Michael Dell Returns to CEO Role at Dell 165
head_dunce writes "It looks like Michael Dell is jumping back into the big chair at Dell because his company is slipping under the direction of Kevin Rollins. I wonder if they should be looking outside the company for new ideas, or if going back to basics is what needs to be done?"
Quid Pro Quo? (Score:5, Funny)
His reply: [com.com] "What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders,"
Joking aside, how things have turned around hey? Although to be fair to Dell, prior to getting his CEO role back, Jobs also said about Apple "If I were running Apple, I would milk the Macintosh for all it's worth -- and get busy on the next great thing. The PC wars are over. Done. Microsoft won a long time ago.")
Re:Quid Pro Quo? (Score:5, Insightful)
Want to be fair? Let's take another look at the Dell business model, shall we?
The industry works according to many 'rules', one of which is the 80/20 citation, saying between two parties, for every dollar transacted at the end, one party will get 80% and the other 20%.
As an example, let's say HP sells a monitor, that is actually manufactured by Samsung. HP knows it will garner approx. 80% of every dollar transacted on the final sale. One monitor sold, at a retail price of USD100.00, which Samsung charged HP $50 for, means a profit of USD$50.00. HP knows that after all expenses are paid, they will net 80%, or USD $40.00 out of that USD$50.00. Samsung knows that after all expenses are paid on their end, they will net USD$10.00 (20% out of that USD$50.00 profit on the back).
As an investor, you typically assume that if you buy HP stock, they will work to maintain that 80% - same with Samsung being expected to negotiate their 20%.
If you learned that HP was settling for 70% and letting Samsung get away with 30%, you might be less inclined to invest in HP and start throwing money into Samsung instead, right? And if that kept up, it would just be a matter of time before HP went out of business, as it rightly should, under such circumstances.
Dell, on the other hand, ignores the gentleman's agreed 80/20 and pushes for as much more as they can get...90/10, anyone? 95/5? 100/0...? Been there, seen that.
Substitute Dell for HP in the above, and then consider...what happens? Dell is a GREAT company and investors love the ROI. Samsung, on the other hand, needs to tread lightly - perhaps it can afford to participate at 90/10 for a short time, hoping that Dell will eventually back off and both sides can move towards a profit balance, but if Samsung continues and doesn't pay attention, it soon starts to collapse. Can't pay bills or negotiate decent contracts with suppliers...investors start walking away. Samsung dies because Dell hollowed them out.
This is the Dell model. Hollow out your suppliers and when one dies, move to another. Scorched earth 21st century style. Nice for Dell, right? Not in the long run, because the day will come when there are either no more suppliers to kill, or no supplier will do business with them. Both of those have happened, and that is where we are today.
Dell is dead, period, as we know it. Maybe Micheal should consider selling sugared water
Re:Quid Pro Quo? (Score:5, Interesting)
But the business model you describe of butchering your suppliers sounds like wal-mart. And they're not going anywhere.
Dell's problem is not their business model, but others copying their business model. (apple?)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Back in the day, Apple had the lead by being able to shorten the time between when a product was made and when it hit the buyer to as little as 8 days in the pipe. This amazed Compaq and HP, who found it hard to get below 15~17 days.
Dell copied Apple, and when things changed and the typical increment that most enjoyed went back up to around 12 days in the pipe, Dell, due to the pressure put on suppliers, managed as little as 5 days. Now, everyone is sel
Re:Quid Pro Quo? (Score:5, Informative)
Dell outright butchers suppliers. There is indeed a difference. I suggest looking up both "symbiotic" and "parasitic" on Wikipedia.
Re:Quid Pro Quo? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
But to your point, it is possible to be a profitable company and not abuse your employees and suppliers. Trader Joes [traderjoes.com] is a privately held grocery store/health food store company that pays employees far above the industry average [workforce.com]. Also, many suppliers like to do business with TJs, since they pay in cash, instead of stretching out the supplier f
Re: (Score:2)
As for profit, well, the dept. stores were pretty much the only stores in the UK which actually increased sales last Christmas IIRC...
