Slashdot Log In
Looking Beyond Vista To Fiji and Vienna
Posted by
CowboyNeal
on Sat Dec 30, 2006 12:20 PM
from the better-and-better dept.
from the better-and-better dept.
Vinit wrote in with an article that describes Microsoft's strategy for future versions of Windows. It begins: "As we all know that Microsoft Vista was originally scheduled to be released in 2003, after two years of Windows XP, but it got delayed by over five years due to various reasons. Definitely, Vista is very very improved OS over the previous versions, but the delayed in the launch has cost Microsoft, billions of dollars. Now the question at the moment is, what exactly after Vista? Microsoft can't afford to wait another five years for an operating system. People are becoming more aware of the choices they have, and Linux is no longer a hobbyist OS, and that day isn't far away when it becomes simple enough to be a viable alternative to Windows. The competition is fierce. That is why, to stay at the top, Microsoft has planned a 'Vista R2', codenamed 'Fiji' which will be released some time in 2008. And after Fiji, there will be Windows 'Vienna'. Windows Fiji, will not be a totally different OS from Vista; but it will be an add-on. Whereas Vienna will be totally different from Vista."
Related Stories
[+]
Vista Followup Already in the Works 482 comments
DesertBlade passed us an InfoWorld article, which has the news that Microsoft is already hard at work on the next version of Windows ... and we may see it as early as 2009. Possibly codenamed Vienna, the next Windows iteration will be coming a brief two and a half years after Vista's launch. This is the same timeframe Microsoft claims it would have utilized for Vista, had they not put Longhorn 'on the back burner' to deal with security issues in XP. Corporate Vice President of Development Ben Fathi is already discussing features for the next OS: "We're going to look at a fundamental piece of enabling technology. Maybe its hypervisors, I don't know what it is ... Maybe it's a new user interface paradigm for consumers. It's too early for me to talk about it ... But over the next few months I think you're going to start hearing more and more."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Looking Beyond Vista To Fiji and Vienna
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 600 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
|
2
(1)
|
2
Fiji (Score:3, Funny)
Why not in Fiji?
Re:Fiji (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Fiji (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.slashdot.org/)
Re:Fiji (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.samthurston.com/)
Yeah they also built in the google desktop search, caught up (sort of) with linux and mac security from five years ago, and stuck in a bunch of Treacherous Computing and Digital Restrictions Managment.
Hell of an upgrade.
Re:Fiji (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.dittobox.net/)
Re:Fiji (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Fiji (Score:5, Funny)
Microsoft's naming convention (Score:4, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Saturday November 03, @04:58AM)
Re:Fiji (Score:5, Funny)
I myself only install Microsoft operating systems as a last resort.
Re:Fiji (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Fiji (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Fiji (Score:5, Funny)
(http://diskis.org/)
Founded some 2500 years ago. Not like it sprung up over night, like the maybe dozen Viennas you got in USA
Re:Fiji (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.littlelui.de/ | Last Journal: Sunday June 22 2003, @05:38AM)
Ah c'mon. If you steal our cities, steal Klagenfurt (feel free to take the whole of Carinthia) but leave our capital alone.
Sincerely,
A Concerned Austrian.
Re: Windows Klagenfurt!! (Score:4, Funny)
(Last Journal: Sunday January 21 2007, @01:58AM)
"We are announcing the Christmas Season release of Windows Klagenfurt. Designed as the replacement to what was code named Vienna, we wanted to draw upon the more phonetically inclusive nature of that town as a metaphor to reflect the diversity of rich experience to be found in this newest Windows release.
***
Remark from Steve Jobs:
"Windows Klagenfurt, hmm? So they picked a name that's as easy to pronounce as it is to maintain the security."
Re:Fiji (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Sunday November 11, @03:52AM)
Re:Fiji (Score:4, Interesting)
1) new windows is announced
2) it is delivered 1 to 3 years later than promised
3) oddly, it turns out a new windows actually arrives in stores every 5 years like clockwork.
