Looking for Answers in the Age of Search 95
prostoalex writes "James Fallows, in a New York Times article, notices that search engines are getting pretty good at providing information for simple keyword-based queries. However, when it comes to the actual information, such as finding the necessary data and statistics, they're not doing a great job. The article talks about the NSA- and CIA-sponsored Aquaint project that aims to deliver answers to questions that might be expressed with a variety of keywords, and need to be 'understood' by the search engine before providing the answer."
Not doing a great job (Score:2, Funny)
Easy (Score:2)
Car keys is also solved. Get a beeper keyring (£3) for your car keys. They beep and flash when you whistle.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Easy (Score:2)
Socks. Buy only one colour of sock. Black, white, whatever as long as they are all the same.
Stay away from white, then, otherwise when you accidentally wash some of your socks with your blue jeans you'll have to start pairing them up again, which would defeat the purpose...
EricMy new book's out this Friday! [memwg.com]
Re:Not doing a great job (Score:1)
search engine (Score:1)
Organize a cage match (Score:2)
Re:Not doing a great job (Score:1)
Re:Not doing a great job (Score:2)
Re:Not doing a great job (Score:1)
Google became self-aware at 2:14am EDT August .... (Score:5, Funny)
I would welcome them... (Score:4, Funny)
I continue to welcome the mighty all-knowing google as the ruler of our lives.
More like... (Score:3, Funny)
Just think; In Soviet Russia the government searches you!
Re:More like... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Google became self-aware at 2:14am EDT August . (Score:1)
Re:Google became self-aware at 2:14am EDT August . (Score:1)
What I'd like to see.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:What I'd like to see.... (Score:2)
Re:What I'd like to see.... (Score:3, Informative)
The Thomas Register might be more what you're looking for.
http://www.thomasnet.com/ [thomasnet.com]
Re:What I'd like to see.... (Score:4, Informative)
I find this behaviour annoying because I tend to search for more obscure stuff. But if you search for company names, this does have the nice effect of almost always getting the companies home page.
Re:What I'd like to see.... (Score:2)
Re:What I'd like to see.... (Score:3, Interesting)
Solution for me was to download the Firexfox "CustomizeGoogle" extension [mozilla.org].
Once installed, the last tab allows you to enter regular expressions of sites to completely remove from displayed search results.
A little bit of config later and its goodbye "about.com", "go.com", "experts-exchange.com" and all the other similar "nothing to see here (unless you give us money)" sites.
Re:What I'd like to see.... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:What I'd like to see.... (Score:1)
E.g. "site:apple.com " will return only search-results from apple.com (and subdomains). It also works for root-domains (sometimes it's useful to include "site:org" in your search to avoid too many commercial links)
Re:What I'd like to see.... (Score:2)
Re:What I'd like to see.... (Score:1)
Real Aquaint Web Site... (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.ic-arda.org/InfoExploit/aquaint/index.
Looking for Answers... (Score:5, Interesting)
No, I don't know why it's being relaunched. My guess is that it's probably one of the answers that we are looking for in the age of search that didn't quite cut it. But isn't that what all these different meta-searches are talking about? The ability to get semantic meaning imbued into the web?
Re:Looking for Answers... (Score:4, Informative)
Regular Slashdot crew don't get it because of the overly complicated status of the current S.W. standards, but in the future some lightweight implementation of the Semantic Web idea will take off and we will have search engines that somehow "answer questions" instead of just "finding words".
Re:Looking for Answers... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Looking for Answers... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Looking for Answers... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Looking for Answers... (Score:1, Insightful)
The computer only has to appear to have common sense; it doesn't actually have to have common sense. This is the key to how many Aquaint systems work.
The great thing about the web is that there are billions of web pages out there, many of them created by humans, and many of those humans have common sense. If you're looking for an answer, there'
Re:OT:Your sig... (Score:1)
Cluster Searching (Score:4, Informative)
Clusty [clusty.com] on the other hand is no sucker for a press release. I find its much smarter at locating actual content.
Myren
Re:Cluster Searching (Score:2, Funny)
Seems to understand pretty well what the average /.er is looking for ...
I agree (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I agree (Score:1)
http://www.google.com/search?q=stiff+nipples&sour
Homunculus (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:WTF? (Score:1, Offtopic)
TACO WHAT IS GOING ON??
Anyone?
