Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

zCodec Video Codec Is a Trojan

Posted by kdawson on Mon Sep 04, 2006 05:10 PM
from the who-is-watching-whom? dept.
Bride of Chucky writes "There's a new video codec out there that claims to offer 'up to 40 percent better video quality' but that resets your computer's DNS settings — opening the way for Trojans, rootkits, or whatever. Techworld warns that zCodec looks professional enough, is widely available, and comes in at 100KB. What's the bet the media companies are behind this somewhere?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Rather than the conspiracy theory. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Spazntwich (208070) <spazntwich.yahoo@com> on Monday September 04 2006, @05:13PM (#16040067)
    (http://www.ablabla.org/)
    I'd give a lot more consideration to an enterprising spammer/botnet advertiser being behind this.

    Follow the money. The MPAA has plenty to make off p2p lawsuits to risk the kind of bad press and fines they'd get by doing something like this.

    Basically, the submitter is an irrational idiot pandering to the anarchist conspiracy theorists in an attempt to start a flamewar. Congratulations, you've probably got it.
  • What! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Funkcikle (630170) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:13PM (#16040071)
    40% better video performance but NO LINK TO IT? Come on!
  • Huh? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by WD (96061) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:13PM (#16040073)
    What are "the media companies" and why would they be behind this?
    • Re:Huh? by mqduck (Score:1) Monday September 04 2006, @05:25PM
      • Re:Huh? by mqduck (Score:1) Monday September 04 2006, @05:27PM
        • Re:Huh? by porl (Score:1) Monday September 04 2006, @10:19PM
      • Re:Huh? by Achromatic1978 (Score:2) Monday September 04 2006, @05:51PM
        • Re:Huh? by sdnoob (Score:2) Tuesday September 05 2006, @12:42AM
        • Re:Huh? by mqduck (Score:1) Tuesday September 05 2006, @02:35AM
      • Re:Huh? by computational super (Score:3) Tuesday September 05 2006, @07:36AM
        • Re:Huh? by mqduck (Score:1) Tuesday September 05 2006, @01:28PM
    • Blame the new guy... by Kunta Kinte (Score:3) Monday September 04 2006, @06:13PM
  • TA:
    Panda's advisory last week revealed that the 100KB file is in fact adware, which "downloads and runs files, changes the DNS configuration and monitors accesses to several adult websites". zCodec, formally known as Adware/ZCodec or Adware/EMediacodec, affects most versions of Windows and was first detected last week, Panda said.
    I am a little bit confused with the modality of the post. Is anyone in doubt that this is quite nasty piece of soft?
  • by Refelian (923767) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:18PM (#16040090)
    Is there any evidence that they are behind this codec?

    Don't you think that after the sony rootkit most companies wouldnt bother with such schemes....
  • Gimme an S. (Score:2, Redundant)

    by uncoveror (570620) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:22PM (#16040111)
    (http://www.uncoveror.com/)
    Gimme an S.

    S!

    Gimme an O.

    O!

    Gimme an N.

    N!

    Gimme a Y

    Why? They put rootkits on CDs. They are just the kind of company that would make a video codec that is a trojan.
  • Freaky coincidence (Score:1, Offtopic)

    by Asmor (775910) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:23PM (#16040122)
    (http://www.asmor.com/)
    I was able to connect fine this morning, then for some reason many sites stopped working. After various troubleshooting, I discovered that my computer had been changed from obtaining the DNS automatically to specifying 4.2.2.2

    Anyone have any idea what might have happened? I didn't download or install anything in the time frame that this happened.
    • Re:Freaky coincidence by Dragonslicer (Score:1) Monday September 04 2006, @05:37PM
      • Re:Freaky coincidence by Asmor (Score:2) Monday September 04 2006, @05:41PM
        • 4.2.2.2 (Score:5, Informative)

          by MillionthMonkey (240664) * on Monday September 04 2006, @06:14PM (#16040392)
          (Last Journal: Wednesday January 31 2007, @02:25AM)
          There is a legitimate DNS server sitting at 4.2.2.2. I think it belongs to GTE (now Verizon). It has the misfortune of having an easy IP address to remember. In a pinch, if you can't remember the IP of your own DNS, there's always 4.2.2.2. Most people who use it have it as their alternate DNS. Verizon likes to give it names like i-will-not-steal-service.sys.gtei.net.

