File Sharing — Harmful to Children and a Threat to National Security 342
jkrobin writes to mention that a recent report from the US Patent office calls peer-to-peer file sharing harmful to children and a threat to national security. "Interestingly, the report makes numerous references to RIAA and MPAA legal actions against file actions, as well as cites a 2005 Department of Homeland Security report that government workers had installed file-sharing programs that accessed classified information without their knowledge."
Whereas: (Score:1, Insightful)
<sarcasm>You go USPTO!!!</sarcasm>
Stop the INSANITY! (Score:5, Insightful)
This is getting just stupid.
We live in a MEDIA driven State of Fear.
Hmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Pencils -- Harmful to Children etc. (Score:5, Insightful)
The Pencil manufacturing concerns of America, however, are resolved to work with the U.S. government to mitigate this crisis. Henceforth, all pencil purchases are tracked with a unique REAL ID-coordinated identifier. Authorized use of pencils will require a tiny microchip implanted under the skin of the right hand. A left-handed version of the chip is expected to be available before 2020--until then, pencil-using left-handed Americans will have to make the sacrifice of writing less legibly until the chip is available.
Wow, I'm really bored today.
Security of what? (Score:5, Insightful)
[snip]
Wait-- children AND terr'ists? (Score:2, Insightful)
Not the real issue.... (Score:5, Insightful)
It sounds like the network administrators in said "governmental offices" should take the precautions neccessary to police the bandwidth. Furthermore, any environment in which said p2p applications are capable of leaking any private information need to be under closer scrutiny.
Don't blame the p2p networks for the actions and negligence of those in control of their own computer infrastructure.
Since when is copyright infringement, and not massively-propagating worms and keyloggers, the problem for national security. The latter causes FAR more breeches of personal identity information and credentials.
Classified info (Score:5, Insightful)
Class (Score:4, Insightful)
If you produce that level of satire as a result, please be bored more often
Re:children (Score:3, Insightful)
Next up,
Websites, email, and ftp are also bad for children, and a threat to national security.
Re:Security of what? (Score:5, Insightful)
as always, personal responsibility is brushed aside in the name of hype.
Harmful to children (Score:5, Insightful)
Hmmm... well at least their glass houses get a lot of light.
Re:Pencils -- Harmful to Children etc. (Score:5, Insightful)
I mean, how dumb do you have to be to believe that because children could be manipulated into violating the law by some evil website designer, this has ANYTHING to do with national security?
Unless they think that when we fence off England and turn it into a giant prison island (I mean, they're already halfway there on the surveilance front) there won't be any young males left to fight our wars if we've put them all in jail for stealing copyrighted (copywrit?) items.
These MAFIAA people don't think like I do, and that scares me because they obviously don't have the same moral (in terms of what's right and what's wrong, not anything religious) standards that I do
Re:Classified info (Score:4, Insightful)
This is precisely what "trusted computing" is actually useful for.
There ARE times in which your computer should not trust you! These are times in which it's not really your computer - which is to say, when it belongs to your employer. And double-extra-when your employer is the government and you have access to classified information.
Re:children (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Classified info (Score:3, Insightful)
NISPOM chapter 8 specifies the requirements for a classified machine.
Whenever I set up a classified net, one of the last things I do before I get certified is to yank the internet connection. All classified nets should be physically isolated.
Also, all software changes to a classified computer must be logged. Ordinary users should not have permissions to install such items, and any attempt to do so should be logged as a potential security risk. I would think that the network/sysadmins of these systems are NOT doing their job properly.
Re:Classified info (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Pencils -- Harmful to Children etc. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Whereas: (Score:5, Insightful)
> into a specialized machine. Clearly a unique specialized
> machine should be patentable.
No the general purpose machine is the patentable invention. Specific information (ie: software) should be protected by copyright. Pure software is not patentable and all software is pure software.
Re:Stop the INSANITY! (Score:5, Insightful)
Americans are so easily manipulated. They have been so conditioned by advertising it's not even funny.
Re:Stop the INSANITY! (Score:5, Insightful)
Senators who don't keep file sharing software away from classified files (or don't actively restrict the software from sharing those files) are a security threat?
hmmm...
Wording could be important on this issue too.
Maybe what we want is for people to RTFM on some of the software they install on their machines. Senators are being paid enough to have a work machine that does not have crap on it. This is a modern world, and if people being elected into office can't keep up with it, they shouldn't be elected. Once they are there, it's there responsibility not to screw up on something stupid like that.
Someone else figure out the RIAA MPAA problem. They're beyond me.
Re:Pencils -- Harmful to Children etc. (Score:4, Insightful)
Or MTV or Elvis or the Beatles or JRR Tolkien or William Powell or Jazz or Margaret Sanger or DH Lawrence or Mark Twain or Henry David Thoreau or Nathaniel Hawthorne, etc, etc, etc.