Hmmmm.... I'd say it was an MO. MS is always ontime. The early announcment is just a bluff to keep people from buying the competition. Hey don't switch to linux cause vista is gonna be so good and it's comming out soon.
Re:Fiji (Score:4, Informative)
2000 is technically NT 5.0.
XP is technically NT 5.1
Server 2003 wasn't filler, it was designed to fulfill and entirely different role-- serving. It's the same NT codebase as always, it just has enhancements/modifications to better support serving and scalability. It's basically XP without all of the userland GUI stuff in it. Technically, it's NT 5.2
For that matter, 98 wasn't really filler, either. It was how they should have done 95 in the first place! ME, yes, that was filler. I will give you that much.
For more information on how things actually are/were, check this page out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT [wikipedia.org]
Re:Where's Saddam? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.sugapablo.net/)
See Apple for details (Score:5, Interesting)
Once you get your basic design right you can gradually improve and alter things. This is where Microsoft failed, their security model was flawed, so with Vista they've fixed it (or so they say).
Re:See Apple for details (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.animal-assist.org/donate.html)
Re:See Apple for details (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, you used to be allowed full access to your own files and do with them as you please.
We'll have no more of that nonsense.
KFG
Re:Geared for speach recognition (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.kibbee.ca/)
think differently (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://technocrat.net/ | Last Journal: Saturday November 10, @06:08PM)
In a perfect world what you said makes some sense, but think on this: In the US the population is aging. Younger folks are a minority, and guess what? You'll get old, too. With aging comes afflictions like arthritis. Once you get it, even a twinge, you'll understand how incredibly $valuable$ and how incredibly useful a voice activated system could be. The first company to really nail it will be rich beyond the dreams of avarice as the expression goes.
MY GF has it in her hands, sometimes she just sits and cries because her hands are on fire,that's how she describes it, like being on fire, and then she can't do anything, nothing that requires any dexterity at all. She used to do fine painting, a lot of intense sewing, etc, stuff like that, but can't anymore. Typing is just out, and there are many many millions like her out there now. It's like having no fingers at all, but it hurts. She can only type very slowly and painfully and because of that hardly uses her computer anymore.
Now, how abvout blind folks? Think it might be a handy option for them as well? How about folks with anything like palsy? Heck, I am thinking for me, say I am out working on some vehicle and I want to look something up. Spend 5 minutes with the degreaser before I go touch the keyboard, or just yammer at it to get to where I want to get, and print it out? Useful there too.
Re:See Apple for details (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://nekobox.org/)
Apple releases patches on a monthly basis, as does Microsoft.
Apple releases updates on a quarterly basis; Microsoft seems to do it on a yearly basis.
Apple releases upgrades on a yearly basis; Microsoft seems to take 5 years to do it.
Some further explanation:
A patch is a small change to fix bug.
An update is a collection of patches tested together, as well as small updates in functionality.
An upgrade is brand new functionality that was not available before.
Re:See Apple for details (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.ericbarker.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday October 10, @08:43PM)
That's because as an OS matures, the amount of new features and functionality that is required or even thought up, becomes less. Bugs get ironed out until there are litteraly no more bugs. OS X has been maturing and developing in both features and fixes since its conception. Of course, the computer industry never stands still, so an OS will always have to accomidate for new hardware, standards, and security concerns.
But here's an example:
MacOS 10.2 needed a better way of navigating individual windows, so designers created Exposé for 10.3... problem solved. From then on, there's no reason to spend a lot of time and energy into window navigation features. Little by little, every need gets satisfied, and there's less and less big new features to create.
