Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Virtualization Software The Almighty Buck IT

After Complaints, VMware Revises VSphere 5 Licensing 80

Posted by timothy
from the think-of-them-as-pretend-instances dept.
msmoriarty writes "Three weeks after IT shops began complaining loudly that the licensing changes with vSphere 5 would cost them significantly more, VMware has revised the requirements (although not as much as some users would like)."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

After Complaints, VMware Revises VSphere 5 Licensing

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 06, 2011 @09:13AM (#37007032)

    ARE YOU FOR REAL?

    Yes, corporations try to to make as much money as they can. That's what they do.

  • by Courageous (228506) on Saturday August 06, 2011 @11:05AM (#37007836)

    It's worse than you say.

    It's not RAM they are licensing to you, it's vRAM, which means memory that you've allocated to the VM's, but may not be using. vRAM is calculated by summing up the allocated memory of each virtual machine. Which is to say, after spending years saying, "but our product is better than our competitors, because you can oversubscribe your memory," they have now said "gotcha!". This move was A) evil, as they told customers with fully paid up maintenance contracts "no, we won't honor the contract, you'll have to buy more product," and B) stupid, as the licensing model directly undermines one of VMware's principal advantages.

    C//

Due to lack of disk space, this fortune database has been discontinued.

Working...