Yahoo Answers, a Repository for Stupid Questions, Is Shutting Down (vice.com) 94
After 16 years of asinine questions and dubious answers, Yahoo Answers is shutting down next month. From a report: The company announced that starting April 20, users won't be able to post new questions or answer other people's questions; on May 4, the site will become inaccessible, and will redirect to the Yahoo homepage. Users who've posted questions and answers in the past can download their data via request before June 30, 2021, here. "While Yahoo Answered was once a key part of Yahoo's products and services, it has become less popular over the years as the needs of our members have changed," an announcement that went out to users, as spotted by the good people of the r/DataHoarder subreddit, said.
I will miss it in spirit. (Score:2)
Though I haven't used it much in recent years, I made the Art of Trolling front page no less than five times due to my answers there.
I'm also annoyed Cheezeburger couldn't keep their databases straight and reset the like count and comments so many times it's hard to tell which ones were actually there....
Do not want! (Score:3)
What is MBMBaM going to do?
Re: (Score:2)
Came up with a product idea for that site. (Score:5, Funny)
I found a place in China that would let you make custom "Magic 8 Balls".
I seriously considered having a batch of them made, in pink or lavender and naming them "Internet Pregnancy Tests".
The idea was to have answers like "Twins", "It was Aliens" and "Yes but it's not yours" to the answer "could I be pregnant?" which made up an unreasonably high percentage of questions on there.
burn it (Score:2)
Literally burn it to the ground and live stream the event. I'll sell you an NFT of the stream.
Re: (Score:2)
Charging money for this as a pay-per-view event would amount to more revenue than all the rest of Yahoo for the past 5 years.
Re: (Score:2)
Better to burn out than to fade away.
As crazy as it sounds the NFT alone would probably be more valuable than Yahoo.
Yahoo running away from social media (Score:2)
Yahoo! Messenger died years ago. Comments section on Yahoo News was removed, probably because the people on it were so horrid. Yahoo Answers, their version of Quora is no more.
Maybe this social media stuff doesn't make them any money. But I suspect it draws in clicks and search results and keeps people engaged to their site. Who ever is making these decisions at Yahoo is probably screwing things up big time for the company.
Re: (Score:2)
And GeoCities!
It served its purpose. You'll note its conspicuous absence in the Terminator universe.
Re: (Score:2)
Yahoo's offerings are not unique. They are a competitor in markets where the winners have already been firmly established. Free email is provided by Google and Microsoft. Facebook is the undisputed king of social networking. Quora defeated Yahoo Answers long ago. Slack has instant messaging covered. And for online news and other services, there is a litany of alternatives.
Yahoo put up a fight, but it didn't come out on top anywhere. Now, it is just slowly withering away.
Re: (Score:2)
Yahoo put up a fight
Yahoo only put up a fight on each front after it was clear they were losing.
Yahoo was once the king of search but failed to improve, leaving room for a little upstart called "Google". Larry and Sergey even offered to sell the Google search engine to Yahoo for $1M. Yahoo turned them down because they didn't think search was important.
Yahoo Answers sucked. Stupid questions and even stupider answers. On Quora, better questions and better answers bubble to the top. Stackexchange does an even better job (al
Re: (Score:2)
Jerry Yang fucked Yahoo shareholders harder than anyone. He was thankfully fired, but way too late. This dumbshit turned down a $44.6 BILLION buyout offer. This was the most Yahoo would ever be worth. It's been nothing but downhill from there.
Re:Yahoo running away from social media (Score:4, Insightful)
This is by no means unique to Yahoo. It's all what I call "death by redesign". It's not as sudden or severe as Digg. It's more of a slow, steady decline. In the beginning there was a hierarchical search, and mail, and finance pages... and they rocked. The finance was clean, and simple. It used GNUplot for charts. It loaded fast. Do I even need to tell you the rest of this story? Yeah, comments are a cesspool but that's not all to it. In the rush to extract more ad rev, and look better on tablets and/or phones, they do what so many sites do: make it virtually unusable to their existing PC user base while failing to attract the hip new people they were seeking. Then when they see they're not getting out of the hole, they dig deeper.
Yahoo was big enough to get kept alive by Verizon or something, I forget. I pulled the plug on my mail there a couple years ago, not because I liked it; but because it isn't always easy to tell all contacts about the switch, especially biz contacts and sites you might like or have forgotten about. At some point, I switched to accessing it using Thunderbird because the interface was so horrid, so there goes the ad revs, Yahoo, and if you stopped allowing POP3 at this point it wouldn't bother me because I haven't even opened Thunderbird in six months to check it.
The only thing left for me is finance, and even that's becoming unusable. You have to wait for some gawdawful thing to process when you type a ticker in to search. If you just hit enter too soon, it does a regular search, totally losing the finance context! How brain dead is that? It's super-spiffy JavaScriptacular though, as the leader of whatever team built that monstrosity no doubt told the managers.
