Inside the Lucasfilm datacenter 137
passthecrackpipe writes "Where can you find a (rhetorical) 11.38 petabits per second bandwidth? It appears to be inside the Lucasfilm Datacenter. At least, that is the headline figure mentioned in this report on a tour of the datacenter. The story is a bit light on the down-and-dirty details, but mentions a 10 gig ethernet backbone (adding up the bandwidth of a load of network connections seems to be how they derived the 11.38 petabits p/s figure. In that case, I have a 45 gig network at home.) Power utilization is a key differentiator when buying hardware, a "legacy" cycle of a couple of months, and 300TB of storage in a 10.000 square foot datacenter. To me, the story comes across as somewhat hyped up — "look at us, we have a large datacenter" kind of thing, "look how cool we are". Over the last couple of years, I have been in many datacenters, for banks, pharma and large enterprise to name a few, that have somewhat larger and more complex setups."
300tb (Score:1, Insightful)
Submitter (Score:5, Insightful)
Well passthecrackpipe, if you and your vast knowledge of large scale datacenters are not impressed with the story, why the hell did you submit it?
Penis.... er.... Data Envy? (Score:2, Insightful)
And they drive to work at 2400mph (Score:3, Insightful)
This means
A) they can push their entire storage through the network in 300*8Tb/(11Pb/s)=200ms.
or
B) the article author does not have a clue.
I think an anlogy would be: I drive back and forth to work everyday, or 400 times a year. My speed on each trip is 60mph, so in a year my speed is 60x400 or 24000mph.
For all the knocks of this center (Score:3, Insightful)
What I have found funny is the number of ppl who are speaking of how big their centers. Offhand, I tend to suspect that those centers could go on a MAJOR f%^&ing diet and need to have their budgets cut to a fifth. And finally, it is time to fire a bunch of the incompetents who can not run a tight center.