Why South Korea Is Shackled To Windows 252
baron writes with a blog post explaining in detail why 99.9% of S. Korea uses Windows. This amazing tale began in 1998 when Korea decided it couldn't wait for SSL to be standardized (which it was in 1999) and commissioned an ActiveX control for secure Web transactions. At first there was a secure Netscape plugin too, but we know how that story ended. Quoting: "This nation is a place where Apple Macintosh users cannot bank online, make any purchases online, or interact with any of the nation's e-government sites online. In fact, Linux users, Mozilla Firefox users, and Opera users are also banned from any of these types of transactions..." Now that Microsoft has made ActiveX more secure in Vista, every Web site in S. Korea is scrambling to get things working again and the government is advising citizens not to install Vista. At the end of all this work, they will still be a monoculture in thrall to Microsoft, with millions of users sitting behind some of the fattest pipes in the world.
Shackled to Windows? (Score:4, Funny)
Laugh. Its funny.
Re:Shackled to Windows? (Score:5, Funny)
kekekeke
Re:Who are you laughing at, Popeye? (Score:4, Insightful)
Starcraft in South Korea (Score:5, Informative)
It's called World of Warcraft...
I don't think you realize the popularity of Starcrft in South Korea. It's almost a national sport, there are multiple cable TV channels that show tournaments live with play-by-play commentators.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
If you're interested in educating yourself, if not for your own interest, then for the sake of not looking like
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But I can just not care if people think I'm an asshat! That's much easier. Anyway, I appreciate that starcraft has units that are genuinely different between sides - In fact TA ruined this over time by making the two sides more and more like each other to the point where if you just install the game and the 3.0c (IIRC) update and don't install any expansion packs, they've already kind of blown it in that department. But I hate everything else about the game, and it's still true that there are only a small
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you should just read my comment. I'm not talking about playing starcraft, although I think that's boring too. I'm talking about watching it. See, this comment [slashdot.org] talks not about how Starcraft is a wonderful game, but about how watching it is a major pas
How easy to give up Freedom (Score:4, Insightful)
and how difficult to get it back
This is not just for Computing but the concept is more important than ever now, in Computing
TCO Study? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought about that Twilight Zone episode [wikipedia.org] where Burgess Merideth was finally alone in the world to read all his books.....and then broke his glasses.
In S. Korea....all that bandwidth, and nothing useful to use it with....
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I am guessing there are people who control hordes of zombie machines that would disagree.
Re:How easy to give up Freedom (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
When in doubt, make up your own cryptosystem... (Score:5, Funny)
The Anti-Massachusetts (Score:5, Insightful)
be on to something. (If you we're already thinking that.)
Re:The Anti-Massachusetts (Score:4, Interesting)
Seoul: 37 34' N 126 58' E
Which explains a lot; 126 58' E - 71 2' W = 198 00'.
In other words, we're practically 180 apart.
Like Geek heven.. (Score:2, Insightful)
Kind of bashing Windows I guess, but it makes me wonder if it's even possible to convert to more open standards at a reasonable price? Even with the "more secure" ActiveX controls, its still easier to modify those existing controls in VS than it is to rebuild the site under OSS.
Sigh. Owning a Monopoly must be nice.
Re:Like Geek heven.. (Score:4, Insightful)
The first thing I wondered when I read this was, "Did they learn their lesson?" They standardized their entire country on a closed system, and when the vendor of that closed system initiates an arbitrary change, they're pretty much screwed and forced to rebuild things. In my mind, the smart thing would be to bite the bullet, drop Active X, and switch to Firefox and have a true multi-platform solution. Hell, if they can't do everything they require in an extension, they can go as far as making their own fork, and they'll retain that option in the future.
Really, this should be a lesson for everyone.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Owning the two dark blue properties just before GO is even nicer.
That's what you get (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why? Did the government _force_ them to use this tech?
Apparently (Score:2, Funny)
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/24/21023
too bad kdawson just upgraded to vista
Diversity (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Botnet and FatPipes (Score:2)
Also, a major flaw in MS-Win could render this country's Internet infrastructure and systems useless.
They really should reconsider this decision. Strategically it isn't a good one. And I don't mean creating another monopoly with Linux or whatever, just give the users a choice, so that their OS environment gets more colored.
