arXiv Now Offers Papers in HTML Format

arXiv blog: arXiv's goal is equitable access to scientific research for all -- and to achieve this, we have been working to make research papers more accessible for arXiv users with disabilities. We are happy to announce that as of Monday, December 18th, arXiv is now generating an HTML formatted version of all papers submitted in TeX/LaTeX (as long as papers were submitted on or after December 1st, 2023 and HTML conversion is successful).

HTML is not replacing PDF but will be an additional format available for arXiv users. Submitters will be invited to preview the HTML version of their papers during submission time, the same way they have always done with PDF. When accessing a paper's abstract page, readers will see a link to view the HTML paper right under the PDF link. The request to offer arXiv-hosted papers in HTML format comes directly from scientists with disabilities who face barriers to accessing the research they need. HTML formatted papers are more easily and accurately read by screen readers and other technologies, which can assist researchers with reading disabilities, including blindness, low vision, dyslexia, and more.

And video?!?

[ZectronPositron]

And HTML can embed video, apps, code and many other sever limitations of the PDF format! I still donâ(TM)t understand why PDF does not support embedded video still.

Re:

[bjwest]

... I still donâ(TM)t understand why PDF does not support embedded video still.

It actually does support embedded video [wikipedia.org] (see second paragraph). I guess nobody uses it.

Re: And video?!?

[ZectronPositron]

Weâ(TM)ll thatâ(TM)s new enough, I had looked into this a few years ago and stackexchangers said it was not possible. Now I see numeorus solutions online for embedding video.

Re:

[ceoyoyo]

ArXiv is taking LaTeX, which is plain text, and converting it to HTML, which is also plain text. HTML does not embed video. It allows you to include a link to video, which can be rendered when the file is.

PDF *can* embed video, but fortunately not many people do it, and I suspect ArXiv would reject your submission. The point of arXiv is to make scientific papers available with as little friction as possible. That means no fees, which means making everything as efficient as possible. Hosting video files isn'

Re: And video?!?

[ZectronPositron]

A number of papers I have reviewed or read had video as supplemental data that was very useful to the research. Thatâ(TM)s the main reason I ask - it seems a signficant technical omission that is incredibly helpful to the publishing of scientific data. some researchers post on YouTube and link to the view, maybe Arxiv does not have to host the video

Re:

[ceoyoyo]

There's no problem putting links in papers, whether they're PDF, HTML, LaTeX, plain text, whatever. You've been able to do that for forty years, and it's trivial to do now with YouTube, GitHub, and a bunch of science specific repositories. It's what links are for. They should stay supplemental though, because there's no telling what will happen to them in a couple hundred years.

On the other hand, embedded video is, by definition, in the file, so it has to be hosted by whoever's hosting the paper, which mean

Re:

[RockDoctor]

The norm is that "supplementary information" is hosted on the (commercial) publication website, and linked to by the paper.

No, I don't expect it to be available in a few hundred years time either. But generally, it is supplementary info and not essential to the paper itself. "Generally", not "always".

down with PDF

[mad7777]

PDF is a Pretty Dumb Format, unless you were planning on killing some trees. I don't need my screen to look like a piece of paper.
Thank you, arXiv!