First IA64 Windows Virus Released 479
NinjaPablo writes "W64.RugRat.3344 has been released as a proof of concept virus. It is the first virus which will only run on Windows on the IA64 platform, and uses APIs from 3 native DLLs to avoid crashing applications. It infects files that are in the same folder as the virus and in all subfolders. The author of the virus has also written other concept virii in the past."
There's no such word as "virii" (Score:0, Informative)
The plural of "virus" isn't "virii." There is no such word. The plural of "virus" is "viruses."
Here's a good explanation from cdknow.com [cknow.com], quoted here in its entirety because the people who most need to read this won't click on a link.
More plural-of-virus resources:
perl.com [perl.com], the canonical and exhaustive source
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard's Frequently Given Answer [tesco.net]
Merriam-Webster's "Word for the Wise [m-w.com]," January 20, 2000.
This isn't a big deal (Score:3, Informative)
"The file infection routine is standard. The last section of the executable is marked as executable, the virus body is inserted into the
last section and a random number of bytes are appended to the end of the virus body."
Re:Does that mean (Score:2, Informative)
???
Twice as fast?
(2^32)*2 = 2^64
Not really.
Roy g biv is the author of the virus (Score:4, Informative)
29A is probably the most elite malware group out there.
Re:There's no such word as "virii" (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Does that mean (Score:1, Informative)
(2^32)*2 = 2^33
no. It's perfectly reasonable. (Score:1, Informative)
I think he was just showing off his Intarweb c0ck.
IA64 is a nightmare. Instruction bundles, etc.
Proof of concept viruses not terrible (Score:5, Informative)
IANAVWOAVG, though (I Am Not A Virus Writer Or Anti-Virus Guy)
Re:There's no such word as "virii" (Score:2, Informative)
just because a word is not in a dictionary, it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. if your view of language was right then language wouldn't have existed before dictionaries were invented and new words would never be formed.
i'm on a little crusade of my own to stomp out pedantic assholes like you who feel the need to dictate to everyone else how they should use language.
this comment isn't informative, it's moronic.
Re:Boxen (Score:2, Informative)
Re:What are the legal implications? (Score:5, Informative)
Umm... the DMCA doesn't really have anything to do with this; no copy-protection procedures have been circumvented, so no copyright violations have occurred here. In point of fact, the virus author hasn't broken any laws by writing and releasing this virus, assuming he hasn't been using it to damage any systems out there (besides his own).
Of course, if he actually were to try and damage someone's box with this virus he might have a hard time of it, since all it does is spread itself throughout the system... you get a minor to major slowdown and increase in file sizes, which can cause other things to break, but it's not very likely.
Re:Wow, on the ball. Maybe MS should hire these gu (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Does that mean (Score:3, Informative)
And what moronic mods rated this Informative????