Shackled to...windows? (Score:5, Funny)
Alternatively... (Score:5, Funny)
wait? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:wait? (Score:5, Insightful)
Well said.
This tale still might have a silver lining, though. A single security vulnerability, properly exploited, could turn the entire economy of South Korea into a cautionary tale. For a decade afterward, at board meetings where purchasing or standardization decisions are being debated, people will randomly interject "But we could end up like South Korea!".
This is slashdot. Do we believe what we say about the perils of vendor lockin and closed-source? If so, then we should also believe that South Korea's predicament will eventually become a clear and obvious error.
Screw nukes (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Uh, it's already a clear and obvious error that has cost them all interoperability, compromised security, and cost them piles of money. I think they're already a cautionary tale. The hard part is getting PHBs to believe that it could happen to them.
Re:wait? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
It's just that it wasn't so publicly shouted out as to the reason why. I cannot tell you how many attempts to break into my network come from IP Addresses in South Korea or how much spam my servers scrub away that originates in South Korea.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is MS's fault how? (Score:5, Insightful)
Yeah, I'm not getting how this is anybody's fault except S. Korea's. SEED is an open specification. There is no reason the Korean community can't develop a plug-in for other systems. All that is required is for the S. Korean CA to allow it. Again, that's S. Korea's fault.
The only fault of Microsoft's lies in an area that the author is grossly misinformed. He says "In IE 7 and in Vista, Microsoft has re-architected Active X controls in such a way to make them 'more safe' by requiring a user action for the control to run", and then links to a page about the Eolas patent resolution. Many places have had to recode websites and controls after this change. While it is Microsoft's fault for the implementation, the impact on S. Korea is entirely up to them.
Sorry, you made your bed.
Re:This is MS's fault how? (Score:5, Interesting)
You need to understand the Korean mentality. It wouldn't have mattered if the government made Active-X the standard, or if they outlawed it completely. Hell, it wouldn't have mattered if the government didn't do anything. This would've happened regardless. The reason is that unlike in America where it's cool to be different and unique, the Korean mentality is to be as homogeneous as possible. Anybody "weird" is singled out and alienated. This mindset is embedded in their society, culture, personal and professional lives, and everything else they do.
The mere fact MS bundles IE with XP pretty much ENSURED that IE would be used by the vast majority of users in Korea.
Even if standards were opened to allow Firefox, Safari, or Opera access to everything online, I will bet that IE will still have 99.9% of the market. Simply because it's what everybody else is using.
Re: (Score:2)
How did that come to be? How is it possible to raise an entire country of emotional bullies [truthout.org] and not have it blow up on itself?
"For his intimates and those closer to home, Bush appears to be what is called an emotional bully. An emotional bully gains control using sarcasm, teasing, mocking
Re: (Score:2)
Not WIndows Fault (Score:2, Insightful)
No, the problem is that incompetently created websites use delicate nonportable nonstandard proprietary software that is only interoperative with one single obsolete platform.
Don't blame Vista; blame people who aren't responsible, experienced, or forward-looking enough to see why complying with standards is so necessary.
Now let's see how people will fix their glaring mistake
Re: (Score:2)
It's only "obsolete" because it was poorly designed in the first place and the vendor had to drop support for it in Vista. Although you can blame the web sites for being stupid and not anticipating that they were going to get screwed by Microsoft, Microsoft is still the primary party at fault here.
And if you think Vista's "advanced te
Mod this guy up! (Score:2)
Korean computers SUCKKKKK!!! (Score:5, Informative)
1. it's running Windows with IE and at least 3 extraneous toolbars
2. it hasn't been defragmented since the computer was first built
3. EVERY website HAS to install software to make it run properly
4. EVERY website the user has bookmarked has at least 5 megabytes of flash (and they're all advertisements)
Everybody in Korea signs up for everything, not knowing how useless the service is, how dangerous it is on their computer, and how much traffic it eats up. Just go to www.daum.net [daum.net] or www.naver.co.kr [naver.co.kr], the two most popular media portals in Korea. What's worse is that Koreans prefer that kind of interface over Google [google.com].
I'm not trying to bash Koreans, Windows, or Internet Explorer at all. It's just that when you put the three together, bad things are bound to happen.
