Slashdot Log In
Domain Name Sold for Millions
Posted by
samzenpus
on Thu Jan 19, 2006 08:02 AM
from the how-much-for-intercourse.com dept.
from the how-much-for-intercourse.com dept.
Luke PiWalker writes "The infamous and controversial domain Sex.com has officially been sold to Boston-based Escom LLC for a reported $14 million. Sex.com owner Gary Kremen was unavailable for comment, but a source from Kremen's company, Grant Media, told XBiz that sales for the famous domain name will still be handled through Grant Media's San Francisco offices. While other terms of the acquisition remain unknown, XBiz was able to locate information on the deal through a company called InternetRealEstate.com, which shares office space in Boston with Domain Name Acquisition Group (DNAG), a company that was involved in a lawsuit surrounding the Sex.com domain in September."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Sex Sells (Score:5, Funny)
$14 million (Score:5, Funny)
(http://medoubuntu.blogspot.com/)
Domain name - so 1999 (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://0ct0pus.livejournal.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday January 19 2006, @07:59AM)
Today's sexy anagram (Score:3, Funny)
Anagram 'Escom' and you get 'Comes' - now we know why they wanted it so bad.
expensive sex. (Score:5, Funny)
is that the most money paid for sex ever?
Re:expensive sex. (Score:5, Funny)
Nice (Score:1)
Is it really worth it? (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.udviklingschef.dk/ | Last Journal: Sunday April 18 2004, @02:52PM)
Too easy (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Tuesday November 13, @10:52AM)
Business.com went for pretty much the same price.. (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.landoverbaptist.org/)
Wikipedia article (Score:5, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex.com [wikipedia.org]
just wait (Score:5, Funny)
(http://circletimessquare.com/)
com.sex
muahahahahaha!
Its all because of the idiots.. (Score:2, Insightful)
Sex.com -- a sex superstore! (Score:2)
Guess they've got to pay for that domain name somehow.
At Last! (Score:3, Funny)
Alexa Rank...3,560 (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://ludditelounge.blogspot.com/)
If this is a benchmark, think of the value of any top ranked site like Business.com [alexa.com]
No link? (Score:4, Informative)
(http://qntm.org/ | Last Journal: Saturday May 06 2006, @09:26AM)
February issue of Playboy (Score:4, Funny)
what about the miss-spellings? (Score:2)
(http://www.drivesentinel.co.uk/)
Wow. I wonder how much for... (Score:2, Interesting)
Sax.com is owned by a D. Miller in Malibu, California
Six.com is owned by some company (Xedoc Holding) in Luxembourg
sux.com is owned by ^!@#$@#$23! Damn. Almost spewed my drink over the computer monitor!
syx.com is owned by "Syx E Business Solutions" in Norway
Strangely enough, sox.com isn't owned by the Boston Red Sox, as I would have expected. It is owned by a "William Boston" in Washington. That name is a weird coincidence, though.
The headline should've been: (Score:5, Funny)
What's so great? (Score:1)
Really, though, what's the advantage of these generic names? Do you buy your books at books.com? I usually get mine at a place called Amazon. Do people (who actually pay for it) download their music from music.com, or iTunes? If, as another post pointed out, the importance of a domain is not in its use for browser navigation, but in the billboard/TV/magazine copy in which it appears, isn't it better to be unique and memorable?
pr0n.xxx (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:pr0n.xxx (Score:5, Insightful)
That solution will neither help people find porn nor stop the christians from whining about it. The problem isn't about segregating porn, but determinig what porn is. Are 18th century impressionist nudes porn? What about Playboy? Is graphical information about vaginal yeast infections porn? If we set up a system where all "porn" goes in the
19x.net (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Wednesday December 07 2005, @07:15PM)
Link is NSFW (Score:3, Insightful)
Oh wait, there are two things wrong with that statement:
1. I read the article.
2. I read the article instead of looking at naked ladies.
Research... (Score:1)
The odd things that strike me about this deal is that people have been 'Googlelized', in that the new Domain name registery is effectively the search engines. You just type what you are looking for into Google(!), even grandma does it (nice image eh?).
What with also the impending
Mind you, if you just spent 14 big ones on a domain name then you're probably hung like a mouse, and could do with all the help you can get...
NA
44 domains sold for $100K or more last year (Score:2)
(http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/)
The list of highest all-time domain sales [multireg.com] is also interesting reading.
Geez, money maker, what? (Score:1)
Sex Sells (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Monday November 27 2006, @09:02AM)
1. retire and never have to lift a finger again.
2. pay someone to do my job.
3. buy a nice car that is even nice enough for a geek to pick up chicks.
4. or buy one single small domain
i think that was a smart buy. i mean who would rather never have to work again so you can stay home all day on your computer, when they could buy a domain name. hmmmm.
NERD.COM, FOLK.COM coming up (Score:3, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Wednesday November 05 2003, @03:12AM)
Among others, we're trying to determine what kind of price we might get for domains like: NERD.COM, FOLK.COM, IBL.COM, PROMARKETING.COM, and a few others.
Ironically, I submitted an "Ask Slashdot" story on this issue with more details yesterday that was rejected. It is boggling the prices these domains are going for now. We sold WISDOM.COM for $475k around 2000 and at the time that was one of the top three highest cash sales of a domain name. Now it looks like nothing.
So, if anyone thinks they can help us with the sale of some of these domains, there's a form on the site. The company who brokered the last sale we did walked away with $47,000 in commission. Can NERD or FOLK go for six figures?
Five bucks says NetSol bungles the transfer. (Score:1)
It could if... (Score:2)