Why Microsoft Will Never Make .NET Truly Portable 293
Michelle Meyers writes "Just days before Microsoft claimed to be making parts of the .NET CLR "available" to other platforms, NeoSmart Technologies had published an article bemoaning and blasting Microsoft's abuse of it's developers by pretending .NET was a true cross-platform framework when they're doing everything in their power to stop it from being just that. Of interest is NeoSmart's analysis of how Microsoft has no problem making certain portions of .NET available to Mac users — just so long as its distributed under an "open source" license that forbids any and all use of the code except for educational purposes — yet are terrified of the very thought of .NET being available to *nix users, even if that's to the benefit of .NET developers everywhere. Even more interesting is one of the comments on that article linking to legal documents in which Microsoft employees discuss the (im)possibility of creating a cross-platform code and UI framework, years before the .NET project even started!"
Re:Java (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Does it matter? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Does it matter? (Score:5, Funny)
Now it's just a runtime for a bytecode interpreted language. Whoopity-doo.
Re:Java (Score:2, Funny)
They fear the power of C, obviously.