Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
AI Microsoft IT Technology

Microsoft Word is Getting Text Predictions Next Month (theverge.com) 117

Microsoft is planning to add text predictions to Word in March. From a report: The new feature will work similarly to Google Docs' Smart Compose option, using machine learning to predict what words an author will need to speed up document creation. Microsoft originally announced a beta of text predictions last year, but it's now on the Microsoft 365 roadmap to reach all Word users on Windows next month. Word will highlight grayed-out predictions when users are writing a document, and the suggestions can be accepted using the Tab key or rejected by hitting Escape. Text predictions can also be completely disabled by Word users.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Microsoft Word is Getting Text Predictions Next Month

Comments Filter:
  • by Ostracus ( 1354233 ) on Monday February 22, 2021 @04:07PM (#61091088) Journal

    Now just think of how better spelled Slashdot would be if this was in every browser. Plus "first posts" would come easier.

  • by Anonymous Coward
    Mostly use Editpad, but if I require more than that, then Libre Office does everything else I need.

    Others may need MS stuff. Fair enough.

  • by zenlessyank ( 748553 ) on Monday February 22, 2021 @04:10PM (#61091098)

    to create a document because of having to fix the auto-correct constantly.

    • to create a document because of having to fix the auto-correct constantly.

      I noticed that a lot for a while in android trying to replace a perfectly valid word with a "better" one that had a completely different meaning. I don't think I've seen that as much recently.

      • by NFN_NLN ( 633283 )

        Fixing a genuine spelling mistake with a DIFFERENT correct word is an example of the cure being worse than the disease.

        Words have built-in error bit detection. A human can see a word with an incorrect letter and immediately know what the correct word is. (Grammar Yahtzee's have turned this into a lifestyle, which only proves my point.) On the other hand you can read through a document with a correctly spelled word that changes the meaning and either accept it or assume they meant a different word - which

        • I work in a poultry farm, and I don't give a duck. My boss would be upset because we actually sell them and giving stock away for free is bad business.

        • Words have built-in error bit detection.

          Do they? I think you're going to struggle to support that claim against the null hypothesis that (whichever language you're talking about) developed randomly, adding in random choices by users along side features from all the other languages known by all the other users, also randomly.

          OK, I'll make an exception for Esperanto - that was, to a degree, designed. Using large concept blocks from Latin and Romance languages, but little from common languages like the 57 var

    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by olsmeister ( 1488789 )
      If it does, you're doing something wrong. You have to hit TAB to allow accept the suggestion, otherwise just continue typing as normal. And you can disable the feature entirely if it really bothers you.
    • to create a document because of having to fix the auto-correct constantly.

      So you haven't used it, don't know how it works, but insist on drawing a conclusion anyway publicly displaying your ignorance. Why is that? Do you actively seek ridicule? Or do you actually and manually take a suggestion from every suggested word and then go back and delete it? If so, seek psychiatric help.

      • I was speaking of my own experiences with auto-correct in various programs. You bitterness seems to indicate maybe, just maybe you are the one that needs psychiatric help.

        • I was speaking of my own experiences with auto-correct in various programs. You bitterness seems to indicate maybe, just maybe you are the one that needs psychiatric help.

          I'm not bitter, just calling out stupid people when I see them. You made an silly assumption about another product from another vendor and yet declared with certainty your ignorant position.

          Your experience is only worth two things: jack, and shit.

          Now in the real world how this system already works (since it is already used in some MS programs) is completely hands off having precisely zero impact on you preparing documents as you need to manually accept each suggestion.

          Now please tell us about all the other

    • by kriston ( 7886 )

      It doesn't auto-correct. It suggests words and phrases. You hit the tab key to accept it. If you don't want it, it does nothing while you continue typing.

      • Well I don't have a copy of the new Word, so I don't know what it does.

        Since the article says it is coming next month, I don't see how ANYONE knows what it exactly does or doesn't do.

        I quit taking the word of companies decades ago.

        • by kriston ( 7886 )

          It's already present at outlook.com. It looks like they've been testing it there for the past several months, perhaps as long as a year.

    • I sincerely hope this feature has a kill switch. Seems about as useful as the long hated Clippy of yesteryear.
      • It probably will. Finding it may be the challenge. Then remembering the location so when Microsoft patches it and turns it back on you can find it again.

  • Do not want (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Austerity Empowers ( 669817 ) on Monday February 22, 2021 @04:14PM (#61091104)

    I don't like this feature in code, email or documents. I spend a lot of time mashing escape to make it go the fuck away, assuming I can't figure out where they hid the setting to disable it.

    Worst feature ever, except maybe "ribbons".

