Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education IT

Gender Gap in Computer Science Growing 1027

EReidJ writes "Looks like finding a compatible girl geek in the computer profession is becoming even harder, as an already wide gender gap among Computer Science majors is becoming larger. From the article: 'A Globe review shows that the proportion of women among bachelor's degree recipients in computer science peaked at 37 percent in 1985 and then went on the decline. Women have comprised about 28 percent of computer science bachelor's degree recipients in the last few years, and in the elite confines of research universities, only 17 percent of graduates are women [...] The argument of many computer scientists is that women who study science or technology, because they are defying social expectations, are in an uncomfortable position to begin with. So they are more likely to be dissuaded from pursuing computer science if they are exposed to an unpleasant environment, bad teaching, and negative stereotypes like the image of the male hacker.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Gender Gap in Computer Science Growing

Comments Filter:
  • Good! (Score:4, Funny)

    by JPamplin ( 804322 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @01:53PM (#14292190) Homepage
    Who needs yucky girls anyway. Cooties! ;-)
  • by precize ( 83096 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @01:55PM (#14292210) Homepage
    "During my freshman year in the computer science department, there were more guys named David than there were girls."
  • Re:Good! (Score:2, Funny)

    by diersing ( 679767 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @01:56PM (#14292212)
    Lets face chicks just aren't willing to go to the extremes of getting degreed to find new and innovative ways to download pr0n, they're just wired differently.
  • Trinary (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 19, 2005 @01:56PM (#14292219)

    Just as the hard-wiring of binary mathematics spun the entire twentieth century about a simple yes-no axis, the invention of the three-state switch promised to revolutionize twenty-fifth century computing. After all, with three states (negative, positive, and null charges) on nanoswitches, computers could now think in terms of yes, no, and maybe, greatly humanizing their internal logic.

    This would have brought many, many more female engineers into the field of computer science (hence accelerating the pace at which computers could do useful things besides transmit, compress, and enhance pornography), except that the same abbreviational logic that turned "binary digit" into "bit" turned "trinary digit" into "tit." This nomenclatural error set computing back nearly three hundred years, and two entire generations of promising computer scientists were lost trying to keep abreast of bad puns.

    -- The Tayler Corporation. "Plotting to take over the world since 1998"

  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 19, 2005 @01:56PM (#14292221)
    Meet a bio girl, have her become a doctor, and spend your days changing diapers and compiling the latest ubuntu release.
  • I think anywhere you go just about, there will be more males named David than females named David. No big surprise there. :)
  • by rocketsled ( 676050 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:00PM (#14292264) Homepage
    WHAT DO YOU MEAN LACKING SOCIAL SKILLS, my 20 sided die guides me with any social situation.
  • by Rakshasa Taisab ( 244699 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:01PM (#14292271) Homepage
    Yeah, but the blame is entirely on the parents. Gender equality should extend to the naming of their child.
  • Re:Trinary (Score:2, Funny)

    by damiceious ( 819510 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:01PM (#14292284)
    The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.
    (Bruce Ediger, bediger@teal.csn.org, in comp.os.linux.misc, on X interfaces.)
  • by CommiePuddin ( 891854 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:02PM (#14292289) Homepage
    I once dated a girl named David. Best seventeen seconds of my life.....
  • by xIcemanx ( 741672 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:02PM (#14292298)
    http://www.penny-arcade.com/images/2003/20030630l. gif [penny-arcade.com] It's sad that people like that exist in my CS department. We have people search on Facebook for female CS majors and then poke all of them in hopes of a relationship. Rather than, actually, you know, talking to them in class.
  • by Cutterex ( 787660 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:04PM (#14292317) Homepage
    "...negative stereotypes like the image of the male hacker."

    It must be the popularization in the mass media of conversations like:

    • The Trinity? Who cracked the IRS d-base?
    • That was a long time ago.
    • Jesus...
    • What?
    • I just thought... you were a guy.
    • Most guys do.
  • by Austerity Empowers ( 669817 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:04PM (#14292319)
    As a geek girl myself, I'd put it a bit above half. sucks.

    As a geek guy, I'd put it a bit above 95%. You only hear from the ones brave enough to come forward.

    Speaking of which, what are you doing Friday night?
  • by xIcemanx ( 741672 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:09PM (#14292368)
    public cells woo(Girl g) {

    if (g.hotness > -10) {
      while (true) {
        hair.smooth();
        lysol.spray(armpits);
        mouth.stammer();
        mouth.tellJoke(lameBinaryJoke);
        if (g.noticesYou()) {
          return semen;
        }
      }
    }
       
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:10PM (#14292378)
    I've seen plenty of female "garbage collectors." Just go people-watching at the mall and observe the type of men that attractive women are attracted to :)
  • by MondoMor ( 262881 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:14PM (#14292421) Homepage Journal
    They much prefer a procedural approach.
  • obligatory (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:14PM (#14292424)
    I put women in uncomfortable positions all the time.

    Bah-dum dum, tshhhh!!!
  • by Eli Gottlieb ( 917758 ) <[moc.liamg] [ta] [beilttogile]> on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:15PM (#14292440) Homepage Journal
    Excuse me, but when did the male hacker become a negative stereotype? Someone's confusing Slashdot's nerds for ESR's hackers, at great expense to available females everywhere.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:15PM (#14292443)
    Speaking of which, what are you doing Friday night?

    Going to recompile the Linux kernel and fix the m0n0wall issues. Just like any other Friday night. You?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:19PM (#14292482)
    will you marry me?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:28PM (#14292560)
    Well, I usually feel that I'm unattractive frequently enough that I don't mistake friendly interaction as sexual interest. I know that people pounce on females with interest in the sciences because they're comparatively rare, and that the prospect of a peer that shares their interests is enticing to them, but I don't think that stems from an absence of social skills. Perhaps you're just equating not being an asshole with having social skills, which is decidedly not the case. There are many areas in courtship where being an asshole is an important social skill.

