.
Nevertheless, those are just methods from which a fascist state can choose from. Torture is not an indication of fascism; torture happens where fascism is not involved and fascism can be instated without any sort of torture. A state which marches on the way of taking away individual rights while empowering the state/corporate elite *is* fascist, whether it does summary executions on the spot or not.
Re:A little perspective for everyone thinking that (Score:5, Insightful)
His wife doesn't get raped at gunpoint.
His child doesn't get burned in an oven."
Mmmm....mighty fine line there what you describe.
How many times in history can we define where governments take small steps up to the above, and each time citizens proclaim it fascism?
Right now in the USA, the constitution of our country is looked upon a merely a "historical" document, nothing really practical to base a government on.
I mean, right now you have people arguing that the right to bear arms is really not needed anymore, and that it causes too many problems for example. Even arguing that the only people who should have the right to arms is the military or police.
These people honestly believe that the USA government couldn't possibly turn on its citizens, or its systems of law and justice could not either.
I point this out because the government has already marginalized most of the population in this country as both the democratic and republican parties themselves are widely known to be corrupt and simply corporate fronts to tame the populace. (i.e. as long as the population THINKS voting is making a difference and they THINK they are choosing candidates, they will not interested in what is really going on.)
Small steps to fascism do not need to be compared against its extremes. History shows us they are all the same and have the same tragic results.
Almost all of it is due to human greed, and the lust for power.
The only sure thing we can count on, is that in the end all governments, with no exceptions, crumble to dust and the tyranny they leave behind form better lessons for us to begin again.
The USA will not be any different.
-Hack
Incorrect! (Score:2, Informative)
And I am inclined to agree that this is one of them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Heh; good suggestion.
In high school, I took a couple years of German from a teacher who was born here in the US, of German immigrant parents. She taught us a lot of German proverbs, and one of the first (also the title of a well-known folk song) was "die Gedanken sind frei" [wikipedia.org], or "[my/our] Thoughts are Free". Her point was that the sort of repression recently imposed by the Nazis wasn't at all an aberration in German-speaking society; it was really just
Re: (Score:2)
I heard a proverb from my own friends of that WW2 age (quite old now)... They made it up to sing to the "Cops" song.
"Good men, good men, good men, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you. Will you come out with your hands over your head, or on the trigger of your gun?"
Chilling effect (Score:5, Interesting)
Sorta like how the US government has been complaining about the difficulty of hiring Arabic translators, despite the statistics from a few years back saying that there were several million US residence who were fluent in Arabic. (And, contrary to the jokes going around, they aren't all gay.
It's commonly known as "shooting yourself in the foot".
Re: (Score:2)
Try 600,000, by the last census. I've worked with Arabic linguists before. The problem in recruiting is that the pay isn't all that great, the job is incredibly boring and has no career advancement. You basically have to be smart, but not too smart (or you'll already have a better pa
Re: (Score:2)
Such numbers are notoriously variable, as they depend on your definition. Here's an interesting article on the general topic [ignatius.edu]. They mention that different studies differ by around a factor of two for the number of "speakers" of English, Spanish and Hindi. I've read a number of similar discussions that mention such problems as whether children are counted (probably not if you're counting voters or looking to hire translators) or whether there's any sort
Re: (Score:2)
I think there's a key difference between the security law and the US translator issue. It's not illegal to speak Arabic, be an Arabic translator, have any number of Arabic books and training aids, nor is it illegal t
First Amendment! (Score:4, Funny)
[/merkin]
But to go to ha-ha-only-serious land, our laws seem to extend to other countries anyway. When it suits us.
HA! Denmark upped the ante (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
--
Arkan
Scare tactic. (Score:5, Insightful)
Fire that lawmaker (Score:2, Interesting)
Happy new computer virus infected Germany!
(Or rather, to hell with it.)
... nazis, gestapo (tagging beta) (Score:4, Insightful)
Had it really been the Nazi's Gestapo, he would not be posting anything in September...
Zonk et al. really need to glue a nicely printed and framed quote of the Godwin's Law [jargon.net] on their beds' footboards, to make it the first thing they see waking up...
Re: (Score:2)
Ill remember to avoid those groups (Score:5, Insightful)
nazis are one of the biggest lessons that have happened to mankind. if some bunch of idiots can not realize that there are places that this example should be recalled, then its not worth to waste words with them.
