Why Microsoft Will Never Make .NET Truly Portable 293
Michelle Meyers writes "Just days before Microsoft claimed to be making parts of the .NET CLR "available" to other platforms, NeoSmart Technologies had published an article bemoaning and blasting Microsoft's abuse of it's developers by pretending .NET was a true cross-platform framework when they're doing everything in their power to stop it from being just that. Of interest is NeoSmart's analysis of how Microsoft has no problem making certain portions of .NET available to Mac users — just so long as its distributed under an "open source" license that forbids any and all use of the code except for educational purposes — yet are terrified of the very thought of .NET being available to *nix users, even if that's to the benefit of .NET developers everywhere. Even more interesting is one of the comments on that article linking to legal documents in which Microsoft employees discuss the (im)possibility of creating a cross-platform code and UI framework, years before the .NET project even started!"
.Net Framework Portability (Score:3, Informative)
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/embedded/bb27810
It even looks as if some companies are making dev boards with it:
http://www.embeddedfusion.com/default.aspx?id=76 [embeddedfusion.com]
In talking with them (M$) it seems that you pay to port this framework to whatever platform you would like to take the framework to. This is with or without an operating system.
Cheers,
Bill
its, it's, IT (Score:2, Informative)
STOP whinging silverlight is coming to Linux! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:So C# is .Net? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:So C# is .Net? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: Why Microsoft Will Never Make .NET Truly Port (Score:5, Informative)
It seems to me that the popularity of
Re:Java (Score:5, Informative)
Instructing end users to install this and that
MS has made
Re:So don't use Swing? (Score:3, Informative)
Indeed. Here's a few:
Those are the ones off the top of my head. There are quite a few more out there in the wild.
Re:Well in that case... (Score:3, Informative)
BTW, any programmer worth his salt shouldn't have had a problem understanding what
To use the ob. car analogy: it's as though a car company tried to sell a new range of vehicles by pointing out how they all use the same chassis, and promoting the wonderful characteristics of Chassis 2.0. No-one who's not a car manufacturer really cares. The additional problem with
Re:So C# is .Net? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Java (Score:2, Informative)
When creating a virtual directory under IIS for apsx pages do you set the application up for Scripts or Scripts and Executables?
Answer.
You setup for scripts, well unless that fails in which case you have to setup for scripts + executables for no apparent reason leaving IIS vulnerable to a hacker dropping a cgi into the directory.
I've never had similar problems with Apache/Tomcat.
Re: Why Microsoft Will Never Make .NET Truly Port (Score:5, Informative)
I use both currently, and I can say that Eclipse may be way better than many IDEs, but Visual Studio.net isn't one of them.
Re:So C# is .Net? (Score:1, Informative)
Re:So C# is .Net? (Score:3, Informative)