KDE 4.1 Beta 1 Released 242
appelza contributed a link to Tuesday's announcement of the next step toward KDE 4.1: "The KDE Project is proud to announce the first beta release of KDE 4.1. Beta 1 is aimed at testers, community members and enthusiasts in order to identify bugs and regressions, so that 4.1 can fully replace KDE 3 for end users. KDE 4.1 beta 1 is available as binary packages for a wide range of platforms, and as source packages. KDE 4.1 is due for final release in July 2008." I haven't used KDE much for the past few years, but the screenshots of a "grown-up" plasma are enough to make me correct that.
Re:Ob (Score:4, Insightful)
At least its getting updated (Score:3, Insightful)
I dunno.... (Score:3, Insightful)
How many KDE3-guified apps are going to switch over to KDE4? I don't expect to see very many this year, but next year should be very telling regarding the desktop's popularity.
Is KDE Taking the Lead? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Nothing new (Score:2, Insightful)
Not that you shouldn't stick with 3.5 if you feel that best serves your needs.
Re:Is KDE Taking the Lead? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Is KDE Taking the Lead? (Score:2, Insightful)
Love the fact that we have competition on the desktop on Linux. It's our greatest blessing!
Re:Is KDE Taking the Lead? (Score:5, Insightful)
Some people feel that completely removing options is a good idea because they are looking to target corporations and limiting options makes support easier, but I have always felt that KDE's approach is much better. Give the users all the options they could imagine and then let them decide what is best. With KDE's approach you can always have some sort of locked down "corporate default" setting that would make support easier but with Gnome's approach what do you do when a user wants a feature that has been removed?
Re:Is KDE Taking the Lead? (Score:4, Insightful)
If anything, the big tragedy is all of the stuff that's now done by KDE/Gnome that should be done by non-X related systems. Wifi association, laptop power stuff, suspend/resume functionality, and so on... all of these things are now handled through Gnome and KDE subsystems to some degree, rather than handled by a non-X related program that communicates to some graphical widget.
There's been a big loss of separation between parts. It's a shame.
Re:Is KDE Taking the Lead? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Is KDE Taking the Lead? (Score:5, Insightful)
During this time, they used the opportunity to fix some long-standing issues and redesign some key components. Things were broken and in development for a long time, while the stable release 3.5.x went into bugfixing mode. Gnome was making steady improvements to their 2.x codebase this entire time.
KDE is only now starting to reap the fruits of this effort. The real power of the platform will become more obvious in the coming years.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:why dont most distros use kde? (Score:3, Insightful)
Gnome has a reputation for being more stable than KDE. On the downside it doesn't have as many features as KDE. (I'm on Gnome, I'm jealous of those sexy screenshots.)
Kind of makes sense that with most of the money coming from business they would rather have something more solid than feature-rich. But this is just a guess on my part.
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:other ob. (Score:3, Insightful)
obvious response: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:KDE mature enough to drop the annoying K prefix (Score:5, Insightful)
iThere iAre iTwo iOther iCompeting gschools gof gthough, i'll grant iou.
Re:Important Caveats (Score:4, Insightful)
If it was meant for bleeding-edge adopters, it should have been called alpha or beta. If it was meant for application developers, call it a release candidate, or split it into two projects and call this one "kdebase 4.0".
Calling it "KDE 4.0" was a mistake.
Re:Is KDE Taking the Lead? (Score:5, Insightful)
Bloat = many apps on a desktop, with few libs (Score:5, Insightful)
If you want to see bloat, look at the apps for any popular desktop that DOESN'T provide a solid, modern, complete core. Run any modern workflow, like quoting a webpage and editing photos to embed in your spell-checked word processor document, to email to someone whose name is all you can recall. Compare memory use, workflow, and integration, AFTER getting used to each desktop for a few months and learning all of the little integration features provided by each solution. I challenge anyone to do it on linux and find a desktop that beats KDE.
Re:Debian Lenny How-to kde4 (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:4.1 -- Now with no desktop icons! (Score:3, Insightful)
The desktop is covered by one or more windows most of the time, so how is it easier to move or minimize windows to launch a program or browse a directory? Any time one important thing is covered by another important thing, it's broken. That's why I hate desktop widgets, desktop icons, and windows that cover each other (not that I have a better idea for that last one).
From my perspective I think KDE 4.1 should put a lot more focus on Krunner (the run dialog). First, they should give it a quicker shortcut so it's easier to launch. I use ctrl-space. It's a better program launcher than icons on the desktop or the K menu because I just start typing the name and after a few letters I can hit enter and it launches. It handles web site bookmarks as well. If it worked that easily for directories and previously connected ssh sessions I'd be all set.
Re:Is KDE Taking the Lead? (Score:3, Insightful)
In the future you could have an automated system that changes according to the app you are using, You could have a plasmoid that displays a contents of a folder. Then you fire up a video-editor (for example), and the plasmoid switches to showing your video-files, or your project-folder or something like that.
The old way (which is still used by other systems) is really about "you can do it this way, and only this way".