Your children really will grow up in the same world you did, populated with the same idiots. So will your grandkids.
Re:Stop the INSANITY! (Score:3, Insightful)
just like rock'n roll in the 50s.. (Score:3, Insightful)
first, they ignore you
then, they laugh at you
then they fight you
then you win.
Re:Stop the INSANITY! (Score:0, Insightful)
Re:Whereas: (Score:5, Insightful)
To say that file sharing allows for children to have access to this or that harmful content, and be subject to other bad things, and to say that files can be put at risk and therefore risk the national security, it would not be a far stretch to understand that to allow one company to essentially enter every computer (as the computer is an extension of your home/business) as they are able to enter your home and business to search, inventory, and accuse (and ultimately with Vista shut down your home/business) then that company and it's product could be considered a threat to national security. P2P is not used solely by children and since it can be useful in business and government it is a lesser threat than that posed by one company having control of the computers of the world. You have unprecedented control and access which creates a major possibility of security threats, if not primarily by Microsoft then by some enterprising vicious terrorist hoping to exploit Microsoft's buggy OSes and buggy spy tools.
You can't go from P2P and the concept of access without going to Windows and WGA/WGN. Whatever applies to the concept of access over the Internet via P2P also extends to any product that could be used to yield the same type of invasive behavior that leads to stealing trade/national secrets be it by a controlling monopoly previously convicted in numerous nations of the world or by someone attempting to exploit the fact that exploits to tools like WGA/WGN could present unprecedented access to terrorists and the governments of other rogue nations.
Re:But seriously, folks (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Stop the INSANITY! (Score:3, Insightful)
"that peer-to-peer networks could manipulate sites so children violate copyright laws more frequently than adults, exposing those children to copyright lawsuits and, in turn, make those who protect their copyrighted material appear antagonistic"
So the risk is being blamed on the P2P networks, when it's in fact the RIAA/MPAA that are the cause of these frivilous lawsuits.
"file-sharing software could be to blame for government workers who expose sensitive data and jeopardize national security after downloading free music on the job"
It seems to me that it's not file-sharing software to blame, but the shitty sys/net admins that the government employs to "secure" the computers that contain this sensitive data. Call me crazy, but I'd think that with the use of Active Directory, even a dimwitted NT admin could setup a computer that wouldn't allow people to install software like this in the first place.
Just my $0.02
Re:Pencils -- Harmful to Children etc. (Score:2, Insightful)
"Sentence suspended if you join the army."
Re:Stop the INSANITY! (Score:4, Insightful)
Now, some departments do- the NSA, for example, has their own chip-fab, and probably runs homebuilt systems for certain top-secret applications. But the NSA also did SE-Linux, so they've shown (at least to me, and who the hell am I to decide) that they can actually handle it.
Re:Stop the INSANITY! (Score:1, Insightful)
The Horror (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Stop the INSANITY! (Score:5, Insightful)
War on Drugs: Nobody uses those any more right? We're all clean and sober now, nevermind those pesky Californians and their "medicinal" marijuana. They're just tree-hugging hippies with glaucoma and don't count.
War on Poverty: We cured that long ago, the incredible wages we pay our hard-working CEOs have been trickling down into the economy for some time and no one is poor any more and we all have health care and social security.
War on Christmas: Won! Wal-Mart now uses the wholesome Merry Christmas instead of the godless heathen phrase "Happy Holidays". Santa Claus is no longer banned from spreading the gospel to children by teaching them the joys of rampant consumerism and owning a tickle-me-elmo.
War on Terror: We invaded Iraq, so no more terrorists, right? A reliable source told me that the insurgency there is in the last throes. However, this is only if the democrats don't ruin it by not supporting our troops by refusing to allow any more to die in the middle of the non-civil war.
Translation (Score:2, Insightful)
#1 - File sharing is only as dangerous as the person running the software. If the user's a twit, don't blame the software, just replace them with a better user.
#2 - File sharing's risk can be controlled at the firewall, either keep an eye on it or shut it out completely. We're talking about offices here, places that have no legitimate reason to be using Limewire et al. in the first place.
#3 - Gov't employees have always had ways to leak information. Sometimes they toss stuff in the garbage without properly shredding confidential documents. Sometimes they get their notebook stolen. Sometimes they leave their passwords written on post-it notes stuck to their monitor. And sometimes they're just would-be spies taking bribes.
#4 - The more stuff gets legislated "out of existence", the more ways people will find to get around the law. They shut down Napster, so people started using decentralized networks. They could try to shut down P2P, we'll find a sneakier way to do it (already happening with encrypted VPN tunnels). How's the saying go ? If [thing] is outlawed, only outlaws will do [thing].
