Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Microsoft AI IT

Microsoft Warns Excel's New AI Function 'Can Give Incorrect Responses' in High-Stakes Scenarios 54

Microsoft is testing a COPILOT function in Excel that uses OpenAI's gpt-4.1-mini model to automatically fill spreadsheet cells through natural language prompts. The function can classify feedback, generate summaries, and create tables based on specified cell ranges. Microsoft warns against using the AI function for numerical calculations or scenarios involving legal, regulatory, and compliance implications because COPILOT "can give incorrect responses." The feature processes up to 100 functions every 10 minutes and cannot access information outside the spreadsheet.

Microsoft Warns Excel's New AI Function 'Can Give Incorrect Responses' in High-Stakes Scenarios

Comments Filter:
  • Annoying. (Score:5, Informative)

    by snowsmann ( 313238 ) on Wednesday August 20, 2025 @10:08AM (#65602342)

    This feature is super annoying. I'll be trying to fill in cell by cell and constantly need to recheck every time I hit enter because sometimes it will just make up stuff for the rest of the data and it's hard to notice until it's too late sometimes.

    • by unrtst ( 777550 )

      I'll be trying to fill in cell by cell and constantly need to recheck every time I hit enter because sometimes it will just make up stuff for the rest of the data and it's hard to notice until it's too late sometimes.

      Wait... so it just auto-completes more of the row data without you asking it to do so?

      TFS sounded bad enough, but it implied that one had purposefully used it in some form, and then the result isn't guaranteed to be right.

      Also, 100 times every 10 minutes may be OK if it's only run during manual data entry (average of one every six seconds), but what if I paste the function down a column with 65k rows? Or send someone a spreadsheet that does that? I'm guessing it does something to handle that as an exception

  • by evanh ( 627108 ) on Wednesday August 20, 2025 @10:14AM (#65602354)

    Why use a millijoule when a Megajoule can do the same thing.

  • by Computershack ( 1143409 ) on Wednesday August 20, 2025 @10:22AM (#65602368)
    If it can't give the right answer and not only that you've got a spreadsheet application that's literally just making shit up then it's time to stop using it.
  • But of course... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by devslash0 ( 4203435 ) on Wednesday August 20, 2025 @10:23AM (#65602370)

    ...even in high-stakes scenarios they won't allow you to turn CoPilot off entirely so that it won't put you at risk, oh no.

    They also forget to acknowledge that while regulatory correctness is of course of big importance when it comes to those sensitive environments, correctness of calculations is EQUALLY important for an average Joe who's doing his sheets for personal reason.

    But they always think about the collectives and shit on the potential impact on individuals...

    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      by gurps_npc ( 621217 )

      Your ideology is showing. This has nothing to do with 'the collectives' or the individual.

      It is about a bunch of idiots being entranced by their newest toy, "AI" and thinking 'We should use it EVERYWHERE".

    • You can't turn it off because they need to be able to monitor you for training data. Microsoft Windows will now monitor absolutely everything you do with every moment so that Microsoft can train their AIs to replace you.

      You're digging your own digital grave and you don't have a choice thanks to 50 years of zero antitrust law enforcement.

      It's a political problem not an economic one but people don't like to hear that so...
    • Will the IRS accept the AI hallucinations as correct? If not, then who gets the liability for mid filing your taxes, you or Microsoft?

      My bulletin board has a Hagar the Horrible comic where Hagar is arguing with a tax collector. The last panel shows them standing in front of a wheel of taxation (like the wheel of fortune). Life is following art again.

  • We know. (Score:5, Funny)

    by mcmonkey ( 96054 ) on Wednesday August 20, 2025 @10:27AM (#65602374) Homepage

    You told us it was AI. Saying it gives incorrect responses is redundant.

  • is like the one who locks the door to the cockpit while you're taking a leak and then flies the plane into a mountainside.

  • Just a toy. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by devslash0 ( 4203435 ) on Wednesday August 20, 2025 @10:36AM (#65602390)

    That's what it is. We're giving adult people a rattle and make them believe it's a spaceship. Too bad there won't be anyone responsible to change their nappy when they shit themselves while playing.

  • WTF?!! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Gilmoure ( 18428 ) on Wednesday August 20, 2025 @10:53AM (#65602424) Journal

    [Why The Fark] would I want a feature that inputs bad data?!!

    That performs bad calculations?!!

    Shit, just make a tool that generates Lorem Ipsum text across a grid of X by Y cells and be done with it.

  • by jenningsthecat ( 1525947 ) on Wednesday August 20, 2025 @11:04AM (#65602446)

    If MS makes this feature (anti-feature?) difficult or impossible to turn off, might it increase LibreOffice adoption?

    I suppose it won't have much of an impact, because MS has become quite expert at raising the temperature just slowly enough to stop the frogs from jumping out of the pot. Still, it's nice to think that their push to control their users' experience, and to force them to subscription models with advertising baked in, might someday result in a huge "fuck off" and a mass migration to free-and-open alternatives.

    • by leptons ( 891340 )
      I already switched from Windows and Office to Linux and LibreOffice due to Microsoft putting "AI" into every goddamned thing. Fuck that.
  • If a computer doesn't have to be consistent, it can be anything else.
  • When they start using it to charge you for Excel by the document, I bet it won't count low.
  • Call it the (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Tablizer ( 95088 ) on Wednesday August 20, 2025 @11:42AM (#65602548) Journal

    ...Darwin Award Function. If you rely on a bot to make key decisions, you deserve whatever mayhem the bot deals you.

