New Distributed.net Clients for DESIII 47
David McGrath writes "The new distributed.net clients are out. If you want to participate in the DES-III contest, you should download them. I've also noticed a marked improvement for MMX processors under RC5 -- blocks take two-thirds the time to complete, at least on my computer. "
It's also worth nothing that Slashdot is
Neck and Neck with
the Evangelista's on rc5. Keep up the good work, and remember that
The odds are 1 in 4987 that we'll wrap this thing up tomorrow
(grin). Anyway, upgrade and let's crush DESIII.
This would truly suck ... (Score:1)
Security through obscurity is usually a bad idea, but in this case, I can't think of any way to really make this secure other than making it obscure.
How they test for bogus clients... (Score:1)
linux growth... (Score:1)
Linux accounts for more than twice as much cracked keys per day as Mac!
And it's share is growing, too. Yesterdays shares per OS:
Windows: 66.1%
Linux: 14.0 %
MacOS: 6.2%
Have a look at this [univie.ac.at] graphs for details.
DES-III PowerPC vS Intel Speeds w/new clients (Score:1)
If you like the PowerPC, you can cluster about 20 6100/66's on top of each other for about $250 @. For about $5,000.
WindowMaker dock version of the linux client (Score:1)
Why is /. listed under "religious"? (Score:1)
This would truly suck ... (Score:1)
and it does seem like something the l00ft would do. Does distributed.net check for this kind of garbage?
Ya, ya, ya... (Score:1)
I know that I'm not going to bother with this upgrade. It's just too much trouble for the return. Perhaps I'll put it on the two machines that I use every day(after waiting a couple of weeks for the bugs to sift out), but it's just too much trouble to deal with fifty-odd boxes and their users for basically no return.
If they don't run DES-3 or the test run, so what? They'll still crank on RC5-64, no gain, no loss, no motivation, no effort.
Seeya when v3 arrives, unless SETI@Home arrives first.
Don't worry too much... (Score:1)
Hell it better still be alive, I contributed some source(bug fixes and screen output formatting) a little while ago!
They are supposed to start up in April. Last I heard that schedule is still valid.
Hmm, I'll send a note and see for sure...
Alphas and Sparcs and PPCs... (Score:1)
Behind but catching up (Score:1)
Look at this delta [distributed.net]
Hahahaha - This guy thinks we're /greedy/ (Score:1)
You used to be annoying, now you're just amusing.
Go get the LATEST client for DES III. (Score:1)
A step-by-step account (Score:1)
EFF?? (Score:1)
Makes a good headline, but... (Score:1)
(Yes I'm not on a team but that's nothing to do with it).
Regarding the lack of an open sourced client.. can't someone just reverse engineer the app? Should be simple to do, no?
Scott
Linux user, Mac user, Windows victim.
Question (logout and still process) (Score:1)
Question (Score:1)
A buddy of mine has tried the client on both a K6-2 300 and 333. It'll run (well, walk) the client with nothing else running. Unfortunately, if you're doing anything else, you take a big performance hit and your keyrate dogs out.
He actually locked the 300 machine twice doing nothing more than RC5 and IRC.
Use whatever you have, just be aware.
What am I running? Currently I'm running a P2 333 with 192 MB RAM and about 9 gigs of disk space. I'll be upgrading in a month or so to a CeleronA OC'ed to 450 or 504. Total cost? $500.
Chas - The one, the only.
THANK GOD!!!
I'm participating. Are you? (Score:1)
Mac's are by far not as evil as your NT machines.
DES-III (Score:1)
Question (Score:1)
Second, the FPU is irrelevant for encryption. Encryption has to be exact, and floating point numbers are exact only up to a certain precision. Encryption software frequently uses bignums, which are integer but can be very long.
Probably the program makes use of the FPU for some optimization, but that's a)unlikely (at least I can't think of useful application of the FPU in encryption) and b)wouldn't be a hard impact on the performance as encryption is integer based.
Anyone hit me if I'm wrong. But, please, not too hard.
There is an alternative: SETI (Score:1)
"Another example of distributed net lies!" -RTFM (Score:1)
Ex Machina "From the Machine"
ExMachina@GeekMafia.dynip.com [http://GeekMafia.dynip.com/]
Question (Score:1)
K6/Cyrix/Pentium (Score:1)
There is an alternative: SETI (Score:1)
Specs on contributers per team... (Score:1)
DES-III (Score:1)
Oh, and if you think MacOS isn't for those of us who like to hack (in the old school reference) then deal with this fact: We're #1, and 36% of the Blocks submitted from D.net are macs....
Now if Apple would just bundle the D.net Client with the iMac.........
Uhh, excuse me sounding like an idiot... but... (Score:1)
Newby question: How to I join team /. ? (Score:1)
Updates for other platforms (Score:1)