          You've already gotten a reply to your original post that indicates at least one other person has seen this happen to their DNS settings. If I'd never typed in 4.2.2.2 myself, and I had no previous business relationship with Verizon or GTE, I'd call shenanigans. A malware writer needing to disable automatic DNS for some reason would have to specify a replacement IP and 4.2.2.2 is convenient to hard code.
          [ Parent ]
      • Re:Freaky coincidence by TheRaven64 (Score:2) Monday September 04 2006, @05:49PM
      • Re:Freaky coincidence by ShaunC (Score:3) Monday September 04 2006, @06:11PM
    • Re:Freaky coincidence by shawn443 (Score:1) Monday September 04 2006, @05:47PM
    • Re:Freaky coincidence by Kumochisonan (Score:1) Monday September 04 2006, @05:55PM
    • Re:Freaky coincidence by jZnat (Score:2) Monday September 04 2006, @05:58PM
    • Re:Freaky coincidence by Monkelectric (Score:2) Monday September 04 2006, @05:59PM
  • Hmm. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by TheRaven64 (641858) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:25PM (#16040127)
    (http://theravensnest.org/ | Last Journal: Sunday October 07, @07:05AM)
    What's the bet the media companies are behind this somewhere?

    A tin-foil hat is a mark of someone who can, in all seriousness, say 'if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it must be a concealed listening device placed by the government under the instruction of the military-industrial complex and funded by the media industry.' The poster should wear his with pride.

    • Re:Hmm. by thelost (Score:2) Monday September 04 2006, @05:28PM
      • Re:Hmm. by Tack (Score:1) Monday September 04 2006, @05:37PM
    • Re:Hmm. by nurb432 (Score:2) Monday September 04 2006, @07:15PM
    • No ducks, but cats maybe.. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday September 05 2006, @02:08AM
  • "looks professional enough"?? (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 04 2006, @05:25PM (#16040129)
    "looks professional enough"?? No way! It has a direct link to the .exe from the front page, without any annoying EULA or email-address harvesting page to click through first. That's a dead giveaway that this isn't legit! (Sad but true.)
  • by Nighttime (231023) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:26PM (#16040135)
    (http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Sunday August 10 2003, @06:00AM)
    Just had a quick run through their therms[sic] and at the bottom there's a URL for http://www.vcodec.com/terms.html [vcodec.com]. However, that URL just leads to a page of sponsored links.

    They also have a Support form on their site. Wonder if they actually are reading the support enquiries or just harvesting emails?

  • No need for conspiracies... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by AgentPaper (968688) * on Monday September 04 2006, @05:27PM (#16040139)
    ...user stupidity makes a dandy explanation. If there is a universal truth in today's networked world, it is that the gullibility of the average Netizen knows no bounds. I'd be willing to bet that you could write a program that claims to turn your printer into a replicator, and some doofus would buy it.

    This ranks right up there with the scores of malware programs that pretend to be malware removers. I assume the original poster would have us believe that all those are really written by the likes of Symantec and McAfee?

  • This is another great example of how lack of technical knowledge can be used to take advantage of "home users".

    Joey Dell doesn't see the difference between technical details of OSS and Proprietary Software, all he sees is the malware being marketed as "Faster SMaller Better"
  • by _Griphin_ (676977) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:29PM (#16040159)
    And why is the webpage still active?!?
  • by knightmad (931578) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:29PM (#16040160)
    Will it run on Linux? We don't want to feel left out again. These damned malware-laden proprietary crap!
  • Oh please... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by kentrel (526003) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:30PM (#16040164)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday April 27 2005, @01:58PM)
    What's the bet the media companies are behind this somewhere?

    That's incredibly presumptuous and a completely baseless accusation. There are lots of people who can clearly benefit from trojans, and someone obviously has seen the potential in video codecs as a nice "social engineering" way of fooling the gullible masses into downloading them. The average person generally searches for video codecs once in a blue moon - they have no way of knowing which sites are legitimate, or which files are legitimate. They'll download whatever sounds promising. In fact, the website looks far more legitimate than some of the genuine codec sites out there.