(Disclaimer:
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As for Dell butchering suppliers.. We all know it's happening but I've yet to see all of these bad things people keep predicting. Intel seems to be doing fine as well as Microsoft and Nvidia, ATI and all of the other suppliers seem to be doing OK. (The ones wh
Re: (Score:2)
Considering your username, that's not surprising ;)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Here is the problem, when I worked at my last job we would buy Lattitude laptops by the thousands. Yes, an order of 1000 or more laptops is considered normal. The pricing we would get would be silly. WE were paying what you would pay if you went online and bough the same item
Re: (Score:2)
They also sell substantially the same products and don't differentiate them well.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
For further information, see Jack Tramiel and style and fate of Commodore. Sounds iden
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Quid Pro Quo? (Score:4, Insightful)
Oh if it were only that simple of a game
Here is how it actually goes... The supplier's people start yammering to themselves about cutting bad customers loose, and it's up to the sales guys to run point and try to force the buyer to put up or walk. The buyer, however, eats sales staff for snack - a quick smile and "Look, do it our way all this year, and next year, if you pull all tens on the appraisals, you can name your price for a change. We will even put it in writing." So, the sales guys cave and spend the next year biting their nails and drinking themselves into a pain-free state. They move on...time moves on. New sales guys come into the fray and when supplier appraisals come out, just prior to refreshing contracts, the numbers don't quite make it & the process repeats and so does the gutting by Dell. Note that this does not go unnoticed by the higher-ups on the supplier side, however. Someone mentions they should cut Dell loose and let them cut down a competitor for a while, but...an SVP comments "...there is perhaps some value in sales being chewed on as long as the competition can't claim Dell as a customer - try your best to keep the blood-letting to a minimum and do what needs to be done to secure a contract renewal". The sales devision takes another beating while R & D gets to enjoy...oh look! Money! Dell investment on the side!
Point is, business does not have to be so brutal. Both sides can come out ahead on all counts without cocking the pistols and clubbing each other as a routine.
"By the way, Samsung is doing great."
Duh - what I gave was a simple enough scenario to serve point-making...hardly detailed reality. Anyone dumb enough to not see that _should_ be anonymous
And again, it's not that simple. Samsung has many divisions, from Finance to SDI, etc. Samsung Electronics covers monitors and TVs, while the memory guys get all the attention. Samsung as a whole IS doing great and will continue for years, but there will always be one division trailing another. That's why the TV division, after being on it's own for 15 years and stagnant, was folded into Monitors a few years back. Funny thing that, since Monitors were split off from the TV division back in the '80s, when Samsung first made those little monochrome displays for something called a Macintosh, that wasn't a TV at all, and no one was sure it was even worth a look
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You can buy a Dell for $359. $52.50 for Windows and $200 for parts leaves around $100 a computer for warranty work and employees. Compare this to ten years ago, where you'd have a lot more money after Windows and parts.
Inaccurate (Score:3, Informative)
For example, Dell has been using motherboards manufactured under the Intel brand name by Foxconn since as far back as I can remember. They've been using Lite-On optical drives, and various power supplies -- often HiPro. All of these companies are still in business and doing quite well (better than Dell even).
I do think that Dell shot themselves in the foot, however in an entirely different matter. Dell started the PC price wars. The competition followed t
Re: (Score:2)
Today, sure - but that doesn't mean there wasn't blood on the saddle 5 or 6 years ago. Today's Foxconn/Lite-On isn't yesterday's, by no means. Been there...seen, tasted, smelled and worked that.
And for every tier 1, hardened survivor, there are dozens of tier 2 & 3 corpses (the true little guys that can't be seen in FoxConn or Samsung's shadow). It's just not as simple as it appears in a rear-view mirror
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
That is nonsense. There are plenty of quality PC makers out there selling PCs bundled with MS products.
