Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Microsoft Security IT

Monad Shell Removed From Vista 330

hggs writes "According to Stephen Toulouse at Microsoft, because of the possible virus threat that targets Monad the shell will not be included in Windows Vista. CNet is reporting that, even though Monad is not to be included on Vista, it will be included on a major server operating system for servers from Microsoft. Codenamed Longhorn server, that edition is due out by 2007." Update: 08/06 04:45 GMT by Z : As Mr. Toulouse states here, the submission here adds one and one and gets three. Monad hasn't been in Vista for about two months. The CNet article is clarifying a previous report stating that Monad could potentially be the first source of viruses in an OS which incorporated it. The interesting news about Monad in the server edition was obscured by the factually incorrect submission, which at first blush seemed to make sense. Mea Culpa.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Monad Shell Removed From Vista

Comments Filter:
  • FP (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Microlith ( 54737 ) on Friday August 05, 2005 @07:24PM (#13254590)
    Yet another feature stripped from the next release of Windows.

    I guess microsoft figures that only people who spend several thousand for a computer deserve even moderately capable tools.

    Oh well. More and more reason to not bother upgrading, and gear towards an eventual switch to Linux someday.
  • Remove the capability of the command line for home users, but leave a buggy and insecure shell for servers where hackers can have lots of fun messing up enterprise level websites!
  • by XorNand ( 517466 ) * on Friday August 05, 2005 @07:27PM (#13254634)
    I dunno. I'd rather have to worry about securing the MS boxes that I admin vs. defending them against DDOS attacks from legions of zombies.
  • by diegocgteleline.es ( 653730 ) on Friday August 05, 2005 @07:39PM (#13254742)
    I don't think monad is buggy. I think that Monad's main problem is that it's too flexible - ie: like perl, python, etc. Just like it's easy to write a virus in a few lines of perl, it should be easier for virus writers to write virus with monad.

    Remember that virus use "generic" tecnology, things that everybody has, IOW generic windows installations. If everybody has a powerful shell script like monad it'll be easier for virus writers to write virus. If it's optional, it will not be so dangerous because virus writers won't write virus for something that is not widespread, and still people who wants it will be happy because they'll be able to install it and use it
  • by mechsoph ( 716782 ) on Friday August 05, 2005 @08:03PM (#13254916)
    Considering that NT is, theoretically the successor to VMS, it sure is lame.

    Where's our versioning file system? Where's our ironclad clustering? (Someone who's a real VMS geek can probably offer more examples)

    Micrsoft hires Dave Cutler, who wrote VMS, and a bunch of the DEC engineers, has them write a brand spankin' new OS to Rule Them All, and they try to sell some retarded crapheap that doesn't have some of the best features of the '80's.

    Of course, the perfectly sensible reason they're selling a crapheap is that performance mattered more than a secure microkernel architecture (which NT, at one point, supposedly was), and backwards compatability with win32 is the only thing keeping people running to back to MS like a crackhead to his dealer.

    Give me my good 'ol 70's Unix. The '80's died, and the 90's just won't.
  • Re:FP (Score:2, Insightful)

    by d34thm0nk3y ( 653414 ) on Friday August 05, 2005 @08:11PM (#13254961)
    Yet another feature stripped from the next release of Windows.

    What a cop out excuse too. Oh gee, the scripting language is vulnerable to malicious programmers in the same way every programming language is.
  • by bjk4 ( 885 ) on Friday August 05, 2005 @08:29PM (#13255056) Homepage
    I can't believe the slashdot editors let this submission go through. To quote the author:
    "First of all, in examining the details of the reports, there is no Windows Vista virus described in them."

    "The viruses do not attempt to exploit a software vulnerability and do not encompass a new method of attack."

    "...there is no relation between Monad and Windows Vista Beta 1."
    The author is pretty clear that the reported virii had ZERO effect on the choice to include monad or not.

    Yet somehow the submitter was able to conclude "...because of the possible virus threat that targets Monad the shell will not be included in Windows Vista.". Will wonders ever cease to exist!
  • MOD PARENT UP (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Uber Banker ( 655221 ) * on Friday August 05, 2005 @08:40PM (#13255121)
    The article was factually incorrect, even though it linked to correct articles, cited in the parent post. This 'story' seems no more than a waste of everyone's time, yet the submitter that pointed this out is (presently) modded down to -1.

    Read up: MS isn't 100% bad. They have some good stuff and good policies sometimes. Don't complain about them point blank to improve your ego, you'll be the kid that called wolf too many times.
  • In later News (Score:2, Insightful)

    by zenst ( 558964 ) on Friday August 05, 2005 @09:09PM (#13255312) Homepage Journal
    It was found that a user thru a careful combination could induce the keyboard to cause the operating system to react in unpredictable ways.

              Latest reports are that all keyboard devices will be prevented from attaching to the new Microsoft operating system for users.

      Server systems which have no need for such a device will still be able to use it, possibly in ways so that easier crafting of shell macro's as long as there not called virus.bat :).
  • Internal memo (Score:2, Insightful)

    by khellendros1984 ( 792761 ) on Friday August 05, 2005 @10:32PM (#13255708) Journal
    Microsoft PHB: So, who really cares about this feature? Power users? Bleh, they're all hackers anyhow. Not worth fixing, easier to just pull the feature. NEXT QUESTION!
  • by theGeekDude ( 905574 ) on Friday August 05, 2005 @11:08PM (#13255904)
    First WinFS, now Monad. Anyone willing to bet on what goes out next before Vista is released?
  • by AnalogBoy ( 51094 ) on Friday August 05, 2005 @11:19PM (#13255952) Journal
    Slashdot has always been anti-microsoft, and in most cases zealously so, but this is just taking it too far. Many valid points are made here, but if the community wants to keep its self-respect, it makes no sense to allow blatantly inflammatory and untrue stories to come across the front page like this. I am a beta tester for Monad. it is nothing special - wmic + cmd + more scripting abilities. msh is not ready for prime time. I can't honestly believe that we're now bashing microsoft in the damned if they do damned if they don't way. They don't release it because it's not ready - the bastards can't write a program! They do release it and it's not up to snuff. Damn them! They released more faulty software!

    I understand the nature of slashdot. I used to be one of the linux zealots prowling the area. I read the front page and, very rarely, the articles. Not quite sure what made me do it this time. But letting disinformation such as this leak to the front page scares me, when useful stories from people are ignored all the time.

"The one charm of marriage is that it makes a life of deception a neccessity." - Oscar Wilde

Working...