Are the Days of Individual Security Over? 125
angry tapir writes "People solely relying on patching and upgrades are lulling themselves into a false sense of security, and individual protection is no longer sufficient in the age of multi-vector attacks, according to the president of the Australian Internet Industry Association. According to AIIA's Peter Coroneos, vendors need to intervene at the network level and provide security tools at multiple levels to help secure people from the variety of threats that are emerging."
Re:Oh and by the way..... (Score:4, Informative)
That's completely untrue despite being a common lie to justify modern alcohol taboos.
Wines were cut when served. The strength of the uncut wine was extremely dependent on the degree of delusion at the time of serving. The uncut wine was stronger than common table wines today. The cut wine was commonly stronger than your typical modern beer. Realistically, wine served then commonly had the alcohol content somewhere between modern beer and modern table wines.
Furthermore, as you can read in my post below, its believed one of the reasons Jesus was asked to create more wine is because they were not properly cutting the wine for the guests, making it extra potent.
Furthermore, it is well understood, the more drinks one had, traditionally, the less cut and therefore more potent the drink. This is because wines then had strong flavors of tar and pitch and cutting made it less offensive. But once had had become joyful, the need to cut the drink became substantially reduced. Such things don't happen, if as you suggest, intoxication is all but impossible.
There is what is commonly taught and widely believed from churches, and then there is the truth...