Asus is one good example... They make great laptops.
Just because there's low end PCs doesn't spoil the entire PC range.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But your original post seemed to imply that it was MS's margins responsible for the lack of quality in the PC world.
Which is it?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If that's the case, then why has their also been a slide in the quality of hardware from companies that don't rely on MS (Sun, Apple)?
I think blaming MS for the slide in PC quality (and prices) is somewhat naive of you. It ignores the fact that hardware quality is sliding everywhere (Unix Servers, non-windows PCs, stereos, TVs, everything)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Dell community when IDC confirmed that Dell market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Dell has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Dell is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Running each supplier down to the lowest cost they will sell at is business. If you're not doing it, you're hurting yourself. If a supplier can't beat costs, either he is inefficient compared to his competitor, or his competitor is taking a loss. Either way, what would I care, as a purchaser, what the story is? How do I even know?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree that higher price doesn't mean higher quality parts. However, the inverse is usually true... The very cheapest parts are almost always crap.
Specs are nice, but like anything else, it's often cheaper for suppliers to over-promise, and take the gamble on having to pay up later...
Where's DEC when you need them?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
People assume that the reason Dell and Wal Mart can offer such deep discounts is because they buy in such large volumes. While that is part of the reason, it doesn't explai
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Without the volume, you have zero leverage on your supplier. Think about it. If Supplier A sells 70% of their product to Dell, Dell will have 100% of the leverage and the others will have nothing. No company would eve
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Funny right.. and this is exactly what he's doing. On his last presentation they dropped the "Computers" part of their name, and it's more and more obvious they are MOVING (not EXPANDING) into consumer electronics.
The Macs are now PC's which can run Windows as well... Maybe we'll see in few years OSX as a platfo
Re: (Score:2)
> get busy on the next great thing"
which is EXACTLY what he did and is doing now..
Re: (Score:2)
HP, the absorber of the losers in the computer wars:
obligatory (Score:4, Funny)
Dude, Dell's gettin' a Dell.
well (Score:4, Funny)
Here's some suggestions for Mike (Score:5, Funny)
dPhone
dBook
etc...
Re:Here's some suggestions for Mike (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Improve Customer Support (Score:5, Insightful)
If you are selling PC's by mail-orders (sort of), you better have more than good customer service that customers can depend on.
Even a premium corporate customer care at Dell su8ks big time.
Apple's phenomenal customer support is the main reason iPod and iMac's still rock.
If i call Apple and am under warranty, the dude am talking to knows the business and take me step-by-step to solve the problem. (am not even comparing store-based support, since Dell doesn't have many stores to sell from).
If Michael Dell can bring customer support back to what it was long back, then am sure Dell will rock.
Corporates love Dell because of its uniform ugly black boxen.
My bank switched to HP after Dell's customer support was unresponsive for the last time....
And also ditch the Dell DJ Music Player. Seriously.
To plagarise Jobs: "Move on from MP3 players. The battle was won long back by Apple.".
Get back to core business of assembling high-quality PCs and phenomenal customer service.
Is that difficult Mr.Dell?
Re:Improve Customer Support (Score:4, Interesting)
I worked for Dell briefly, an experience I'll be happy not to repeat. The entire company is very shareholder-centric. I really doubt we're going to see a terribly different Dell from what we saw about 5 years ago. They are still going to build dirt-cheap machines for the 'lowest common denominator' people and they are still going to operate with the previously mentioned 'scorched earth' policy towards their hardware suppliers.
I'm pretty certain that Michael Dell is being brought back to keep the stockholders happy and to attempt to restore the image. Few people will remember that he made the company the way it is, and I feel that Kevin Rollins is taking the scapegoat role.