Trusted Computing can help (Score:5, Funny)
Ironically, Trusted Computing, hated by the larger Internet community, can actually play an important part in protecting privacy. It is unfortunate that uninformed opposition has slowed the adoption of this potentially very useful and helpful technology. I am working hard to advance Trusted Computing and I can't wait for the day when I can run transparent servers which remote clients will be able to validate and trust. Someday I expect that all Tor servers, anonymous remailers and other privacy protecting technologies will run on Trusted Computers.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I see a lot of knee jerk reaction (Score:5, Informative)
The police were investigating a bomb threat posted to an online forum for German police officers. The police traced one of the objectionable posts on the forum to the ip address for Janssen's server. Up until his arrest, Alex Janssen's Tor server carried over 40GB of other random strangers' Internet traffic each day. Showing up at his house at midnight on a Sunday night, police cuffed and arrested him in front of his wife and seized his equipment. In a display of both bitter irony and incompetence, the police did not take or shut-down the Tor server responsible for the traffic they were interested in, which was located in a different city, over 500km away. Janssen's attempts to explain what Tor is to the police officers fell initially on deaf ears. After being interrogated for hours, someone from the city of Düsseldorf's equivalent of the Department of Homeland Security showed up and admitted to Janssen that they'd made a mistake. He was released shortly after.
Summary : somebody saw his server was the originator IP, somebody reacted quickly, a bit like the US homeland departement IMO could have done, and fell on the face because 1) they gathered the wrong PC 2) once the dust settled they recognized their error after being interrogated for horus. Not DAYS. Not MONTH. Hours. Sure it sucks but it was a bomb threat, in other word there was urgency, and they did not torture him, they did not water board him and pretend afterward it ain't torture. They interrogated him for hours and released him and admitted mistake.
And people here are taking comparison to loss of liberty and Nazi ? Hellllooo ? Knee jerk reaction ?
Dont.... (Score:3, Funny)
Der Kommissar's in town, uh-oh
And if he talks to you
And you don't know why
The more you live
The faster you will die
The regularity of anti-German FUD (Score:4, Informative)
It is an unusual characteristic of Germany that everyone suffers from angst (fair enough, they invented the word) but the angst is all about really unlikely events (acrylimide in barbeque food causing cancer for example) and yet they throw caution to the winds the moment they get in a car.
This angst condition is so endemic I have christened it "Fright Club". Only a few weeks ago they were obsessed with "wifi smog" people were switching of their routers and phones to protect themselves from this new scourge. It didn't appear to stop them from watching television or listening to the radio, but there you go - science and magic confused or just interchangeable.
Coupled with this angst is another curious condition called Gründlichkeit or thoroughness. Gründlichkeit is just so much part of the German character. Back in Scotland you could read the important parts of the Blue Book tax guide in the bookshop and easily identify any new legal tax avoidance strategies. You couldn't do that with the German Tax Books because there are about 127 of them (the last time I tried to count them). My accountant just photocopies pages out and sticks them in the tax return. You have to pay canal tax but there's no canal and you don't get one either.
In Germany when you change your address, you have to inform the special municipal department -Wohnamtmeldegung- (department of names and addresses)of the change and fill in three forms. A group of students could not understand how this did not exist in Britain or USA. "What's to stop you getting on a plane, flying to the UK, robbing a bank and then flying home?" was their completely serious question and my answer: "Even German bank robbers don't normally use their identity cards or leave a forwarding address during the robbery," leaves them completely unconvinced.
Conversation with Wohnamt Official:
Official:"What is your father's occupation?"
"He's dead, what difference does it make?"
Official:"I have a space in the form for it"
"which job would you like?"
Official:"His last one..."
Official:"What religion are you?"
(proudly) "Agnostic"
Official:"You can have: Catholic, Protestant or atheist."
"But I'm an agnostic"
Official: Ticks 'atheist'
As for thoroughness, Non-German partners are often very surprised when they clean the entire house from top to bottom only to have their partner point out that they forgot the single cup they drank their post cleaning coffee in which is standing on the immaculate sink - dirty. There is no mention of all the good work, because the concept of balancing good things against negative things (one good thing outweighs loads of bad things) is rather specific to English speakers. German anthropology uses the concept of a linear measure of perfection (or distance from it!) and the streets are so clean you could eat your dinner off them. Well, almost but this is the real reason behind this action, more national character than conspiracy.