    • This may be very problematic for those of us who write technical documentation. Will it know the correct terminology, acronyms, and expressions?
      • I had a friend, a Phd in physics. He told me about one particular dissertation paper (back before this tech, but related). The proof reader corrected every occurrence of "iff" to "if". Same here.
        • I had a friend, a Phd in physics. He told me about one particular dissertation paper (back before this tech, but related).

          The proof reader corrected every occurrence of "iff" to "if".

          Same here.

          I had a similar experience: a professor corrected my "iff" to "if" and I had to explain it to her. It was a graduate class and, given the subject matter, she shouldn't have needed a student to explain it to her. It wasn't as if I was trying to be extra clever by throwing it in unnecessarily—I was quoting a source!

      • This may be very problematic for those of us who write technical documentation. Will it know the correct terminology, acronyms, and expressions?

        I was actually thinking that technical writing is the only field where this could actually work well. Because technical writing depends on a certain argot and works almost programmatically, it would be easier to create a predictive algorithm for technical writing than other forms. The formatting and whatnot is already XML. Given that technical writers usually have to adhere to very specific style guidelines, it would be much easier to predict everything from terminology to syntax. You could even optimize it

        • The problem is that while technical documentation follows rules for a field, all of what I mentioned changes by subject. For example, writing about databases is related but different than big data. Sure there could be templates however the variations in subject would require very broad templates. What if I need to write about databases and big data, for example.
    • Huh? Presumably, it will just display it in grey but won't type the sentence into the document unless you press the side arrow. In other words, it won't mess with your typing like autocorrect does.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      I love this feature. Makes emails faster, a lot of them are just routine stuff.

      For code is even better. You can easily use long, descriptive variable names because code competition makes typing them really fast.

      • I've certainly found it helpful in some contexts.
        There are certain sentences I use frequently.

        In code, if I write "while " pretty much every time that's going to end up being:

        while ( ) {

        }

        So yeah. Long ago I created my own autocomplete for such things in vim. It leaves my cursor in the parens, where I want it.
        On the other hand, predictive text / autocomplete can be bad when you're presenting in a meeting. Maybe I should use things like incognito windows when presentingto reduce that tendency.

      • by jbengt ( 874751 )

        Makes emails dumber, a lot of them are just routine stuff.

        FTFY

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          When some recruiter contacts me I don't need to reply with a Shakespearian sonnet. When I'm acknowledging a meeting I don't require anything more than a simple canned sentence.

          Even when writing more complex emails, Gmail often predicts the rest of the sentence I was going to write anyway. If I was going to write that then who cares if it was autocompleted or not, the result is exactly the same.

          I've got better things to do than hand craft exquisite emails.

      • > because code competition makes typing them really fast. [emphasis added]
        Excellent! You can't make this stuff up!
    • Can't you just keep typing over the suggestion and ignore it? I am sure that you can. Or just turn the fucking thing off?
    • Escape? Why not just keep typing? The feature does literally nothing unless you select the word and can be completely ignored.

      Personally I find it pointless because registering the suggestion visually and then deciding to accept it is slower than simply touch typing in the first place.

      • You can ignore it to the same degree you can ignore blinking ads and seizure-inducing animated GIFs. Having "suggestions" pop up constantly will be very, very distracting for any professional writer.

        Will there be a new market for suggestion blockers in productivity applications?

        • Will there be a new market for suggestion blockers in productivity applications?

          Just.

          Turn.

          It.

          Off.

          Seriously, how hard is this?

        • You can ignore it to the same degree you can ignore blinking ads and seizure-inducing animated GIFs.

          I mean if you can't handle this then how did you make it this far on the internet.

    • don't get me started on the Ribbon!

      At the point it was introduced my big beef was that I (and probably most people) had spent long enough learning how to use Office pretty much the same way, every version that it seemed not only unnecessary, but almost intentionally trying to push a particular way of working on users. And I know for a fact I wasn't the only person who thought this way, because for a while you could buy an office extension to disable the ribbon and bring back menus, which of course you had

    • Why are you still using MS office and not LibreOffice?
    • by kriston ( 7886 )

      You don't hit escape. You just keep typing. The tab key accepts the suggestion. Any other key makes it go away automatically.

  • and will be bannded from the bar test.

  • It looks like you're trying to add a feature to assist users via predictions based on their recent actions. Would you like a snazzy graphic to go along with that?
  • The New Clippy? that will pop up and "help" you to speed up document creation. I've found auto-co-wreck (auto-correct, corrected) slows me down. One reason I use FocusWriter to write the text, and then paste it (if I must...) into Word. But the need for speed when trying to pour one's thoughts on virtual paper...

    I personally am waiting for the brain-interface to Word, but then it will be a headache in more ways than one.

