Prescription Meds For Vista Sleep Disorder
Posted by
kdawson
on Sun Mar 11, 2007 07:33 AM
from the you-will-sleep-now-and-when-you-wake dept.
from the you-will-sleep-now-and-when-you-wake dept.
Arnold O'Connor writes "NeoSmart Technologies has compiled a list of hotfixes and patches provided by Microsoft for Windows Vista that address a large number of issues related to waking/resuming a Vista PC (both x86 and x64) from sleep or hibernation. Sleep-related disorders have plagued Vista since its release, though they were not present in earlier betas. Most of these fixes are due to be included in Windows Vista SP1 — codenamed Fiji."
Related Stories
[+]
Vista an Uneasy Sleeper 395 comments
Emmy King writes "'One thing we just can't wrap our mind about is the terrible, broken, and completely pitiful support for waking Vista up from a Deep Sleep or hibernation.'
Any time you attempt to wake Vista up from Hibernation or "Deep Sleep" (S3-induced sleep mode), it dies. It's either a BSOD, or a driver error, or a broken network, no DWM, lack of sound... the list goes on, and on. So much for an operating system to "power" the future! (No pun intended!) That's with properly-signed drivers and no buggy software on multiple PCs..."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Prescription Meds For Vista Sleep Disorder
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 144 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Ah! (Score:5, Funny)
Problems? (Score:1, Informative)
How widespread? (Score:4, Interesting)
Our next generation of software is being tested under Vista and we have a number of dedicated test machines and dual boot development machines of different vintages. None of them have any problems at all with suspend or hibernate.
Just because there is a cure it doesn't mean that the problem affects everybody
When will they learn. (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://tsfraser.googlepages.com/index.html)
First they have people pay them to be Beta Testers (for the privilege of being able to use the OS before the general public, and being those jerks who put 3 years of MS Vista experience on their resume). This doesn't attract people who want to thoroughly test the product, this only attracts people who think it is still the 1990s and wants to inflate their resume. So if they did report any bugs or problems it was probably for more minor things or the most major things. Sleep Problems are kinda in the middle annoying but not enough to put a bug report on.
Second poor response from my when bug testers do report a bug. Either they state that it isn't important or the conditions to get it are to off. In contrast I remember putting a bug in for Mozilla years back for an obscure problem on sizing the app across multiple displays of different resolutions. They weren't able to fix it quickly but they kept track of it until it was fixed.
Third Beta Testing is not used as much for Bug Testing but for product evaluation. It is used to see if the product is liked by the general population not as a method of fixing problems. This creates the problem 2 ways because Microsoft Beta Testers are of the following.
1. Love MS so much that they like everything that it does no matter how crappy it is, or make excuses for it problems (Don't get me wrong there are these type of people for every OS)
2. Wants to keep their Resume up to spec to keep in demand of stupid employers so they can have 3 years of Vista Experience. They don't want to report bugs or difficult to use problems because it gives them the advantage over people who just started using production Vista.
3. College Students/Professors mostly because they have extra time during the day to research these things. This group is most likely to report problems and give feedback. But that is only one segment of of the user base. And most college students and professors don't use the sleep options as much because they are on Campus which pays their electricity bills.
Vista And The Hype (Score:1, Insightful)
(http://sukhbirsingh.wordpress.com/)
Vista... (Score:1)
They have a codename for Vista's SP1 already (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://alansplayground.spaces.live.com/)
Windows XP wasn't perfect either. (Score:1)
(http://12.183.160.165/~ccfreak2k/index.html | Last Journal: Tuesday October 03 2006, @12:11PM)
How can it be FUD.... (Score:1)
1995 called (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.s5h.net/)
Fiji is Vista SP1? (Score:2)
What are your sources that Fiji is the codename of Vista SP1 anyway? For what we know, Microsoft confirmed neither of those.
When will they fix the DRM bug? (Score:4, Funny)
Of course, they'll probably claim they can't take out the DRM because it's a crucial part of the operating system.
Hmmm - wonder how ReactOS is doing lately....
Haha (Score:1)
(http://boxxa.com/)
More Disorders (Score:2, Funny)
I'm so shocked (Score:2, Interesting)
What's odd is that none of those patches or things mentioned going wrong is what I was dealing with. I was getting the click of death from my hard drives until I rebooted the computer.
I guess I can see this as very unfinished hardware drivers but for something as serious as this, Vista should have never been released in this pitiful state.
