Boing Boing Threatened By Software Creator 351
mfh writes "StarForce has issued threats to Boing Boing's Cory Doctorow in retaliation to Cory's post about the anti-copy malware that installs itself along with many popular (and unpopular) video games." From the BoingBoing post: "Yesterday, I posted about StarForce, a harmful technology used by game companies to restrict their customers' freedom. StarForce attempts to stop game customers from copying their property, but it has the side-effects of destabilizing and crashing the computers on which it is installed. Someone identifying himself as 'Dennis Zhidkov, PR-manager, StarForce Inc.' contacted me this morning and threatened to sue me, and told me that he had contacted the FBI to complain about my 'harassment.'"
Yay, more useless litigation... (Score:5, Interesting)
Don't you love how every time these people... (Score:5, Interesting)
And then, of course, comes the OMG LAWSUIT brigade, claiming libel and slander when, again, opinions of a entities buisness practices are protected free speech...Hoping to tie up critics in a huge and costly (in the short term) legal battle to silence them. (PriceRitePhoto scandal, anyone?)
It just goes to show the sort of people behind this company that, instead of making logical arguments against their critics, they choose to take the 'dirty route' with the aforementioned threats...360, Claira, Jack Thompson, PriceRitePhoto..
I really, really, really hope someone gets up the gonads to take one of these foolish corporations, PARTICULARY so a adware/spyware corporation or someone with similar malicious intent to court when they issue a groundless Cease and Desist in a attempt to hold face and further their own intent.
Fin.
Re:The FBI? (Score:5, Interesting)
Starforce incompatabilties (Score:0, Interesting)
Starforce causes more harm than good, and I believe gamers have to show their dismay by simply not buying games with it. Hopefully if the sales are hurt enough, game publishers will stop using this "protection" and we can finally put a bullet in it. Unfortunately too many people who buy games don't realize the game is protected by this, and might just be blaming Windows for their computer's crashes.
Geeks embrace copy protection and DRM (Score:5, Interesting)
That may explain why some people here might be puzzled to notice that geeks are among the most fervent supporters of DRM, copy-protection, spyware and other restrictive technologies. Witness the many gamers who have StarForce installed on their systems. Witness the many iTunes lovers (myself included) who've bought into the DRMed songs Apple offers.
It's sad to realize that we are heading straight into a DRM/copy-protection nightmare, and the worst part is that we're fully aware where we're going. Gamers are leading the way. They seem to be fully content to have anti-copying and anti-cheating software running in the background while they play World of Warcraft or Half-Life. It seems that these companies are using our geek tendencies (must...play...new...game!) against us. Is this the beginning of the end of our freedom on the net?
Boinging for justice (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:The FBI? (Score:4, Interesting)
More importantly, make sure it's addressed to the directors of the company. I'm sure they won't appreciate their PR manager making a PR disaster even worse.
Boycott Starforce (Score:3, Interesting)
Perfect. Just Perfect. (Score:5, Interesting)
This is absolutely perfect. StarForce is accusing Doctorow of slander and/or libel (probably libel, as his remarks were published). Now, if he wants to press that case, Doctorow will have the opportunity to validate his claims in court. If he fails, he'll be found liable (of libel), and punished accordingly--as it should be. If he succeeds, plaintiff (StarForce) will lose, and will get the additional bonus of having their software be demonstrated in court as malware.
As an additional bonus, if StarForce loses, Doctorow can countersue, also for slander and/or libel--if you accuse me of lying, and I'm not, it damages my reputation.
As long as Doctorow is confident in his claims, his only thought should be "bring it on."
Re:Here is a picture of Dennis Zhidkov (Score:5, Interesting)
And apparently he's spends a lot of free time pissing gamers off:
Starforce Posts Thier Objections to Toms Hardware [subsim.com]
This may seem familiar (from C|Net): StarForce Response [com.com]
Can you say whacko? Ooooopppss! I may be attracting a lawsuit or at least a visit from the FBI...
Re:The FBI? (Score:2, Interesting)
In years past when I was into gaming and had a fairly popular web site devoted to it, I had quite a few discussions with folks from game companies, esp. Epic and Apogee.
Epic's president (my senile old mind can't remember his name, bless him; it's been several years now) was thoroughly paranoid about piracy.
He was paranoid because while in college, he "pirated" all his software, he said. There's a good chance you can find posts from planetcrap.com from him on the "wayback machine" (archive.org) about this if anybody wants to find it.
So no, these guys don't have to give any slick speeches convincing the ganme companies piracy is rampant, they already believe that for every game sold there are ten pirated.
(Sorry about the A/C; mcgrew from the now defunct "Springfield Fragfest" (now a porn site, I believe) here. Almost MRC="terrify".)
Interview with Starforce (Score:4, Interesting)
So what if it reads more like a press release... but of particular interest is this: There is no legal concern because before a user loads a game, he or she has agreed to accept the conditions of the end-user licensing agreement, typically known as a EULA. These are also known as click and go, or click and accept agreements. When you accept, you are saying I will load this game or application at my own risk, and have read and understood the terms. Or there will be a disclaimer that protects the publisher from damages of any kind due to their products' use. Our product is licensed to our customers, and becomes part of their product, so the user by accepting the terms, is giving approval.
It seems to me that one could read that to say that they are knowingly installing software that can damage a computer, and that the manufacturer is not liable. But anyway, I'm curious about the wording on that license -- since this is third party software, I wonder if it's still covered.
Re:Yay, more useless litigation... (Score:2, Interesting)
StarForce is a funny thing, it's rapidly taking over the copy protection market because it's generally considered to be the best out there right now, I think defeating it requires you to do some complicated 6-step dance that culminates in you actually unplugging some of your hardware (ie there's no one-click generic crack).
Given the extremely vague nature of what Cory has posted I'm not surprised they are suing. Is it right for them to sue? Probably not, our society should be less litiguous. But seriously - they've written some software and this guy is equating it with bots and adware programs, which it isn't at all, and he's also claiming it has serious bugs but not backing up his claims with any proof either.
He might as well have claimed that StarForce enjoy being Evil because they're Russian while he was at it. It would have been about as worthwhile as his other comments.
Re:Yay, more useless litigation... (Score:3, Interesting)
However, given that the claims people were making against StarForce were specifically that it physically broke drives, I'm not surprised that was a part of the rules ... otherwise it would have turned into $10,000 for any bug report going which I doubt many software companies would be willing to make.
Clearly their software shouldn't interfere with legitimate CD/DVD burning and I'd hope they'd fix that though if the claims are true (could well be, especially if it's a weird hardware specific bug).
Re:the problem with "don't buy" (Score:5, Interesting)
I work about the last place you'd expect to be tech savvy: A railroad, surrounded by union truck drivers, most of which are pushing retirement age.
I'd say most of them own a home computer. Of the ones that own a PC, most could reinstall the OS without trouble. They all know about spyware, and I've heard at least one "AdAware vs. Spybot" zealotry argument. At least one of them reads
I could walk into the break room and say "Sony rootkit" and probably three quarters of them would know exactly what I was talking about.
The reach is getting bigger, boys and girls. The second their digital TVs break, or their mp3s no longer work, the blue collar slice of America will know and complain, rest assured.
Re:Simple Fix - Don't Buy (Score:4, Interesting)