I'm not saying that OS X is perfect, or even close to perfect; I hope it continues to grow and evolve as long as it exists. For one thing, it bewilders me why the designers have never bothered to standardize the window design in the Finder... which is still a bit clumsy. For the most part, Apple is pretty solid on creating very concise UI standards that are based on fundimental principals of grapic design and interface philosophy... but the finder is one area that they've stumbled a bit, and even though its probably more functional than OS9s, it's not as air-tight in regards to keeping with a standard Look & Feel. The original intent of brushed metal, for one, was a standardized Look & Feel for applications that simulate physical hardware: calcultors, CD players, Movie players, etc, so why it shows up in file navigation systems and web browsers is beyond me.
So, OS X has some improvements to make, but from a functional standpoint, they're small knit-picks.
Re:See Apple for details (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://mangahowto.dnsdojo.org/howto/)
The delay in Vista seems to have been caused by the desire to release (even internally) a single "OS product". But the fact of the matter is that an OS is composed of hundreds (thousands even) of small parts. MS is trying to release "the latest and greatest" of each part simultaneously. The inevitable ping-pong between departments trying to get it all to work with one another causes massive delays.
FLOSS usually avoids this problem because each project is developed completely independently. Most projects do not use the bleeding edge GTK library for instance. They use the latest "released" and "stable" library. Even though GTK development continues, projects usually don't care. They tie themselves to a stable rather than moving target.
It is generally the job of the distro to make it all work together. But again, they are working against stable targets for the most part. Nobody says, "Hey it's a week before release and the GTK guys released a new version of the library. Let's delay and make everything use it." (Generally speaking that is -- I'm sure there have been exceptions).
Of course there are some problems. Sometimes you just *have* to release 2 versions of GTK in the distro. But who cares (Yay for ld.so! Why the Windows people can't see the benefit of dealing with shared libraries like this in completely beyond me...) Of course worse is moving between versions of something like perl.
It's strange... I've tried to convince several of the companies I've worked for to operate in this manner, but I can't get anyone to try it. Have 2 different groups: Development - that works on a backlog of tasks and incrementally improves various pieces of the product; and Release - that takes versions of the development pieces, matches them with marketing requirements, makes a cohesive product and releases when the marketing requirements are met.
I keep trying to tell people that there is no need to freeze development just because you are doing a release. In some shops I've worked in I've literally sat on my ass for months waiting for the release to go out (while some other poor schmuck is camping in his cubicle trying to finish some last minute requirements).
Re:See Apple for details (Score:4, Interesting)
Having the source code is a great advantage. A
Re:Shared libraries? So now DLLs are good? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Shared libraries? So now DLLs are good? (Score:4, Informative)
(http://iabervon.org/~barkalow/ | Last Journal: Saturday May 31 2003, @02:01AM)
DLLs are only bad because you can't set up a system with a sufficiently complete collection of them at the same time that every program will get the DLL it needs. Just because Microsoft's implementation of something is terminally broken doesn't mean it's not otherwise a great idea.
Five years? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Five years? (Score:5, Informative)
Perhaps what the author meant to say was that the intended 2 year interval between releases became 5+ years.
New OS? I Think Not... (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://kweilo.chex-uk.net/)
How, we all ask, will it achieve such wonders?
The answer: "Windows Fiji will feature a more powerful sidebar, Monaco, a music authoring tool similar to Apple's Garageband, default playback of HD-DVD, more advanced Speech Recognition, and new themes, icons, wallpapers, games, and minor tweaks to almost everything."
Mmmhmm. I can't be the only one sitting here thinking 'what a load of bull'. I mean, really, if I wanted to get this apparently 'new generation' of computing, I'd go out and buy a
Bill Gates, Speech Recognition and Crediblity. (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://yro.slashdot.org/~twitter/journal/177855 | Last Journal: Sunday November 04, @10:56PM)
Anybody who follows Gates knows that he has been serious about speach (sic) recognition for a long time.
It's hard for anyone who does not "follow" the cult of Gates to take anything he says seriously. He's been promising the moon and stars for decades but has yet to deliver anything but mild UI modifications. Generally, his company writes down a wish list of competitor's features and promises to deliver them bigger and better in his "next" release. As the years roll by he drops all of the features until he's left with something like Vista, which offerst the user little beyond DRM madness and a UI upgrade, which he then invariably promotes as "revolutionary".