Problems with Nvidia (Score:2)
Standy Issues (Score:2)
Probably not Microsofts fault (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.webworks.se/)
When Microsoft creates a new version of windows they most likely develop it to follow the ACPI standard. By doing so, the functionality may break on non compliant boxes, and Microsoft will have to go back to add quirks to make it work.
Being the dominant OS vender, Microsoft at usually manage to get full specs to the failing devices, and have a fair chance of compensate for the errors in the hardware and BIOS.
Developers of other less common OSes, such as Linux may not be that lucky. So I really wish Microsoft hadn't bothered to fix this, unless of course they really are the ones that are responsible for this screw up, and left it to the hardware vendors. That way it would be easier for all OS vendors, including Microsoft, in the long run.
Historical Perspective (Score:2)
(http://www.threesquirrels.com/)
Despite the many irritations that my Mac brought with it, this one thing that it does extremely well.
Comatose? (Score:1)
Confirmation (Score:1)
(http://chadjohnson.ath.cx/)
When does the "Wow" start again? (Score:1, Funny)
Mac and PC (Score:5, Funny)
Mac and PC in twin beds, an alarm goes off. Mac wakes up but PC was sitting up in bed twitching nervously.
"Good morning--"
"AH!"
"I'm a... Mac."
"And I'm a p-p-PC."
"Hey, PC, haven't you been sleeping?"
"No! No, I, uh, I-I can't sleep."
"Really, do you need something?"
"No, it's not that. I-I mustn't go to sleep because I'm afraid I won't wake up. There have been reports, you know, that since the release of Vista, PCs have had problems with not waking up from sleep."
"Gee, that's too bad. Me, I have no problems waking up from sleep. I mean, within two seconds, I'm up and fully alert. That isn't true for you?"
"..."
"Uh, PC? PC, hello? Hey, PC, wake up!"
"..."
"Oh my."
Vista WON'T Sleep (Score:2)
(http://www.thefryhole.co.uk/)
Now since i installed something (I believe my new GFX Drivers) it won't sleep. It'll turn the monitor off, but when i nudge the mouse or hit the keyboard it'll turn the monitor on and it'll be at the lock screen. According to powercfg it does support S3 sleep, strange.
Codenamed "Fiji"? (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Wednesday May 16, @05:49AM)
Microsoft is in its death throes. Vista isn't an OS, it's a work in progress.
--
Toro
Couldn't be any worse than the Mac (Score:2, Insightful)
This is just about the lamest thing about Macs. And it's been this way a long time. I finally had to disable the safe sleep functionality, which means you can't swap batteries w/o losing state. And they don't make it easy to do this. A small price to pay for not frying your computer, though. Does Vista do anything this lame? Probably not.
3 years ago and still mad (Score:1)
A very appropriate code-name (Score:1)
Vista Sleep problem? (Score:1)
Re:x64? (Score:2)
Re:x64? (Score:1, Funny)
Re:x64? (Score:3, Informative)
(Last Journal: Tuesday October 02, @10:22PM)
Re:x64? (Score:2)
(http://whineymacfanboy.googlepages.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday April 12 2007, @09:28AM)
Are you retarded? x64 is the extremely important architecture from the early-mid sixties. It wasn't replaced until the x86 architecture in the mid to late 80s.
Turn on AHCI after installation (Score:2, Informative)
(http://g-rave.nl/)
Re:Only one hotfix needed (Score:1, Informative)
Re:x64? (Score:1)
Re:I'm not going to be an early-adopter lemming (Score:5, Insightful)
Exactly the same. Especially since IE7 is more or less the same for me as a webdev, I can test all of my stuff on XP.
And we gotta realize: early adotpers always get stuffed with higher prices and lower quality. It's just the way things are, even if the product is developed under most stringent quality requirements, a bunch of undetected defects will be known soon after a wide launch.
The only thing that bothers me here is that on many consumer offers, companies FORCE you to get OEM Vista with a new PC. This early after launch, and with so many known flaws, how could you possibly require your customers to buy Vista PC when XP is much better right now?!
Do you have such experiences yourself? How easy it is to get a "downgrade" and in which hardware vendors it's easiest to do so?
Re:Another MS OS, Commence Stream of Patches (Score:2)
The advantage to those, if you just need to update say your web browser, or music app, or other random file tool you don't have to reboot.
Re:Only one hotfix needed (Score:1)