Long gone are the days when Dell computers were the reliable ones that you spent a couple extra hundred on because they really were that good. This is the reason Dell bought Alienware, to try to regain the image of quality machines.
Also, IMHO, I have to agree with another poster as well, most Dell-branded products were pretty horrible. Axim line was alright and the LCD's were pretty good, everything else (including the computers) was pretty poor. Again, just my feelings on 'em...
Re:Improve Customer Support (Score:4, Informative)
I've actually migrated large accounts from HP, IBM & Fujitsu to Dell because of the lack of support from those vendors.
I know it is different for individual users but for large businesses all of my support is provided by native English speakers in the same country as me. On rare occasions you will get an engineer that is 'lacking' but most of the time it's someone who can understand what you are saying and will either identify the problem or book the service call if you've already done the technical troubleshooting.
Am I the only customer with this experience ???
Re: (Score:2)
For example my latest dealings with Dell support. Machine keeps crashing, after 2 weeks on their support website and MS site I done all the investigation to prove its a hardware issue. Their response is "reformat the machine". I tell them I have already done this and run the dell diagnostics and supplied them the info. Not good enough have to jump through the hoops again.
So I do, and told motherboard is broken
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You can add another scam, selling fake processors. Years ago, my mom bought a Pentium 120 from a mom and pop shop. When it was a few years old, I took it apart to upgrade some things. What a POS. Every part was the cheapest possible one you could imagine. I tried overclocking the CPU figuring I'd get at least 133, but it wouldn't go over 120. I pulled the "warranty void if removed" sticker off the bottom of the CPU and found it was a Pentiu
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I wanted to schedule a couple of drives being added to a server.
a) They got me the wrong parts (which meant two visits from a tech)
b) It took 2 months for the whole process
Re: (Score:2)
Ahhh - thought so.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
> improve Dell's lousy customer service
Agreed! All my dealings with Dell this is the single point where I have always had negative dealings with Dell.
> and in-source it to US again.
That may not always make it better. The problem with Dells support isn't that it is in India. It is that for the home users we get a "call center" rather then a "technical support center". There is a huge difference. Call Centers hire the lowest common denominator thats sk
Re: (Score:2)
The first priority of Michael Dell should be to improve Dell's lousy customer service and in-source it to US again.
Dell may have already started this for some models. The first banner at the top of Dell's OptiPlex Desktops page [dell.com] now says: "BUILT HERE. SUPPORTED HERE. OptiPlex desktops include North American-based technical support." I don't know if any other lines have North American-based support for non-corporate customers.
Corporates love Dell because of its uniform ugly black boxen.
If you missed it, in November 2003 Dell moved their corporate support for OptiPlex and Latitude back to the USA from India [cnn.com] after complaints.
Apple's phenomenal customer support is the main reason iPod and iMac's still rock.
I don't know if I'd call it "phenomenal," but I like kno
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, I wonder what his priorities are?
I think it will be interesting to watch Dell going into the future, to see if the CEO is all that important. It's always hard to separate leadership qualities from the circumstances. Is Dell's current CEO part of the problem? I don't know. But HP has adopted many of Dell's successful tactics, and that is definately a problem (for Dell).
Re: (Score:2)
Where I believe Dell has huge problems is that their servers are pretty lame and their strong-point which was initially the desktops/laptops market has been neglected.
A few examples of why I believe this are things like cutting corners by using one year warranty hard drives in laptops they give out 3 y
Re: (Score:2)
We have signed up for Gold service, which is probably an extra $50.
Recently I had an experienc
Re: (Score:2)
less proprietization, please... (Score:4, Insightful)
While yes, proprietary hardware is a shrewd business tactic, and it brings in more revenue stream, it is quite contrary to the hardware industry standard. It is one of the sole reasons I stay clear from dell hardware, and I am probably not the only techie to do so because of proprietization of the hardware.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They are even using regular power-supplies now, bringing them into standardization on every part I know of inside the machine.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not happy with the direction they have gone at a corporate / sales level, but proprietary parts hasn't been an issue on machines I buy from Dell in a few years now.
