Some Ways To Avoid Spam On Gmail 308
jafo writes "In general, Gmail has been extremely spam-free. More recently, however, it's gotten dramatically worse. I've written up some thoughts on Gmail spam and keeping the spam down. Want less spam on Gmail (and likely others)? Try generating an account name using "apg -M L -t"."
I hate my postman!! (Score:5, Funny)
Now, since that my address is 1 Aardvark Avenue, Australia; I am the first person that gets his mail delivered off the truck.
So just as I go out the door on my way to work, he drives up - delivers my mail (very dramatically) and yells "FIRST POST"
Re:I hate my postman!! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I hate my postman!! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I hate my postman!! (Score:4, Insightful)
The point is that information is not always shared in the way we think it will be shared - whenever there is a human contact in the process, then there is the chance that your details will be made public. It might a postman, your ex-wife, a workmate, etc.
You never really know when your details are made available to the spammers, but more often than not it is a 'harmless' passing on of details, that does the damage.
Great (Score:5, Funny)
Amateur! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Amateur! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Amateur! (Score:4, Insightful)
Maybe that could be a solution, use a sub domain as the actual mail address, and just prepend abuse@ as the address, so instead of spam-me-not@domain.com you'd use abuse@spam-me-not.domain.com.
Those buggers won't be able to figure out which addresses are 'safe' to spam, and which ones may quite likely bring down hell upon their little minds.
Re:Amateur! (Score:3, Insightful)
PS: JavaBear... I'm shocked that someone with such an old account is someone I've never heard of before. Drop me a line sometime.
Re:Amateur! (Score:2)
Re:Amateur! (Score:2)
I have 12 gmail accounts, and the ones that have "normal" words and names in them get loads of spam. But the other, stranger names get none. And I have given the addresses out equally (to a select few people).
Re:Amateur! (Score:2, Funny)
Why?
Multiple personality disorder?
Re:Amateur! (Score:2)
guessing names spamming (Score:5, Insightful)
just my experience..
Its going to get worse though. As more people use it and when it goes out of beta and some spammers can start getting accounts and testing...
Heck I have a domain with one email addess (which is a catch all). I've never ever given out the address, yet I get spam there... Lots of it.
Its making email so much less usefull
Re:guessing names spamming (Score:5, Informative)
Here's the tweaks I used [slashdot.org]
Re:guessing names spamming (Score:5, Informative)
Re:guessing names spamming (Score:2)
Where the webmail interface really strikes (in addition to normal webamil advantages) is with things like conversation grouping and the search feature. I have to use Outlook 2k at work - and gmail is vastly superior, despite it's web-based nature.
Re:guessing names spamming (Score:2)
I run an email service, and it cracks me up everytime I get an email like this:
"Hi, Please cancel my account - john. It gets way too much spam!"
Umm yeah, SpamAssassin is good, but not that good.
I avoid spam on gmail! (Score:5, Insightful)
SpamAssassin is catching nearly 100% of the spam bound for my regular personal email account. I don't need Google's help with that.
Re:I avoid spam on gmail! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I avoid spam on gmail! (Score:2)
This article could be "How to avoid spam on Yahoo" - just don't bother with Yahoo.
(how'd you guess my profession anyway?)
Re:I avoid spam on gmail! (Score:2)
The grouping of replies is very nice. The rest is available in some fashion in other mail clients.
RTFA (Score:2)
First of all, I'll say that none of the messages which were marked as spam were legitimate messages. However, I'm not using these accounts very heavily yet. All of them have received under 10 legitimate messages since I set them up. So far, Gmail is doing a good job of classifying the spam.
Your homebrew setup is no better off than a stock GMail account. And I don't have to maintain my o
Re:RTFA (Score:2)
Why this useless blog entry actually made it onto
It's a brain dead article. Yes, I read it. It should be filed under the "Well, duh.." category.
Re:RTFA (Score:2)
Your homebrew setup is no better off than a stock GMail account. And I don't have to maintain my own SpamAssassin, GMail does it for me.
You might be amazed what you can do with a combination of SPF, SpamAssassin, and procmail. I cut out anywhere from 25% to 75% of my spam depending on the day, and all it took was an up-front time investment of a couple hours to save many many hours later on.
My test (Score:5, Informative)
I havn't used or given it out to anbody, the spam folder gets about 25 messages a day. Luckly google has done a perfect job with marking them all spam.
Re:My test (Score:2)
My name is particular enough that when you search for it on google (i.e.: "Firstname Lastname"), almost all returned links are relevant so it wouldn't seem to me that auto-generated addresses should easily match and yet I get spam into my gmail inbox
Boggles the mind...
Re:My test (Score:2)
6 of the 29 actually have my username in there, and most of the others are seemingly valid usernames that are close to mine in the alphabet. I suppose that since my username is short, and I've used it
Re:My test (Score:2)
I wish that gmail
Re:My test (Score:2)
Suggestions will not work (Score:3, Interesting)
Gmail spam (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Gmail spam (Score:2, Informative)
If you use Mozilla 1.7.x or Firefox, you can install URIid [mozdev.org]. Then add this line to your userContent.css (or you can get ChromEdit [mozdev.org]):
Of course, feel free to add any CSS.
