
Journal sllort's Journal: The birth of Anonymous Hero 34
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Moderation is a game. The only way to win is not to play.
What is the value of a dollar? The answer is that a dollar is worth as much as the government says it is worth. Money is a game we play to create scarcity in the face of abundance; it is a means of keeping track of something imaginary. So what is a Karma point worth? Well, it's worth whatever CmdrTaco says it's worth. Karma is an imaginary thing that has gained value through an electronic construct. sound familiar? The truth is that Slashdot is in many ways the first of the Massively Multiplayer Role Playing Games. Before the first castle in Ultima Online, there was a user with the most Karma to blow.
Slashdot has changed quite a bit since those days. We have a strict levelling system defined now. Here are the various levels you can achieve, and the powers you are granted at each level:
Levelling up
Last I checked, here are the various levels in the vast Role Playing Game that is Slashdot:
(Your score in the game is called 'karma'):
- Score: -24 to -10: Ghost. Ghost players attack (post comments) with a -1 threshold, making them unable to hit any target except those who choose to be hit. Ghost players are limited to two attacks per day, and the label 'Terrible' is placed next to their name.
- Score: -9 to -1: Zombie. Zombie players attack with a threshold of Zero, making only their subject lines visible and reducing the effectiveness of their attacks. Zombie players, like ghost players, can only attack twice per day, and the label 'Bad' is placed next to their name.
- Score: Zero: Dying player. In this transitional state, a player appears to be a normal player, but the label 'Neutral' is placed by their name to signal that they are close to death.
- Score: 1-12: Journeyman. A journeyman player can attack ten times a day with a score of one. The label 'Positive' is placed by their name.
- Score: 12-25: Adventurer. An Adventurer attacks with the same effectiveness as a journeyman, but has the label 'Good' placed by their name.
- Score: 26-50: Sword Saint. A sword saint can devastate his opponents in combat, attacking with a bonus of +2 and flaming them up to twenty-five times per day. Sword Saint players have a distinct advantage, but they are not invincible.
Player killing
So how do you turn a Sword Saint into a Ghost? Well, player killing is alive and well on Slashdot. I'm not going to go into the details of player killing in this article, but suffice it to say that it is possible to defend yourself from normal players but not from Editors. The best way to defend yourself is to create as many separate accounts as you can, and continue levelling them up. This is very time consuming, and it's one way to keep you 'hooked' on the game.
Guilds
Guilds are a recent addition to the game of Slashdot, and they were retro-fitted and bolted on in much the same manner that many MMORPG's added guild support after product launch due to massive player demands. Basically, Guilds allow you communicate more easily with your allies and gain bonuses to your attacks when attacking enemies, though these bonuses are temporary and cannot be used for player killing.
How do I win the game?
Before addressing how to win the Slashdot MMORPG, it's important to look at how other similar games are won. For instance, how do you win at Ultima Online? I believe the answer to that is that if you play, you have already lost. The only people winning in the MMORPG market are Origin, Microsoft, Verant, et al, i.e. the people taking your money. The more time you spend playing, the more time you spend losing. While you are questing for karma, trying to get just one more level, you are losing. Perhaps the only way to win is not to play.
Consider for a moment that when you mark another account as a foe, you assign a numeric penalty to that person's comments which causes you to never view them again. This means you have judged everything this person will ever say in advance, and deemed those future words not worth viewing. You have prejudged them. You are engaging in automated prejudice. How do you explain that to your kids?
The only way to win is not to play
The game is a construct not just to waste your time but to manipulate what you say. If you have ever altered what you post to Slashdot because of fear of karma retribution or the possiblity of a karma reward, then you have bowed to the pressure of an artificial system, a plastic reality placed upon you in order to control you.
I challenge you to break free of the system. You can still post comments to Slashdot without playing the game. You can do it very easily. Just post everything as an anonymous coward. How will people know it's you? Use you public key to sign your comments. If everyone did this, the game would be over, and everyone would win. It's a huge prisoner's dillema, to be sure, but only if you are still worried about getting a high score.
This journal is probably being read by quite a few Sword Saints thinking to themselves 'how can I afford to stop attacking with my +2 bonus??'. Stop thinking inside the box. It's probably harming your brain.
- -s.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9rdIKKpz2COjVE3YRAiBUAKCUiQVxqZ8P2duUVROP1hMch8bawACg3cgU
5bGq8d2a3WYOIoMG01H4iwI=
=21mV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Please consider adding additional class (Score:1)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9rdIKKpz2COjVE3YRAiBUAKCUiQVxqZ8P2duUVROP1
5bGq8d2a3WYOIoMG01H4iwI=
=21mV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re:Please consider adding additional class (Score:2)
Seriously though, have you thought about just posting what you want? it's only a game if you let it be. Don't play, fine. But do post. I read at -1 and find good comments at both +5 and -1.