Re: (Score:1)
What? I've replaced the power supply, installed an additional hard drive, DVD+/-RW drive, and a graphics card and TV card in my Dell PC. Oh, and upgraded the memory twice.
My sister now has my "Proprietary" PSU in her computer I made from pretty standard parts.
Re: (Score:2)
His information was dated. Dell used to reverse the polarity on their power supplies (IIRC) so that a COTS one wouldn't work and it would damage other boards if you tried your trick. I remember a friend just re-connecting the wires on a standard PSU to get a Dell back to life.
That's how Dell lost me (Score:2)
Yep. I battled with a Dell PE2650 with a PERC 3Di controller which never really worked under Linux 2.6 (it couldn't keep up with the faster I/O without going offline). Trying to retrofit another SCSI co
Reboot ? (Score:5, Funny)
Dell's problem (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But Dell isn't after rocket science, its goal isn't to do R&D. Just like Walmart isn't going to offer top-cuisine, Dell isn't going to improve the computer. What made Dell big is selling computers dirt-cheap via the internet. Many people simply don't even look around to find a better deal, if they need a PC they go to Dell.
My take is that the bloatware
One change in direction that wouldn't go amiss (Score:3, Insightful)
For the love of god, stop loading up PCs with useless bloatware.
I've actually been buying Dells for a couple of yeaes now. My laptop and my last two desktops have both come from them. Since my student days ended and I got a job, I've found myself relatively cash rich but time poor. As a result of this, I've lost the patience I used to have for building my own PCs and ironing out the kinks and have come to appreciate the option of paying a little more to have somebody do it for me, while still being able to pick which components I want. I take it for granted that when I buy a new PC from Dell, it will, out of box, be slow, unstable and full of 30 day trials for software that only a gibbering moron could ever want to use. I therefore backup the drivers folder, format the hard disk and reinstall XP (I find that the amount of crap Dell are bundling is growing so fast that even the decrappifier doesn't cut it any more).
However, this is not the experience that a lot of people are looking for when they buy a new PC and many people don't have a clue how to go about reinstalling an operating system. All they know is that their new Dell PC, which they've probably paid slightly over the going rate for, is slow as hell, to the point of being painful to use. The further from the cutting edge the system you buy, the worse the problem seems to be, as Dell give no thought to performance in deciding which particular crap to inflict - they just pile it all on.
Case in point - my parents bought a new laptop last year, to keep in a villa they own. It's only going to be used for 6-10 weeks each year, for web-browsing and a few basic office-type apps. Therefore, they picked up one of the bargain-basement Inspirons. A few days later, I get a call asking for help with it. This laptop (a Centrino 1.4, if I remember, with 512 RAM) was taking *6 minutes* to start up completely from the moment you hit the power switch. Fortunately, I was able to talk them through reinstalling XP over the phone, at which point the startup time came down to about 90 seconds.
Not everybody is going to have access to somebody who can talk them through this. In most cases, people are just going to make a note never to buy another Dell again. I fail to see how the small premium that Dell gets paid for crippling its systems like this can even vaguely resemble a valid long-term strategy.
Re:One change in direction that wouldn't go amiss (Score:5, Informative)
2) Lots of people ARE gibbering idiots.
3) Many people have low expectations of PCs
4) They are quite likely to blame software problems on MS anyway.
5) Corporate buyers will do a clean re-install anyway.
6) Home users will probably have the machine just as bloated with malware in a week anyway. The is the reason for 3 above.
Re: (Score:2)
2) Lots of people ARE gibbering idiots.
3) Many people have low expectations of PCs
4) They are quite likely to blame software problems on MS anyway.
5) Corporate buyers will do a clean re-install anyway.
6) Home users will probably have the machine just as bloated with malware in a week anyway. The is the reason for 3 above.
