you haven't emulated SMB unless you allow remote execution of code ;)

well ... windows file sharing is just that ... a security flaw

Makes me glad that I have an SMB block enforced on my rou32der324f[NO CARRIER]

A security flaw in the implementation of a protocol developed by Microsoft? Naw... Couldn't be! Microsoft's stuff is built to last. There's no such thing as a security vulnerability in Windows.

SP2 users are unaffected.

SMB is a Microsoft protocol.

Heh.

But it will be a while before the Samba team gets Linux to BSOD. Dammable Developers

CifsFS

This message was brought to you by the department of redundancy department.

Well, not to sound like a broken record, but you can bet your sweet ass that the smbfs module code will be fixed quicker than you can say rmmod, or if you prefer, quicker than you can say "make dep clean bzImage modules modules_install".

The difference is the opportunity to take action through the utilization of an openly available codebase.

Can we start blaming Microsoft for bugs in Linux now?

Was fuer ein frage ist dieser?
You on /. son, where the only thing less connected with reality is a political campaign...

ERROR DETECTED

REASON - NFS used with in 10 words of the word secure.

RESULT - AHHHH!!!!

more than root

...God?

remove from the LAN/WAN, dissect then reinstall. Its the only safe way.

No. I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

Funny, I googled for "remote linux root exploits" and I didn't get a single hit. That clearly points to the obvious; Google's Censoring Linux Vulnerabilites!! OMFG!! Now only if it.slashdot didnt have such a shitty color sheme, maybe I'd feel better about my IT-related job and stop posting mindless drivel like this.
AC is for cowards!

OMG! How can we find a way to blame Microsoft?!!?