#5 - This is our goddamned government. This ain't a dictatorship or monarchy, it's a democracy. If these officials aren't acting in accordance with the people's needs, we need to fire the bastards!
Re:Stop the INSANITY! (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't think anybody has claimed potatoes yet, have they?
Drop the drunk image and take up potato chips instead.
Since my favorite band is the Corrs, you could also just start claiming that Ireland has the world's most beautiful women AND best bands (since you can claim U2 as well.)
Ireland has the world's best potatos, the most beautiful women, and the best rock bands!
Doesn't that sound better than "Ireland has the most drunks"?
(Even if Andrea has been caught on camera having to be helped out of a pub by her friends on occasion...compared to Tara Reid, that's nothing.)
This just in... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Stop the INSANITY! (Score:3, Insightful)
"You're My Engineer" - The Last Mimsy
Re:Stop the INSANITY! (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, which is why they claim file sharing is harmful to children since they will be sued and therefore harmed. Similar legislation exists for marijuana. Most of the problems associated with marijuana are caused by the fact that it is illegal (gangs, prison, drug dealers, etc.). Make file sharing (or marijuana) legal and you eliminate the harm caused by both. Unfortunately the RIAA would not profit from this so it becomes a tough decision for them. They can profit and harm children, or not profit and not harm children. Hell, they may as well cut the middle man and just sell kiddie porn.
Re:Security of what? (Score:3, Insightful)
We had a blast when we declassified the source code to the system we were working on. The program handled highly classified data, but there was no reason the algorithms themselves had to be controlled. The Air Force stood to save money by maintaining the code off-site in a non-classified facility. But every line of every file had to be gone through by an authorized person before it could be cleared and it was a large system.
We handled WINTEL data, which meant that it could be used to identify people in the field, people who could die (or worse) if their identities were compromised. Stupid mistakes like moving data without authorization undo all of the precautions we went to to protect that data and the people who collected it. I took my job very seriously and so did many of the people there.
And yes, when people brazenly break protocol when handling sensitive data, I think they should go to jail, the exception being protection for whistle-blowers.
Contrast that with the casual treatment of Valerie Plame.
Re:Stop the INSANITY! (Score:3, Insightful)
The sad part is the people who came up with this junk study already know this, so they truly are just caving to the RIAA/MPAA with their pathetic fear mongering.
Re:bogus and reality check (Score:4, Insightful)
As for wars, information is a critical part of what people fight over. Ever hear of all the "intelligence" failures that lead to Iraq? The whole case for war and all the reasons the US attacked were based within information.
I agree, tyranny and ignorance exist along a continuum. There is a huge middle ground that we can rest in where people will be happy. There is no need to chose one to avoid the other. Copyright, in principle is sound as an idea, the way it was initially framed. But in practice today, (c) is completely out of control. To lose access to information for a time period of (life of the author + 70 or 95 years), given a median human lifespan of about 70 years... this is effectively information tyranny. The information is never available for use in your lifespan. Your assertions that statements I write are "rhetoric" seem childish and transparent - they do not help your case.
I never asserted that all information is equal. It is clearly not. You put relative value of information in one class that you defined as lower than other categories. There is not one axis of value, but even if there were, each person would get to assign value to information, as they want. Who defined what information is in what category? You? RIAA? ISP filtering software? I don't accept your categorization of "entertainment" and you shouldn't accept my categories or values. As such, I reject your relative value scheme. Each individual has their own values.
Most movies are both art and business: very big $ business, and a remarkable art form. I don't judge what information private individuals want to exchange with each other. Who said anything about any of this being noble?
Users (Score:4, Insightful)
Odd... (Score:2, Insightful)
Should we just go ahead and abolish the free interchange of ideas while we're at it, so we can stop the sharing of such harmful ideas as "I think we should go home and beat our children" or "I think we should get together and resist our Tyrannical Opressors (TM)" and then just silently curse this minority that 'ruined free speech' for the rest of us?
Or should we recognize that govenment regulation of the exchange of information or ideas which, (although not being a lawyer) I could have SWORN was for forbidden by the first amendment, is the action of the corrupting influence of large amounts of what was originally, (ironically) OUR money which we gave to the RIAA/MPAA etc., when we purchased music and movies "legitimately" in the first place?
RIAA and MPAA are like DRUG ADDICTS, we gave them the drug, cash, we want to stop supplying them, but they are strung out and need more of the drug. Always they need more, and I think, if they could, they would be willing to kill (you or me) to get it. However, killing is generally still illegal, so they can't.
Seeing them pull the strings of our lawmakers telling us ultimately, that it is illegal for us to talk to one another is disenhartening to say the least.
~Hal
Re:Stop the INSANITY! (Score:3, Insightful)