Google understands me..... (Score:1, Funny)
There's nothing more annoying... (Score:3, Insightful)
It's even more annoying when you had the same question a couple of months before, and had found the answer, but can't remember what the answer was, where your found the answer, or what search terms you had used. (and it's even worse if that site has gone down in its rankings, and something else with people asking the question, but no answer, now ranked higher).
Re:There's nothing more annoying... (Score:2)
Asking a question, only to find that the only answers you get are those 50+ people being told to "Go Google for it. Sheesh!"
I run into that on occasion, like with my current mod_perl problems.
Re:There's nothing more annoying... (Score:1)
We use Mindmeld (Score:4, Informative)
It uses more of a human based system, it 'learns' as folks type in different questions (and versions of the same question)and tell it whether the answers it gives are helpful. As uses 'teach' it, it gets better at providing relevent results to natural language queries.
Worth a look:
http://mindmeld.sourceforge.net/mmsf/index.php [sourceforge.net]
Comedy. (Score:3, Funny)
Things to fix first... [Google] (Score:3, Funny)
2. Google needs to filter responses based on ad content. If there are a ton of ads, chances are, the site is bupkiss and its priority should be massively downgraded.
3. Google needs to filter based on ownership by holding companies. These cybersquatters should be downgraded in response priority and their pets should be sterlized or neutered to control the pet population.
4. Google needs to get back in the kitchen and make me a pie.
===
Fix those things, then perhaps we should worry about statistical analysis... (but hey, thats just me)
IMHO, if you want accurate stats and information, go to a library...
and this? (Score:1, Interesting)
seems to be a good crap filter
Google works pretty well (Score:5, Insightful)
Google is the number one search agent for me as more often than not with a short list of carefully chosen starting terms, and a little refinement from sleuthing, I can find what I need pretty quickly.
Do the search engines have to be so smart they find what we meant to find or even what we think we meant to find as opposed to what we literally asked for? They're tools, like library cards, not servants there to do our work for us and stop us from thinking about the search process. Are we complaining because this all isn't as brainless as AOL?
Because they are tools only (Score:5, Insightful)
I think that there will always be a need for knowledge specialists (professional researchers), whose job it is to develop useful results from requests for information, using whatever tools are at hand.
Tools like Google and MSN Search are not the only thing you need to find information. There are still places for other information, and 'because Google said so' is not a valid reason for accepting information as relevant, or factual.
Although these tools will continue to improve, the application of wisdom will still require human input to make the results useful.
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:What I would like to see (Score:1)
It's interesting to think about indexing 5062af as 5062 as well, but some searches would probably become less precise because we added in more general matches.
TFA in a nutshell. (Score:2)
Re:TFA in a nutshell. (Score:1)
answers.com (Score:1)
Old maxim, but still relevant. (Score:1)
Here's what I do: (Score:2, Interesting)
If you run Linux, you have a decent tool-kit on hand to enhance search engine performance. Use lynx from the command line, with either the -source or -dump option, and pipe it through sed and such to filter it however you like. A recursive check of each
Re:Here's what I do: (Score:1)
How 'bout some web browsers with better widgets built in to them? Gridsheets, sorting features, fi
Understanding ? (Score:1)
Isn't this (Score:2)
Re:Isn't this (Score:2)
I've spent too long with Mr Nortons software.
The answer is simple. (Score:2)
If you have to ask, you won't get away with it.
The insanely talented and successful people I know with extensive mods would never think to ask. They simply wouldn't take a job that required them to change their appearance.
If that's not where you are in your career, well, suck it up.
Everyone else in this thread babbling about how "unprofessional" and "childish" mods are, well, they can suck it up too. There are people out there who are good enough to come to work every day with eye patch, a jester'
wrong thread, bubba (Score:2)
finding the real information is difficult (Score:1)
let me get this straight (Score:2)
Re:Wikipedia (Score:1)
Looking for Answers in all the Wrong Places (Score:2)
"Recently, for example, I was trying to track the changes in California's spending on its schools. In the 1960's, when I was in public school there, the legend was that only Connecticut spent more per student than California did. Now, the legend is that only the likes of Louisiana and Mississippi spend less. Was either belief true? When I finally called an education expert on a Monday morning, she gave me the answer off the top of her head. (Answer: right in spirit, exaggerated in
Google searching (Score:1)
QuASM (Score:2, Informative)
Re:QuASM (Score:1)
Stuff that I never even knew about was easy to answer, only if google was available at my side (and with the StayOnTop held on for IRC). I played for about 2 hours getting
Re:The Answer To Life The Universe and Everything (Score:1)