A good article, but... (Score:5, Insightful)
And while the same techniques are used to try and stop spammers from finding your account, there aren't any gmail specific ideas, which is what I hoped I would find int he article.
suuuuureee (Score:5, Funny)
This helps to get less email from your friends as well.
Re:suuuuureee (Score:3, Funny)
I was just wondering why I don't get any mail from them even though I DO have a simple username...
Then I realized...
ouch
Password generator (Score:5, Interesting)
The key to good password generation is allowing the user to describe how it's to be done. This increases the ability to memorize passwords and makes it harder for an attacker to guess.
To that end, I have created a sort of reverse regular expression syntax where you describe the password to the program using general patterns. Try it out.
Re:Password generator (Score:2)
Re:Password generator (Score:2)
and th
My experience (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:My experience (Score:2)
I've given up all hope. If they guessed my full name, then they're guessing everything. Might as well go publish my e-mail address on usenet! :)
Re:My experience (Score:2)
When gmail started putting the spam count in brackets I was getting 6500 spam emails every 30 days.
For the last month or so it has been around 3500 for 30 days.
Gmail misses 10 a day and gives me a few false positives a month. The false positives would definitely be spam to most people. I wish they would i
Spam vs False Positivies (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Spam vs False Positivies (Score:2)
check this email addy .. (Score:5, Interesting)
http://www.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijkl
most spammers won't think you're serious.
Re:check this email addy .. (Score:2, Insightful)
Yes, but (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Yes, but (Score:2, Funny)
Spam, by nature... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Spam, by nature... (Score:2)
Re:Spam, by nature... (Score:2)
Re:Spam, by nature... (Score:2)
Re:Spam, by nature... (Score:2)
When you die, you stop sending e-mail.
Re:Spam, by nature... (Score:2)
When you die, you stop sending e-mail.
Unless you use Eliza to send replies...
TOP SOFTWARE... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:TOP SOFTWARE... (Score:2)
Re:TOP SOFTWARE... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:TOP SOFTWARE... (Score:2, Interesting)
A couple of tips:
- you almost always want to have "...and sender is not in my address book" as part of the filter expression.
- For definite spam, I set the actions as "delete" AND "delete from server". This is particularly useful for webmail or other non-archiving clients. In my case I check my email from both Windows and Linux
What Spam? (Score:2, Insightful)
- IP
Re:What Spam? (Score:2)
This is my experience, too. Out of the hundred or so spam messages I have received thus far, not a single one has escaped my spam folder. Also, no false positives, yet.
BTW, doesn't GMail allott invites based on how much mail you receive? I have ten invites right now, the most I've ever had.
More Useless News (Score:4, Insightful)
Listen, spammers use dictionary attacks. They'll send their turdlets to any number of common names and words and variations thereof. It's the same for any email domiain. The phenomena certainly isn't unique to Gmail. You see it taking place on just about every ISPs mail servers. And God knows it's no big revelation that if your email address is hard to guess then you'll get less spam. For Pete's sake! I can't believe how lame this is. This is one of the lamest stories on slashdot I've seen in quite some time.
My take on it (Score:2, Informative)
On the other hand, Gmail marks every last one of them correctly.
Re:My take on it (Score:2)
I do this regularly (well a URL monitor does it for me) as a precaution. A few months ago, Google told me that I had accidentally posted my real address on a forum, and I pleaded with the webmaster to remove it.
They took it down, and that email address still only receives ~1 unsolicited email a week, usually from a friend with a virus.
Re:My take on it (Score:2)
Use apg to generate a username! (Score:4, Funny)
Username: sds#SFD#4sdv_sd
password: johnsmith
That is gonna screw those crackers!
Every spam I've gotten @ gmail recently... (Score:3, Informative)
Maybe they're using botnets (Score:2, Insightful)
I have an alternative approach (Score:3, Interesting)
That way all the spam I get should start going to my GMail account thereby leaving my real email account (hosted on my home server) free for me to use with friends and family etc. (It's been 100% spam free in the nine months I've been using it)
Previously I'd been using a "throwaway" domain name I bought specially for this (which gets redirected to a real account) but it's due for expiry soon and, now I have a GMail account, it can go ! So my top tip of the week is get several free web mail accounts and use them for everything but your private stuff.
And on this note I'd never use my GMail account for any private stuff as, fer fecks sake, they're a SEARCH company. How long do you think it'll be before their new corporate shareholder overlords start doing some real intensive data mining on all your GMails ?
"But dude, their motto is do no evil" I hear you squeak. Sorry, they're a publically listed company and will do whatever "the market" tells them to do...
Re:I have an alternative approach (Score:2)
http://www.spamgourmet.com
It creates useable/disposable email addresses that are self-timed to destruct after a certain number of replies to the address. Very elegant solution to avoid the problems you describe.