    Smarter users might do regular intensive searching to make sure they are getting a legitimate file, but the average user will not. It's far more likely that the author of this trojan is just exploiting the fact that so many users of codecs are clueless than yet another paranoid conspiracy that the media companies are behind it. Really, will the slashdot editors ever get over their bias and just print actual NEWS.

  • Send someone to jail (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Lord Apathy (584315) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:30PM (#16040165)

    Enough is a enough. A message needs to be sent to these bastards. Suing and fines only do so much. They fine these bastards, they file for bankruptcy and its over. They close the company and the fines and suits go away. Can't sue what doesn't exist and current corp. laws protect us from going after personal assets.

    Time to bring some real charges against these fuckers and send a few of them to prison for a good long stretch. And I'm not talking 6 months in a jail with 500 hours of community service. I'm talking 10 years in maximum security.

    I know some people say the punishment doesn't fit the crime but I think its time it did. If we would have locked up some of them bastards from Sony then I bet this one wouldn't' happen.

  • and nobody's doing anything.....why? (Score:4, Informative)

    by Desolator144 (999643) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:31PM (#16040167)
    www.zcodec.com registrant info:

    ZCodec Inc

    Abrahamen Biderman

    webmaster@zcodec.com

    5624 17th Ave

    Brooklyn

    New York

    NY,11204-1834

    Tel. +718.2364275

    Creation Date: 23-Dec-2005

    Expiration Date: 23-Dec-2006

    Okay first of all, it was registered almost a full year ago and second, even now I could probably drive to his house/office (assuming that info is accurate) and arrest him myself faster than the FBI could. Why does everyone always sit around and do nothing when stuff like this happens? Someone should at least give him a call :-) It's not even nigeria this time, how expensive could it be?

  • No bet... (Score:3, Insightful)

    ...because even if it were true, we'd likely never see proof. As such, that kind of speculation in a story submission is immature on the part of the submitter and allowing it to go out unedited is irresponsible of the editor. (Bonus points if they're the same person, I didn't check.)
  • "The media companies are behind this"? Are you letting twitter [slashdot.org] loose on the Submit Story function now?

    Whoever wrote that needs their heads checking.
  • Fire! (Score:1, Offtopic)

    by Randseed (132501) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:54PM (#16040281)
    Fire twinklers and a full spread of light balls! Fukkkkov!
  • by Animats (122034) on Monday September 04 2006, @05:54PM (#16040282)
    (http://www.animats.com)

    Looks like this is coming from a known source of spyware in Ukraine, "Inhoster.com".

    "zcodec.com" is actually "85.255.117.106-xbox.dedi.inhoster.com", a dedicated server at a "nlayer.net" colocation site in San Francisco. The dedicated server appears to be associated with "atrivo".

    Both "inhoster.com" and "atrivo" appear to be "psuedo-ISPs"; they have web sites that look like those of an ISP, but they don't really offer services for sale. Both have bad reputations: see "Spywarequake Scam on the Run [netrn.net]. The previous attacks were based on phony anti-spyware programs. Now that people are wise to that one, the new frontier is apparently phony codecs.

    The WHOIS information for "zcodec.net" appears to be bogus. It's given as "Abrahamen Biderman" at "5624 17th Ave, Brooklyn, New York" There is an "Abraham Biderman" with an office at 5624 17th Ave, Brooklyn, New York, and he's a political figure and investment banker [forbes.com], with a career running major financial institutions. Probably not behind some two-bit spyware scam.

  • thats news - heres a tip (Score:4, Interesting)

    by gsn (989808) on Monday September 04 2006, @06:08PM (#16040350)
    wow a codec is spyware - inconcievable!!! Who the heck told you to download an unheard of codec which you probably didn't need. The vast majority of spyware is around because people download things they don't actually need from an untrusted third party source. I can't begin to count the number of computers I've had to fix because some twit downloaded a codec pack or opened an scr file in their email or downloaded some game crack to pirate a game and found it installed bonzi buddy.

    Virtually every bloody codec pack you could download contained spyware/adware - some of them put in by the developers themselves. I've got some lovely versions of Nimo, K-lite and gordian knot to prove it. Hell, DivX pre 5.2 had GAIN in it and if you didn't know where to look on their website you had no way of finding the version without it (it didnt have the encoder so wasn't gain supported) . VLC is all I download for video playback now. If they don't support it I don't need to watch it - I've an flv file convertor for those of you who know how to download the dang yourtube/google videos that vlc cant handle perfectly.

