Microsoft Disputing Just How Big Its Customer Data Leak Was (protocol.com) 5
Microsoft says that an unspecified amount of customer data, including contact info and email content, was recently left exposed to potential access over the internet as a result of a server configuration error. From a report: Cybersecurity vendor SOCRadar, which reported the data leak to Microsoft, said in a blog post that data belonging to more than 65,000 companies was affected. Microsoft, however, said in its own post that SOCRadar "has greatly exaggerated the scope of this issue." Microsoft didn't disclose specifics around the number of companies whose data may have been exposed in the leak or the amount of data involved. The server misconfiguration was reported on Sept. 24, and the impacted server was "quickly secured" after that, according to Microsoft. Due to the configuration error, there was a potential that certain "business transaction data" could have been accessed without a need for authentication, Microsoft said. The data corresponds to "interactions between Microsoft and prospective customers," including around the planning and implementation of Microsoft services, the company said in its post.
Microsoft Disputing? (Score:4, Funny)
People Never Learn (Score:3)
There seems to be no end to the gamble companies will take with Cloud services. Some people never learn. Over 65,000 companies compromised due to ONE SERVER being misconfigured. There is no other circumstance in which so many companies can potentially be destroyed by a single server except for Cloud Computing.
This whole thing is insane in the widespread incompetence of so many disparate companies handing over the keys of their kingdoms to another highly incompetent entity. It's just mind-boggling how willing so many companies are to gamble with the futures of so many people.
Re: (Score:2)
Getting SPAM at a MS unique email address (Score:3)
Hmmmmma year or so ago I reported to Microsoft security that I'd gotten a spam email (for an AMEX card) to a unique email address that I'd ONLY used when communicating with Microsoft for one of my clients that would have been "'interactions between Microsoft and prospective customers,' including around the planning and implementation of Microsoft services." They were pretty insistent it wasn't a breach on their side, which was completely impossible, since the address was completely unique (and not guessable). Guess I know differently now! Wonder how long this exposed??
640K should be enough as a fine said Bill (Score:2)
It's not about the severity of the leak but the height of the fine that Microsoft needs to pay.