  • Which relies upon... (Score:5, Informative)

    by martynhare ( 7125343 ) on Monday February 22, 2021 @04:21PM (#61091132)
    APIs which submit your typing to Microsoft servers, just like how Office uploads the images you insert to perform AI analysis to add descriptions of said images (for accessibility as well as searchability) to documents automatically. When key apps include these features as standard, privacy is dead. Not that there's much of a real-world impact [parliament.uk] when healthcare data is already in Microsoft's hands [digital.nhs.uk] by virtue of it being accredited as OFFICIAL for storing/sending sensitive patient information.

    I wonder what the liability is on Microsoft's end if they get compromised...
    • by ljw1004 ( 764174 )

      APIs which submit your typing to Microsoft servers, just like how Office uploads the images you insert to perform AI analysis to add descriptions of said images (for accessibility as well as searchability) to documents automatically...I wonder what the liability is on Microsoft's end if they get compromised...

      I suspect that when Microsoft get compromised, the anti-Microsoft folks will be surprised to learn that in most cases Microsoft didn't actually retain problematic data, and it was all so aggregated or anonymized that there's no liability. Just my guess.

    • You can't compromise Microsoft -- they already compromised everything to start with. ;-)

    • I wonder what the liability is on Microsoft's end if they get compromised...

      Fortune 500 companies literally store secret internal documentation on Microsoft provided hardware in Microsoft's cloud accessed via Microsoft's website. These APIs are the least of their concerns.

      Incidentally the company I work for recently declared we're no longer allowed to use online translation services, except for Microsoft office's built in translator, which sends data to MS.

  • As a computer nerd I would love to hear they've licensed Google's generative model. Of course that is really awful and inevitable, and is going to bring us all the trouble we would expect. Remember "let's make a chatbot trained on stuff people say online"? That was great too.

  • I was just thinking that my word processor needed another way to pop up just the word I didn't want.

  • So they are collecting statistics on what words I use? Just in word or all MS apps, or everything on Windows? Including encrypted documents? I'm concerned about the database they would need to generate in order to do this effectively. If it doesn't have a lot of data to back it up, its likely to just be really annoying
  • Yeah, OpenOffice.org had this feature in 2004. It was actually pretty useful.

  • letâ(TM)s set so double the killer delete select all."

    I can't wait to untangle the mess this will create...

  • But only as long as it's done via audio prompts, and in Gilbert Gottfried's voice [youtube.com].

  • was to send some SMSs to a friend. Start each with a letter or two and accept whatever text prediction gave me. Just make sure that the friend is a good one and knows what you are doing!

    • A fun game that I played once I get the money supply to the house and get the money supply to keep up with the other one I can get you a copy of the receipt.

      That's what happened when I accepted the autocomplete on yours. Makes more sense than some things we see posted on Slashdot.

      • A fun game that I played once once I get to the game that I will be there in about the same time as well as well as as well as as well as as well as as well as as well as

        It just got stuck on stupid. Silliness is fun.
    • by PPH ( 736903 )

      A priest, a rabbit and a vicar walk into a bar.
      The barman says to the rabbit, "What do you want to drink?"
      The rabbit replies,"I don't know, I'm only here because of predictive text."

  • I wonder if you use it too much if they can charge for copyright infringement, since they (or their algorithms) are doing the writing?

  • Will it have a cartoon paper clip along with the suggestion to make it 'fun' too? They could call it Clippy.

  • by Retired ICS ( 6159680 ) on Monday February 22, 2021 @05:19PM (#61091326)

    Like most other automagic this will probably work better when disabled. This is bound to be yet another annoyance which has to be disabled as part of the installation and setup procedure for all Microsoft products. It only takes minutes to install Microsoft product, but then you need to take *days* to disable all the mis-features to make them useable.

    • My kingdom for a mod point. This is the first thing I do any time I get a new machine at work, disable all the auto-nonsense Microsoft throws at people. It's the only way to get anything accomplished.

      I can't count the number of times I do one thing, such as put in a tab stop on one line, and Word thinks I want to do it to every line thereafter. Did I tell you to put in a tab stop on the next line? No? Then don't do it!

      • by jbengt ( 874751 )
        I believe there's a setting to make the next paragraph the same style when you hit enter. Can be useful, but not if it picks up things like tabs added that are not really part of the named style.
    • If its anything like my tablet, auto correct will be turned back on every time there is an update.

  • Obsoleting the user is so primitive.
    Why go through all that effort, to make that "product"?
    You're like Apple.

    Softbank et al are way further!
    Just take the *customer* entirely out of the equation!
    (He's poor now anyway, cause you already got all his money!)

    1. Create vapor startup.
    2. Declare "valuation". (Like $3 trillion.) You just created money out of thin air!
    3. Buy shit with "parts" of that imaginary money!