    Learnt the hard way not to download things from any third party site even if its trusted back in high school. I run XP because I like playing games. If I had a tinfoil hat I'd read the source and then compile and do MD5 checks but I'm lazy and will take the binary packages, and I suspect one day I will pay for that laziness, despite my use of Tea Timer and the Spybot S&D hosts file and immunization databse, Lavasofts ad aware, windows defender and rootkit revealer, hijack this, peer guardian 2, and spyware blaster. One day I will be an idiot and download a binary with some spyware that is still under the radar for all of these and I will be pissed when I realize it. Atleast, I will realize it, but most users wont.
  • I bet PC will (Score:4, Funny)

    by ericdano (113424) on Monday September 04 2006, @06:08PM (#16040353)
    (http://www.jazz-sax.com/)
    I bet PC [apple.com] will be pissed. Poor guy. Spyware, Viruses, physical damage and now....this?
  • by Bruce Stephens (6634) on Monday September 04 2006, @06:09PM (#16040356)
    Licensor may offer additional components through our version checking/update system. These components include: Toolbar, Popup advertising solution, Commercial homepage manager, Commercial messenger.
    How can anyone resist?
  • Why take the detour? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Opportunist (166417) on Monday September 04 2006, @06:09PM (#16040362)
    When the straight line connects much better?

    Music companies have huge legal departments that can (and do) get their info from ISPs with subpoenas. Trojan distributors are constantly trying to find new ways to push their junk onto your computer, often by paying heavily for 0day exploits.

    Who is more likely to buy a "cheap" way to bug your PC?
  • What's behind what (Score:1)

    by noidentity (188756) on Monday September 04 2006, @06:33PM (#16040483)
    What's the bet the media companies are behind this somewhere?

    What's to bet that a grudge and agenda is behind this unfounded swipe?

  • Whats the bet? (Score:1)

    by matw8 (901439) on Monday September 04 2006, @06:35PM (#16040490)
    since you asked... about 1 in 1,000,000 But I grant you there is still a chance.
  • This isn't news - "codecs" have been used for years as spyware/trojan droppers. Great social engineering - "hey, to view this porn, you need to install this codec". It's sufficiently tech sounding, and computery to sound believable, so it works.

    --Simon
  • by ATMD (986401) on Monday September 04 2006, @07:33PM (#16040770)
    (Last Journal: Monday November 27 2006, @01:17PM)
    From the Therms of use:
    SOFTWARE INSTALLATION: Components bundled with our software may report to Licensor and/or its affiliates the installation status of certain marketing offers, such as toolbars, and also generalized installation information, such as language preference and operating system version, to assist Licensor in its product development. No personal information will be communicated to VCODEC or its affiliates during this process. Licensor may offer additional components through our version checking/update system. These components include: Toolbar, Popup advertising solution, Commercial homepage manager, Commercial messenger.
    Yay, malware!

    Also:
    zCodec enhances your music listening experience by improving the sound quality of video files sound, MP3, internet radio, Windows Media and other music files.
    Is it me, or is that not the job of a codec?
  • by jasonfrog (882259) on Monday September 04 2006, @07:40PM (#16040812)
    and there is more, http://www.pcodec.com/ [pcodec.com]

    the same blurb, different .exe, but again packed full of trojans.

    Domain Name: PCODEC.COM
    Creation Date: 25-Aug-2006
    Expiration Date: 25-Aug-2007

    People are being enticed into downloading this codec by the following posting that is being spambotted on to public forums that allow guest posting..

    "Br1tney Spe@rs r@ped! ;)
    http://britneyspearsrocks.info/ [britneyspearsrocks.info]"

  • by ChadL (880878) * on Monday September 04 2006, @07:54PM (#16040887)
    SOFTWARE INSTALLATION: Components bundled with our software may report to Licensor and/or its affiliates the installation status of certain marketing offers, such as toolbars, and also generalized installation information, such as language preference and operating system version, to assist Licensor in its product development. No personal information will be communicated to VCODEC or its affiliates during this process. Licensor may offer additional components through our version checking/update system. These components include: Toolbar, Popup advertising solution, Commercial homepage manager, Commercial messenger.
    This is in the therms of use. So even if the reason that made this post does not have backing... this statement tells me to keep out.
    There are some reasons for reading the TOS, you know.

