Security Guards, Alarm Companies Object to Australia's National Fiber Network 156
natecochrane writes "Australia's proposed high-speed National Broadband Network has put the fate of more than a million security alarm systems that alert Australians to fire, home invasion, break-in and medical emergency in limbo pending the building of a simulated test bed next year. A group that represents security guards and those that supply monitored alarms has concerns that ranged from the inconvenient ('angry customers woken by their alarm systems beeping' during a nightly NBN upgrade) to life-threatening in the case of medical alarms, its CEO said. 'Under the fibre-optic system there won't be that redundancy and backup [from the copper phone system]. So if it goes down no one will know,' ASIAL CEO Bryan de Caires said."
Re:Really about kickbacks (Score:3, Informative)
I don't know about Australia, but here most people pay a flat rate for phone service. They don't pay per call. So what incentive would telecoms have to give kickbacks to alarm companies?
Correct me if in fact in Australia customers pay per phone call or per minute.
Charge is per call for local calls. Time charges on non-local calls. Back when I worked on traffic signals we could get hard wired leased lines for $300 AUD a year from Telstra within a single exchange area. Our gear was located to minimise the cost of the leased lines. That was two actual strings of conducting copper, point to point. You don't see that these days.
Re:Really about kickbacks (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Is 3g the answer? - no (Score:3, Informative)
For mission critical or life threatening services a simple 3g service would provide the necesacery backup, or just dual FO connections pointed at different NTU's on seperate networks.
HIGH AVAILABILITY DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
Simple redundant comm paths might get you as far as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_availability#Percentage_calculation [wikipedia.org] 99% availability or, with some engineer finagling, even 99.9% availability. That means that on average such a system might be non-working anywhere from 8.5 hours to more than 3.5 days in the course of a year.
The copper telephone network systems requires a level of availability that defined the term "carrier grade" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier_grade [wikipedia.org], aka 99.999% available. That means they might be non-working for little more than 5 minutes during an entire year.
That's a huge difference.
People misunderstanding redundancy claim (Score:3, Informative)
People on here are misunderstanding the claim of redundancy.
What the guy is talking about is with the POTS, your telco has giant battery and generator warehouses that can run the entire city grid for 48+ hours in the event of power outage. Normally, this is not the case with fibre, especially at all of the junctions.
Re:But on he other hand (Score:3, Informative)
PING (Score:2, Informative)
lol (Score:5, Informative)