Detecting Tailgaters With Lasers 1136
stoolpigeon writes "Police in Arizona are using laser range finders to detect and ticket tailgaters. An officer can now measure not only the speed of passing vehicles but also how close they are to one another. The detectors described in the article are built by Laser Technology Inc., a company that provides lasers for traffic control, engineering, and even tactical/military solutions. The article mentions how tailgating is connected to many accidents and incidents of road rage; this observation fits my experience."
Re:Not the Tailgaters Fault (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Tailgating (Score:2, Interesting)
My wife and I got hit in our brand new car Friday.
We where stopped at a stoplight, the road was dry, their was no fog, it was on a well light six lane road and the lanes on both sides of us where clear.
A 17 year old kid as he put it was not paying attention and locked up his brakes and hit us.
He was charged with careless driving and allowed to drive HOME!
Had we been crossing the intersection and he had T-Boned us it could have been fatal. If we had been crossing the street it could have been fatal. If I had been on my motorcycle it could have been fatal.
Why did he get to drive home when it was obvious that he couldn't drive safely?
If you are at fault with an accedent you shouldn't be allowed to drive until you learn how to drive. And I don't mean at one of the comedy or other stupid driving schools.
Re:Leave it to us! (Score:2, Interesting)
The point of a speed limit is safety. Revenue is a nice side-effect (and necessary, both as a deterrent and logistically).
That frees up cops to do real police work. Heck, they may even have enough free time to enforce other laws, like immigration.
Re:Tailgating (Score:2, Interesting)
Of course, I really want to piss those people off, maybe they'll have a heart attack and die before they have a chance to pollute the gene pool too much.
Re:Tailgating (Score:3, Interesting)
Like this one? [gadgetuniverse.com]
Re:Moo (Score:3, Interesting)
I agree. I've wished for years there was some kind of system where I could press a button and report a complaint on a car. You could chose a simple complaint (tailgating, speeding, going too slow, running lights, etc) and then it would be tied to their license plate. These would be agregated and people who get high numbers of complaints (i.e., the worst drivers) could then be "investigated" and ticketed. Bonus points for putting a camera in every car and attaching a little video clip so you can show the guy weaving through 20mph rush hour traffic at 70mph being an idiot so he can be fined.
As is the only way is to call the police and report it, but unless the guy is being REALLY unsafe, it's usually not worth the time (or they wouldn't go after the guy unless a cop just happened to be nearby).
Say what you will about black-boxes in cars, the way the local college students drive I'd vote for them. Heck, forget the college students, look at the general population around here and they seem like a good idea (especially when it gets rainy or snowy and the idiots come out who thing you should driver faster to get home sooner).
Re:Tailgating (Score:3, Interesting)
Basically, you tune your speed to the amount of space between you and the tailgater. You slow down until they back off (usually they do), then you speed up. You stay fast until they start tailgating you again, at which point you let off your gas.
One key is probably not to use your brakes, which makes this too obvious. I don't really want them consciously thinking about the fact that I am actively braking. That'll just piss them off.
I'd say this works about half the time, and probably won't trigger any road rage. But the flip side is that it does fail about 50% of the time.
I also don't know if I'm really "conditioning" that 50% or not, but as an engineering-type I say who cares if the logic is right if it works? 50% is still an improvement over 0%.
Re:Tailgating (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Tailgating (Score:2, Interesting)
I live around Lancaster, PA. Last year, westbound on Harrisburg Pike through East Hempfield, heading toward Salunga, had this car with his high beams on just riding my bumper then backing off, so I'd get blinded, then not.
I got pissed, figure I'm not driving the next few miles to Mount Joy this way, so I pulled off the road to let 'em pass. First time I've ever done this. Know who passed? I'm gawking at the police car that guns past.
Had a similar thing occur on Oregon Pike/Rt 272 heading north going through Manheim Township. No back and forth by the vehicle behind, but right on my tail and acting like he's going to pass, moving to the center line. I get sick of the behavior, so I pull over to allow them to pass. It's a police vehicle.
There are other instances (I do a lot of night driving; late work). My suspicion is that's police officers doing their night rounds will often tailgate you in order to get you to speed up. If you are on the speed limit or under it by 5 mph, the more they do so. So be careful with the fast/slow approach, esp. in states that allow VASCAR, even if you are still under the speed limit (they'll use your speed up as an excuse to get a faster mph reading).
Also, besides the 2 experiences above, Manheim Pike/Rt72, heading north to Maheim, had a large pickup trucking blinding me. I pull over, it bullets by. I resume. Up the road, pickup lights can be seen disappearing, still pulling away. Up the road, after a bend (where the pickup's rear lights were last seen), turns out to be a speed check, pickup apparently wasn't picked up. I'm doing the speed limit the whole way, I see a vehicle rapidly approach from the side that is clearly in a rush to get behind me (late night, sort of obvious), it does and then tailgates me for 2 miles. Vehicle turns off and I confirm in my rear view--it was a police vehicle. Subcompacts/compacts/small cars are targets not only for the abusive SUVers (there are many good SUV drivers, just that they are overshadowed by the asses) but also by police (small car, probably young, targetted as less likely to lawyer up (lack of funds by you means more funds for them)).
Re:Tailgating (Score:5, Interesting)
Gawkers should have their driving privileges revoked.
Re:Not so funny as true. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Tailgating (Score:2, Interesting)
In Germany, people (tend to) get over as soon as they see you behind them, especially (but not only) on the highways. And on the highways, they don't wait for you to get right behind them, THEN try to find a spot to move over. If you're zooming along at 130 mph and they're only going 100, if they haven't moved over already as they're legally required, they'll get out of the way fairly quickly as soon as they see you.
[SIGH] I miss that place.
Fog lights == Removal of tailgaters (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Fog lights == Removal of tailgaters (Score:2, Interesting)
1. I did that (once only - I'm not totally evil) several years ago on a wet road. That is tapped the brakes to light them up. The rapidly approaching small truck braked hard and the road camber (curved road surface) moved him into the ditch. What a nice surprise.
2. Then my geology teacher came to class one day and said he tapped his brakes which sent some stupid #$% into the ditch. He was so grimly pleased I realized right there I never wanted to date his beautiful daughter (even if I could have).
Thanks
Jim the B!
Who are all these people in your journal?!?!?! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Tailgating (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Tailgating (Score:2, Interesting)