I use it all the time when signing up for forums, ordering online, etc... with no problems.
hth,
jeff
Published addresses? (Score:4, Informative)
Doesn't matter if your account is simply garbage, as long as someone can spider it on the web. All honor to the dictionary attack, but as we all know, it doesn't take very long [slashdot.org] before someone finds your account on the web. Also, there are ways to prevent this [slashdot.org].
I never have my mailto clickable, and I use combinations of images to display it.
For those without apg (Score:4, Informative)
I don't know about you, but suggesting people selecting rheyghyab@gmail as their email address seems pretty stupid to me. Granted, spammers will have a hard time guessing it, but everybody else will have a hard time remembering it.
Re:For those without apg (Score:2)
My spam poisioner that generates email addresses for harvester bots makes email addresses like that.
every harvester bot will get 100 email addresses like the usernames you mentioned on every page they hit on my sites.
Also, I am certianly not the only one doing this as I am using a project from sourceforge do do this, so making usernames like that is not effective.
Re:For those without apg (Score:2)
tango-yankee-zulu-echo-romeo-kilo-alfa@gmail.co
Don't be a doof (Score:2)
Best bet for anti-spam (Score:4, Informative)
And it's totally free!
http://www.jetable.org/en/index [jetable.org]
Spam activity after Ebay (Score:2, Funny)
Hiding email (Score:2)
But your email worths nothing if noone knows it, and if enough people knows it in a way or another, at the very least some will be infected by worms or be part of botnets that will share your hard-
A few key words might do the trick (Score:2, Informative)
worse? (Score:2)
That is, unless, your referring to the 3-4 spam messages my Gmail account gets per week.
Free Invites (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Free Invites (Score:3, Informative)
Single use "+" syntax? (Score:3, Informative)
Of course sooner or later spammers will learn to remove the + part. Then still putting periods at arbitrary places of your gmail u.s.ern.ame remains
Personally, I *don't* like that feature of google (Score:2)
Secondly, I've been noticing this week in the spam folder, that I'm getting a lot of copies of the exact same message, sent to myusernameXX where XX are just two random numbers.
So now, instead of getting one copy of any given spam consuming my storage, I'm getting multiple copies sent to invalid addresses that just happen to start with my username.
was gmail ever really spam-free/proof? (Score:3, Insightful)
or is it that now that there are so many email addresses @ gmail, any random 6-8 character string @ gmail.com is likely to match up with *somebody*, so just flooding the system will get some through.
gmail, like hotmail, will become a victim of its own success very quickly.
I get tons of spam in Gmail but (Score:2)
Once something is flagged as spam it appears to flag it for everyone (least it looks like what it is doing). As spam dealing goes, Gmail has to be one of the best.
I'd like less false positives (Score:2)
Re:Hey Bob can I get your email... (Score:5, Funny)
Sure, it's "tiasi54ffcb44334bcvxw53ezz3wr@gmail.com," that is t as in this, r as in really, i as in is, a, s as in stupid, i as in idea...
Hey, I wanted this gmail adress... dammit, the good names are always gone when I want to register something...
Re:Hey Bob can I get your email... (Score:2)
Re:Hey Bob can I get your email... (Score:3, Funny)
Wow, not only do you make it really difficult to memorize, you also spell it wrong when you give it out! Pure genius! I'll bet you never have to worry about any mail!
Re:Name (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Name (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Name (Score:2)
Burn, karma, burn!
Re:My gmail address has only been used to register (Score:3, Funny)
My gmail address has only been used to register a troll account on Slashdot
Is it Anonymous.Coward@gmail.com?
Re:My gmail address has only been used to register (Score:2)
Re:How Gmail is really delivering (Score:2, Informative)
Re:How Gmail is really delivering (Score:2)
Re:How Gmail is really delivering (Score:4, Insightful)
NO, you're completely wrong. I get lots of spam addressed to names close alphabetically to mine at my ISP, which is not GMail.
There may be one name in the "To:" header, and hundreds of similar ones were in the "BCC:" header, which is not transmitted along with the message. However each of the "BCC" addresses generates a new message at the mail server which has the name attached to the "envelope" of the message, which is dropped when it's delivered to your mailbox.
Re:How Gmail is really delivering (Score:2)
That is not how SMTP works [faqs.org]. To an SMTP server everything that you see in your email reader (headers and all) is simply the message itself. The typical SMTP server pays no real attention to the typical email header, although often it will add a couple of lines. It delivers mail based on the SMTP commands, which are never added to the email itself.
An example copied from the FAQ page ('r' is the server and 's' is the clien
Maybe offer to pay them, (Score:2)
presuming you are getting email free from Google ?
Re:the bad part is false positives (Score:2, Interesting)
The false positives is becoming an increasing problem for me also. I use GMail for mailing-lists, and more of the messages from those lists are now falling foul of the GMail spam-filters. The lists which show particular failures in this regard are debian-user and vim-user.
I had hoped that there would be some way of keeping those messages from the GMail filter, but of course there isn't one. Bizarrely enough, the system was much better at the false-positives, it seems to have gotten worse as the volume of a