Microsoft Worried OEM 'Craplets' Will Harm Vista 527
elsilver writes "An article at the CBC indicates that Microsoft is worried that the assorted crap most OEM companies load onto a new machine may affect users' opinion of Vista. An unnamed executive is concerned that the user will conclude the instability of the non-MS-certified applications is Vista's fault. Is this a serious concern, or is MS trying to bully OEMs into only including Vista-certified apps? As for the OEMs, one "removed older DVD-writing software they found was incompatible and replaced it with Vista's own software." — do they get points for realizing it was both buggy AND redundant?"
My guess (Score:5, Interesting)
A company like apple, which monopolises the whole process to fit with their brand, is in a better position here. I mean, from a marketing perspective, all it takes is one lousy OEM company to install buggy shit on their computers and you can ruin the Vista brand.
Good! (Score:5, Interesting)
Understandable (Score:5, Interesting)
Make Crap Optional (Score:2, Interesting)
By providing the original installation media without installing it, Microsoft is happy that the software doesn't come pre-loaded, the end user is happy that they don't have to remove stuff once they buy their computer, and the OEM distributor should be happy because they will get more customers from it. Everyone is happy, so why is it so difficult?
Yes (Score:5, Interesting)
My computer came with XP and a preinstalled keyboard shortcut program. This program had the nasty side effect of crashing ANY fullscreen app that tried to launch, with the single exception of Jedi Outcast.
At the time, none of these other games I had were designed with XP in mind, so I immediately assumed that XP's compatibility was abysmal and I was NOT happy. Fortunately I was able to correct the REAL problem soon enough.
I concur (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:It IS Vista's fault (Score:2, Interesting)
We must note that for 10 years straight MS has been targeting their product to the uneducated majority (I mean not computer educated). They have been able to bear the fruits of that stupidity (as in not-wanting-to-switch, afraid-of-thinking, that kind of things) for so many years.
Now when the tables are turned, and the stupidity is against them (negative PR because of 'craplets'), they don't want it. Sorry, but you can't have the cake and eat it at the same time.
Those Craplets are the keys to Microsoft's success (Score:5, Interesting)
We payed the OEMs handsomely for the privilige of reducing the functionality of our software - both in discounts and in revenue-share kickbacks for upgrades.
I'm pretty certain the money the OEMs makes from this crippleware *MORE* than pays for the cost of Windows (especially the discounted OEM windows) - and is the #1 reason HP, Dell, etc like Windows over Linux.
Get rid of the paid-for-crippleware, and OEMs will jump to Linux very quickly.
I won 2 excellent systems from... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I concur (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't care about the machine, I can write crap software to bug up the running experience if the user lets it run. Unlike a new mac or linux install, this is really a windows only problem(out of the 3). I always do a fresh install with a new windows box to get rid of anything that could be there. And everything runs alot smoother and quicker if I do that.
Re:Good! (Score:3, Interesting)
Naturally, I had blatted this partition when I installed fedora. Then, when a few weeks latter I decided I actually wanted to dual boot I seemed to be SOL. However, in Dell's credit and despite consistent negative press regarding their technical support, they have been excellent. I emailed to explain the situation and the following day, a complete set of CD's for all software (including XP) dropped through my door (no charge).
Microsofts own fault (Score:2, Interesting)
At some point they changed this policy,and now reward those manufacturer who sell systems with restore CDs. Of course the manufacturers jumped the chance, and included as many "craplets" as they could. And with most manufacturers shipping ONLY restore CDs and no install CDs, the only way to get a clean machine is to either buy a second copy of Windows, or replace your fully licensed OEM version with a pirated copy of whatever your friends are running (usually replacing XP Home with Pro, because that's what they have).
No Craplets in Mac OS X (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I for one agree (Score:3, Interesting)
No idea if it's kosher with the licensing, but you could just use a pirated key on install and then use the tool to force the original serial back onto the machine.
Re:My guess (Score:5, Interesting)
Problem is that the customer is RIGHT in that statement. I am demoing Vista here at the office because the Boss wants us to test it as many of our customers are the "oooooh new shiney!" type.
I am running it in slow hardware... Pentium 4 3.2ghz 1gig ram and SATA drives.
and it is in fact SLOW AS A DOG compared to XP.... Yes, I only have a low end Nvidia 6600GT video card with 256 meg of ram, so that might be the problem as well.
But the honest truth is that Vista is very slow compared to XP. if I turn off all the crap it gets better but most people wont turn off the crap because the difference between vista and XP disappears.
And that is what customers want... Purdy shiney flashey! they do not give a rats ass about anything they cant see and feel.