It's what Slashdot almost became!
Re: Yahoo running away from social media (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Yahoo Japan is still going strong. It was originally a joint venture between Yahoo! and Softbank, but Yahoo! sold its stake long ago.
As well as a popular search engine, Yahoo Japan has many other businesses. One of the most popular is Yahoo Auctions, which is much bigger than eBay in Japan.
Re: (Score:2)
There where a lot of trolls in the Yahoo News which made it almost useless. But the reason that Yahoo News shut down the comments section, same reason CNN and other liberal sites did, because they got tired of their agenda being reviled in the comment sections. They would post a story full of half truths or down right lies and people would correct them in the comments sections. It got to be to much for the moderators to come along and delete the corrections. Easier to just close the comments and ca
Re: (Score:2)
they got tired of their agenda being reviled in the comment sections.
Do you honestly think news executives, even ultra liberal ones, give a crap about what some grandfather and retired navy vet has to say on their comments section? That people are showing up every single day, reading stuff, clicking on stuff, and seeing ads seems like easy money. I can't imagine a CEO that is so thin skinned that they care what some randos are saying. If anything the right-wing push back against the liberal media would only fuel more left-leaning articles because they're getting so many page
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, that is pretty much the reason the comment sections are gone. It was a big problem for CNN. You could just skip the articles and go right to the comment section for the truth. Jeff Zucker is such a fucking control freak that he couldn't stand have CNN's lies and half truths corrected by The Truth on their very own site.
Yahoo did it for the same reason. They shutdown the comment section for that very reason. The only difference between CNN and Yahoo is Yahoo admit that it was the reason they d
Re: (Score:2)
* for some definition of truth.
Re: Yahoo running away from social media (Score:1)
Quora (Score:1)
The bots, CCP shills, and trolls all migrated to Quora.
Re: (Score:2)
and Slashdot.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget the just plain wrong "answers." Lots of those on Quora too. I guess we should be grateful for the existence of sites like this though, it makes it nice and easy to spot whe some idiot has done all their homework or research on Quora.
A Repository for Stupid Questions (Score:4, Funny)
Great, so how about Amazon (Score:4, Insightful)
I am now inundated with questions of "will this ink work with my xxx printer?". How the hell would I know? I have a printer, the ink worked with it. As it should, the page explicitly said my printer was supported.
What, you think I'm going to buy one of your printers, order ink for it, and see if it works? Yeah, how about no on that.
Amazon needs a "stupid question" button I can push once and get no more "does this specific thing work with my other specific thing" so I don't get any more questions on it.
Re: (Score:2)
They also need a stupid answer button. The only thing dumber than getting the "will this ink work with my xxx printer?" questions in your email are the "I don't know, I have yyy printer" answers they show on the product page.
Re: (Score:2)
They did at least add an "I don't know" button that avoids the whole thing. This drastically cut down on the number of answers that were some variety of "I don't know" or "Maybe" or "Boat"
Re: (Score:2)
Walmart does the same thing just not as bad. Really, I feel like tech support every time I get these questions.
Re:Great, so how about Amazon (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't usually mind answering questions about stuff I've bought from Amazon. Then I bought printer ink, cuz the refill place I've used for the past decade turned into a pizza shop last time I needed ink.
I am now inundated with questions of "will this ink work with my xxx printer?". How the hell would I know? I have a printer, the ink worked with it. As it should, the page explicitly said my printer was supported.
Yeah. I have found that people really suck at asking questions. They skip the critical stuff that needs to be asked and include all kinds of irrelevant information that makes it impossible to answer the question because it's theoretically possible that the weird included information is actually very important but they didn't explain why.
For example, here's a theoretical question someone might ask about printer ink that is good:
I have the Acme ABC811 printer but this ink is rated for the Acme 810 printer. Will it work on the 811?
That is a great question. I may not know about the ABC811 printer, but somebody else might. Maybe the 811 uses the exact same ink as the 810 but somebody can probably answer that. Unfortunately, here is what kind of question people really ask:
I live in western Kentucky and my printer is on the 2nd floor of a 2 story house where I only have a wifi connection and I only use the printer on Saturday mornings. Will this ink work?
Who knows? You didn't say anything about the model and why is anything else relevant? Maybe they think it might impact the ink to have the printer working on wifi. People make these questions so much harder than they need to be. Some are good ones but many are terrible. Generally, the shorter and sweeter the question is, the more likely it can get an answer.
A bit late, but. . . . (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Half the time the answer to "will this ink work with my printer?" is "why didn't you buy a laser?"
I.e. often the answers are just as useless as the questions.
It wasn't just the questions (Score:3)
The answers sometimes caused either facepalm or aneurysm.
