Nerdy Photo in Vista DVDs Thwarts Disk Pirates
Posted by
CowboyNeal
on Thu Jun 14, 2007 06:22 PM
from the tiny-family-albums dept.
from the tiny-family-albums dept.
maximus1 writes "Microsoft says that the tiny photo on the Windows Vista Business Edition installation disks is an anti-piracy feature. The tiny photo of three grinning men — less that 1 mm in size — is one of several images incorporated into the hologram's design intended to make it harder to replicate a Vista DVD, according to Nick White on Microsoft's Vista team blog. 'The real story is interesting, but conspiracy theorists will be disappointed to learn that it is not the result of a deliberate attempt to deceive,' White wrote."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Nerdy Photo in Vista DVDs Thwarts Disk Pirates
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 265 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
If it were porn... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:If it were porn... (Score:5, Funny)
How is someone supposed to know (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Thursday February 21 2002, @04:37PM)
And it only assumes the buyer cares.
Fifth picture discovered (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Fifth picture discovered (Score:4, Funny)
Re:How is someone supposed to know (Score:5, Informative)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Watermarks such as this are designed to prevent counterfeits, not piracy. There are large scale counterfeit operations designed to pass themselves off as legitimate software resellers. Considering the type of disc presses these organizations have access to these days, they can stamp some very authentic looking discs.
The BSA and other such agents look out for these tiny missing features, so they know when and where to release the hounds.
A mom and pop shop with a few extra installs than licenses is small potatoes. They group stamping 100s of thousands of discs in China and selling them as genuine in Europe are the big daddy potatoes.
Re:How is someone supposed to know (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://reverend.healeys.net/)
Re:How is someone supposed to know (Score:5, Informative)
This isn't about stopping you or me from installing a pirated copy of Vista (knowingly or unknowingly), this is about making it that bit easier to find and shut down the big counterfeiting operations.
Fascinating (Score:2, Insightful)
It's all about the photo (Score:3, Insightful)
All pirates care about is 1) Does it install? 2) Can I "activate" it?
Cheers.
Re:It's all about the photo (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://picknit.com/ | Last Journal: Saturday July 29 2006, @03:58PM)
Re:It's all about the photo (Score:5, Funny)
REAL pirates primarily care about: Can I SAIL it and get away?
fail (Score:2, Redundant)
(Last Journal: Saturday August 25, @03:49PM)
since when do software pirates care about watermarks if they can still copy the data just fine? For that matter, how many pirated copies of Vista actually exist? [such negative reaction to it why pirate it?]
Re:fail (Score:5, Informative)
Re:fail (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.p10link.net/plugwash/)
Plain pirates who do nothing to disguise what they are selling as legit may do some damage but buisness customers are easilly scared away from them by the threat of audits, counterfieers OTOH can sell at a much higher price to buisness customers taking sales directly from MS.
Re:fail (Score:5, Funny)
Re:fail (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.tanningbeds4less.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday November 05 2006, @07:23AM)
Dell had to revert back to selling XP due to customer demand. Many poles, published on many sites, indicate that the business world is nonplussed with Vista and many have no plans to migrate over. This includes our shop that runs all XP on the desktop and Linux on the servers only.
Many, many people are not interested in Vista, particularly since it won't run a lot of popular software. By the time you can't get support for XP, we will have already migrated to either OS/X or Linux. There IS a lot of negative reaction to Vista. The average gamer or grandma may not care because it is their only choice, but many of us will stick with XP until a better choice comes along. I run IT and I haven't bothered installing it, although I can for free. Won't run all my hardware and software, is buggy as hell, so why would I?
What really matters: More people are trying to pirate XP than Vista. When people won't even STEAL a product, I would consider that a negative reaction to it.
exactly (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://blog.myspace.com/jonathano)
1. Plastic sleeve
2. No box
3. Burned CD with "Vista 32 Eng" written in Sharpie on the front.
And it works great. Even came with the guys phone number in case I had problems applying the validation hacks.
If youre going to buy a pirate version what do you care? I have seen the nicer versions (with fake box et. al.) but trust me, no one is fooling themselves into thinking that they are getting a $400 program for ten bucks.
But my even more ghetto pirate version only cost $5 and it came with Office 2007 as well (which employed the same counter measures)
Re:exactly (Score:4, Insightful)
That's for the $10 copies. There are, however, the $400 copies, in which case people are fooled into thinking that the $400 they're paying for this program is going to Microsoft instead of some thief's pocket.
(And yes, this is in fact theft. The data might not be "stolen", but the $400 definitely was stolen.)
Re:exactly (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.crfh.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday November 14 2006, @02:47PM)
No, it isn't. Selling an item with the pretense that it's a different item is called "fraud".
Re:exactly (Score:4, Informative)
Re:exactly (Score:4, Funny)
Link To Pictures (Score:5, Informative)
The three guys trap your soul ... (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Friday February 02 2007, @12:54AM)
All I know is ... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.animal-assist.org/donate.html)
Re:All I know is ... (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Saturday August 25, @03:49PM)
Re:All I know is ... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.animal-assist.org/donate.html)
I Feel Ripped Off (Score:5, Funny)
Let's see what's wrong... (Score:5, Interesting)
They dont really want to stop piracy (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.sohomedic.com/)
"I buried Paul" (Score:5, Funny)
Avoid CLick through (Score:5, Informative)
no ads.
This isn't an anti-piracy measure, Microsoft is actually pretty upset about it. They don't like easter eggs because it makes them look unprofessional. If they find the guys that did this, they will probably be fired.