Despite all of that, I thought he liked to talk about handwriting recognition. You know, the tablet PC, that' he's promissed the world since the Apple Newton. Palm, OpenZarus and Xstroke all beat him to the punch and his tablet PC has yet to catch on.
He might as well claim his next OS will have AI and do "seemless" speech recognition. He won't loose much credibility that way. At this point, he's got so little to use, I'd sooner believe penis pill spam.
Re:New Generation? I Think So (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.nine-times.org/)
Yes, he's been crazy about speech recognition, and it makes a certain sort of sense. However, the idea that speech recognition alone will replace the keyboard interface shows a lack of imagination. Part of the reason we've stuck with keyboards for as long as we have is they're efficient. They're cheap, can operate easily in noisy areas, and allow for purposeful manipulation of text. If you're a good typist, keyboards can be faster and easier, too. And can you imagine trying to play Half-Life with a speech interface? Keyboards aren't going anywhere.
So what does that leave for speech? Maybe you can say, "launch microsoft word" and then, once it's launched, you start typing. Or you could say, "next song" and iTunes would switch to the next song instead of having to click on a button. Wowwie! And what happens when you're sitting at your computer, and you say something to your friend about "the next song in my playlist..." How does it know you don't want to go to the next song?
The problem is that having computers respond naturally to speech requires an awful lot of AI that we won't have anytime soon. Even if we do have that amount of AI in a PC someday, it's still not clear that a keyboard won't be preferable for many interactions. Of course, maybe once we have that level of AI, we won't be trying to type anything up anymore anyway. I'll say, "Computer, please write a letter to my mom." and the computer will just do it. "Computer, write me a slashdot post on this topic."
There are only two groups of people I'm aware of who think that it's a good idea speech recognition for the purpose of doing away with keyboards, and have really good text-to-speech to you so you won't have to read. Those two groups are "children" and "Bill Gates". The best major applications for these technologies are accessibility for the disabled and portable devices. That's pretty much it for the foreseeable future.
As you said (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.bobpitch.com/)
Few things I'd like to see are:
1) Tight integration to client devices. I stuck MCE onto my PC and it really was a pleasure to see my TV stuff picked up by their lovely BDA drivers and all that Tivo stuff appear. Whilst that was nice, it was nowhere near the f'in quantum leap when I pointed my 360 at my big PC over the wifi and got all those features suddenly appearing on my 40" screen.
Wifi implementation is very cheap and MS are normally good at allowing 3rd parties to access their tech (unlike Apple), yet have not quite managed to sell it very well. I'd like a clock radio that played my podcasts etc - I think I just like the idea of having a big central PC that can do all the heavy lifting and a number of thin clients that can all access it (and not all have to have their own bespoke software running on the back end).
2) Haptic stuff. Look at the Wii. Could be basic stuff like a laptop just turning off the screen if there's nobody sitting infront of it or mouse gestures like strokeit integrated into the GUI.
3) Telephony. I've no idea why I have an IP deskphone and laptop sitting on my desk. They have messenger which provides perfectly good person to person calls, they have outlook that provides a centralized mail and calendar resource - can't they just bolt on telephony? Point my deskphone number to my laptop wherever it is, divert to mobile if my PC is off, hold calls if I'm in a meeting etc?
4) Have some balls when it comes to hardware manufacturers. Apple is able to say 'right, we're using the new bios thingie' and make the hardware. MS tentatively seems to make steps towards it, but continuously supports old stuff. Now I know they have to support the old stuff and I know many people appreciate it - but they need to clearly define what hardware they want people to use to optimize 'the experience' and tell Dell. They have started to do this with the Vista certification - I've no idea why people bitch abotu this, but if you want flashy graphics, you need a decent PC and you need people to be able to buy that decent PC with confidence. The quasi-flash drives supported under Vista are a good thing - but I WANT MORE.