Hurry Internet Archive. Save this repository of human stupidity!!! /s
Re: (Score:2)
We're talking Yahoo, or Stackoverflow here?
It's prehistoric Quora .... (Score:4, Funny)
It's been a LONG time since I ever thought asking a question over on Yahoo might get me a decent answer. But I've got to say, I subscribed to the daily digest of random questions/answers on Quora and it's typically so interesting or informative, I get sucked into clicking on one of them to read more and wind up burning the next 20-30 minutes reading other items of interest up there.
Generations will miss out on the important answers (Score:5, Insightful)
Yahoo! Answers has provided us with so much knowledge, including answers to burning questions such as: How is babby formed? [youtube.com]
Re:Generations will miss out on the important answ (Score:5, Funny)
I live in georgia but i dont see rusia no where not even sound but they says theres tanks should i be worried? [archive.is]
My girlfriend hasn't had her period since she got pregnant. please help she is freaking out. she thinks the baby is drinking her blood?!?! [archive.is]
Re: Generations will miss out on the important ans (Score:2)
"I live in georgia but i dont see rusia no where not even sound but they says theres tanks should i be worried?"
This reminds me of when I was a very young kid back in the 1980s, years before the Berlin wall fell. I frequently heard about the turmoil between the East and West Germany during that time, with Berlin usually mentioned. Except I didn't know about Germany or where it was in the world.
I was riding with my family on the Pennsylvania Turnpike, and I looked up at the big green sign, and saw "B
Re: (Score:2)
Lots of evil looks towards the father is part of the process.
What loaded post title and summary (Score:5, Insightful)
Calling all questions on the site stupid is pretty superficial and reflects a pretty limited mindset.
Sure, some people have odd questions but different people have different gaps in their knowledge. Forums and collaborative sites are a big part of the web, including slashdot, stackoverflow, qora. Are they "Stupid" and "Dubious" too?
Like the site or not, it was one of the first sites where people could go and ask questions, they were pioneers in gamification of answers and their attempt at helping people was well intentioned.
The tone of post is quite disappointing though
Re: (Score:1)
slashdot, stackoverflow, qora. Are they "Stupid" and "Dubious" too?
Um, yeah. To a not insignificant degree at least.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: What loaded post title and summary (Score:2)
I hope someone archives the good leaving the drek to disappear.
But keep the "Babby" and "Will sitting in the back seat of a Prius affect my dick and balls?" posts. =]
Not always useless (Score:1)
How is babby formed? (Score:3)
How is babby formed?
How girl get pragnent?
For those who don't remember the countless memes [arstechnica.com]
In other news (Score:2)
Slashdot, a repository for stupid comments, lives on.
"How is babby formed?" (Score:2)
(Yes, this is where the meme started)
Georgia law [Re:"How is babby formed?"] (Score:5, Interesting)
Responding to your sig. It's not illegal to give voters water at a polling place. It is illegal to hand a voter a bottle of water and say, "Vote for $CANDIDATE";
Sorry, but that turns out not to be the case. The new Georgia " Election Integrity Act of 2021" law says it is illegal for any person to give food or drink-- including water-- to voters in line. It does not state this is only true if they are "electioneering."
It may have been the purpose to ban electioneering (the ban on giving food or drink is in a paragraph that is about "soliciting votes in any manner or by any means or method") but the actual text of the law bans any person from giving food or drink without restriction.
Text is here: https://www.legis.ga.gov/api/l... [ga.gov]
Short summary here: https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/31... [cnn.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't get why this matters
How long do you generally spend waiting in line at your polling station?
do democrats need more water than republicans?
If you've ever considered the average wait time at polling stations, did you make the assumption that they'd be roughly the same, state-wide? Can you think of any reasons why that might not be the case? Would any of those reasons correlate with the likely voting intentions of those using the stations?
I definitely would not drink water given to me by a stranger at a voting line.
Whilst I can empathise with this 'concern', fortunately I do not share it. I don't ever envisage the need (not in the USA, for starters),
Re: (Score:2)
Have they done actual research that revealed that GA democrats will leave without voting if they are offered fewer drinks / snacks? Because I find that fucking bizarre.
Re: (Score:2)
I get that this is some kind of nefarious plot by republicans to suppress votes.
Honestly, I'm somewhat 'conflicted': the (presumed) intention seems sensible, but the method used (no person can offer material aid to another, whilst at a polling station) crossed over the line from common sense to spiteful. In the ensuing partisan keyboard wars all nuance has been lost.
My question is, are voters in blue districts actually leaving without voting because they're too thirsty / hungry to wait in line for the full queue.
I have no idea.
Because that would suggest something worse is going on, at least to me.