Re:Avoid CLick through (Score:4, Informative)
Leading up the release of Windows 2000, Microsoft starting getting a lot more serious about selling servers into the government and large enterprise markets. These guys saw NT 4 as the first really credible enterprise-class product from MS, and were evaluating Win2k to see how things were progressing.
The story, as I recall it, is that one of these customers had some strong words for our easter eggs, suggesting that any company that could let such things frivolous things into their products wasn't doing a very good software engineering job, and thus couldn't be trusted to run an enterprise-scale business.
The argument never made much sense to me. Easter eggs, at least on teams I worked on, were never anywhere near critical-path code. And they often seem to have been pretty well tested by every member of the product team who wanted to verify their name showed up. Maybe there's some story I don't know about how an Easter egg caused a perf hit, or crash or something (I bet if such a story existed, Raymond would know it.). In any event, it seemed like we one day got this email that said "no more Easter eggs ever again", and that was pretty much the end of it.
Re:Avoid CLick through (Score:5, Funny)
At least... (Score:5, Funny)
Who is looking for these images? (Score:2)
So why bother with them then? Seriously, let's say that I wanted to know if someone was selling me a counterfeit vista disc. I look on the back and there's nothing there, how do I know whether or not the watermark is there?
Completely fucking worthless.
So this is why Vista is so expensive (Score:3, Funny)
(http://www.bytesandbeans.com/)
Sweet!
Worried about being authentic (Score:5, Funny)
If you intentionally buy "pirated" software (Score:2)
(http://slashdot.org/~nurb432/ | Last Journal: Friday August 27 2004, @03:24PM)
Sort of like counterfeit bills, if it passes at the local burger joint, its good enough. Who cares if the feds catch it at the federal bank and take it out of circulation? You got your use out of it.
Nerdy Photo? (Score:5, Funny)
If there were really serious, THIS [informacyde.com] should have been the embedded image.
Sensible Idea (Score:2)
Probably a cryptographically encoded image (Score:1)
(http://www.users.qwest.net/~waffleck-asch/ | Last Journal: Wednesday November 07, @04:46PM)
I always liked legal MS Cds... (Score:1)
(mailto:georgespamungus@gmail.com)
Small image (Score:1)
It's a secret BECAUSE... (Score:4, Funny)
(http://youtube.com/thedarkener)
Image Here... (Score:2)
(http://dieppe.cjb.net/)
upon being told about the hologram... (Score:1)
Kneel before ZOD (Score:4, Funny)
(http://jptechnical.com/)
Does no one get it? (Score:4, Insightful)
You go to your local mom and pop PC shop. You buy a PC for $1000 including Vista. They give you a disk that has a nice color silkscreened vista logo. 9 months later, the activation hack they applied and didn't tell you was applied is fixed via update, and you call MS to deal with validation. They ask you about your disk, which has no holograms. They tell you you've been "had," so you go back to the mom and pop shop and require a real copy, this time knowing what to look for and demand.
The same story could be told about small businesses who are not large enough to use corporate version with their own keyserver, and thus buy bulk professional licenses and have the CDs as proof of license.
I don't buy it... (Score:2, Insightful)
I can see the fnerds! (Score:2)
(http://www.members.optusnet.com.au/~synchrotech | Last Journal: Monday September 24, @07:26PM)
How is this news? (Score:1)
(http://lachy.id.au/)
It's all about the hologram (Score:1)
The real secret. (Score:2)
(http://portal2portal.com/ | Last Journal: Monday June 04, @08:46PM)
Wow,good thing because the copy I almost bought.. (Score:2)
-ted
Wrong Side (Score:1)
(http://carnagepro.com/)
Cracked? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Vista by itself is enough to thwart piracy (Score:5, Funny)
not first time for 3 people picture easter egg... (Score:2, Informative)
(Last Journal: Sunday June 04 2006, @10:01AM)
http://www.eeggs.com/items/26468.html [eeggs.com]
For those click weary, it is about the Tandy Color Computer 2, and the famous deveoplers picture. Now this was in the computer and you had to hold down certain keys, etc... but still it look very familiure to the "security" picture.
http://bink.nu/photos/news_article_images/picture
BTW, that small makes it an easter egg if you ask me... As the average person would not beable to look for that "SECURITY" check when purchasing the software. Really, nice try MS.. You've been egged, just accept the joke and move on.
Not worth it (Score:3, Informative)
(Last Journal: Saturday January 06 2007, @01:13AM)
Other companies do. And I bet a fair number operate in China. So guess who can make 1mm holograms?
Most pirates won't bother because their target markets don't care. But how hard is it for a factory to have "production overruns" or "test runs"?
In fact, I've seen a 100% original MS CD that was a _low_quality_ stamp (and was not easily readable by some drives) - you could see the "shiny side" was "disfigured" - I've seen low quality pirate CDs that looked like that, but wasn't expecting MS to use the same el-cheapo manufacturers.
I bet if MS sues one of those Chinese factory after a few too many "overruns", it'll just close down, and reopen under a new name and "new management", and start making the same stuff.
Three Pictures (Score:1)
(http://meuhlavache.enterinmydream.info/psp)
"DRM" tag...? (Score:3, Informative)
Come on, people; if you dilute a phrase enough it is liable to lose its meaning; calling all anti-theft measures from holograms on discs to security guards at the entrance of a shop "DRM" will just detract from legitimate efforts opposing the use of actual DRM to prevent fair use, etc.