5) Better implementation of Bluetooth (and whatever comes along next). I'd love to be able to have my PC boot up (maybe into hibernation) when my phone walks in through the door. Popup on my phone screen with a summary (at least) when I get an email.
Just reading through my points, it seems I want integration. I may be in a minority as most people here seem to get their knickers in a twist when MS bundle a browser with XP - but I want all my stuff to just work together nicely and out of the box. I can't expect MS to support every device, but maybe if they just published some open standards (or formally adopted the perfectly good open ones we already have) hardware manufacturers WOULD comply (as I would buy).
Re:As you said (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.newsique.com/)
I can TOTALLY picture myself in a crowded air port entering my vpn password using the amazing voice recognition they're touting.
Re:New Generation? I Think So (Score:5, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Thursday May 03 2007, @11:34AM)
So, at this time, one job was the person who listened to a recording and transcribed the recording into written text, oftimes reformatting it in a prescribed fashion. Though the shuttle is piloted largely by three redundant computers, we still have people transcribing letters. To be sure, some of this has to do with the amount that is costs for a human to do each of these tasks, and the accuracy, but a lot has to do with the difficulty of automating creative tasks like cooking and cleaning and transcribing. Add to this that in many cases people wish these tasks to be done how they like at the moment, and not in an absolute prescribed form and the result is a huge engineering problem.
So, if we begin to live in the 21st century, and leave the bigoted preconceptions behind, then we see that speech recognition is a specific solution that efficiently utilizes a specific resource, the human brain. And, if like in flight, we do not try to emulate the flapping of the wings but the result of the flapping of the wings, then we might see that the keyboard based solution is in fact an efficient solution that utilizes the strengths of the current resource, the electronic computer.
This does not mean that speech recognition does not have its place. Apple uses it to allow the launching of applications and the like, which is useful for certain people. More advanced speech recognition is available for those who want it. However, spending time on this instead of say, a pseudo self organizing file system, seems quite pointless.
Why did this even get posted? (Score:5, Insightful)
Summary: (Score:3, Funny)
Vienna: Microsoft takes a philosophy class. Wonders why it did everything a certain way for the past 15 years. Gets high. Oooo...look at all the pretty colors and new interface paradigms.
Actual article (Score:4, Informative)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Don't you hate reading the whole thing and getting to the end and seeing SOURCE? I wish I could digg this article DOWN!
Re:Actual article (Score:4, Insightful)
While I have no other reason to question the integrity of the blogger, or the uhm... other blogger. My bullshit detector is hovering at about '9'. I am a cynical man, and this new business of establishing credibility through a network of blogs ("gross" syndication might be too generous) instead of a genuine original credible content rubs me the wrong way. There are a lot (most?) of blogs out there with no other purpose than to serve as an adsense speed bump between you and what you actually want to read. A great many of which don't even lead you there, but to a labyrinth of plagiarism and advertisements that if you are diligent enough to follow the long trail, end at a wholly non-credible source (if they source at all).
Yes, it is the second [slashdot.org] time I posted this, but since that thread was off topic and you are addressing the issue directly... forgive me.
Re:Microsoft: *kicks dead horse* (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.last.fm/user/uhlume/)
Yet another Apple innovation, appropriated by Microsoft. Have they no shame?
It's Windows 98 SE all over again. (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.livejournal.com/~freontrip)
Who wrote this? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/)
I'm not looking for Shakespeare here, but the submitter is what, eight?
Re:Who wrote this? (Score:5, Interesting)
While I have no reason to doubt either the blogger, or the uhm... other blogger. My bullshit detector is hovering at about '9'. It wouldn't be the first time someone sourced themselves in the pursuit of adsense dollars. Or just to lend themselves some credibility for that matter.
Re:Who wrote this? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://theravensnest.org/ | Last Journal: Sunday October 07, @07:05AM)
From TFA (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://rodness.blogspot.com/)
While in Windows Vienna the current interface will be completely stripped, no more explorer shells, and taskbars. No start menu. Probably no toolbars, or menus and Speech Recognition will become a major input device. One thing is for certain, Vienna won't be just an operating system, but a new generation in computing.