All of this is true*. Its sad that there apparently is no profit in a mass produced consumer
Re: (Score:2)
If Microsoft told the big OEM's that they had to stop installing this crap or risk being charged more for windows (or whatever penalty Microsoft uses with them when they do something MS doesn't like), the OEM's would have no choice but to comply. Microsoft would win because they don't get t
Re: (Score:2)
This is one of the many problems that Vista rectifies.
Too cheap (Score:2)
Oh, and stop putting stupid blu
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
The register analysis (Score:5, Interesting)
In summary, nothing, as Michael Dell has been actively involved in all decisions anyway, and is at least equally responsible for Dell's downfall.
Re: (Score:2)
But investors won't read the Reg article and will likely stop selling for a while because they think Dell is going to do a turn-around. And that has real value - after all, it's a public company - they're in the business of stock price as much as computers.
I think the real problem is computers are about as cheap as they can be without redefining what goes into a c
Wish Dell or someone would go where HP used to be (Score:5, Insightful)
Just once I wish some large manufacturer somewhere would adopt the stance that HP used to have, back when Hewlett and Packard were running the show. Back before Queen Bitch of the Universe took over:
Uncompromising quality.
Damn near everything they did was done right, and when it wasn't, they went to great lengths to fix it.
Quality costs money, but you know what? I buy for the long term. I'd rather pay 2-3x up front for something that'll last a lifetime. I'll do that even for equipment that might be obsolete in 5 years because at least I'll know that it simply won't fail in those 5 years because it's built right.
Computers are harder to do that way, of course, because of the rapid pace of technological advancement, but a good design could make replacement of those bits easy while allowing you to retain the rest. Things like keyboards, mice, cases, power supplies, etc. can be built solid and built to last a very long time because the technology behind them doesn't really change much. As an example, I'm sure many of us here still make use of old IBM buckling-spring keyboards, the kind that are 15+ years old and work as well now as they did when they were new. That's the kind of quality I'm talking about.
And yet, you basically can't find anyone who builds things that well anymore. It's not "profitable" or some such crap. But I say that's bullshit. HP managed to get away with it until its founders let go of the reins. They had their up times and down times during the reign of their founders, but their customers were loyal because HP could be relied upon to do it right.
Maybe I'm just looking at things through rose colored glasses, but I still have my HP 41CX and 11C calculators as proof that the equipment they built really was built to last. But who builds things that way these days? Nobody I know of. Not even HP.
That's something that I think needs to change. I just wish someone would step up to the plate...
Re:Wish Dell or someone would go where HP used to (Score:3, Interesting)
I understand the sentiment, but I won't pay much more at this point. I turn over laptops every 18-24 months, and *for my needs* it's just not worth putting too much extra in for a better built unit. Others will of cou
Re: (Score:2)
My laptop upgrades tend to get smaller and smaller, it'd be hard to swap out components and end up with something physically smaller without completely replacing the machine anyway.
Re:Wish Dell or someone would go where HP used to (Score:2)
You're only going to get that from some place that's not run as a public company by a fleet of low-rent MBA's. When you have three hundred nattering nabobs walking around saying "We've got to drive the cost out of this thing" you get what we have today. It's made worse when the items are commoditized. HP used to be run by the engineers, but not any more. You see where that got you.
If you step out of the commo
Distorted Visions (Score:5, Interesting)
Just Reformat the C: Drive (Score:2, Funny)
. . . and reinstall Windows.
Everyone knows that fixes ANYTHING that's wrong with a Dell - just ask their customer support team!
Dell Hell (Score:2, Interesting)
Things DELL should change (Score:5, Insightful)
2.Hire technical support people that know something about computers. And let them have the power to do real technical support instead of insisting that they follow the checklists.