Re:finally! (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Now that you mention it... (Score:3, Interesting)
"We won't sell Windows to you unless you offer your users the option of a clean install with all the apps you want to bundle on seperate media."
I don't think the DoJ would have any problem with Microsoft forcing vendors to let the user decide what they want.
Re:It IS Vista's fault (Score:4, Interesting)
Actually, this is a real problem on OS X. A load of sysctls haven't been tweaked since the NeXT days, and the default limit is 100 processes per uid. If you've got a few terminals open then it's very easy to hit this limit, and once you do it's pretty much impossible to do anything unless you can ssh in as another user (I miss virtual terminals on OS X). Mind you, it's much easier to kill OS X by simply allocating a load of memory a page at a time. Hopefully Leopard will include a less broken VM subsystem, but I'm not holding my breath.
Re:Craplets? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Craplets? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Craplets? (Score:3, Interesting)
OK, lets look at this from a "normal" person's POV.
"Normal" people buy computers of two types. Macs or PeeCees. Macs come from one manufacturer, with one OS. PeeCees come from various manufacturers with one OS.
If something goes wrong with their computer, it gets slow, it crashes, or any of that they blame the manufacturer or just accept it. Regardless if its user error, an OS error or hardware error.
To "normal" people Microsoft is an abstraction where people really don't know what they do or provide aside from the fact that they do something and provide something that has netted them LOTS of money, so if they are rich, then it must be good, whatever it is or does.
"Normal" people don't know or care about computers that much. I'm a geek, I know that my DVR has a Motorola RISC processor, a 120 Gig harddrive, and some propriatary OS and software installed on it. But even though I know a little more about the inner workings of the thing, I use it as a black box just like everybody else. I smash the buttons on the remote to switch channels, to select recorded material, to set up my favorite channels, etc. Even though I can point out the bugs in the software and hardware in the box, and I know pretty much how it works, I don't address it as a Motorola 6xxx HD DVR. I just say to people I have Cox's digital cable service with Tivo-like abilities. Others reply, wow thats cool. I have DirectTV, or I just have Cox's digital cable, you mean you can skip commercials?
Now, when people find out I'm a computer guy, they think I know about their computers, and if they run a Windows based PeeCee, I just say I don't use those kinds of computers because I don't. If they ask for advice, I tell them to buy a Mac. I then change the subject to something important like the weather or similar.
Re:Craplets? (Score:3, Interesting)
I know that there is no way that I would ever buy from the personal side of Dell again.
Re:1. Buy box (Score:3, Interesting)
Actually, many PCs these days don't even go that far. I saw a new HP that only came with a picture of a CD printed on a piece of paper, with instructions on how to burn your own system restore CDs from the rescue partition on the hard drive, and directions to boot from the rescue partition to reinstall Windows if the hard drive gets screwed up.
Re:Craplets? (Score:3, Interesting)
Unless you want a laptop.
Barring a gigantic influx of cash I would never buy a prebuilt desktop unless it was a refurb. Sometimes that can get you a system dramatically cheaper than you can even build it. But for a laptop, you have no options but to simply buy one.
Well, let's go offtopic here... First, it's a line from a song and so it doesn't necessarily match reality ideally. However, I do agree on it. See, your mistake is believing that the "War on Terror" is actually about stopping terrorism. It is not. You simply cannot stop terrorism by declaring war on it, nor even by waging "war" on it. War and alternatives to war are what lead to terrorism.
What do I mean by that? We created Osama Bin Laden in very real ways. His people were trained by the US government. We gave them money to stop the Opium trade, which they did! for about one year. If you look at the graphs (too lazy to google up Afghani opium exports right now) it really worked for about one year. Of course, the same money paid for flight schools and such and directly supported 9/11.
We were interested in supporting OBL because of our other political goals - which are financially motivated. I won't go into the whole sad story, because you can look it up. But suffice to say that the situation would not be possible without a certain level of tension. The "War on Terror" is specifically designed to cause further conflict because that raises money. Halliburton was found to be the only company ready to go into the middle east and rebuild under some bullshit standards crafted by the US government. You might call me paranoid but I think it would be incredibly naive to believe anything other than that they were notified ahead of time as to what they would need to be ready, or that the specifications were crafted specifically to favor them.
Now, you can make money during either wartime or peacetime, but there's simply more money to be made from conflict. Edge conditions are where the greatest energy differentials exist and thus where the action is.
If we were serious about ending terrorism, we'd stop killing people in third world countries (or helping others to kill them) in order to preserve our financial institutions.