Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Spam Government The Courts The Internet News

MySpace Sues Spam King 118

Harry Maugans writes to mention a lawsuit filed by MySpace against Scott Richter, the 'Spam King'. Filed under California's harsh anti-spam laws, the suit alleges that Richter sent millions of unsolicited 'bulletins' to MySpace users over the past few years. From the article: "The suit is aiming for monetary damages and an injunction that would permanently ban Richter and his affiliates from MySpace. The amount of money sought by MySpace has not been disclosed. Richter was already ordered to pay $7 million in a 2003 lawsuit filed by Microsoft after initially refusing to settle the dispute for $100,000. Microsoft announced in 2005 that it would be using the money from the settlement to fuel further antispam operations."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

MySpace Sues Spam King

Comments Filter:
  • by EveryNickIsTaken ( 1054794 ) on Tuesday January 23, 2007 @10:27AM (#17723098)
    Tom has had a class action suit leveled against him for sending out millions of unsolicited "friend" requests.
  • mmmm, spam (Score:5, Funny)

    by bsundhei ( 1053360 ) on Tuesday January 23, 2007 @10:30AM (#17723138)
    So is 'Spam King' the even cheaper version of Burger King?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 23, 2007 @11:05AM (#17723532)
    There is another way: it's hard to make a profit if you're dead.
  • by Lazerf4rt ( 969888 ) on Tuesday January 23, 2007 @11:26AM (#17723828)

    They interviewed this guy on the Daily Show [google.com] last year. Fun watch. He insisted he was not a "spammer" but rather a "high volume e-mail deployer". He also argued that people "want" to get the e-mails he deploys.

    I wonder how he will spin unsolicited bulletins sent from stolen MySpace accounts? "People enjoy receiving bulletins from their friends about valuable products and services. We just help them do that."

  • by C_L_Lk ( 1049846 ) on Tuesday January 23, 2007 @11:42AM (#17724012) Homepage
    Certainly, at least in the US, some spammers could be considered enemies of the state and enemy combatants, if they are spamming government email addresses and cause congestion or other undue strain on the mailboxes of government employees and staff members. So, just declare them an enemy combatant, they lose their rights as a citizen, they get moved to Guantanamo, the suspected terrorists they share quarters with find out they are spammers, and they swiftly end their lives without prejudice. Why? Because their last terrorist bombing was thwarted because their cell of operatives couldn't get their proper instructions by email, because they were too busy trying to filter out the stock pump-n-dump emails for PHYK.PK and the ones from the Cialis pushers. Problem solved.
  • by VEGETA_GT ( 255721 ) on Tuesday January 23, 2007 @11:58AM (#17724158)
    All the cash being spent on lawsuits should be spent to buy Sealand and donate it to spammer's with one simple Rule, you all live there. I am sure they would jump at the chance. Then you tell the US that we have a nice target here to test your new rail gun on. See it works out great, the US is happy it got to fire off its big new guns, and we Kill off spam as who would start spamming if they realize we killed the last major spammers in a fun way. Win Win Baby.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 23, 2007 @12:12PM (#17724302)

    Although victims of spammers are often the most stupid of stupid people, it might be the case that a concerted education attempt will affect some people, if only in the field of basic literacy. Perhaps a realistic target might be one mistake every 6 words, on average?

    Whether "high legalsuits" will help or "crap over spam will still be sent" is anyone's guess, once they've taken a guess at what that means...

  • by morgan_greywolf ( 835522 ) on Tuesday January 23, 2007 @12:30PM (#17724486) Homepage Journal
    Give the poor guy a break. He is, after all, a former BBS SysOp. Most SysOps are horrible at spelling and grammar...that's why they became SysOps. ;)

    (I'm a former BBS SysOp as well, so I'm making fun of myself as well. :D)
  • by Lord Apathy ( 584315 ) on Tuesday January 23, 2007 @02:18PM (#17726224)

    Or we could take a few of the big ones out and stake them out in the desert like one of those old western movies. Then we could strip them naked, poor honey all over them and sit back and wait for the ants. We could even pass the day by placing side bets on what would get them first, the sun or the ants.

    Then we take the video an post it to youtube.

    It's just a thought....

Everybody likes a kidder, but nobody lends him money. -- Arthur Miller

Working...