Cisco Confirms Arrest In Theft Of Its Code 113
spafbnerf writes "Informationweek is reporting on Cisco Systems' confirmation of an arrest in connection with the theft of its IOS 12.3 source code last year. On Tuesday, The New York Times reported that federal officials and security experts have acknowledged that the theft of the Cisco source code was part of a wider pattern of thousands of attacks on military and research computers perpetrated by an unknown number of individuals." From the article: "The FBI fully recognizes the inherent sophistication and global nature of intrusion investigations...As such, we have worked hard to develop strong partnerships within the international law-enforcement community. In this case, we have been working closely with our international partners to include Sweden, Great Britain, and others. As a result of recent actions, the criminal activity appears to have stopped."
Re:theft? (Score:2)
Well, the article says theft, so we better believe it!
I feel so sorry for all the Cisco employees having to write out all that code again because it was stolen.
I can confirm this (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I can confirm this (Score:2)
do they believe it themselves? (Score:5, Interesting)
I read that as: "As a result, the criminals have realised they were being watched and have cleaned up their act, and have made sure they are not noticed by 'them' anymore.
Now on to the FA.
Re:do they believe it themselves? (Score:3, Insightful)
I read that as: "As a result, the criminals have already gotten all the code they were looking for, and now have moved on. This is why there doesn't appear to be any more activity."
Re:do they believe it themselves? (Score:2)
I can't wait to see some more of AcidBurn's clevage!!!
Appearences (Score:1)
I hope whoever it was at least left an easter egg behind.
Appears to have stopped - for now! (Score:4, Insightful)
Then again we could just write rock solid code. but that apparently is cost prohibitive.
Re:Appears to have stopped - for now! (Score:2)
On the other appendage, a vintage PC in my basement churns packets on its cozy shelf, with an OS that has seen continuous attention of millions of developers...
Face it, the bad guys _will_ have guns. No laws or copyrights can stop them. By obstructing the access you limit the amount of kids but do nothing against
Re: (Score:1)
Over-confident (Score:5, Funny)
Thanks to the bear patrol recently put in place in my neighborhood, all bear-related activity appears to have stopped.
Re:Over-confident (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Over-confident (Score:1, Funny)
No more hackers! (Score:2)
Re:No more hackers! (Score:2)
Hey this is slashdot, not slash Dot.
"appears to have stopped"... (Score:4, Funny)
Yeah. Stay put for 2 months more. And just in case you have something urgent, tunnel through Luser832, I have planted enough "evidence" on his PC to keep him in prison for 50 years.
Too bad... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Too bad... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Too bad... (Score:5, Funny)
We have a 7100 series that I use as a step-ladder to access stuff on a top shelf. It has never teetered or shifted.
Re:Too bad... (Score:1)
Re:Too bad... (Score:2)
Re:Too bad... (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Too bad... (Score:2)
And if it does start to teeter one day, you can fix it since you have the source now!
Or something like that.
Re:Too bad... (Score:1)
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
Re:If you're gonna get "nicked" by Cisco... (Score:4, Funny)
When was the last time you tried lifting a 6500, let alone walking with it under your coat? Only do this if you manage to drive out with a 6500 router AND Chambers' Porsche*.
*No, I don't know what he drives. Artistic license.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:If you're gonna get "nicked" by Cisco... (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:If you're gonna get "nicked" by Cisco... (Score:1)
Re:If you're gonna get "nicked" by Cisco... (Score:1)
Theft? (Score:4, Funny)
Information wants to be free.
Appearances are deceiving (Score:3, Funny)
Wow, that statement really made me feel better.
Light on evidence? (Score:2)
The fact that every report says "since the arrest, the intrusions have stopped" ought to tell us something...
Re:Light on evidence? (Score:3, Insightful)
Mainly that the folks who are behind the break ins read the same news articles we do.
Re:Light on evidence? (Score:3, Insightful)
Someone Better Talk to Bush (Score:2, Insightful)
Had Bush known that this was occurring, he would have stepped in and stopped this attack on US sovereignty.
We all know that the US will always choose the unilateralist role in defeating enemies of the State.
(chill... It is a joke.)
Re:dumb moderator (Score:2)
Daddy needs a new karma bump!
Re:dumb moderator (Score:2)
That's what I thought. It was just an offhand remark, not a standup show.
What you think means less to me.
Funny moderations don't affect your karma.
I never said they did. I was commenting on the criticism of the 'dumb moderator' poster.