You eviscerate the anonymous coward, whose PGP-sig shatters into a thousand pieces
Absolutely brilliant! (Score:2)
Granted, since the n-th Editor attack (I can't remember which one; there have been so many), I now default to reading at -1 in order to trawl up the gems that have been "Ghosted" intentionally or by accident. I sure would like to be able to put the FPers, the ignorant punks, and all their ilk in a lockbox so I wouldn't have to read them again, but this may be the best solution.
What is the exit plan, were such a nirvanna come to pass*? Would the signal-noise ratio get worse, or what? Would the editors crack down and crack out? How could you scan for your friends (the search here is pretty poor)?
*Now we know, ever since T(HG)SB, that 99.99% of the people on here are stuck in the Matrix; they would neither appreciate nor participate in this new end-game.
Re:Absolutely brilliant! (Score:1)
And I challenge you to prove your statement:
You can also read some previous posts [slashdot.org] that I made concerning this type of thing. The gist of it is that I try to use the friend/foe thing as a way to filter the crap flooders and idiots.Having spewed that, I do think the idea of wrapping your messages in pgp is good. I have thought of this previously in a different context, when yahoo was borking email to thwart spammers. My idea was to use something pgp-like with error correction in a clear text format. That way you could be assured that your messages get through even with systems replacing phrases and wrapping lines, or in M$'s case, stripping/adding bullshit (Use MSN messenger! You'll love it!). The concept would work equally well on /. since the moronic page wideners cause long URLs to get fucked. (Although they should be fucking links.)
If you're serious and got any damn skills, why don't you pick up something like avantslash [fourteenminutes.com] (which was buggy in 2.7, don't know about 2.10) and fix it up, maybe smash something like it into a newsreader with auto-verification and error correction? That would be the best, to be able to read /. like a newsgroup.
I'd swear there was another project somewhere that seems to be MIA. I've just discovered slashutils [wildspark.com]. Not the one I was thinking of.
Re:Absolutely brilliant! (Score:2)
Re:Absolutely brilliant! (Score:1)
All I was talking about was a different front end to the messages. You pull the entire page while not logged in at -1, this should give you the cached page since most people don't log on. Then if you either get a message with a response to your post, or at decreasing intervals of e.g., 1 hour, 3 hours, 12 hours, ...., you re-pull the entire page and compare to your previous page to see what comments are new. You could be even smarter and only pull it depending on how many new comments have appeared since the number of comments is listed on the front page.
This allows you to do much more intelligent processing that /. can't do because of the excessive load it would cause. For instance you could run the equivalent of a spam filter to remove "useful" comments like "screw you. screw you in your stupid ass." regardless of whether a user or an AC posted it. If you wanted to get fancy, you could attach mugshots to your buddies posts (determined through either nick or pgp sig.)
Re:Absolutely brilliant! (Score:1)
All you have shown me is that AC's that have scores of -1 are sometimes worth reading, and I'd agree with you completely. I don't believe that moderators should downmod anything that is not obviously stupid.
Unfortunately, even here we have the taint of the moronic.
Such a useful contribution. Indeed. Might I add that besides you, that is the only AC post here. And you wonder why the AC is disparaged? I'm sure the person who posted that has an account but did not use it for lack of balls. When I tell someone their being a dumbfuck [slashdot.org], I do it logged in, karma be damned.I await further response to the other points in my posts. You are on the podium screaming for change, expect questions.
PS: btw the philosophy is "you rise to the level of your peers". I do not consider you enemy nor friend.
Re:Absolutely brilliant! (Score:1)
Re:Absolutely brilliant! (Score:1)
Speaking as a sword saint (Score:2)
Sounds nice, but.. (Score:2, Informative)
One possible way is to post comments through some sort of a wrapper. It'll sign the messages for you (an added bonus!), remember their CID and SID, and later it'll iterate through all the non-archived comments you posted and check if any of them gained responses. The problems are that it'll increase the load on slashdot and it's also forbidden by some scriptures [slashdot.org].
what do you think of this? (Score:1)
Opinions?
Re:what do you think of this? (Score:2)
and yeah- for writing some funny stuff that gets moderated up to 5 or for carrying a one-sided conversation cursing at moderators (see my last journal article if yr interested) I have made a slew of enemies.
4 of which are a crew. (Good for them!)
1 of which states in his sig "I foe anyone who abuses the +1" and I abuse the +1 like it was going out of style.
and 2 of which I have no idea about. FUCK 'em.
A big Duuuh (Score:1)
Figured it out years ago, err, why else do people come here?
you have figured out the game (Score:2)
but you have too much free fucking time on your hands.
Excellent sir (Score:1)
Too bad- (Score:2)
It's much easier to go to your user page and see what you've posted and read what you have to say.
SO be it.