Something worse is going on. When voting is 'deliberately' designed to be difficult, time consuming, awkward to attend, and so on, for anyone, then the system is not fit for purpose in a first world democracy
Re: (Score:2)
Make voting miserable [Re:Georgia law] (Score:2)
Have they done actual research that revealed that GA democrats will leave without voting if they are offered fewer drinks / snacks? Because I find that fucking bizarre.
I will hypothesize that the idea is that they want to make the voting experience miserable, so that next election the marginal voters will decide not to bother. "Last time I stood in line in the hot sun for three solid hours before I could even get in the door, nobody even offered my water; I'm not doing that again."
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Try being careful what you say or you will be lumped in with the gap-toothed Trump supporters.
You have too high an estimation of the importance of the opinions of you and your buddies in the Groupthink Police. Go ahead, lump away.
your waving the 'virtue signalling' in my face just strengthens my belief [blah blah blah]
Well, that would be truly disappointing, if only I cared about your beliefs regarding me. I used "virtue signaling" (note the spelling) because it's convenient shorthand for insincere, disingenuous questions of concern, such as "Why is giving water to voters illegal"? Aside from that, my simple factual answer would only be interpreted as an endorsement of the Georgia law
Dont despair. (Score:2)
Damn (Score:5, Funny)
I'm going to preserve this question [yahoo.com] here as easily one of the best belly laughs the Internet ever delivered.
My girlfriend's dad recently passed away...how can i help her get past this so i can introduce her to anal?
Re: (Score:1)
>>1 decade ago
who goes out of their way to code this?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks, I hate it (Score:3, Insightful)
I know answers is known for the article title but there was other stuff on there. Especially while it was popular. All of that will disappear. What's the replacement? Social media and sites with paywalls. Quora already soft blocks you. Just another part of the internet to turn to dust.
We are headed for an era of perpetually disappearing history and all that it brings.
Re: (Score:2)
Wasn't that why torrents were invented? To preserve "history"*?
*Oh, and "culture", can't forget that too.
But (Score:2)
Re: But (Score:2)
You'll have to wait to see if you get a tax credit next time you file. It's the only way to be sure.
HOW IS BABBY FORMED? (Score:2)
Do way instain mother to pay respects.
They should link to the uncyclopedia (Score:2)
now that would be informative
yahoo... (Score:2)
the thing that wouldn't leave. https://vimeo.com/477679423 [vimeo.com]
I dont understand why (Score:2)
I don't understand why they should bother shutting this stuff down. It' has to be more popular than much of their services and the cost to upkeep it has to be pretty trivial.
Re: I dont understand why (Score:2)
"New and richer experiences for our users blah blah blah....,"
As I've mentioned a few times before here, this is the death knell for what you are used to using, and why you should never rely entirely on "The Cloud".
Granted I don't think Yahoo is even saying this. More likely the company itself is on it's death bed, and they are trying to shed as many 'frivolous expenses' as they possibly can. I'm amazed they lasted as long as they did. Best case for them I can see is that they get bought out before they die
/r/AskReddit (Score:2)
This sub stole AskYahoo's milkshake. It makes Yahoo users look like geniuses.
ASCII stupid question... (Score:3, Funny)
..get a stupid ANSI.
Re: (Score:2)
I only use EBCDIC you insensitive clod
There is nothing like (Score:2)
Trying to find an an answer to a very vexxing problem only to be met with crap that looks like it was written by a 6 year old.
"lulz mee too"
"i'm having the smae problem. Someone e-mail me the answer pls"
"X is a piece of crap. Why don't you switch to Y"
If this is what YA is populated with, shutting it down means less garbage/road blocks between me and what I am searching for
Re: How 'bout Reddit? (Score:2)
Any forum that caters to the LCD will always be filled with 'content' like this.
I wish the real reason for shutting down the YA forums were given instead of "our users are just posting stupid shit". But that might scare the investors who are still on board.
Been a long time (Score:1)
It wasn't entirely bad until people got bored (Score:2)
May have been a lot of stupid questions on there but it was the only place that helped me remember the movie The Wraith many years ago. Weird that I'm now feeling nostalgia for an interaction I had with strangers regarding something I was feeling nostalgia for at the time.
I guess this is what getting old feels like...
I did a Wayback Machine spot check (Score:2)
Well, at least the "Babby" post seems to be archived
http://web.archive.org/web/202... [archive.org]
(crawl from 2020). With the other post, YMMV
(Hopefully this isn't just loading some Javashit forum data from the Yahoo servers which will be broken come May)
Re: I did a Wayback Machine spot check (Score:2)
I took another look at the page, and the news headlines at the top look current. :\
It's possible this page is still pulling the forum data from Yahoo's servers. :(
Re: I did a Wayback Machine spot check (Score:2)
Oops, nevermind. All the articles are dated 2020. Sorry about that.
[Keeps fingers crossed]