    Also as a side note, the file name of the "Therms of use" is therms.html for whatever that may mean.
  • Ok so.. (Score:1)

    by ShaolinTiger (798138) on Monday September 04 2006, @08:56PM (#16041202)
    (http://www.shaolintiger.com/)
    Let's all stick to VLC?

    Thanks!

    DivX has been pumping us full of Spyware for years, this is nothing new.
  • by stegre (464969) on Tuesday September 05 2006, @01:01AM (#16042376)
    Seems like Panda just drafted up a new press release for a old well known Trojan (ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_Codec [wikipedia.org]) - one that's been around for months. They just wrote it up like it's something new and distributed it to the likes of TechWorld - to generally "scare" people, and, of course, get their own company name in print (and they apparently didn't even have anything to do with finding it!). Business at Panda must be slow these days...
  • by niceone (992278) on Tuesday September 05 2006, @02:12AM (#16042646)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday June 19, @07:48AM)

    This is kind of interesting, usually these trojans are targetted at the least technical people (screensavers, games etc) - seems to make sense, there's more of them and they're more likely to fall for it.

    But presumably you have to be at least a little technically interested to know what a codec is and think you want one. So are they gaining some advantage by targetting a smaller group who's less likely to fall for it? Are their machines on for longer on faster connections?

    • Men by kwikrick (Score:1) Tuesday September 05 2006, @07:50AM
  • by Tanuki64 (989726) on Tuesday September 05 2006, @04:10AM (#16043046)
    ...manipulate my /etc/resolv.conf or my /etc/hosts?
  • Their TOS seems to hide the facts by masking it as a "security feature" instead of spyware.. Look carefully to the TOS:


    (a) "Internet Explorer Security Plugin 2006": Internet Explorer toolbar that protects your computer while you browse by setting high level of security for suspicious hosts.
    (b) "Public Messenger ver 2.03": Popup advertising module that opens Internet Explorer ad windows when you are connected to internet.
    (c) "Internet Security Add-On": your Internet Explorer homepage will be changed.
    (d) Security software: antivirus/antispyware application.


    Even I, after reading this would not think this would be "spyware" with exception to (b). I don't like any software to change the settings/homepage or interface without me agreeing to it anyways but still .. it's a dodgy TOS
  • by Sloppy (14984) on Tuesday September 05 2006, @02:00PM (#16046657)
    (http://www.biglumber.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday September 18, @12:25PM)

    What the hell does that mean? How do you know if something looks "professional"? Are you checking to see if it's a full-time business vs a hobby, or some kind of test like that?

    Sometimes I think "professional" is one of the dumbest and most-abused (to the point of being renderred meaningless) words in our language. We're seeing used here as implying lack of spyware (wtf does that have to do with getting paid?!) and it has often been used to describe how someone dresses. What a great word for saying nothing.

  • I have my doubts about that. It's just a little thing. But "Therms of use" strikes me as not something an American would write... twice. [zcodec.com] (Check the url of the link.)

    I'm going out of a limb and say that that's just someone registering false info. Also, there is no 17th Ave in Brooklyn. [google.com]
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Use Linux (Score:4, Informative)

    by rm69990 (885744) on Monday September 04 2006, @06:19PM (#16040429)
    Or use Windows and don't download dangerous software. Any piece of software with a set of "therms of use" should be avoided (see the software's home page to know what I'm talking about). Or of course buy a Mac (sorry, Apple fanboy here :-P)
    [ Parent ]
    • Re:Use Linux by 19thNervousBreakdown (Score:2) Monday September 04 2006, @06:54PM
      • Re:Use Linux by killproc (Score:1) Tuesday September 05 2006, @08:19AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:I blame Windows (Score:1)

    by Jon.Laslow (809215) on Monday September 04 2006, @09:35PM (#16041420)
    Wow. You have a post like that, and you signature reads,
    Blame the user, not the software.


    *Claps*
    [ Parent ]
  • by AcidLacedPenguiN (835552) on Tuesday September 05 2006, @06:31AM (#16043453)
    Amilcar Perez???

    dear god! its a terr'ist!
    [ Parent ]
  • 17 replies beneath your current threshold.