Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government Networking IT Technology

State of Virginia Technology Centers Down 190

bswooden writes "Some rather important departments (DMV, Social Services, Taxation) in the state of Virginia are currently without access to documents and information as a technology meltdown has caused much of their infrastructure to be offline for over 24 hours now. State CIO Sam Nixon said, 'A failure occurred in one memory card in what is known as a "storage area network," or SAN, at Virginia's Information Technologies Agency (VITA) suburban Richmond computing center, one of several data storage systems across Virginia.' How does the IT for some of the largest departments in a state come to a screeching halt over a single memory card? Oh, and also, the state is paying Northrup Grumman $2.4 billion over 10 years to manage the state's IT infrastructure." Reader miller60 adds, "Virginia's IT systems drew scrutiny last fall when state agencies reported rolling outages due to the lack of network redundancy."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

State of Virginia Technology Centers Down

Comments Filter:
  • HA fail (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 27, 2010 @12:03PM (#33393622)
    How does a fault in a single SAN controller cause an outage of the entire data storage network? Expensive SAN solutions are expensive & highly redundant for reason. This smells like a "Let's buy the cheaper solution" and/or an infrastructure design fail.
  • Re:card? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by snookerhog ( 1835110 ) on Friday August 27, 2010 @12:06PM (#33393644)
    sounds like nobody in Virginia knows either
  • Awful. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by boneclinkz ( 1284458 ) on Friday August 27, 2010 @12:11PM (#33393716)
    Our primary concern should be a complete audit of World of Warcraft server hardware, to ensure that this vulnerability does not exist in other, more vital networks.
  • by Daniel_Staal ( 609844 ) <DStaal@usa.net> on Friday August 27, 2010 @12:14PM (#33393764)

    Add in politics: Get a couple of representatives arguing over where the money (if any) should be spent, and all possibility of real redundancy and fault-tolerance go out the window.

    It's true in larger government organizations than this. The failures just haven't occurred yet.

  • Question. (Score:2, Insightful)

    by U8MyData ( 1281010 ) on Friday August 27, 2010 @12:15PM (#33393786)
    Umm, so what's the point of having a SAN if it weren't redundant? Me thinks there is more to this story.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 27, 2010 @12:17PM (#33393804)

    There's not a lot of money left over for redundancy after you take out the kickbacks, graft and bribes.

  • Re:Question. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by MightyMartian ( 840721 ) on Friday August 27, 2010 @12:25PM (#33393902) Journal

    Probably involving executives vacationing in nice tropical locales by rewarding themselves with hefty bonuses. Meanwhile some poor IT guys weren't given the budget that reflected how much the State was paying out, and had to cobble together a SAN solution, or pick the cheapest one off the shelf. The IT guys will, of course, be the patsies for this whole episode, with the CEO and CTO all huffing and puffing and vowing to State officials and lawmakers that they're doing everything they can to get to the bottom of this.

  • by cgenman ( 325138 ) on Friday August 27, 2010 @12:49PM (#33394250) Homepage

    Everyone seems to think that a network outage is no big deal, until the network goes down. That's when people start thinking of the burn rate of an entire organization sitting on their thumbs while that network of off-the-shelf Linksys routers is replaced by some kid at Best Buy. Or how that 5k dollars per year for a backup external line suddenly pales in comparison to the 5k dollars per hour your organization is wasting because you were a cheap bastard.

  • Re:HA fail (Score:2, Insightful)

    by g0bshiTe ( 596213 ) on Friday August 27, 2010 @12:53PM (#33394326)
    I live in Virginia, it's more like business as usual for a Commonwealth.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 27, 2010 @12:54PM (#33394334)

    That's insane. Terry Childs failed (he was arrested and unable to make changes to the network)--and the city kept running.

  • by Daniel_Staal ( 609844 ) <DStaal@usa.net> on Friday August 27, 2010 @01:20PM (#33394678)

    My 'preconceive bubble' is based on my current job for the US government, and the situation we have in our department.

    It might be true on average that government agencies are better at keeping their own infrastructure, especially if they can manage to keep their accounting and design of that infrastructure at a lower level. However, once those decisions pass the level from the internal to the external (or: From those hired for the job, to those elected/appointed into it), that long-term planning appears to break down, in favor of political squabbles.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 27, 2010 @01:32PM (#33394868)

    This is what Politics in VA is all about.

    Favors handed out; tax money wasted.; public screwed.

    Rinse and repeat.

  • Re:HA fail (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 27, 2010 @01:43PM (#33395014)

    Did the dude from the City of SF design this network so that if he wasn't there to SSH in with a modem he had hidden in his toaster over, the ram in a SAN would bring the whole network down?

    No he asked them repeatedly to buy a spare, which was denied, then he refused to yank it out of the live production system when another's department's boss said to give it to the chick he was banging so she could be a computer expert too.

  • I heard... (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday August 27, 2010 @01:53PM (#33395144)

    That they were going to do "Remediation" of the NAS when the problem started, and they had EMC guys on site, and everything. They must have killed the primary when they attached the secondary. Don't wait for a weekend outage window, lets just do it now on a Tuesday afternoon at 2pm. No one will know... oops....

  • Re:HA fail (Score:4, Insightful)

    by ultranova ( 717540 ) on Friday August 27, 2010 @04:15PM (#33397136)

    B-b-but you're saying that the bloated corrupt government that takes money from people at gunpoint and has no incentives for efficiency might have done a better job than a private contractor that works on the God-given free enterprise system that rewards efficiency and punishes waste!

    On the contrary, the free market did exactly as it was supposed to: it eliminated the inefficiency of redundant systems and a safety margin. Efficiency or the safety of redundancy, you can have one or the other but not both. That's why any important system should be managed by the government, and free enterprise should be limited to the role of logistical optimization it's actually good at.

    Unfortunately some people nowadays consider free market their religion, so we got deregulation and resulting financial crisis. Oh well...

  • Re:HA fail (Score:5, Insightful)

    by cgenman ( 325138 ) on Friday August 27, 2010 @05:46PM (#33398322) Homepage

    If you're big enough that you're not just going to be scaling staff up and immediately down again, hire your people in-house. It's not a question of government vs private companies. It's a question of hiring your best people to be on staff, or outsourcing to someone who doesn't have the same motivations. This is true if you're a government, a corporation, a private entity, or a high school marching band. Plus the markup on external IT services is just obscene.

    Poorly managed projects will be poorly managed internally or externally. But externally poorly managed projects are a lot more expensive, and harder to reign back under control.

Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.

Working...