3.Don't use proprietary hardware. More specifically, all components inside the machines should be standard as much as possible (for example, use standard PSUs with standard pinouts and not proprietary ones with custom DELL pinouts). Would make it easier for DELL to just switch suppliers if they e.g. decided that brand x power supplies sucked and brand y were better. This gives DELL negotiation power over suppliers (whereas if they had a custom PSU, the company that makes them has more leverage since the costs to have another company continue to make the custom PSU are expensive relatively speaking)
4.This also extends to software. Do not use any proprietary drivers. All hardware should use the same drivers as you would use if you bought the hardware in a box from a retail store. All drivers should have separate installers included directly with the machine and/or be available to download from the web site such that it is possible to install a normal non DELL non OEM copy of Windows on the DELL machine and not have hardware that wont work right because the only way to get the drivers is to install the special DELL version of windows.
5.Tone down the crap that is pre-installed. All spyware should be removed completely. All demos and time limited software should have uninstall options and also any limitations in the software (such as anti-virus programs with shorter subscription lengths than retail boxed copies have) should be clearly documented.
Re: (Score:2)
Every helpdesk I had the mispleasure of calling is guilty of that. "Don't use proprietary hardware"
The PSU is my brother's Dimension 4600 desktop (purchased in late 2003) failed and we replaced it with an off-the-shelf 450-watt unit. Works fine. "Tone down the crap that is pre-installed"
Amen to that. The Dimensions I mentioned above had so much crap preinstalled, it certainly didn't feel like it was powered by a Pentium4. It'
oops... where did my formatting go (Score:2)
Every helpdesk I had the mispleasure of calling is guilty of that.
"Don't use proprietary hardware"
The PSU is my brother's Dimension 4600 desktop (purchased in late 2003) failed and we replaced it with an off-the-shelf 450-watt unit. Works fine.
"Tone down the crap that is pre-installed"
Amen to that. The Dimensions I mentioned above had so much crap preinstalled, it certainly didn't feel like it was powered by a Pentiu
Re: (Score:2)
The ones that sound promising over the phone normally are your worst nightmare. They tend to do too much their own way, and since 90% of all problems are in the top 10 of problems already known and solved, you want the customer to do *exactly* what you want.
"2.Hire technical support people that know something about computers. And let them have the power to do real technical support instead of insisting that they follow the chec
Re: (Score:2)
bloated crap...is there anyway..... (Score:2)
i dont want all that crap. i am buying from them and therefore i should get the say. i say if someone specifically asked for not to have all that bloat then whats the problem in meeting that?
As long as their employees hate working there... (Score:2)
$0.02USD,
-l
What a liar (Score:2)
Would you take over the day-to-day reins of the company again?
I'd have to give them up first. I haven't stopped being involved with the company all the time.
But taking over as CEO?
No. [CEO Kevin Rollins] and I run the company together. I haven't changed that, and I'm not going to change that.
Tough spot to be in (Score:2)
Dell lost lean SupplyChain early mover advantage (Score:2)
GateWay and Dell were the first to pitch PCs to the general public this way.
No Bricks and mortar inventory costs helped too.
Once Compaq and Hp joined them in the 'race to the bottom' Dell started to lose that early-mover (and pricing)advantage. Notice that IBM bowed out of the PC market at about this time....PCs and to some extent servers have been pretty much commodotized at this point...
Out
Look outside? (Score:2)
I doubt it. (Score:2)
"We love Linux, and we're doing our best to support the Linux community. We see lots of opportunity there. If the Linux desktops could converge at their cores, such a common platform would make it easier to support. Or, if there was a leading or highly preferred version that a majority of users would want, we'd preload it."
Re: (Score:2)
You bought these via a corporate account? So these were not normal costumer pcs? Then it's really bad, they just annoy their biggest costumers like hell. They know that any corporation will not even use AOL or 30-day symantec trials. Which system admin will keep on buying corporate amounts of dells if he has to work many extra hours to remove the software they put on there. Actually, this will make dells much more expensive if you calculate t