So Fiji is going to rip off all the cool features of Leopard and incorporate into Vista while Vienna aims to be the next generation of computing. Why does this sound so familiar... oh wait....
And didn't we just recently have an article on stupid movie uses of computers that blasted the "talking computer" from Star Trek as being a completely useless interface? So why is this a good thing?
But it's also Microsoft. "2003" was codespeak for 2007, so "2008" means 2015 or something... and all the cool new features will be dropped for reasons of infeasibility anyway.
"Definitely, Vista is very very improved OS.." (Score:5, Interesting)
No Support for IPX, Appletalk, WebDav, or NetDDE
Even less capable backup built in than XP, which itself had inferior backup to previous versions
High cost
Bloat #1 - takes over 10GB of hard disk
Bloat #2 - 2GB of RAM needed
Crippled wordpad can't read
Obtuse menuing requiring going in half a dozen or more levels in for basic controls
Stupid ReadyBoost trying to do what would be better done by simple swap/page to usb device, except RB is MUCH slower
Hardware vendors not in hurry to support Vista
in short, you'll gain nothing and lose functionality by going to Vista. save your money, just say NO.
other reasons why vista is inferior (Score:4, Informative)
50+ millions lines of code bloat
lots of stupid, unnecessary eye candy
alleged security features, some that have already been broken ("most secure o/s ever", my ass)
a virgin ip stack
DRM silliness
kernel restrictions that keep third party security systems out -- said systems having done a much better job than Microsquish at keeping the bad guys out. You can, of course, pay extra for windows "defender" -- somewhat like buying an antidote from the people that poisoned you in the first place
As Ren and Stimpy might say to Ballmer, "you eeeediot!"
I'll agree with everything else, BUT... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:I'll agree with everything else, BUT... (Score:4, Insightful)
Question is - why Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, even AIX can provide support for IPX and AppleTalk, and Microsoft new, ohh so super new OS can't?
Re:"Definitely, Vista is very very improved OS.." (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.nodomain.org/)
Wow.. didn't realize that. WTF were they thinking?
I'm currently on a 2gb vista test machine and it's going into swap all the time. 2gb is really not enough... it's dog slow due to the swapping.
Add to that:
Broken program files menu that doesn't cascade (so you have to know where what you're looking for is before you look for it).
Font bugs that regularly turn the fonts to unreadable crap requiring a reboot.
Claims to have NFS client but this does not actually function.
Running about 50% of available software switches aeroglass off. Sometimes it doesn't come back on without a reboot.
S...L...O...W... I mean this is a dual processor 64bit machine and it's slower than the celeron running XP next to it.
Has it really? (Score:5, Interesting)
Until the day Vista ships, MS is getting huge amounts of cash from Windows XP licenses on almost every new PC sold. Most people don't run out and buy a new OS for existing PCs, they usually stick with whatever came with it. How exactly will Vista increase MS's revenue to the tune of billions? Had they released something sooner, what new cash flow would that have provided and would it have justified the expense for development?
I'm sortof dancing around my real point here: I think the *real* reason so much time has gone buy since XP is that Microsoft really hasn't had much incentive to release a new OS.
After the fiasco that was WinFS... (Score:4, Insightful)
Bad Omen (Score:5, Funny)
WinFS? (Score:5, Interesting)
As for "file locations" being managed by applications - mmm, no thanks, I rather group files by projects which can involve many applications. What I'd really love is a return to the functionality present in Word for DOS, where the application would look in the current working directory for project specific configuration files.