Re:Korean computers SUCKKKKK!!! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
They didn't seem bandwith-intensive to me, but of course Adblock+ and NoScript helps a lot. :P
Korean _WEBSITES_ SUCKKKKK!!! (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Korean computers SUCKKKKK!!! (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Hmm, 300-600kbps and still it takes awhile to load everything. 50%+ CPU load with all the various flash, and MY EYES, MY EYES, DEAR LORD the layout is TERRIBLE!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
1. it's running Windows with IE and at least 3 extraneous toolbars
2. it hasn't been defragmented since the computer was first built
3. EVERY website HAS to install software to make it run properly
4. EVERY website the user has bookmarked has at least 5 megabytes of flash (and they're all advertisements)
Everybody in Korea signs up for everything, not knowing how useless the service is, how dangerous it is on their computer, and how much traffic it eats up. Just go to www.daum.net or www.naver.co.kr, the two mo
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
ActiveX (Score:5, Informative)
A
Personnely I doubt that Vista will break these Korean ActiveX modules indefinetely, as MS can release a patch after the OS is releashed and selling, at their leisure. MS would never create a situation where an entire country is put off their flagship product, especially a country with 99.9% MS Windows usage, as stated in the article.
While I find the prevalent MS monoculture in South Korea in itself quite alarming and surprising, I don't think that the compatability issues with Vista are a cause for major concern. Nobody is foring anybody to upgrade to Vista after all.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I think you'll find the problem is that it's the very fundamental design decisions in ActiveX that are the problem.
ActiveX was originally designed with almost no thought to sec
Proprietary software (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
It's that last part that freaks me out... (Score:5, Insightful)
Just thinking about it makes me want to tell my firewall to shun all traffic from large swaths of the world...
Another question: Couldn't this be forced through liability? I.e. These companies need to switch to using the now much-more secure SSL to handle transactions, or find themselves liable when their customers identities are stolen through their weak quasi-encryption scheme. That's why US companies did it--they didn't want to get sued because a weak protocol was cracked.
Re: (Score:2)
I guess there's a price to pay with being on the "cutting edge".
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
*** STOP 0x0000007B (0xF201B84C,0xC0000034,0x00000000,0x00000000)
INACCESSIBLE_BOOT_DEVICE
If this is the first time you've seen this Stop error screen, you are
very fortunate. However, it is highly unlikely that this will be the
last time you will see this.
This particular error means that there was a problem reading the boot
information from the hard disk drive. If you are hearing strange
clicking noises coming from your computer, you should go out and buy
a new hard drive as soon as pos
other parallels (Score:4, Insightful)
The Government of Canada uses a public key infrastructure system, that only works in some browsers. Famously for the past census, only some people could access it.
Some important sites, such as banks and airlines, don't support other browsers or require plugins as well. It is getting better with the important cross platform critical mass of Firefox, but far from perfect.
Is it a public highway, or something designed only for Ford Explorers(tm)?
Re:other parallels (Score:5, Informative)
In fact the Canada Revenue Agency website even supports Opera, among other things.
http://www.netfile.gc.ca/browser-e.html [netfile.gc.ca]
CIBC, Royal Bank, ScotiaBank, TD Bank, PC Financial all support Safari and other minority browsers
http://www.cibc.com/ca/legal/browser-security.htm
http://www.royalbank.com/online/faqindex.html [royalbank.com]
http://www.scotiabank.com/cda/content/0,1608,CID4
http://www.tdcanadatrust.com/ebanking/sup-br.jsp [tdcanadatrust.com]
http://www.banking.pcfinancial.ca/a/security/what
Re: (Score:2)
I was really talking generally of the internet/web as a vendor neutral space, particularly in the public sphere. For example, the LCBO's original web site was 100% Flash, and you'll sometimes see sites that requir
I'm SO glad you clarified this (Score:3, Funny)
It's good that you put up this article for us, helping to clarify that we're talking about South Korea and not North Korea.