    = DarwinAwardGPT("Your prompt request")

  • Yet another Microsoft blunder. Seriously though. I want to know what manager approved this stupidity.
    • by zlives ( 2009072 )

      the new m365 landing page is just a giant copilot scam download add use copilot and nothing else matters advertisement. hard to actually find apps

  • ..."High-Stakes Scenarios" without cross checking and verifying deserves what they get

    • by zlives ( 2009072 )

      umm you make it sound like we are given a choice here, between bing and google AI browsing has become a nightmare with no ability to make it go away. apps are headed that way.

  • Good use case: =COPILOT("These cells contain fulltext feedback we collected about the new coffee machine",A1:A100,"Assign one of these categories next to each comment",D1:D5)

    Bad use case: =COPILOT("Take this export from our sales system",A1:AK1000,"give me three names of people who should be promoted. Be careful. Good luck.")

    • by unrtst ( 777550 )

      Good use case: =COPILOT("These cells contain fulltext feedback we collected about the new coffee machine",A1:A100,"Assign one of these categories next to each comment",D1:D5)

      Reminds me of a joke I had just run across:

      Interviewer: "I heard you were extremely quick at math"
      Me: "yes, as a matter of fact I am"
      Interviewer: "Whats 23x857"
      Me: "492"
      Interviewer: "that's not even close"
      me: "yeah, but it was fast"

      Might want to prefix it with some few-shot learning examples or similar.

  • I'm not anti-AI but FFS I wish people would stop trying to shove it down my throat. Invite me to try it, ask me if I want it. But stop turning on for me and not telling me about it. The code completion guesses for my AI aren't even wrong --most of the time--, but they are wrong often enough - probably 20-30% - that it just slows me down and I'm turning it off. If you have a friend that randomly lies to you even 10% of the time, would you consider that friend a trustworthy person? Would you count on them
    • by zlives ( 2009072 )

      but how are you going to love it unless it is shoved deep down your throat repeatedly,
      i may be confused

  • by RUs1729 ( 10049396 ) on Wednesday August 20, 2025 @01:24PM (#65602840)
    Can you imagine if such a lack of reliability affected computers in general in the same way?
  • They're telling us it's useless trash?
  • Microsoft is testing a COPILOT function in Excel [...] Microsoft warns against using the AI function for numerical calculations

    So, don't use it at all? Because that's literally what spreadsheets are for? I agree.

    Even better would be to not use Excel at all, because Microsoft has been destroying all of its advantages. It isn't fastest any more. It isn't most reliable. It doesn't have the best interface. It used to have/be all of those things. Now literally the only things it has over LibreOffice Calc are live pivot tables and a split function that doesn't require that users know how to build a regexp. LO Calc could have clear techni

  • Try using that fucking hot mess in MS Word. It's fucking useless and so annoying I could scream. The damned thing pokes in and asks if I want to re-write shit or want to use some obscure function.

    Copilot is now the new Clippy that we call all hate for wasting cpu cycles.

  • Don't like the profit numbers: re-roll. Excel has one job: calculate the numbers properly! If AI corrupts the output, drop it.
  • Is to never use AI for anything where individual results matter.
  • by nospam007 ( 722110 ) * on Wednesday August 20, 2025 @06:04PM (#65603600)

    Excel 2007 display bug: Some calculations like 77.1 * 850 incorrectly displayed 100000 instead of the correct 65535. The value in memory was correct, only the display was wrong.
    1900 leap year bug: Excel incorrectly treats 1900 as a leap year due to legacy Lotus 1-2-3 compatibility. This affects date math and WEEKDAY calculations.
    Floating-point precision errors: Excel uses IEEE 754 doubles, but subtraction of similar numbers (e.g. 22.26 - 21.29) can yield unexpected results like 0.970000000000002.
    STOCKHISTORY function bug: In Microsoft 365, this function sometimes shows #CONNECT! or wrong stock prices.
    Circular reference calculation bug: In some cases, Excel returns 0 or invalid values due to silent circular references that are not flagged properly.
    Statistical function inaccuracies: Some functions like STDEVP used numerically unstable algorithms, causing subtle inaccuracies in large or skewed datasets.
    MOD bug (older versions): MOD sometimes returned incorrect results when used with floating-point arguments near precision limits.
    Cell limit bugs: Pre-Excel 2007, exceeding 65,536 rows silently truncated data. In rare cases, formula ranges referencing these limits produced wrong totals or #REF errors.

  • ... numerical calculations or scenarios involving legal, regulatory, and compliance implications ...

    Then, what is the purpose of MS Excel? They're demanding that people treat software that costs hundreds of dollars, as a toy.

    Many people can't make a good spreadsheet, with their best effort. How are they going to handle software that sabotages their work? Yes, that is all Microsoft Co-pilot is offering and MS Corp. is demanding that everyone is obedient to it. How greedy can they get? As already noted, a giant calculator (spreadsheet) that guesses answers will be replaced, with haste.

    Everyone is t

"In the long run, every program becomes rococo, and then rubble." -- Alan Perlis

Working...