Re:64bit linux world-domination-201 by 2008 (Score:4, Informative)
(http://theravensnest.org/ | Last Journal: Sunday October 07, @07:05AM)
I think Mark Twain said it best (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://zoeshire.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday October 31 2002, @05:12PM)
We've heard it all before. Seriously. And it happens just like that: "Yeah, we know XP isn't that much of an upgrade to MS-Windows 2k, but you should see Longhorn! Oh, it's gonna be great! It'll milk your cows, skim the cream, and make fresh ice cream! It'll put your kids through college! Oh, and it'll, uh, make your complexion clear up, and get rid of your herpes!"
Every time Microsoft releases a less-than-stellar product (which is invariably), they start bragging about how great things will be in the *next* release, on which they haven't even started working. That's the Microsoft modus operandi: promise more than the competition currently has, and deliver less. Wash, rinse, repeat.
timed to fail methinks (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://code.google.com/p/nmod/)
Somehow I don't see this as a viable plan.
Incremental service pack based improvements to Vista? Yes indeedy, but a completely new OS? What a stupid idea. They do, after all, sell to the Corporate world, and that does not like complete change in IT infrastructure every two years
Will *this* time mark Microsoft's recovery? (Score:3)
(http://slashdot.org/)
"Will Windows 2000 have the drivers running at ring-0?"
The answer was initially "what does that mean?" and eventually, "yes it will."
This isn't Win32's only source of vulnerability and instability, but it's certainly among them. And the obvious solution was virtualization. Back before Win2000's release (and each release thereafter) I had hoped to see something along the lines of WINE or some sort of virtualization mode for compatibility and a "native mode" for all modern releases of applications.
And when MacOSX came out and did precisely what I had hoped Windows would do, not only was I pleased to discover that my idea wasn't unique but that it was workable and functionable. (Well, sort of... I have been supporting a production environment that involves MacOS in Classic mode and while it basically works, it's not quite stable... no more stable than Windows is in its present form anyway.) But it also served as proof that Microsoft COULD have done this and probably SHOULD have done this.
Perhaps they WILL do this eventually, but will it be soon enough?
I love to hate Microsoft, honestly, but for the good of the IT world at large, I'd just rather see Microsoft fix their crap and let's just get on with things. If Linux continues to grow and improve as it has been, I'd rather see further adoption based on its present and future merits rather than because of the faults in Microsoft products.
Timeline for Windows Vienna (Score:5, Funny)
(http://mistersanity.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday May 29, @04:42PM)
2007 Q1 Vista released; work on Vienna begins.
2007 Q4 Microsoft announces Vienna will contain innovative new filesystem
2008 Q2 Microsoft projects release date for 'Vienna' as late 2010 or early 2011
2008 Q3 Microsoft announces Vienna will revolutionize the internet desktop
2009 Q2 Microsoft announces Vienna's filesystem will make search irrelevant
2009 Q4 Microsoft projects release date for Vienna as second half of 2011
2010 Q1 Microsoft announces Vienna will be inherently more secure than Vista
2010 Q2 Microsoft announces Vienna's new API will make developers' jobs easy
2010 Q4 Microsoft announces Vienna will have built-in internet telephony (VOIP)
2011 Q2 Microsoft projects release date for Vienna in early 2012
2011 Q3 Microsoft announces Vienna will work with next-generation security hardware
2012 Q1 Microsoft announces partnership with wireless internet provider to enhance Vienna's
internet telephony, allowing users to go "unplugged"
2012 Q2 Microsoft projects Vienna release date pushed back to 2013
2012 Q3 Microsoft announces Vienna's wireless internet telephony will make cellphones obsolete
2013 Q1 Microsoft announces Vienna's wireless internet telephony will be more secure than cellphones
2013 Q3 Microsoft announces Vienna kernel will be most secure OS kernel ever
2013 Q4 Microsoft projects Vienna release date in early 2014
2014 Q1 Microsoft announces the new filesystem may not be ready for RTM but will ship
just after Vienna in a service pack
2014 Q2 Microsoft announces Vienna public beta will be forthcoming later in the year
2014 Q3 Microsoft announces the new developer API will be spun off as a separate project from Vienna
2014 Q4 Microsoft promises Vienna release no later than 2015 Q2