Thank you. My comrades in North Korea will be relieved to hear this.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm all for less dupes but you people need to get a grip sometimes.
uh? (Score:2, Interesting)
maybe this has something to do with a fervent windows dedication? linux games are still limted to cedega, and no one wants to pay for play, although some people don't care, like my friend who pays their dev fee on top of his WoW subscription; i guess it depends on your dispos
this is a perfect indicator (Score:3, Interesting)
Shackled? And this has hurt them how? (Score:2, Interesting)
According to Wikipedia, South Korea's economy began a miraculous recovery starting in 1998. They enjoyed 10% growth in 1999 and 9% in 2000. Growth continued, though at a slightly slower (but very respectable) 6% after that. And interestingly, the major driver of that growth is in the service industry - the very segment of the e
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
And if they make the same mistake again and just retool for Vista/IE7 instead of migrating to open standards, another huge up-front cost when those proprietary formats and "standards" go the way proprietary formats always do.
It's kind of like taking massive amounts of coke - sure, your m
Broken, yes. But is it being fixed? (Score:2)
That'd remove the cross-platform problems. (You'd still have the cross-browser problems, but IE+Firefox is infinitely better than just IE, even if Opera/Safari/etc don't work)
Patents, maybe? Or just lack of developer
Can you say "morons"? (Score:2)
I knew you could.
Give Gates a chance and the US will be "shackled" as well.
ActiveX controls - the SECOND biggest stupid POS Microsoft ever produced - after the Registry.
Or maybe it's the DLL - I'm currently fighting a client's ancient Windows 95 machine (don't ask!) that is locked in DLL hell with the oleaut32.dll crap...
Somebody put Microsoft out of business NOW! Please!
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah! Shared libraries suck! Everything should be statically linked. That's also why I'm just performing an rm
In Korea... (Score:2)
TCO will include this? (Score:2)
That's the explanation, what's the solution? (Score:2)
It is worse elsewhere, almost ... (Score:3, Interesting)
The matter is worse in other parts of the world where many more were affected.
A while ago, I wrote about Microsoft and Arabization [baheyeldin.com] and the issue of browser independence [baheyeldin.com].
Remember that there are about 300 million native Arabic speakers, and it is the 5th language or so worldwide, spread over 20+ countries. Not to mention the many others who read or speak Arabic as a second language.
In the mid to late 1990s, Microsoft entrenched itself in the Arabic internet market. Most sites were just unusable form anything other than Microsoft Internet Explorer.
Since MS IE does not adhere to standards, and it became the dominant browser by the early 2000s, this monopoly further entrenched Microsoft as the sole technology provider for web sites in the Middle East.
Speaking to a developer at a fairly large company about it, he said : "forget Mac and Linux, we say the application requires Microsoft IE 5 [at the time]". I was flabbergasted by that attitude.
Not only is he mandating a certain browser, but an entire operating system and hardware architecture! And that went unchallenged.
Fortunately, things started to improve over the last year or two, with FireFox gaining ground, and there is no single government forcing a monoculture via banking security or something like that. Sites that used not to work (including Al Jazeera Arabic web site) are usable once more, perhaps with a few glitches here and there.
Still, most people use Hotmail for their email, and MSN for chat (voice and text). It may take time, but I hope the spread of FireFox, Mac OS/X and to a lesser extent Linux will continue to keep web site developers cross platform, and never force the monoculture that was prevalent up until a few years ago.
& I thought N Korea was a barbaric dictatorshi (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Its purpose is to manage restrictions on what users can or cannot do with the content. In what way does it manage rights?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=218612&cid=17
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
People are attacking me more than they attack the RIAA/MPAA. And I didnt even claim I was the writer.... they just assume that. I even explain to another commenter later on that I DIDNT WRITE THIS. [slashdot.org]
It was originally a joke, but you all need to chill.
Re: (Score:2)
you're assuming that the people berating you are the same people violating copyright. that is not a safe assumption. this is a logical fallacy, but I'm too lazy to look up which one.
Re: (Score:2)
If you could, you ought to consider WHY I do this? I give coherent arguments on other troll threads (we
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Now we know where all those spam-distributing botnets are located. Bring out teh bombers! :)
Re: (Score:2)
So I can use any operating system.
So I can use any random computer anywhere (friend's, work, library, random internet kiosk at the breckenridge ski resort up on the mountain)
And that I never considered that amazing before today.
Amazing that you would use a random computer ... (Score:2)
Perhaps I'm paranoid, but I find it amazing that you would use a random computer to do online banking. Who knows what key logging software has been maliciously installed.