    No, when you don't have social skills it manifests more like confusion and shame. Think of it like illiteracy, where the person cannot understand or relate to the subject matter and is excluded from the benefits of proficiency.

    There are of course instances where not having social skills can result in an accumulation of torment and create desperation. In that state one might be so eager to find some sort of social comfort as to immediately frighten off other parties. That's close enough to what you mean, but the process of reaching that state is more complex than just a lack of social skills.
  • by ryry ( 198300 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:42PM (#14292691) Homepage
    over-weight ... 90 pound ... wimplings

    Man I sure am glad I chose an English degree over CS ...
  • Re:Good! (Score:4, Funny)

    by wcleveland ( 919106 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @02:49PM (#14292787)
    circle circle dot dot, now i've got my cootie shot... bring on the babes!
  • by guaigean ( 867316 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @03:41PM (#14293300)
    As a geek girl myself...

    Is this a Turing test in action?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 19, 2005 @03:44PM (#14293325)

    >1. Not overweight. (120 pounds)
    >2. Not ugly. http://www.heartlandsi.com/HeartlandServices/IT.as [heartlandsi.com] px (yes, the only girl here >though)
    >3. Not bi or lesbian (although the way men are, I have certainly considered going the other >way, especially after dumping my last boyfriend -- in October)

    Are you crazy ?? Admiting you are a single geek women on slashdot. Anyways, since no one has kept up the tradition ......here it goes

    You are beuatifull will you marry me ?

    There! Thanks for posting your picture again :)
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday December 19, 2005 @04:21PM (#14293637)
    By the power vested in me as the Anonymous Coward, I hereby pronounce you husband and wife.

    You may now send smilies at each other.
  • by Kris_B_04 ( 883011 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @04:25PM (#14293674) Homepage Journal
    LOL
    But why did you post as an Anonymous Coward?
  • by Cerberus7 ( 66071 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @04:41PM (#14293802)
    Your post is worthless without pics for the rest of us.
  • by Kris_B_04 ( 883011 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @07:01PM (#14294981) Homepage Journal
    Oh dear.
    I checked, and the web page stats says the IT Page has been hit over 800 times since I posted that note...

    That's more hits than we have had in one year...

    *sigh*
  • by mj2k ( 726937 ) on Monday December 19, 2005 @10:05PM (#14296013)
    This entire article is a load of BS... I'd give an arm and a leg to have _one_ girl in my CS classes, and most guys in CS would do the same! Hell, I would give just about anything to meet _one_ female every semester in a class... And don't give me the "you should try going to parties" routine, I go to LAN parties every other week, why just last month I kicked this girl's ass so badly at quake, that after cussing at her for being an f*ing n00b, she began to cry... Afterwards I offered to give her lessons on strafing in the privacy of my home, and she still wouldn't go for it... Damn female... and they say I have problems with social interaction...
  • by raehl ( 609729 ) <(moc.oohay) (ta) (113lhear)> on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @04:05AM (#14297113) Homepage
    This is a non-problem. I put this in the same category as "Why arn't there any black people in northern michigan?" Is it because Northern Michigan hates black people? Of course not - it's because black people don't want to go there! There's no jobs, and it's freaking cold!

    The question not being asked here is, why would you want to get a CS degree? CS doesn't exist in a vacuum - computers are tools to solve other problems. If you're a woman, and you are smart enough to use computers, why not major in biology, and use computers to solve biology problems? Or major in chemistry, and use computers to solve chemistry problems? Or major in any of several engineering fields? You don't need to know how operating systems or cache management or machine code works to write useful programs.

    Women don't participate in CS because women don't want to. Men major in CS because:

    1) They think it will make them lots of money
    2) They REALLY REALLY REALLY like computers.
    3) They are social idiots and CS ain't a bad career for people who don't like people.

    Maybe, just maybe, girls don't major in CS because they have other things they'd rather major in, that better match their interests and talents, both intelletual AND social?

    I've met several women who are proficient at computers. Only one of them majored in computing - the rest all majored in something else, whether it be chemistry, biology, technical writing, or graphics design. They didn't pass on CS or drop out of CS because of bias, they did so because of better options for them. Of the women I knew who dropped out of CS, they dropped out either because they were dumb (the same as all the guys who drop out of CS), or because they were BORED OUT OF THEIR SKULLS. They took a chem or bio or english elective and liked that better. About half-and-half. Contrast that with many of the men in CS - how many of them even have the option of doing something else? There are many, many men in CS who are in CS because they have no idea what else they can do, because they were socially stunted, and instead of being pushed to do girly things, were allowed to spend those career-forming high school years staring at their monitor and occasionally watching Star Trek.
  • by keraneuology ( 760918 ) on Tuesday December 20, 2005 @02:34PM (#14300555) Journal
    You really need to stop cutting and pasting from web pages. I strongly urge you to try reading the documents you cite.

    You say: "these from 2000 and 1999".

    The document says: data as of "Fall 1992".

    I told you that the data was 13 years old and you respond with the publication date. What does that prove?

    And your data itself is incomplete: you post the interpretation of "Four out of five full professors are males" and in the fall of 1992 this was true. HOWEVER - the significant data would include the averge time employed of those at the rank of professor. The devil's in the delta - compare the average time since bestowment of professorship of women then compare those numbers with the count of men awarded professorship during that period of time. Cross-tab with years of experience. Then we'll talk.

Those who can, do; those who can't, write. Those who can't write work for the Bell Labs Record.

Working...