2015 Q1 Deal with wireless internet company falls through
2015 Q2 Microsoft announces innovative filesystem will be in release after Vienna
2015 Q2 Microsoft announces Vienna will still feature "unplugged" internet telephony,
but user will have choice of third-party wireless providers
2015 Q3 Microsoft releases limited beta of Vienna to select individuals and companies
2015 Q3 Reviews of Vienna start coming out; reviewers note internet telephony not present
2015 Q4 Microsoft announces final product name for Vienna will be Windows Fiesta
2015 Q4 Microsoft confirms internet telephony will not be ready to ship with first release
2016 Q1 Microsoft releases public beta of Fiesta to a wider audience
2016 Q2 Microsoft announces final release date for Fiesta in November; nobody believes it
2016 October Microsoft announces Windows Fiesta will be available to select customers in
November, retail version will ship in January
2016 November Microsoft announces Fiesta now available to select customers
2017 January Microsoft actually releases Windows Fiesta
Oh, Vienna! (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.badstep.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday December 30 2003, @06:04AM)
As bad as XP is I'm sticking with it. (Score:5, Insightful)
I have no interest in an operating system designed to protect content owners, protect microsoft with horrible activation functionality and little to no benefit to myself.
If I didn't require Windows for work I'd have nothing to do with it. I've been a long time Windows user since Windows 3.1 and each release seemed to be such a major improvement over the previous. Until Vista. Vista is not a users operating system. It's more of a prison.
Another name for SP1? (Score:3, Insightful)
This sounds more like Service Pack 1 of Vista. Of course, calling it that would be admitting that maybe they didn't get everything right the first time. I'm sure the very idea that Microsoft wouldn't get something right the first time comes as a major shock to Slashdot readers. :-p
Seriously, though, announcing a new "updated" version and your next-generation OS strikes me as a really good way to tank initial sales, particularly in the business arena. A good many CIO's have finally gotten it that it's usually a good idea to wait for SP-1 of any MS OS before rolling out, and "leaking" that an SP1 (by whatever name) is being released in two years pretty much seals it for them. Not that there was tremendous enthusiasm for migration in the first place. This is actually a good time for Linux to start trying to push itself onto the business desktop. You have MS not releasing an OS on time, let alone reliable hardware requirements until the last minute, there's no compelling application which can't be run on XP, and they're hinting at a new release in two years. All of which is not calculated to be endearing to someone who's in charge of a major rollout.
The "next generation OS" sounds like a bunch of wishful thinking, more than any actual code.
Wait. What? (Score:4, Funny)
(http://blog.mzzt.net/)
Wait... are they already admitting Vista was a bad move? ;)
Does the author speak english (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Saturday October 16 2004, @11:34PM)
Microsoft's plan to integrate wine (Score:3, Funny)
Vienna, in the local language, is spelt 'Wein'. If you pronounce that as an English speaker, you might say it in the same way you say 'Wine'. Wine [winehq.org], as a few people know, is an Open Source implementation of the Windows API on top of X and Unix. Perhaps Microsoft don't like the idea of such software, and want to produce a product that confuses users of Wine. Or maybe they'll do away with their development line completely, and Wine will become the next version of Windows.
Then Microsoft will be able to expand out the acronym to something like:
"Windows Emulator, it's not!" or "Windows Is Not an Emulator"!
Accurate info? (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.musterion.net/)
Call my math fuzzy (it's happened before) but if it was originally scheduled to be released in 2003, and it's being released in 2007, then the delay was less than five years...
I've heard similar figures thrown out before, but where do these figures come from? How has the delay cost them? One could argue it has resulted in lost revenue, but XP was still selling well during that time and Vista will be making its sales now. Delayed revenue perhaps, but lost? Are they talking perhaps money spent on developers and such? That might be a point, but billions? What would be the reference for that?
Re:Windows: Generations (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://clintonhawk.net/)