I guess I should be less oblique so that my comments can reach the education level of folks like yourself.
In other news (Score:2, Funny)
Re:In other news (Score:2)
Oh well, that's still double plus good.
Phew! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Phew! (Score:2, Insightful)
At least they can continue development on it. It must have been costly to have to put development on hold while the source code was missing.
Or maybe the code wasn't stolen, rather copied.
torrent? (Score:2, Funny)
Damn I was wrong! (Score:2, Funny)
The suspect (Score:5, Funny)
I look forward to Maureen O'Gara's next scoop though: "He came from Uppsala, the headquarter of famous open source company mySQL AB! Also the place where Vikings once slaughtered Christians in pagan rituals! All a coincidence? I think not!!"
Re:The suspect (Score:2)
Yes, but on the other hand he got famous for being stupid enough to get caught.
A nice paradox summed up in the movie Young Poisoner's Handbook. Our anti-hero has decided to become the world's greatest poisoner. But the greatest poisoner can't get caught, so how is he going to get famous?
Re:The suspect (Score:1)
Must be nice to have such confidence (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Must be nice to have such confidence (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Must be nice to have such confidence (Score:2)
Firewall? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Firewall? (Score:2, Funny)
Oh Wait...
Re:Firewall? (Score:2)
Re:Firewall? (Score:2)
Swedish reporting: (Score:1, Informative)
http://www.dn.se/DNet/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=678&a=41
Decentralized Networking... (Score:4, Insightful)
We all know that the internet can be a very dangerous place, so why would any company in their right mind choose to have computers with potentially sensitive source code or database information remaining on a publicly facing network?!
Very few machines in a given development or database office should have Internet access, and these machines should not be directly connected to the rest of the company. The reason you spend all of that cash on networking equipment is for private closed intranets, it's not to get you online!
Plugging into the internet is just like going public, no matter how many basements with feline guards at the doors you have in place, you can never be 100% secure.
Re:Decentralized Networking... (Score:2)
They don't. (Score:2)
By definition, no company in their right mind would do such a thing.
I applied for a system administration job at a local hospital. During the interview, my would-be boss showed me their network diagram which looked something like:
After I picked my jaw back up off the floor, I asked what the vertical line represented. "That's our firewall!," he beamed. And what kind? "It's Gauntlet running on Windows NT."
I didn't get the job
Use the source, luke. (Score:2, Funny)
Don't they WANT it secure? (Score:5, Interesting)
Translation: We don't have time to QA this code, so we'd rather not have anyone do it themselves, either, then hack us with the holes we neglected to look for in the first place.
Ugh. Sometimes I wonder if there ought to be an open-source REQUIREMENT in RFP's to vendors. Hell, code availability has HELPED Linksys (who's also Cisco!) - folks have "hacked" it to make it MORE robust, but you don't see any greater number of "hacks" for Linksys products than you do for anyone else...
Maybe Cisco ought to focus on the security BASICS (it's still easiest to get into some else's network because they never changed the default password than it is to script-kid some mutated hack into working) rather than worrying that "outsiders" might actually harden their products FOR them...
Re:Don't they WANT it secure? (Score:2)
Whether the concern is legitimate or not is a different issue.
Re:Don't they WANT it secure? (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm really growing tired of people blindly presenting the position that EVERYTHING would be better open-source.
Look at the number of security vulnerabilities over the last 5 years for the Linux kernel. Now look at the vulnerabilities over the same 5 years for Cisco IOS.
Simply having something opensource does not imply that the end result will be more secure. And the prospect of having something like IO
Yes: and that's why they arrested the boy (Score:2, Interesting)
Translation: We don't have time to QA this code, so we'd rather not have anyone do it themselves, either, then hack us with the holes we neglected to look for in the first place.
Well, if security isn't a concern in our daily lives; why should
Re:Yes: and that's why they arrested the boy (Score:2)
I would hope our network kit doesn't come with a master key preset from the factory. The ind
The Terrorists on Fox's "24" couldn't hack Cisco (Score:1)
Re:The Terrorists on Fox's "24" couldn't hack Cisc (Score:2)
I asume that they are at least intelligent enough to not waste incredible amounts of time, enery, and manpower to hack / break into Cisco so they can perform a very high level analysis of the source code for security holes, so they can hack into backbone routers and misconfigure / shutdown them.
Instead of say, the dumb way of running into the telephone pole brining down the power lines outside or blowing up a critical resource.
Most people
Starwars (Score:1)
Cisco got the code from Stanford University (Score:1)