    Just make sure you never cash out!
    Just sell the shit you bought with the imaginary money for real mone

    • 2. Declare "valuation". (Like $3 trillion.) You just created money out of thin air!
      3. Buy shit with "parts" of that imaginary money!

      2.a. Learn that no one knows of your vapor startup and won't buy any of your stock.
      3.a. Someone does buy your stock, you buy other things and then sell them then that someone wants to cash their stock in and you don't have the jing.

  • Congratulations, Microsoft. You figured out a way to upload the content of users' documents to your server now. The EULA will surely say "the data you willingly transmit to Microsoft will only be used to help improve Microsoft products and services, or in accordance with our privacy policy."

  • by rebill ( 87977 ) on Monday February 22, 2021 @06:00PM (#61091426) Journal

    Back in 2019, Elise posted a song on Youtube based on the predictive text Apple provided: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DwAIsFbBSE [youtube.com]

    Apparently watermelons will take over. I wonder how crazy that will get with Microsoft's predictive text.

  • We will just type a beginning phrase and Word will do the rest.:

    It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, I am an invisible man, call me Ishmael...

  • by Oligonicella ( 659917 ) on Monday February 22, 2021 @06:32PM (#61091484)
    I'll type my own damn words.

    Old song. Most of the younger ones won't get it.
    • >I'll type my own damn words.

      The uneducated and stupid are going to have the computer do it for them so they can present themselves as better educated and smarter than they are.

      And it'll work well enough to get their foot in the door and even to hold on to a position once they're in. The ability to write coherently will become a less valued skill for a lot of jobs.

      Most people barely care about education except as hoops to jump through to get a job. This hoop just got easier for them, and the human race

  • by bjwest ( 14070 ) on Monday February 22, 2021 @09:39PM (#61091838)
    I'd rather not have my entire document, thesis, report, letter, article, novel or whatever I'm currently working on transmitted to the cloud to be scanned as I'm writing it.
  • as the infamous paperclip?
  • by Maxo-Texas ( 864189 ) on Monday February 22, 2021 @11:52PM (#61092014)

    "Oh crate, now that means phat cow I cang compose host Jim's is this with the predictive words that ate Always wrong."

    Google has gotten *worse* and *worse* as they expand the vocabulary beyond common usage words.
    Google *regularly* inserts obscure or even foreign words instead of the ordinary vocabulary word it should be using over the last 12 months. To make things worse- it *continues* to change the words so even when the text is correct- it may suddenly change it right as I post. It also insists on randomly capitalizing any words that are movie or book titles.

    In cases it's not obvious... the first sentence is the raw output of google voice.

    Three to four years ago it was *really* useful. But it had a much smaller vocabulary and a much better sense of what words were common and what words were rare. I don't even recognize some of these words like "thinj". I suspect it's accidentally or intentionally being trained with nonsense words. On my latest phone, it insists on inserting "oh" before comma's. So a list of words oh, adverbs oh, and nouns looks like this.

    Microsoft and Google need to get more humans back in the loop. They are depending too much on self training without proper guidance.

    • by nazrhyn ( 906126 )
      I can absolutely confirm the "oh" thing. There was actually also a period of time recently where the post-hoc corrections were not happening at all (which, for me, are usually improvements) and it would just randomly capitalize all sorts of stuff. No idea why that started or why, around a week ago, it stopped.
  • ... I let my mobile phone predict entire sentences, it having learned (I suppose) from recent messages I had sent. It's disturbing and funny at the same time:

    Yes I am that you can get the encrypted file is still in town? I'm going shopping for tomatoes. Would you want me to feed the cats this is going on. Don't worry I hope you got a start to evolve flippers and I are thinking about hiking with you. Furthermore, and that's what time are you leaving? Twenty minutes of you journeying through it was odd an
  • by thesjaakspoiler ( 4782965 ) on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @05:41AM (#61092304)

    Who needs Tolkien if Word can do it.

  • A great way to improve this would be to bring back Clippy as a virtual assistant and have him verbally try to complete your sentences for you as you type.

  • It's actually pretty good. [youtube.com]
  • I tried to text this girl from work "Hey, I need that info by tomorrow. Is that possible with Bob off?" And the predictive text changed it to "Hey, let's me and you spend some special time. It'll be good for your career."
  • Google has been implementing this on some level already which is good. I guess Google got the lead because of its possibly bigger database.
  • Some of us know how to touch-type, and we don't necessarily look at the screen as we type. I'll definitely be turning this feature off on the rare occasions when I use MS Word.
  • Use all the data they gathered from their Tay experiment...

If all the world's economists were laid end to end, we wouldn't reach a conclusion. -- William Baumol

Working...