Germany has these laws and they pale into insignificance compared to the UK's
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Ah Europe, progressive land of freedom (Score:5, Insightful)
Four words:
No Software Patents (yet).
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Or we could allow silly patents like you do, patent roman and greek alphabets whose prior art are belong to us and watch americans resorting to cyrillic if they want to sell software here.
Oh wait, "PEAKTOP" is a cyrillic rendition, IIRC. You gotta go arabic, or chinese.
Re:Ah Europe, progressive land of freedom (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Ah Europe, progressive land of freedom (Score:4, Insightful)
What does this got do with freedom? If someone turns you in telling the police that he received bomb threats from your IP address (which happened in this case), the only thing the police can do is investigate. And that inherently involves obtaining physical evidence, in this case seizing the computers as soon as possible before the suspect (yes, a potential criminal) destroys the evidence.
Now if there had been no freedom in Germany, the man would have not been released within a few hours with explanation he is innocent.
Re: (Score:2)
To where?
Aside from a private island, a lot of people look at Sweden as the Holy Grail....a western Mecca. If even the Swedes are looking to move out, where is there left to go?
Re: (Score:2)
I still had to sit back and contemplate how an entire population would take what happened in Sweden sitting down. Insane taxes, socialized everything, prohibited self defense, despite gang and racist violence towards white, blonde swedish girls... very worrisome that a Nordic population would so utterly surrender themselves
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
How did Ikea manage to become a global brand, and its founder one of the richest men in the world, if the Swedish state is so anti-capitalist?
Look, every single person in the world believes their taxes are unreasonably high. This is rarely true. Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] provides an interesting chart, which shows Sweden as having high pers
Re:Kind of makes sense. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Kind of makes sense. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Intent on design != only use, or even most common use (see: napster)
Re: (Score:2)
Intent on design != only use, or even most common use (see: napster)
Clearly it is being used by a sufficiently large number of the "intended people" if this guy was able to collect 100 legit account details with just one Tor node: http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/11/1730258 [slashdot.org]
Gun manufacturers aren't responsible for the crimes that gun users commit.
Car manufacturers aren't responsible for the 4,000 automobile related deaths that occur each month in just the USA.
Toll road operators aren't responsible for drug smugglers that drive on their roads.
ISPs aren't responsi
BUT german laws say (Score:5, Interesting)
for example, "Teledienstgesetz" (translate this as: Telecommunications Act) says
(1) Diensteanbieter sind für fremde Informationen, die sie in einem Kommunikationsnetz übermitteln oder zu denen sie den Zugang zur Nutzung vermitteln, nicht verantwortlich, sofern sie
1. die Übermittlung nicht veranlasst,
2. den Adressaten der übermittelten Informationen nicht ausgewählt und
3. die übermittelten Informationen nicht ausgewählt oder verändert haben.
1. didn't initiate the connection,
2. didn't choose the recipients and
3. didn't choose or change the information.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
That's like the idiots that don't want stores to sell crowbars because some burglers use them to break into houses. Common sense here says my right to buy a crowbar without obtaining a permit from the government is not a fredom that should be revoked simply because some people abuse it. If you don't like them using a crowbar to pry open your front door, find another way to deal with them. Don't revoke a right from me.
This is just a
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It would be different if this was just a hosting provider who provided service in good faith that someone took advantage of, this is someone running something INTENTIONALLY untrackable.
Built into that statement is the implicit assumption that law enforcement has an inherent right to track any Internet traffic back to its source, and that any intermediate service providers have the obligation to build their systems in such a way that this tracking is possible. Essentially you are saying that no one has t
Re: (Score:2)
The only difference here (besides that there is no specific allegation of illegal traffic in this case), is that it's more difficult to tell who's a router and who's the source. I can understand governments getting antsy about that, but making laws against it is about as stupid as making a law that P==NP. The law is just denying a property of information, namely, that practical anonymity is feasib
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Actually he manipulated and rigged the elections. Thank god that sort of thing never happens today...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:gestapo (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The "Dont Tread on Me" flag, aka the Gadsden flag, was a flag bourne in the American Revolution, not the Civil War. The Rattlesake, before the Bald Eagle, was the symbol of the United States itself.
How can we take your anti-semitic comments in any kind of serious manner when you do not even know the history of the very symbol of the American Revolution, no, the core values of the United States itself?
Bully I say, Bully!
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
As for the integration, while there are too many unintegrated ones, 100% is way too high a number.